Technology Transfer Innovation Program (T 2 IP). What Is the Program Mission Why Is It Important Who Is It Designed to Assist How Will It Encourage TT.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Manatt manatt | phelps | phillips New York State Health Information Technology Summit Initiative Overview and Update Rachel Block, Project Director United.
Advertisements

Karl Donert, National Teaching Fellow HERODOT Project coordinator HERODOT: Benchmarking Geography.
Welcome to Site Management Amy Thompson. Agenda I.Foundation Introductions Setting the Session Agenda II.Site Management Principles III.Site Management.
In its 2001 strategic plan, The College of Osteopathic Medicine called for the development of a medical education unit. In the spring of 2003 a group of.
1 Mid-Term Review of The Illinois Commitment Assessment of Achievements, Challenges, and Stakeholder Opinions Illinois Board of Higher Education April.
IMPLEMENTING EABS MODERNIZATION Patrick J. Sweeney School Administration Consultant Educational Approval Board November 15, 2007.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Forsyth County Schools February 15, 2012.
Widening Participation & Employability: Breaking Down the Barriers Ruby Hammer Senior Lecturer Law School.
The HR Paradigm Shift Discover Stakeholder Value for the Human Resources Function.
Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in the Seventh Framework Programme Support actions.
World’s Largest Educational Community
Using the New CAS Standards to Assess Your Transfer Student Programs and Services Janet Marling, Executive Director National Institute for the Study of.
Campus Improvement Plans
Space Grant Workforce Development Initiative: Initial Survey Results Michaela Schaaf Karisa Vlasek Mary Fink Brent Bowen Melissa Wurdeman NASA Nebraska.
Technology and Economic Development Intellectual Property Issues in Research Jim Baker Director Office of Technology and Economic Development
An Excellent Proposal is a Good Idea, Well Expressed, With A Clear Indication of Methods for Pursuing the Idea, Evaluating the Findings, and Making Them.
1 GETTING STARTED WITH ASSESSMENT Barbara Pennipede Associate Director of Assessment Office of Planning, Assessment and Research Office of Planning, Assessment.
Successful Graduation Projects
1 GETTING STARTED WITH ASSESSMENT Barbara Pennipede Associate Director of Assessment Office of Planning, Assessment and Research Office of Planning, Assessment.
1 Program Performance and Evaluation: Policymaker Expectations 2009 International Education Programs Service Technical Assistance Workshop Eleanor Briscoe.
College Strategic Plan by Strategic Planning and Quality Assurance Committee.
National Science Foundation: Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (TUES)
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Bayard Public Schools November 8, 2011.
Effective dissemination and evaluation
FY14 Budget Priorities August UAS Mission UAS Core Themes  Student Learning enhanced by faculty scholarship, undergraduate research and creative.
The Integration of Embedded Librarians at Tuskegee University Juanita M. Roberts Director Library Services Ford Motor Company Library/Learning Resources.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WORKSHOP. What is the Professional Development Plan? The Professional Development Plan is a directed planning and evaluation.
Service-Learning Course Design for Community Colleges: Using the Text for Improved Service-Learning Practice and Outcomes Campus Compact 2007.
A Commercialization Measurement System Jim Tolle Verisystem.
Year Seven Self-Evaluation Workshop OR Getting from Here to There Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
Professionalizing Mobility Management: Developing Standards and Competencies Julie Dupree, Easter Seals Association of Travel Instruction Conference August.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
1 Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level Administrative Support for Large- Scale Funding Applications – Session.
Technical Assistance to Support the ADRC Grantees June 2004 The Lewin Group.
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING.
Telecommunications Engineering The University of Texas at Dallas The Erik Jonsson School of Engineering and Computer Science Jonsson School Industrial.
Communicating the Strategic Value of TT Mojdeh Bahar, J.D., M.A., CLP Assistant Administrator Office of Technology Transfer ARS, USDA
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Center Grove High School 10 November 2010.
The federal Small business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) programs annually award over $2.4 billion in contracts.
Knowledge Translation Conference KT Solutions for Overcoming Barriers to Research Use Hosted by SEDL’s Center on Knowledge Translation for Disability and.
August 20, 2008 Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) CTSA Evaluation Approach Institute for Clinical & Translational Research (ICTR)
Program Quality Assessment Duane K. Larick North Carolina State University Council Of Graduate Schools New Deans Institute July, 2007.
Learn Local Quality Preaccredited Teachers Community of Practice Moderation Workshop South East Victoria ACFE Region 5 th August 2015.
1 SBIR/STTR Overview Wang Yongqiang. 2 Federal SBIR/STTR Program ‣ A +$2Billion funding program set-aside for small businesses seeking to early stage.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
SCHOLARSHIP Teaching Faculty members are responsible for teaching effectively by employing useful methods and approaches that facilitate learning. Faculty.
@PlymUniASTI /PlymUniASTI Working Together: Collaboration and Group Work for Employability External Consultancy.
National Center for Research in Advanced Information and Digital Technologies Henry Kelly Federation of American Scientists NITRD Briefing September 16,
PACE BDC MENTORING TRAINING PROGRAM FOR CLIENTS AND MENTORS PACE All Rights Reserved
Giving Them our Best: 4-H Professional Development Logic Model Outcome: 4-H educators reflect quality, distinction and leadership in the field of youth.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
UTPA 2012: A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-PAN AMERICAN Approved by President Cárdenas November 21, 2005 Goals reordered January 31, 2006.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 10. Evaluation.
North Carolina Council on Developmental Disabilities
Bellevue University Faculty Development November 4, 2005
Update from the Faster Payments Task Force
Flag and Logo USAID/Pakistan Alumni Association Discussion on New Directions October 1, 2016.
LTRC 30th Anniversary -- External Program Overview
Presented to IEEE Standards Education Committee 11 April 2014
RESNA 2018 Annual Conference
Procurement.
PRESENTATION TITLE Faculty Enhancement and Instructional Development (FEID) Proposal Support Sharon Seidman, Ph.D. (HHD) and Erica Bowers, Ed.D. (Director,
Be The Transformative Change
ICES Strategy day
Seminar on the Evaluation of AUT STEM Programme
Presentation transcript:

Technology Transfer Innovation Program (T 2 IP)

What Is the Program Mission Why Is It Important Who Is It Designed to Assist How Will It Encourage TT

Technology Transfer Innovation Program (T 2 IP) What Is the T 2 IP Program Program Goal The goal of the T 2 IP program is to provide UTCs with examples, resources, best practices and strategies with their stakeholders that will enable them to transform selected research efforts into products (applications) that can benefit the transportation community.

Technology Transfer Innovation Program (T 2 IP) Why is Technology Transfer (TT) Important Addresses U.S.DOT’s Long Term Goals-System Improvements and Internal Strategic Plan Cost effectiveness-Promote Innovation Creates Employment Opportunities New Industry It’s the Law within the Federal Government Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 It’s a UTC Requirement as well as a Goal

Technology Transfer Innovation Program (T 2 IP) UTC Program GOALS 1. Research Selection: an objective process for selecting and reviewing research that balances mulT2IPle objectives of the program. 2. Research Performance: an ongoing program of basic and applied research, the products of which are judged by peers or other experts in the field to advance the body of knowledge in transportation. 3. Education: a multidisciplinary program of course work and experiential learning that reinforces the transportation theme of the Center. 4. Human Resources: an increased number of students, faculty and staff who are attracted to and substantively involved in the undergraduate, graduate and professional programs of the Center. 5. Diversity: students, faculty and staff who reflect the growing diversity of the U.S. workforce and are substantively involved in the undergraduate, graduate and professional programs of the Center. 6. Technology Transfer: availability of research results to potential users in a form that can be directly implemented, utilized or otherwise applied.

Technology Transfer Innovation Program ( T 2 IP ) REPORTING REQUIREMENTS FOR UNIVERSITY TRANSPORTATION CENTERS (UTCs) EXHIBIT A PERFORMANCE INDICATORS FOR UNIVERSITY TRANSPORTATION CENTERS (UTCs) Research Selection 1. Number of transportation research projects selected for funding using your UTC grant funding (Federal and/or match). _______________ 1a. Number of those projects that you consider to be: basic research ________, advanced research _________, and applied research __________. Projects may be included in more than one category if applicable. Technology Transfer 10. Number of transportation seminars, symposia, distance learning classes, etc. conducted by your UTC for transportation professionals. ________________ 11. Number of transportation professionals participating in those events.

Technology Transfer Innovation Program (T 2 IP) How Will T 2 IP Achieve its Goal? Introduction of USDOT SBIR program concepts and technology requests. SBIR Objectives are: Stimulate innovation Meet technology needs of USDOT via small business Increase commercialization of innovation Provide opportunity for diversity in transportation

Technology Transfer Innovation Program (T 2 IP) Types of Tech Transfer from UTCs Research: Scholarly Latent/Passive- not purposefully developed for TT Strategic-UTC working with the LTAP Active- purposefully pursued to move into a product (application)

Technology Transfer Innovation Program (T 2 IP) Project Deliverables: Develop Prototype Program Selected UTCs To Assess Prototype Revise Prototype Based on Assessment Development of Suggested Outcomes Implement P1 Prototype with UTCs

Technology Transfer Innovation Program (T 2 IP) Program Outline- Nine Areas Section 1- Technology Transfer Background, Importance, Current Practice, Metrics Section 2- SBIR Background, U.S.DOT SBIR, Other U.S. DOT Programs, STTR Section 3- UTC Best Practices Section 4- Program Discussion and Feedback

Technology Transfer Innovation Program (T 2 IP) Tech Transfer (TT) and Innovation Program Syllabus-Level One Development Agenda ItemObjectiveActivity 1.Introduction of ParticipantsAudience Make-up and what they want out of the program Who they are, what they do, what do they expect out of program flip chart to record responses 2.Overview of ProgramGive Audience a Clear Understanding of the Programs Goals PPT presentation/Audience participation 3.Significance of Technology Transfer in the UTC Program Short Review of the UTC Tech Transfer Goal &activities used by UTC’s to achieve TT goal PPT review of UTC Program Goals and Stats on TT Current metrics used to document TT 4.Brief Introduction to U.S. Small Business Innovation Research Program Provide the audience with a basic understanding of the why and what of the SBIR/STTR program PPT of US SBA SBIR/STTR programs

Technology Transfer Innovation Program (T 2 IP) 5.U.S. DOT Small Business Innovation Research Program Presentation Provide the audience with basic understanding of why, what and how of the USDOT SBIR Program PPT on USDOT SBIR Program 6.Other Programs in U.S. DOT Promoting Tech Transfer Provide the audience with a basic understanding of what other programs USDOT has to promote tech transfer PPT on USDOT /other programs supporting Tech Transfer 7.University Activities Facilitating Tech Transfer Provide audience with a basic understanding of how other UTC’s have accomplished Technology Transfer Roundtable discussion by selected UTC’s Develop list of best practices for Tech Transfer 8.Best Practices Tech TransferProvide the audience with cumulative list/matrix of best practices for TT Roundtable discussion in small groups with cumulative summary 9.Program Evaluation and AdjournProvide audience with opportunity for evaluation input and after action review Live and hand out evaluation form

Technology Transfer Innovation Program (T 2 IP) Who Can Benefit From T 2 IP: UTC- Faculty, Students, Administration, Stakeholder USDOT- RITA, SBIR, Agency R/T External Stakeholders Transportation Community

Technology Transfer Innovation Program (T 2 IP) How Can T 2 IP Achieve Its Mission: Spread the word-Awareness Disseminate Best Practices for TT Information Sharing between UTCs Additional Resources Process Model for Initiating TT WEB Portal and Workshops

Technology Transfer Innovation Program (T 2 IP) Feedback Discussion And Thank You