1 Airship fo shizzle. Jon Anderson Team Lead Hours Worked: 118 2 Team Member Jon Anderson.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Analysis of Rocket Propulsion
Advertisements

Stephen Hu Deployment Vehicle Selection Helicopter Design Hours Worked: Team Member Stephen Hu.
Introduction to Propulsion
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI CDR Presentation.
Investigating the Use of a Variable-Pitch Wind Turbine to Optimize Power Output Under Varying Wind Conditions. Galen Maly Yorktown High School.
ME 480 Introduction To Aerospace: Chapter 2 Prof. Doug Cairns.
Engineering design is… the process of devising a system, component or process to meet needs a decision-making process in which science and mathematics.
1 Titan EDD Fall Semester 12/02/2008 Andrew Welsh Jon Anderson Nick Delucca Steve Hu Travis Noffke Pawel Swica CDR Andrew Welsh.
Range (nm) Payload (kg) Payload (lb) Endurance (hr) As a total system, Vigilante.
The Lander is at a 25 km Lunar altitude and an orbital period of approximately 110 minutes. After separation occurs the Lander is completely self sufficient.
Temperature ( C) Pressure ( bars) Jupiter Probes Venus Surface Exploration CNSR Europa Surface and Subsurface Titan.
Oculus Superne. 2 System Definition Review Mission Objectives Concept of Operations Aircraft Concept Selection Payload Constraint Analysis and Diagrams.
Hybrid-Electric HMMWV: Platform for Advanced Lead Acid Battery Testing Future Work Dr. Herb Hess Adapt the thermal management system to the advanced lead.
AAE 450 Spring 2008 Jerald A. Balta 3/27/2008 Propulsion Team/CAD Final Slides.
Cooling System Architecture Design for FCS Hybrid Electric Vehicle
Barry Barrios Structural Engineer Daniel Chaparro Structural Engineer Laura Garrity Propulsion Chad Lieberman Control Surfaces Adam Vaccaro Electrical.
COMM Subgroup Tomo Sugano (Primarily served as COMM personnel) Tasks –Started out by helping Relative Orbit team with differential delta-V requirement.
Stephen Hu Deployment Vehicle Selection Helicopter Design Hours Worked: 98 1 Team Member Stephen Hu.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI FRR Presentation.
PHAT-TACO Experiment Pressure Humidity And Temperature Tests And Camera Observations Hannah Gardiner, Bill Freeman, Randy Dupuis, Corey Myers, Andrea Spring.
Student Satellite Project University of Arizona Team Goals Design, Fabricate, and Analyze a Structure that will Support the Payload –Space Allocation of.
A Simple Entry, Descent, and Floating System for Planetary Ballooning Daisuke Akita Tokyo Institute of Technology.
Titan Mariner Spacecraft Study Titan Team! IPPW-5 June 24, 2007.
Dhruv Patel 12th- Project manager Max Beasley 11th- Systems Engineer Trey Hargett 11th Jonathan Ford 11th Brent Higdon 11th Austin Lambert 11th Jay Chenault.
© Lavochkin Association, 2013 Ganymede Lander mission overview.
EXTROVERTSpace Propulsion 02 1 Thrust, Rocket Equation, Specific Impulse, Mass Ratio.
Ryan Mayes Duarte Ho Jason Laing Bryan Giglio. Requirements  Overall: Launch 10,000 mt of cargo (including crew vehicle) per year Work with a $5M fixed.
Stephen Hu Deployment Vehicle Selection Helicopter Design Hours Worked: Team Member Stephen Hu.
ECE 7800: Renewable Energy Systems
Back to TITAN 24/06/2008 All rights reserved, 2007, Thales Alenia Space Template reference : K-EN TITAN probes following CASSINI - HUYGENS Denis.
1 Airship fo shizzle. Jon Anderson Team Member Hours Worked: Team Member Jon Anderson.
1 Airship fo shizzle. Jon Anderson Team Lead Hours Worked: Team Member Jon Anderson.
AAE 450- Propulsion LV Stephen Hanna Critical Design Review 02/27/01.
Competition Sensitive Dennis Asato June 28, 2001 XSuperNova / Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Propulsion.
1 Titan EDD Fall Semester 12/02/2008 Andrew Welsh Jon Anderson Nick Delucca Steve Hu Travis Noffke Pawel Swica CDR Andrew Welsh.
STRATEGIES FOR MARS NETWORK MISSIONS VIA AN ALTERNATIVE ENTRY, DESCENT, AND LANDING ARCHITECTURE 10 TH INTERNATIONAL PLANETARY PROBE WORKSHOP June,
Introduction to IWA. The IWA is based on a patented, next generation design called the Internal Wing Aircraft. The concept brings three separate wings.
LETS Phase 3 Review 4/29/08. Agenda Team Introduction Daedalus Concept Concept of Operations Subsystem Overview Daedalus Performance Daedalus Vision Questions.
Critical Design Review Presentation Project Nova.
Pawel Swica1 Entry/Integration Hours Worked: Team Member Pawel Swica.
Colorado State University Paul Scholz, Tyler Faucett, Abby Wilbourn, Michael Somers June
Payload Concept Review [Team Name Here] [High School Name & Team # Here] 1 [Team logo here]
ACE Science Workshop March 10 th, 2009 Armin T. Ellis, Deborah Vane, Mark Rokey Jet Propulsion Laboratory.
Proprietary & Confidential Information of StratoComm Corporation Bridging The Divide A Blueprint For Creating A New Standard For Equitable Wireless Telecommunications.
Flight Readiness Review UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA CONNER DENTON, JOHN FAULK, NGHIA HUYNH, KENT LINO, PHILLIP RUSCHMYER, & ANDREW TINDELL MENTOR : RICHARD.
AAE 450 Spring 2010 AAE 450 2/11/2010 Kathy Brumbaugh Chris Spreen
WORK Work = Force x Distance POWER power = work done ÷ time taken ENERGY 1-POTENTIAL ENERGY (Potential Energy = Force x Distance ) 2-KINETIC ENERGY Energy.
Transportation LandSeaAir. Transportation Transport or transportation is the movement of people and goods from one place to another. The term is derived.
AAE 450 Spring 2010 AAE 450 2/25/2010 Kathy Brumbaugh Chris Spreen
Gas Turbine Engine – Turbojet
Planetary Lander PDR Team Name
3-D Printed Pressure Vessel Design to Maximize Volume to Weight
Preliminary Design Review Presentation
Technical Resource Allocations
Design/Build/Fly SU DBF
Payload Concept Review
[Team Name Here] [High School Name Here] [Team # Here]
PROJECT METEOR: RITSAT1 P08102
Sounding Rocket PDR Team Name
Lunar Descent Trajectory
Sounding Rocket CDR Team Name
Final Readiness Review
Mars Rover CDR Team Name
Classroom Rocket Scientist
Rocketry Trajectory Basics
<Your Team # > Your Team Name Here
<Your Team # > Your Team Name Here
Extreme Altitude Mountain Rescue Vehicle
Sarah Shoemaker 3/20/2008 Structures, Gondola Design, Tanks, CAD Final Slides AAE 450 Spring 2008 Structures.
Presentation transcript:

1 Airship fo shizzle

Jon Anderson Team Lead Hours Worked: Team Member Jon Anderson

Agenda 3 Outline: Vehicle selection – Military Decision Making Process (FM 101-5) Airship Design Airship Performance Deployment Enabling technologies Recommendation and conclusion Questions 3Jon Anderson

4 Problem Determine which aero-vehicle or combination of aero- vehicle would be best suited for a mission to Titan. Apply Military Decision Making Process

5 Recommendation A combination helicopter – airship design Helicopter – Primary science mission Collect scientific information Airship – Primary communication mission Relay science information to orbiter/earth

6 Facts Vehicle must be able to land. Vehicle must be able to carry the given science instrument payload. Vehicle must have some means of self propulsion. Only a helicopter-airship combination will be evaluated. Most heavily researched options.

7 Assumptions All designs can survive atmospheric conditions All designs can be packaged into a 3 m diameter aero shell All designs will operate within 0-5 km of the surface

8 Courses of Action Helicopter Airship Tilt-Rotor Airplane/Glider Helicopter/Airship combination

9 Screening Criteria Vehicles must have some basic research done from other sources. Can’t design vehicles from nothing

10 Evaluation Criteria Mass – Lower is better Pre Designed Level – Higher is better Operational Life time – Longer is better Top Speed – Higher is better Redundancy – 0 if not available, 1 if available

11 Weighing Criteria Pre-designed Level – 10% Mass – 25% Operational Life time – 15% Top Speed – 10% Redundancy – 40% Assign 1,2,or 3 with 1 being the best in that category

12 Analysis – COA screened out Tilt rotor Airplane/Glider Lack of information

13 COA - Airship Mass – 490 kg Pre Designed Level - High Operational Life time – 150 Days Top Speed – 3.5 m/s Redundancy - None

14 COA - Helicopter Mass – 290 kg Pre Designed Level - low Operational Life time – 120 Days Top Speed – 4.5 m/s Redundancy - None

15 COA - Combination Mass – UNK – Assume largest Pre Designed Level – Medium Operational Life time – 120 Days Top Speed – 3.5 m/s Redundancy - Yes

16 Information Presentation Took COA Applied weighing criteria Assigned number values based on 1 as the “best” and 3 being the “worst” Tallied findings in a table Example calculation for combination values: Mass - highest mass – scored 3, weight 10%, score =.3 Pre-design level – second highest – scored 2, weight 10%, score =.2

17 Analysis Continued - Airship Mass (10%) Pre-design level (10%) Life time (15%) Speed (15%) Redun. (50%) Total Airship Helicopter Combination Overall Total score – Lower is better Combination is the recommended COA Through research – divided mission of science and communication to save on overall mass.

18 Airship Design Jon Anderson Mission Goal: The primary mission of the airship is to function as a relay between the orbiter and the helicopter. The secondary mission of the airship is to function as a reserve platform capable of carrying out the science mission should the helicopter become inoperable.

19 Design Constraints Jon Anderson Communication payload Extra redundancy – orbiter and helicopter Science payload Power subsystem MMRGT

20 Assumptions Jon Anderson Mass Assumption: Needed initial estimate for mass of hull and structural components Found fraction of weight for non-hull components vs NASA Estimated initial weight Designed airship, calculated final mass Reiterated process with calculated mass

21 Equations Jon Anderson Buoyancy and Volume equations: Shape and Surface Area equations: Sources: 5. Wolfram: The Mathematica Book, Wolfram Media, Inc., Fourth Edition, Gradshteyn/Ryzhik: Table of Integrals, Series and Products, Academic Press, Second Printing, 1981

22 Equations Jon Anderson Drag and Reynolds number equations: Thrust and power available equations:

23 Diagram of Airship Jon Anderson Length13.83 m Width3.45 m Volume34.47 m^3 Ballonet volume8.96 m^3 Fins1x1x.7 m Gondola.7x.7x1.63 m 20% Margins

24 Reynolds # and Drag vs Velocity Jon Anderson

25 Power Required/Available vs Velocity Jon Anderson

26 Inflation time/percent vs Lift Jon Anderson

27 Performance Jon Anderson Mass195 Kg Operational Cruse Velocity2.5 m/s Max Velocity2.98 m/s Min Climb/Descent Rate *50 m/min Range36200 km Service Ceiling5 km Absolute Ceiling40 km Estimated Lifetime *150 days

28 Deployment Jon Anderson Airship inflation immediate Both bayonets and main envelope Changing ballistic coefficient Separate via explosive shearing bolts Immediately max velocity

29 Enabling Technologies Jon Anderson Multi Mission Radioisotope Thermal Generator Complicated – beyond scope of design 5 fold increase in power Lower mass

30 Recommendation and Conclusion Jon Anderson High Altitude Design Detailed data bandwidth analysis Hull/system optimization Experments

31 Questions? Jon Anderson

32 Backup slides - Mass Jon Anderson ComponentMass (kg)Mass after 20% Margin (kg) Subsystem Power2nd Generation MMRTG Battery - 12 A h lithium Turbomachinery Turbine Compressor Piping Electric Motor Alternator Total PropulsionPropeller, axel, case* Total Science InstrumentsHaze and Cloud Partical Detector33.6 Mass Spectrometer1012 Panchromatic Visible Light Imager Total CommunicationX-Band Omni - LGA SDST X-up/X-down X-Band TWTA UHF Transceiver (2) UHF Omni UHF Diplexer (2)11.2 Additional Hardware (switches, cables, etc.)67.2 Total ACDSSun Sensors IMU (2)910.8 Radar Altimeter Antennas for Radar Altimeter Absorber for Radar Altimeter Air Data System with pressure and temperature56 Total2024

33 Backup slides - Mass Jon Anderson C&DHFlight Processor Digital I/O - CAPI Board State of Health and Attitude Control Power Distribution (2) Power Control Mother Board Power Converters (For Integrated Avionics Unit) Chassis Solid State Data Recorder Total StructureAirship Hull Gondola* Tail Section: 4 Fins and attachments* Attitude Control44.8 Helium Mass (Float at 5 km) Inflation tank for Helium* Bayonet fans and eqipment Total ThermalInflight and during operation Total Total Airship Dry Mass Total Aiship Float Mass

34 Backup slides Component Power Required (W) Power Required after 20% Margin (W) Subsystem Power580 W Generated ProplusionPropeller/EngineSee Figure 2 TotalSee Figure 2 BayonetsFans (2)90108 Total90108 Science InstrumentsHaze and Cloud Partical Detector20 Mass Spectrometer28 Panchromatic Visible Light Imager10 Total CommunicationUHF Transceiver74.88 Total

35 Backup slides - Power Jon Anderson ACDS*Sun Sensors 0.56 IMU22.2 Radar Altimeter37.6 Air Data System with pressure and temperature7.72 Total68.08 C&DH*Flight Processor; >200 MIPS, AD750, cPCI11.6 Digital I/O - CAPI Board3.44 State of Health and Attitude Control - SMACI3.44 Power Distribution6.88 Power Control3.44 Power Converters (For Integrated Avionics Unit)13.84 Solid State Data Recorder0.64 Total43.28 Total Power Required without proplusion with all systems operating - Straight and level Total Power Available for Propulsion - Straight and level335.84