Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Appraisal Systems
Advertisements

Lee County Human Resources Glenda Jones. School Speech-Language Pathologist Evaluation Process Intended Purpose of the Standards Guide professional development.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A new model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The correlation.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The FEAPs as a.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty
Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Alignment of State and Federal Requirements SB 290 ESEA Waiver Oregon Framework.
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Increasing Student Growth and Achievement A Systems Approach: Improving Our Teacher Evaluation System Dawn.
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
State Consortium on Educator Effectiveness April 2011 CCSSO Ohio Principal Evaluation System.
 Teacher and administrator evaluations are governed by Florida Statute and State Board Rule 6A  The Florida Department of Education and.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Educator Effectiveness in Colorado State Policy Framework & Approach October 2014.
Session Materials  Wiki
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
1 Ohio’s Entry Year Teacher Program Review Ohio Confederation of Teacher Education Organizations Fall Conference: October 23, 2008 Presenter: Lori Lofton.
Agenda Overview of evaluation Timeline Next steps.
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Field Test Overview.
New England Regional Colloquium Series “Systems of State Support” B. Keith Speers January 24, 2007.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Resident Educator 16 “What do I need to know and do?”
Data Sources Artifacts: Lesson plans and/or curriculum units which evidence planned use of diagnostic tools, pre- assessment activities, activating strategies,
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Geelong High School Performance Development & Review Process in 2014.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
Session Materials  Wiki
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
What you need to know about changes in state requirements for Teval plans.
Education Unit The Practicum Experience Session Two.
Idaho Principal Evaluation Process Tyson Carter Educator Effectiveness Coordinator Idaho State Department of Education
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 4: Professional Growth Plan Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
School Counselor Evaluation RubricEvaluating with Fidelity Linda Brannan, M.Ed, NBCT K-12 Student Support Services Consultant NC Department of Public Instruction.
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
Ohio Department of Education OCTEO Conference March 19,
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Overview of the Texas Teacher and Principal Evaluation Systems.
Student Achievement Teacher & Leader Effectiveness Overview of Stronge & MyLearningPlan/OASYS Interim Report #1 January 27,
Setting Your Goals For TTESS Memorial HS Training September 11, 2015.
Ohio Principal Evaluation System Pike County Joint Vocational School March 7,
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
Page 1 Teacher Evaluation Process & Instrument Dale Ellis Bill Long Jed Stus.
OEA Leadership Academy 2011 Michele Winship, Ph.D.
Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Update Kentucky Board of Education August 8,
DECEMBER 7, 2015 Educator Effectiveness: Charter School Webinar.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Five Required Elements
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
State Board of Education Progress Update
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Presentation transcript:

Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems

Ohio Principal Evaluation System (OPES) Developed in 2007 Field tested in 2008 Adopted by SBOE fall 2009 Piloted in 19 school districts and 140 schools 2008 – 2010 Train the trainer with 23 ESC’s

Ohio Principal Evaluation System Research Based Model Aligned to: Ohio’s Standards for Principals District and school improvement plans, local priorities, goals and objectives Current evidence and findings on effective leadership

Ohio Principal Evaluation System Structure: A goal setting process System of formative assessment and coaching (examining the work of leaders) System of summative evaluation that includes a rating system to delineate leader effectiveness

Ohio Principal Evaluation System Structure Ohio Principal Evaluation System Professional Growth and Development Plan Formative Assessment and Summative Evaluation Self Assessment Analysis of Student Learning Goal Setting Formative Assessment Student Growth Prof. & Comm. Summative Evaluation

Ohio Principal Evaluation System OPES Components: Self-Assessment on Ohio’s Standards for Principals Analysis of Student Learning Goal Setting & Professional Growth Plan Formative Assessment & Coaching Summative Evaluation

Ohio Principal Evaluation System Ohio Standards for Principals What are the critical dimensions that define effective school leadership?

Ohio Principal Evaluation System Self-Assessment Against Professional Standards Ohio’s Standards for Principals Knowledge and skills are developmental Version 2.1 and 2.2

Ohio Principal Evaluation System Formative Assessment and Coaching Supports opportunities for reflective practice Objective and evidenced based Guide the professional growth of the principal Interactive and collaborative

Ohio Principal Evaluation System Formative Assessment and Coaching Peer to Peer (Small Learning Communities) Direct Observation Examining Artifacts Instructional (80:20); Collaborative (50:50); Facilitative (20:80)

Ohio Principal Evaluation System Annual Summative Evaluation Principal Self-Reflection Evidence based Performance Scoring Rubric that differentiates levels of effectiveness (ineffective, proficient, accomplished, distinguished)

Ohio Principal Evaluation System Questions?

Ohio Teacher Evaluation System Please refer to booklet: A GUIDE TO SUPPORT HIGH QUALITY TEACHER EVALUATION

Ohio Teacher Evaluation System What it is Based On: Ohio’s Standards for the Teaching Profession Current evidence and research on assessing effective teaching Research linking teaching to student learning

Ohio Teacher Evaluation System What it is Designed to Do: Encourage professional dialogue Foster professional growth over time Propel schools to higher levels of effectiveness through improved teacher performance Improve student learning and increase student achievement

Ohio Teacher Evaluation System Structure of the Evaluation System: Evaluation criteria: Ohio’s Standards for the Teaching Profession Levels of effectiveness that are objective, evidenced-based Weighting system Processes for connecting multiple sources of evidence Standards setting: career stages

Ohio Teacher Evaluation System Framework of the Evaluation System: Self-Assessment against Standards Analysis of Student Learning Coaching and Formative Assessment Goal-Setting

Ohio Teacher Evaluation System Framework of the Evaluation System: Collection of Evidence/Artifacts Formal Observation and/or Projects or Action Research Student Growth Data Written Summative Evaluation

Ohio Teacher Evaluation System Definition of Teacher Effectiveness: Understanding of student learning & development Knowledge of content Use of varied assessment strategies to inform instruction Planning & delivery of effective instruction Creating a learning environment that promotes high levels of learning Skills of collaboration & communication; professional growth & responsibilities

Ohio Teacher Evaluation System Guidelines for High Quality Teacher Evaluation Systems  Using the tabloid sheet provided, select a Guideline and think about your Current Reality and your Desired State  Discuss with your team or table

Formal Observation Process Pre-Conference Observation Narrative Reflection Post-Conference

Video: Discuss Observations in your group… Plan Teach Assess

Ohio Teacher Evaluation System Gap Analysis and Planning Tool: Self-assessment based on characteristics of high quality evaluation systems Generates a report with stages to determine where district falls compared to the Guidelines Assists districts in developing a scope of work to create high quality teacher evaluation system

Ohio Teacher Evaluation System Timeline of Activities: Suggested activities and timelines for districts (2 years) to support redesign of teacher evaluation system

Ohio Teacher Evaluation System ODE: Field test tools and protocols with districts (early adopters) Provide opportunities for stakeholder feedback Writing team and ESB continue to design and refine procedures, processes and instruments Plan for implementation and scale – district information sessions, webinars, etc ESB recommends model to SBOE for adoption ODE: Begin to scale implementation with 30 – 40 districts by providing ongoing training, support and technical assistance Credential evaluators Districts re-design or adapt evaluation systems to align with the state model

Ohio Teacher Evaluation System Workbook - Getting Started: Examine policies and practices Engage key stakeholders Communication Goals for high quality teacher evaluation Definition of teacher effectiveness

Ohio Teacher Evaluation System Questions?