1 Beam and Target Issues Chris Booth 5 th May 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Neutrino Factory Front End (IDS) -Chicane & Absorber David Neuffer C. Rogers, P. Snopok, C. Yoshikawa, … January 31, 2012.
Advertisements

Progress on Target Design Chris Booth Sheffield 2 nd August 2004.
KT McDonald Target Studies Weekly Meeting July 10, Power Deposition in Graphite Targets of Various Radii K.T. McDonald, J. Back, N. Souchlas July.
Alexandr Drozhdin March 16, 2005 MI-10 Injection.
Accelerators 2006 Roger Barlow 1: Wakefields 2: The NS-FFAG.
ISIS Related Issues for MICE Adam Dobbs Proton Accelerator Development Meeting, RAL 24 th March /03/20111A. Dobbs.
TJR Feb 10, 2005MICE Beamline Analysis -- TRD SEPT041 MICE Beamline Analysis – TRD SEPT04 Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. February 10, 2005.
MARS15 Simulations of the MERIT Mercury Target Experiment Fermilab March 18, Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider Collaboration meeting Sergei.
Pion yield studies for proton drive beams of 2-8 GeV kinetic energy for stopped muon and low-energy muon decay experiments Sergei Striganov Fermilab Workshop.
Target & Capture for PRISM Koji Yoshimura On behalf of PRISM Target Group Institute of Particle and Nuclear Science High Energy Accelerator Research Organization.
Pion capture and transport system for PRISM M. Yoshida Osaka Univ. 2005/8/28 NuFACT06 at UCI.
30 March Global Mice Particle Identification Steve Kahn 30 March 2004 Mice Collaboration Meeting.
Progress on Target Design Chris Booth Sheffield 14 th July 2004.
TJR Sept 22, 2004MICE Beamline Analysis -- SEPT041 MICE Beamline Analysis – SEPT04 Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. September 22, 2004.
1 Downstream scraping and detector sizes Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE collaboration meeting CERN.
TJR 10/30/031 MICE Beam rates Tom Roberts Illinois Institute of Technology 10/30/03.
March 30, 2004 TJR1 MICE Target Source Calculations Tom Roberts Illinois Institute of Technology March 30, 2004.
Luminosity Monitor Commissioning MICE Collaboration Meeting March 2010 Paul Soler, David Forrest Danielle MacLennan.
 Stephen Brooks / UKNF meeting, Warwick, April 2008 Pion Production from Water-Cooled Targets.
Intensity Limits and Beam Performances in the High-Energy Storage Ring
MICO 9th Aug 2010J.S. GraulichSlide 1 MOM report o Last Week o Run Plan for this Week o Machine Physics Jean-Sebastien Graulich, Geneva.
Downstream e-  identification 1. Questions raised by the Committee 2. Particle tracking in stray magnetic field 3. Cerenkov and calorimeter sizes 4. Preliminary.
MICE Target Review Chris Booth Sheffield 12 th June 2006.
ISIS Beam Protection System and MICE operation. Dean Adams 29 Nov 07 Presented by Chris Rogers.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Meson Production Calculations 1 st Princeton/Oxford High-Power Targets Workshop Oxford May 1-2, 2008.
28 April 2005Ckov1 Update -- S. Kahn1 Update to the Upstream Cherenkov  -  Separation Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Lab May 2, 2005 Detector Tele-Meeting.
Jun 27, 2005S. Kahn -- Ckov1 Simulation 1 Ckov1 Simulation and Performance Steve Kahn June 27, 2005 MICE Collaboration PID Meeting.
Target Activation Study Paul Hodgson The University of Sheffield.
N. Doshita, Yamagata Univ.1 The COMPASS polarized target for Drell-Yan physics Drell-Yan physics Informal International Workshop on Drell-Yan physics.
FETS-HIPSTER (Front End Test Stand – High Intensity Proton Source for Testing Effects of Radiation) Proposal for a new high-intensity proton irradiation.
Chris BoothMICE-UK I.C. 16th January Useful meeting held at RAL last Thursday. Representatives of MICE, ISIS & others with Sheffield electronic &
Tracking Studies of Phase Rotation Using a Scaling FFAG Ajit Kurup FFAG07 12 th – 17 th April 2007.
Goals and Status of MICE The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment J.S. Graulich.
Target & Capture for PRISM Koji Yoshimura Institute of Particle and Nuclear Science High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK)
Status of Hybrid target R&D at KEK-LINAC T.Takahashi Hiroshima University LCWS/ILC10 Beijing Collaborators: V. Strakhovenko O. Dadoun, R. Chehab, A.Variola,
Target material and thickness considerations Alain Blondel, with thanks to Dean Adams and Dan Kaplan Priority for rebuild is to have a target mechanism.
DE/dX measurement by OPERA film Tsutomu Fukuda (Nagoya Univ) Emulsion work shop (11/12,2005)
Triggering with the RPD E. Burtin, CEA-Saclay COMPASS Hadron run trigger meeting, Feb. 12, 2008.
Luminosity Monitor UKNF Meeting 7 June 2010 Paul Soler, David Forrest Danielle MacLennan.
1 dE/dx  Let’s next turn our attention to how charged particles lose energy in matter  To start with we’ll consider only heavy charged particles like.
Ion operation and beam losses H. Braun, R. Bruce, S. Gilardoni, J.Jowett CERN - AB/ABP.
RAL Muon Beam Line Properties. ISIS 70 MeV H- injection Ring accelerates up to 800 MeV in about 10 ms 50 Hz cycle - Dual Harmonic System ~ 2 x 1.5 MHz;
Status of Target Design Chris Booth Sheffield 28 th October 2004.
Beam line Experiment area SC magnet Pion production target
March 18, 2008 TJRMICE Beamline Status1 MICE Beamline Status (March 18, 2008) Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. Illinois Institute of Technology.
Instrumentation and Simulations for Target Test MICE Collaboration Meeting 22 October Bill Murray 1, Paul Soler 1,2, Kenny Walaron 1,2 1 Rutherford.
1 Question to the 50GeV group 3GeV からの 54π と 81π 、 6.1π の関係 fast extraction 部の acceptance (81π?) Comments on neutrino beamline optics?
Neutron measurement with nuclear emulsion Mitsu KIMURA 27th Feb 2013.
Shock Tests on Tantalum and Tungsten J. R. J. Bennett, S. Brooks, R. Brownsword, C. Densham, R. Edgecock, S. Gray, A. McFarland, G. Skoro and D. Wilkins.
IHEP/Protvino for FP420 R&D Collaboration 1 IHEP/Protvino Group: Igor Azhgirey Igor Bayshev Igor Kurochkin + one post-graduate student Tools:
Radiation Shielding Assessment for MuCool Experimental Enclosure C. Johnstone 1), I. Rakhno 2) 1) Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois.
Radiation study of the TPC electronics Georgios Tsiledakis, GSI.
Early Beam Injection Scheme for the Fermilab Booster: A Path for Intensity Upgrade Chandra Bhat Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory DPF2015, ANN ARBOR,
5 May 2006Paul Dauncey1 The ILC, CALICE and the ECAL Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
A. Bertarelli – A. DallocchioWorkshop on Materials for Collimators and Beam absorbers, 4 th Sept 2007 LHC Collimators (Phase II): What is an ideal material.
1 Muon Capture for a Muon Collider David Neuffer July 2009.
CKOV1 design status 1. Generation of muon and pion beam files 2. PID performances with water radiator 3. Does it help with fluorocarbon FC72 ? 4. Conclusion.
RF separated beam and other beam issues Lau Gatignon, COMPASS workshop, 22 March 2016.
Heating and radiological
MICE The International Muon Ionisation Cooling Experiment
Methods of Experimental Particle Physics
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #14 Energy Deposition in Media Particle Detection
of secondary light ion beams
of secondary light ion beams
Status of Target Design
JOINT INSTITUTE FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH
Muon Inverse Rotation and Acceleration
Particle ID Diagnostics in the MICE Beamline
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #14 Energy Deposition in Media Particle Detection
Plans for future electron cooling needs PS BD/AC
Presentation transcript:

1 Beam and Target Issues Chris Booth 5 th May 2004

2 Tom Roberts’ presentation to collaboration meeting (30 th March): “1.4E12 protons on target” to deliver 300 – 500 good muons to MICE i.e. 1.4  traverses of target 1 mm 10 mm titanium

3 PDG values for titanium: dE/dx) min = MeV (g cm -2 ) -1 density = 4.54 g cm -3 T = 800 MeV  p = 1.46 GeV/c  = 1.56 dE/dx ~ 1.25  dE/dx) min Hence E loss per transit ~ 8.4 MeV (TR simulation  5.4 – 5.9 MeV)

4 Energy loss per machine cycle ~ 1.4   8.4 MeV = 1.9 J i.e. 1.9 kW in 1 ms! Effect on Target? Heat loss by radiation only (2 cm 2 area, 30% emissivity?) 1 Hz  1.9 W  T = 860 K 10 Hz  19 W  T = 1500 K 50 Hz  95 W  T = 2300 K Conduction? Thin, low-mass shaft. Poor thermal path through suspension. Curie temperature of magnet?

5 Effect on ISIS? PDG  I = g cm -2  27.5 cm p = 1.6 GeV/c   ~ 0.7  0  2.5% probability of inelastic interaction in 10 mm thickness i.e. 3.6  inelastic interaction/pulse Beam losses acceptable? Induced radiation a problem?

6 Other points raised by Tom Roberts: Momentum loss per traverse ~ MeV/c  Will all be lost from beam? Rotate target 90°? No effect on heating or hadronic interactions. Mom. Loss  10, Mult. scat.  3 Is transverse slot in beam pipe acceptable?