L ECTURE 14: H UME ’ S R ADICAL E MPIRICISM. T ODAY ’ S L ECTURE In Today’s Lecture we will: 1.Recap our investigation into empiricist theories of knowledge.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Frontiers of Western Philosophy Empiricism
Advertisements

PHIL 101 DAY 3 Epistemology Day 2 Maymester 2007.
Berkeley’s idealism (brief)
Empiricism All knowledge of things in the world is a posteriori (that is, based ultimately on experience). Purely mental (i.e., a priori) operations of.
HUME AND EMPIRICISM  David Hume – Scottish philosopher – Epistemological approach set out in two key works:  A Treatise of Human Nature.
Charting the Terrain of Knowledge-1
EmpiricismEmpiricism. Concept Empiricism All concepts from experience; none innate Hume: “... all our ideas are nothing but copies of our impressions,
Idealism.
RATIONALISM AND EMPIRICISM: KNOWLEDGE EMPIRICISM Epistemology.
Hume on Taste Hume's account of judgments of taste parallels his discussion of judgments or moral right and wrong.  Both accounts use the internal/external.
David Hume ( )  Fame as a philosopher (for Treatise and Enquiry) followed fame as an historian (for A History of Britain)
Berkeley’s Empirical Idealism Copyright, 1996 © Dale Carnegie & Associates, Inc.
The Empiricists on Cause Locke: powers in material objects cause our ideas; ideas of primary qualities represent external things Berkeley: the concept.
Rationalism: Knowledge Is Acquired through Reason, not the Senses We know only that of which we are certain. Sense experience cannot guarantee certainty,
HUME 1 BEHOLD THE RADICAL EMPIRICIST. David Hume Historian Economist Psychologist Philosopher.
© Michael Lacewing Plato and Hume on Human Understanding Michael Lacewing
CHAPTER FIVE: THE SOURCES OF KNOWLEDGE P H I L O S O P H Y A Text with Readings ELEVENTH EDITION M A N U E L V E L A S Q U E Z.
Parsing Categories of Belief Why Early Modern M&E divides belief into two types: Sensory & Mathematical.
L ECTURE 17: T HE T ELEOLOGICAL A RGUMENT AND C AUSALITY.
Modern Philosophers Rationalists –Descartes –Spinoza –Leibniz Empiricists –Locke –Berkeley –Hume Epistemology - the theory of knowledge (what and how we.
Definitions of Reality (ref . Wiki Discussions)
BERKELEY’S CASE FOR IDEALISM (Part 2 of 2)
Chapter 8 HUME. How does the mind/body problem reveal a partial incoherence within Cartesian metaphysics? In what ways does David Hume turn away from.
Rationalism and Empiricism
‘The only serious philosophical question is whether to commit suicide or not…’ Albert Camus 7 November 1913 – 4 January 1960 ‘The Myth of Sisyphus’ What.
Epistemology Section 1 What is knowledge?
OMSC/ MIDWIFERY PHILOSOPHY OF MAN Submitted by: CHARLOTTE S. FRANCISCO.
 Doubt- to be uncertain about something, to hesitate to believe  Dualism- the belief that the mind and body are separate (but interact). Mind is a kind.
1 The Empiricists: Hume Theory of Ideas Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana.
Metaphysics in Early Modern Philosophy. The Atomic Theory of Matter The atomic theory poses a challenge to theories of substances or objects Atomic theory:
© Michael Lacewing Hume and Kant Michael Lacewing co.uk.
L ECTURE 6: D ESCARTES. L ECTURE O UTLINE In today’s lecture we will: 1.Become introduced to Rene Descartes 2.Begin our investigation into Descartes’
The Turn to the Science The problem with substance dualism is that, given what we know about how the world works, it is hard to take it seriously as a.
BERKELEY AND IDEALISM Strange to claim there is an external world;
David Hume ( ) An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding Revised, 11/21/03.
David Hume ( ) “The Wrecking Ball”
An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding
Definitions of Reality (ref. Wiki Discussions). Reality Two Ontologic Approaches What exists: REALISM, independent of the mind What appears: PHENOMENOLOGY,
KANT ON THE SYNTHETIC A PRIORI
L ECTURE 15: C ERTAINTY. T ODAY ’ S L ECTURE In Today’s Lecture we will: 1.Review Hume’s radical empiricism and its consequences 2.Outline and investigate.
Lecture 13: Empiricism.
What is an example of a secondary quality?
1. 2 David Hume’s Theory of Knowledge ( ) Scottish Empiricist.
John Locke: empiricist  There are no innate ideas.  ALL knowledge comes from sense experience.
Religious Studies Hume: empiricism and the Fork. Religious Studies Empiricism Hume is an empiricist. This means that he thinks all knowledge comes a posteriori.
An Empiricist Theory of Knowledge Locke’s Theory of Knowledge Lecture 6.
The Origin of Knowledge
GRADING: First essay 25% Second essay 35% Exam 25%
Hume’s Fork A priori/ A posteriori Empiricism/ Rationalism
Hume’s Fork A priori/ A posteriori Empiricism/ Rationalism
PHILOSOPHY OF HUMAN PERSON
Skepticism David Hume’s Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding and John Pollock’s “Brain in a vat” Monday, September 19th.
David Hume and Causation
Philosophy and History of Mathematics
Concept Innatism.
Skepticism David Hume’s Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding
Major Periods of Western Philosophy
Michael Lacewing Hume and Kant Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
John Locke and modern empiricism
Think pair share What type of argument is the cosmological argument?
Recap Questions What is interactionism?
Plato and Hume on Human Understanding
Major Periods of Western Philosophy
On your whiteboard: What is innatism? Give two examples to support it
Problems with IDR Before the holidays we discussed two problems with the indirect realist view. If we can’t perceive the external world directly (because.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 7 Berkeley
Metaphysics & Epistemology
A Brief Intro to Philosophy
Descartes and Hume on knowledge of the external world
Presentation transcript:

L ECTURE 14: H UME ’ S R ADICAL E MPIRICISM

T ODAY ’ S L ECTURE In Today’s Lecture we will: 1.Recap our investigation into empiricist theories of knowledge 2.Briefly consider the problem of correspondence and Berkeley’s arguments against Locke’s theory of knowledge 3.Become introduced to the radical empiricism of David Hume 4.Critique and discuss Hume’s theory of knowledge and its implications on philosophy, metaphysics, & science.

R ESPONSES TO L OCKE

Locke’s Theory of Knowledge: All ideas (knowledge) comes from experience There are two forms of experience: Sensation (Outer) Reflection (Inner) All ideas are either from inner experience or outer experience There are no innate ideas, only innate faculties Experience SensationReflection Simple Ideas Complex Ideas Passive Active

Locke’s Theory of Knowledge Water itself Idea of the water The idea of the water corresponds to a real object MindReality

Epistemological dualism Inner Experience External Experience Water itself Idea of the water

R ESPONSES TO L OCKE The Problem of Correspondence Representational theories of perception maintain that everything we know is an idea in the mind that represents or corresponds to something outside of the mind Problem: How do we know if our ideas of an object accurately correspond to the object itself? All we have are ideas of objects We cannot have knowledge of anything that is not an idea Therefore, we cannot have knowledge of an object apart from an idea Therefore, we can never know if our ideas of water correspond to the water itself

Berkeley’s Response to Locke Water itself Idea of the water Berkeley argues that there is nothing more to an object than the qualities we perceive (the idea) We can never perceive the causes of things we perceive MindReality

Epistemological dualism Inner Experience External Experience Water itself Idea of the water

Berkeley’s theory of Reality Mind Idea of the water Ideas exist only in minds All things are ideas Therefore, all things exist only in minds

R ESPONSES TO L OCKE Berkeley’s Arguments for Idealism Esse est Percepti (To be is to be perceived) All objects (chair, water etc.) are sensible things A sensible thing is a collection of qualities that we perceive There is nothing more to any object than the sum of its qualities All sensible qualities exist only as ideas Therefore, objects only exist in minds Nothing exists independently of a perceiving mind The idea of a substratum (substance/matter) that is the cause of ideas, but free from qualities is incoherent. This is because we cannot: a)have an idea of something that cannot be experienced b)perceive the causes of what we perceive c)conceive of anything without qualities.

R ESPONSES TO L OCKE In Summary Locke’s theory of knowledge faces the following problems: 1.The problem of correspondence We can never be sure whether our ideas of an object correspond to the object itself There is an epistemological gap between our knowledge of an object and the object itself 2.Berkeley’s Criticisms We are never able to have an idea of anything that cannot be perceived The idea of physical substance is incoherent All that we can be sure of is that minds and ideas in minds exist We can never have access to the object itself

D AVID H UME

David Hume: o Lived o One of the ‘great’ British empiricists o Advocated a Radical form of empiricism o Made important contributions to Metaphysics, Epistemology, Philosophy of Religion o Hume’s radical empiricism has important consequences for the investigation into philosophy, religion and science

D AVID H UME David Hume’s Phenomenalism All knowledge is derived from and limited to appearances Appearances are presented to us in our perceptions Perceptions can be divided between 1.Impressions Lively, Vivid Sensations 2.Ideas Pale impressions / copies All ideas are derived from impressions All the mind possesses is a collection of perceptions

D AVID H UME David Hume’s Phenomenalism There are two bases of knowledge: 1.Relations of Ideas Ideas that are intuitively or demonstratively certain E.g. Geometry, Arithmatic, Logic, Algebra etc. 2.Matters of Fact Ideas that pertain to the world E.g. The sun will rise tomorrow, This chair is red, etc.

D AVID H UME What’s so radical about Hume’s radical empiricism? Aristotle, Aquinas, & Locke all argue that we can have certain knowledge For example; This is a chair The chair is really red The chair exists But! Hume argues that these thinkers fail to follow empiricism to its rational conclusions Hume: If all knowledge comes from perception Either Our ideas are certain but not informative Or Our ideas are informative but not certain

I MPLICATIONS OF H UME ’ S R ADICAL E MPIRICISM

I MPLICATIONS The limits of knowledge: 1.Relations of Ideas Ideas that are intuitively or demonstratively certain E.g. Geometry, Arithmetic, Logic, Algebra etc. Relations of ideas can give us certain knowledge They don’t teach us anything new They have no bearing or relevance on reality For Example: Socrates is a man All men are mortal Therefore Socrates is mortal Doesn’t teach us anything new Has no relevance upon reality Certain

I MPLICATIONS The limits of knowledge: 2. Matters of Fact Ideas that pertain to the world E.g. The sun will rise tomorrow, This chair is red, etc. Matters of fact can teach us new things about the world But they can never be certain It is always possible that they can be rendered false Entirely dependent on perceptions For Example: Earth days are now 1.26 nanoseconds faster Teaches us something new about the world Cannot be certain

I MPLICATIONS Hume’s attack on the principle of substance: It is natural to believe : Descartes/Locke: There exists both mental and physical substance Berkeley: Physical substance does not exist but mental substance (mind) does Hume’s challenge: Do we ever perceive substance? No. Therefore, we cannot rationally claim that substance exists Hume: Sense impressions have priority over ideas There are no ideas without sense impressions Hume: Sense impressions have priority over ideas There are no ideas without sense impressions

I MPLICATIONS Hume’s attack on the principle of the ‘Self’: It is natural to believe : Berkeley/Locke/Descartes: That there is a thinking thing, a ‘self’, ego, etc. Hume’s challenge: Do we ever perceive a self? No. Only many perceptions Therefore, we cannot rationally claim that the self exists Hume: Sense impressions have priority over ideas There are no ideas without sense impressions Hume: Sense impressions have priority over ideas There are no ideas without sense impressions

I MPLICATIONS Hume’s attack on the principle of ‘Causality’: It is natural to believe : That every event has a cause / Causal connection Hume’s challenge: Do we ever perceive a necessary connection? No. We perceive that A occurs, then B occurs; but we don’t perceive the necessary connection where A causes B All we perceive is contiguity (things close together) and succession; We never perceive causation! Therefore, we cannot rationally claim that every event has a cause Hume: Sense impressions have priority over ideas There are no ideas without sense impressions Hume: Sense impressions have priority over ideas There are no ideas without sense impressions

I MPLICATIONS Examples against causation: At age 1 a child begins to: o Feed themselves o Walk by themselves o Learns simple words o Receives their Measles, Mumps, Rubella vaccinations For Example: A child (A) receives their MMR vaccinations, then (B) begins to feed themselves A  B But! A did not cause B.

I MPLICATIONS Implications for modern scientists: 1.All scientific theories must be limited to what can be observed or observed in principle 2.All scientific claims are either i.Relations of ideas E.g. All mammals are warm blooded Or ii.Matters of fact E.g. The Earth day is now 1.26 nanoseconds faster 3.Scientific claims/’laws’/theories cannot be certain (only likely or unlikely) It is always possible that a scientific claim can be proved false because of future observations Popper: Scientific theories must be falsifiable (Principle of Falsifiability) For example: Theories of the subconscious cannot be observed or falsified; therefore they are not scientific Popper: Scientific theories must be falsifiable (Principle of Falsifiability) For example: Theories of the subconscious cannot be observed or falsified; therefore they are not scientific

S UMMARY Summary: Empirical (all) knowledge can only be either: Necessarily true but not informative Or Informative but not certain All ideas are derived from perceptions Any idea we have that is NOT derived from perceptions should be abandoned When we run over libraries, persuaded of these principles, what havoc must we make? If we take in our hand any volume, of divinity or school metaphysics, for instance; let us ask, “Does it contain any experimental reasoning concerning matter of fact and existence?” No. Commit it then to the flames: for it can contain nothing but sophistry and illusion. (David Hume, Textbook, p.225) When we run over libraries, persuaded of these principles, what havoc must we make? If we take in our hand any volume, of divinity or school metaphysics, for instance; let us ask, “Does it contain any experimental reasoning concerning matter of fact and existence?” No. Commit it then to the flames: for it can contain nothing but sophistry and illusion. (David Hume, Textbook, p.225)