Community Clinical Data Exchange – By the Numbers Healthcare Information Technology 2003 January 14, 2003 James Kalamas.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Integrated Healthcare Management system. Standards based design. [ Supports HXP (Health Exchange Protocol) a standard in exchanging health care data ]
Advertisements

Organizational Structure of a Hospital
Computers in Health Care Hospital Information Systems.
Denise B. Webb State Health IT Coordinator May 9, 2013.
HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW Amy Cooper, MPHFebruary 28, 2013.
Pharmaceutical Care Solutions 8 March 2010 © Copyright ESH 2010 Submission to Greek Ministry.
Patient Access Intake Center
March - April 2003 Boston Children’s Hospital e Standardization and Automatic Extraction of Quality Measures in an Ambulatory EMR Denni McColm, CIO,
Kansas Rural Health Options Project Quality Improvement Committee CAH QI Survey Results Spring, 2002 Survey administered and analyzed, on behalf of KRHOP,
Mark Schoenbaum, Office of Rural Health & Primary Care The Minnesota e-Health Initiative e-Health Initiative Smart Health.
CLIQ CLinical InQuiry MaRDI Last update 2/04. Information Access Challenge Delays / failures in dissemination of reports/ results to primary care community.
Information Technology for Physicians’ Medical Practices Renee’ Ross Hung N. Winn.
Lecture 1 Healthcare Information Systems (Ch. 6)
Chapter 4. Describe the history and evolution of health care information systems from the 1960s to the present. Identify the major advances in information.
“Hospital Information System: A Transition to a Health Information System” Kiki Tsitoyanni Presales Manager Soren Hayrabedyan Consultant H-SYSTEMS, Health.
Chapter 2 Electronic Health Records
Engaging the C-suite to Advance Pharmacy Practice Providing quality patient care through progressive pharmacy practice Evaluation of Unit-based Pharmacy.
Component 1: Introduction to Health Care and Public Health in the U.S. 1.5: Unit 5: Financing Health Care (Part 2) 1.5d: Controlling Medical Expenses.
Image from and-station JennaLedger.
Current and Emerging Use of Clinical Information Systems
History of Health IT Unit 3 Lesson 1
Organizational Structure of a Hospital
United Medical Accountable Care Organization (UMACO)
Web Prevention Early intervention Improved outcomes More effective management of chronic disease.
Hospital Report Manager (HRM): Hospital Reports From Paper to Pixels A Clinician’s Experience. Carol Martyn, Office Manager Peer Lead, OntarioMD Dr.
Group KEVIN STEVEN EKAPUTRANTO RENDY WINARTA STEFANY TRIFOSA GLADYS NATALIA.
Eric Montion Vi Tran Natalie Whitlock. January 26 th - “Hospital in Turmoil” January 26 th - “Hospital Announces Big Payroll Cuts” February 18 th - “In.
H ISTORY AND E VOLUTION OF H EALTH C ARE I NFORMATION S YSTEMS.
Hospital Information System
 Healthcare management can be defined as the use of clinical and information technology, as well as managerial and leadership skills, to ensure the optimal.
Meeting Stage 1 Meaningful Use: A View from a Healthcare System Pamela McNutt Sr. VP & CIO Methodist Health System Chair, College of Health Information.
The Santa Barbara County Care Data Exchange Ronald A. Paulus, M.D., M.B.A. President, CareScience.
Santa Barbara County Care Data Exchange June 22, 2004 Sam Karp, Director Health Information Technology California HealthCare Foundation NHII 2004 Cornerstones.
June 18, 2010 Marty Larson.  Health Information Exchange  Meaningful Use Objectives  Conclusion.
September, 2005Cardio - June 2007 IHE for Regional Health Information Networks Cardiology Uses.
CMS Physician Quality Reporting J. Marc Overhage, MD, PhD Director of Medical Informatics, Regenstrief Institute Regenstrief Professor of Medical Informatics,
Organizational Structure of a Hospital.  Levels allow _____________________of hospital departments.  The structure helps one understand the hospital’s.
Training. Intro to HEALTHeLINK HEALTHeLINK, the Western New York Clinical Information Exchange (WNYCIE), is a Regional Health Information Organization.
1 Doctors Go Digital Presentation to the Clinic Board Dec 3 rd 2009 Group 4 – Lynne Carveth, Barbara Kapelman M.D., Lisa Heavilon, Chad Hodge, Jeremy Music.
Copyright © 2011 Delmar, Cengage Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Chapter 5 Electronic Health Records.
Santa Barbara County Care Data Exchange October 22, 2004 Sam Karp, Director Health Information Technology California HealthCare Foundation A Regional Health.
Memphis, TN Thomas Duarte, Executive Director, MSeHA.
dWise Healthcare Bangalore
How Including HIPAA Transaction Sets in RHIO Architecture can Help Fund Clinical Information Exchange Fred Richards, CTO/Co-Founder April 10, 2006.
Collaboration Expedition April 18, page 2 April 18, 2006 Roger A. Maduro -- Collaboration Expedition Meeting Institute of Medicine on VistA “VHA’s.
ENGINEERINGSOLUTIONS. Horizontally and vertically integrated system 5 hospitals & 33 ambulatory care centers 20,000+ employees & 1,200 employed physicians.
Respiratory Therapy Department Data Considerations October 21, 2009 Best Ever Hospital Best City, IL MMI – 405: HIT Integration, Interoperability, and.
Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE), Process, Costs and Benefits Joe Shaffer, MS Alberto Coustasse, DrPH, MD Graduate School of Management, College.
Both refer to a group of systems used within the hospital or enterprise that support and enhance health care.
Terminology in Healthcare and Public Health Settings Electronic Health Records Lecture a – Introduction to the EHR This material Comp3_Unit15 was developed.
ADMINISTRATIVE AND CLINICAL HEALTH INFORMATION. Information System - can be define as the use of computer hardware and software to process data into information.
Lithuania eHealth Overview Normantas Ducinskas Head of eHealth Coordination and Implementation Division Lithuania MoH.
The value equation for family medicine training programs Judith Pauwels, MD University of Washington WWAMI Network.
Other management positions COMPETENCIES…
Diversifying Revenue Streams in Federally Qualified Health Centers Presented by Zara Marselian, MA, FACHE Founder, President and Chief Executive Officer.
1. Forming Care Partnerships Lessons Learned 2 Our Call to Action Virtually all of our residents experience transitions in care Care coordination between.
Re-engineering Cardiac Catheterization at Cornell Medical Center
Corporate Overview CPSI Founded 1979 Executive Office - Mobile, AL.
Financial Analysis Of Electronic Health Records (EHR’s)
Lesson 1- Introduction to Electronic Health Records
Ministry of Health Montenegro ERASMUS+ KA2 PROJECT:
Electronic Health Record Update
The Nation’s First Statewide Health Information Exchange
Special Topics in Vendor-Specific Systems
CS581 Electronic Health Records Term Project
Component 1: Introduction to Health Care and Public Health in the U.S.
Health Care Information Systems
EHR SYSTEM Sarah Vagner HTHS 230.
Lesson 1- Introduction to Electronic Health Records
President and Chief Executive Officer
Presentation transcript:

Community Clinical Data Exchange – By the Numbers Healthcare Information Technology 2003 January 14, 2003 James Kalamas

WE ATTEMPTED TO QUANTIFY THE FINANCIAL VALUE OF CCDE Questions we set out to answer What are the quantifiable economics for community clinical data exchange (CCDE)? How do these economics impact success of CCDE? Interviewed major healthcare system constituents Reviewed academic literature Estimated costs and benefits Built financial model to value CCDE Major activities

WE ESTIMATED VALUE BASED ON TANGIBLE ELEMENTS OF COSTS AND BENEFITS CostsBenefits Implementation- Initial startup costs (year 1) for defined community Cost drivers Hardware Software Development Installation Training Support- Annualized costs for maintenance of CCDE from years 2-5 (assumes a 5- year life cycle) Maintenance contracts for hardware/software Application support Ongoing help desk/systems administrator Web enablement- Benefits to individual constituent of bringing own information online Benefit drivers Lab savings Radiology savings Staff savings Fewer readmissions Network benefits- Benefits to individual constituent of different health care constituents joining the network Fewer medical errors Enhanced lab revenue from proper coding Test duplication avoidance Staff savings

THE FOLLOWING PARTICIPANTS AND INFORMATION ELEMENTS WERE INCLUDED IN OUR COMMUNITY* *Payors excluded due to existing more advanced solutions for payor/ provider information sharing and likely limited provider participation due to payor involvement. Pharmacies excluded given more efficient information sharing via PBMs Transcribed reports Voice transcriptions Images (X-ray, CT, MRI, Ultrasound, Nuc Med) Imaging Center Patient demographic information Admission, discharge, transfer notes Laboratory results Radiology results Other diagnostic tests (e.g., EKG, cardiac cath, PFTs) Hospital medication lists Bedside chart information (vital signs, nursing notes) Daily physician notes Hospital Patient demographic information Transcribed notes that have been digitized Patient insurance information (more likely to come directly from payor) Billing information Physician Group Test results Laboratory Formulary lists Medication list PBM None Patient

WE MODELED 3 HYPOTHETICAL COMMUNITIES *Low penetration is ~33% institution participation and 15% physician usage adoption **High penetration is ~66% institution participation and 35% physician usage adoption ***Given low numbers in community, penetration percentages for institution participation not applicable Constituent type Low*High** Total number in community Medium Major hospital Diagnostic imaging center Independent laboratory PBMs Major physician groups Physicians , Large Major hospital Diagnostic imaging center Independent laboratory PBMs Major physician groups Physicians , ,750 Penetration Small*** Major hospital Diagnostic imaging center Independent laboratory PBMs Major physician groups Physicians

NET VALUE INCREASED WITH COMMUNITY SIZE AND PENETRATION *Includes annual support costs and amortized implementation costs over 5 years Medium Large LowHigh Penetration Community size $U.S. annual $800,000 $900,000 Costs* Benefits $490,000 $180,000 Costs* Benefits $780,000 $600,000 Costs* Benefits Net($310,000)Net($180,000) Net$100,000 $1,400,000 $2,600,000 Costs* Benefits Net$1,200,000 $1,000,000 $1,300,000 Costs* Benefits Net$300,000 $2,200,000 $7,900,000 Costs* Benefits Net$5,700,000 Value Small

Most likely organizers MD free riders Benefits fragmented First-mover disadvantage VALUE WAS MODEST FOR EACH CONSTITUENT AND FIRST MOVER DISADVANTAGE EXISTED FOR ALL CONSTITUENTS $U.S. annual 1 Costs are determined by individual site costs plus central costs distributed among participating constituents 2 Central costs are $280,000 for 1st year and $150,000 annual support costs. For 1 constituent alone on the network, annual costs would run $290,000, which includes all central costs amortized over 5 years and costs for individual site Per constituent Total for all constituents Intrinsic benefits of providing data Network benefits Total individual benefits Costs 1,2 Total benefits Number of constituents Total costs $180,000$110,000$290,000$120,000 $2,000,0007Hospital$840,000 Imaging center $44,000$(15,000)$29,000 $110,000 $120,0004$440,000 Laboratory $70,000$170,000$240,000 $110,000 $480,0002$220,000 Physician group $90,000$280,000$370,000 $120,000 $1,100,0003$360,000 Other physicians $0$2400 $40 $4,200,0001,750$70,000 PBM$0 $110,000 $03$330,000 ~$7,900,000 ~$2,200,000 LARGE COMMUNITY, HIGH PENETRATION

SUMMARY Quantifiable economic value meaningful when sizable network in place Substantial first-mover disadvantage Hospitals most likely organizers of CCDE Quantifiable quality and service benefits could substantially increase value Organizational challenges remain