Line 22 BRT: Summary Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority May 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bus Lane with Intermittent Priority Graham Carey PE., AICP BRT Project Engineer, Lane Transit District, Eugene, Oregon QUALITY TRANSIT -- NOW.
Advertisements

Bus Priority in Portland - Lessons Learned
Los Angeles Bus Rapid Transit Tour Lessons Learned.
BUS RAPID TRANSIT Silicon Valley Leadership Group October 3, 2012.
Transit Signal Prioritization (TSP) Considerations within RTS Corridors Rapid Transit System Steering Committee Technical Memorandum 2 Existing Conditions.
FTA’s Small Starts Program Charlotte, North Carolina October 11, 2007.
Transit Signal Priority Applications New Technologies, New Opportunities Peter Koonce, PE APTA BRT Conference – Seattle, WA Wednesday, May 5, 2009 Technology.
1. We can’t promise all green lights… …but we can minimize the number of red lights, stops and delays.
9/7/2012 MBS UU.
SR 50/UCF Connector Alternatives Analysis Orange County Board of County Commissioners January 13, 2015.
WMATA Bus ITS Project Update Transit Signal Priority Briefing to the Traffic Signals and Operations Working Group April 21, 2005.
Lecture 6 Bus Rapid Transit, design elements and operational issues Dr. Muhammad Adnan.
MTC Technology Transfer Seminar Transit Signal Priority Abbas Mohaddes, President & CEO October 22, 2003.
Transit Signal Priority Work Group Report 7/30/13
Consolidation Commission - Transportation Sub-Committee City of Orlando Signalization Presentation September 8, 2005.
Swift BUS RAPID TRANSIT (BRT) ITS Washington November 12, 2008.
Advanced Public Transit Systems (APTS) Transit ITS CEE582.
Improving the Passenger Experience Pennsylvania Public Transportation Association (PPTA) April 2015.
San Jose Traffic Signal Communications and Synchronization Project Presented by Ho Nguyen City of San Jose, Department of Transportation May 12, 2009.
Transit Priority Systems (TPS) Chun Wong, P.E. City of Los Angeles, Department of Transportation T3 Webinar.
1 Example of How Bus Stop Inventory is Used and Issues are Addressed.
3rd Street Light Rail Process and Challenges of Developing Transit Signal Priority Javad Mirabdal, Jack Fleck & Britt Thesen Department of Parking and.
Freedom to work Freedom to text Freedom to read.
1Prepared by AC Transit Service Development Transit Signal Priority For the San Pablo Rapid Bus.
1 Presentation to TAC June 17, 2009 Overview of Rapid Bus Measures and Effectiveness And Case Studies.
RT-TRACS A daptive Control Algorithms VFC-OPAC Farhad Pooran PB Farradyne Inc. TRB A3A18 Mid-Year Meeting and Adaptive Control Workshop July 12-14, 1998.
Rapid Transit System Steering Committee Meeting December 4, 2012.
Bus Rapid Transit: Chicago’s New Route to Opportunity Josh Ellis, BRT Project Manager Metropolitan Planning Council.
1 Corridor Cities Transitway Presented to: Amberfield HOA January 15, 2015.
South/West Corridor Improvements Service and Facility Alternatives September 9, 2014 Planning & Project Development Committee March 3, 2015.
Joint Transport Forum I Rapid Transit Line 2 Our Future Transport I West of England Sub Region.
ITS for BRT Systems: How Does Boston’s Silver Line Compare With Other BRT Systems? Carol Schweiger, Assistant Vice President ITS Georgia Annual Meeting.
Bus Management System in SEOUL Metropolitan Area.
THE MILESTONES OF MASS TRANSIT CS 410 Blue Group communicate 2Me.
Greenwood Transit and Sidewalk Project N 90th St to N 105th St Community Open House Sarah Butler, Project Manager September 14, 2015 Presentation begins.
Mark Phillips BSDA/Metro Long-Range Planner. The Foundation: Moving Transit Forward.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 20: Transit System Design.
TRB/APTA 2004 Bus Rapid Transit Conference When is BRT the Best Option? the Best Option? 1:30 – 2:40 p.m. Paul Larrousse Director, National Transit Institute.
South/West Corridor Transit Improvements PRIMO & ENHANCED AMENITIES PLANNING PHASE September 9, 2014 Planning & Project Development Committee August 11,
Transit Priority Strategies for Multiple Routes under Headway-based Operations Shandong University, China & University of Maryland at College Park, USA.
Urban Partnership Agreement Summary August 27, 2007.
NESTS Transit Planning Project Facilities and Technology Briefing with CAST of Cornell University and Creighton Manning Engineering, LLP.
Portland North Small Starts Alternatives Analysis Coordination Meeting June 16, 2009.
BRT in India Delhi Case study. What is Delhi HCBS Delhi HCBS is not a BRT system. It is primarily a road infrastructure project. It was not conceived.
Southwest Washington ITS Traffic Data Collection & Analysis: A Tale of 3 Projects Jill MacKay ITE Traffic Simulation Roundtable October 4, 2012.
1 Development of a Regional BRT System Proposal Presented to the TPB Access for All Committee April 23, 2009 Michael Eichler and Monica Bansal Transportation.
Regional Priority Bus Transit Conference June 24, 2009.
Implementation Transit Priority System and Mobile Internet Passenger System in the City of Los Angeles Kang Hu and Chun Wong City of Los Angeles Department.
Portland North Small Starts Alternatives Analysis Coordination Meeting June 15, 2009.
Transit Signal Priority (TSP). Problem: Transit vehicles are slow Problem: Transit vehicles are effected even more than cars by traffic lights –The number.
Transit Signal Priority (TSP): Deployment Issues and R&D Needs as Identified by Practitioners Hallie Smith Brendon Hemily.
TRB/APTA 2004 Bus Rapid Transit Conference The Results of Selected BRT Projects 2:00 – 3:20 p.m. Walt Kulyk Director, FTA Office of Mobility Innovation.
NEW STARTS/SMALL STARTS. New Starts Eligibility  Based on the results of planning and Alternatives Analysis  At least 50% or more of the total project.
DICK RUDDELL EAST LANCASTER BUS RAPID TRANSIT PROJECT ______________________.
Express/Rapid Bus Opportunities for Priority Bus Transit in the Washington Region Sponsored by National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board Chun.
Transit Signal Priority: The Importance of AVL Data David T. Crout Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon (TriMet) Presented at Transportation.
South/West Corridor Transit Improvements ZARZAMORA AND MILITARY PRIMO BRT PROJECTS ENVIRONMENTAL AND PRELIMINARY DESIGN PHASE September 9, 2014 VIA Community.
1 Bus Rapid Transit Strategic Plan May BRT Strategic Plan Evaluate feasibility and effectiveness of six BRT corridors Establish framework for.
Commuter Rail Studies Summary of MAG High Capacity Transit Study June 2003 Commuter Rail Summary.
GRTC Bus Rapid Transit Project July 17, Agenda 1.BRT Concept 2.Project Goals 3.Project Benefits 4.Project Corridor 5.Proposed Multimodal Access.
Intelligent Transportation Society of Virginia Annual Conference & Exposition May 19-20, 2016.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY Geary Bus Rapid Transit Project Presentation to the San Francisco.
Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) ACEC Presentation May 25, 2017
Free MetroRide Travel Time and Reliability Improvements
Transit Signal Priority: Evolution
Bus Rapid Transit Study
Transit Signal Priority: The Importance of AVL Data
City of Alexandria Virginia Transportation and Environmental Services
Presentation to City of Palo Alto Rail Committee on Quiet Zones
Highly Automated Vehicles Law Enforcement Needs / Questions
Presentation transcript:

Line 22 BRT: Summary Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority May 2003

Generally Accepted Features for BRT (Minimum of Four Required) –Exclusive Rights-of-Way –Signal Priority –Queue Jumpers –Improved Station Areas –TOD and Transit Sensitive LU Planning –Limited Stops –Low Floor Boarding –Real Time Passenger Information –Uniquely Designed Vehicles

Line 22 BRT: Key ITS Elements l Advanced communications system (ACS) l Selective transit signal priority (TSP) l Dynamic passenger information l CCTV and emergency communications l Traffic management center coordination

Overview of Original Objectives l Increase operating speed and time point adherence using bus signal priority and queue jump lanes l Provide dynamic bus arrival and system bulletins on-board and at stops l Improve overall passenger comfort with enhanced stations and low floor, low emission vehicles

Operating Targets Station spacing ± every mile Schedule time at ± 85% general traffic speed Tight time point adherence Minimized dwell time at stops Headway no less than every 10 minutes peak, 20 minutes off-peak Conventional service retained at reduced level

BRT Project Estimate Total = $32,422,250

Computer enhanced station at Julian St. and El Camino Real

Status Queue jump lanes at Page Mill and Arastradero completed AVL/AVI and articulated coaches in service Beta test completed on bus priority software Signal hardware upgrade procurement Phases I & II in process Preliminary station sites identified

Bus Signal Priority l Caltrans has developed signal controller software modifications to provide bus priority functionality l Articulated coaches are equipped with priority request transponders l Funding provided for bus signal priority along El Camino Real from Race Street to the Palo Alto TC by BAAQMD (70% of the corridor)

Bus Priority Operating Principles l Pedestrian calls as well as railroad and public safety preemption protected l Maximum frequency of priority grant every second signal cycle l No priority during transition to coordination l Phase skipping not permitted

Priority Requests l No manual intervention by driver l Only late buses place requests l Priority requests granted on a first- come first-served basis l Priority granted as early green and/or extended green l Truncation on check out or time out

Schedule l Procurement of hardware in process l Phase I implementation in Spring ’04 l Phase II implementation in Summer ‘04 l Before/after study conducted longitudinally by Cal-Berkeley PATH on both phases

James T. Jarzab BRT Program Manager VTA 3331 N. First Street San Jose CA (p) (f) (m)