1Frank Simon ALCPG11, 20/3/2011 ILD and SiD detectors for 1 TeV ILC some recommendations following experience from the CLIC detector study

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Proposal for a new design of LumiCal R. Ingbir, P. Ruzicka, V. Vrba October 07 Malá Skála.
Advertisements

Background studies Takashi Maruyama SLAC GDE Baseline Assessment Workshop SLAC, January 18-21, 2011.
Higgs branching ratios study Oct Hiroaki Ono (NDU) Oct ILC Physics WG general meeting.
GUINEA-PIG: A tool for beam-beam effect study C. Rimbault, LAL Orsay Daresbury, April 2006.
Simulation Studies of a (DEPFET) Vertex Detector for SuperBelle Ariane Frey, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik München Contents: Software framework Simulation.
P hysics background for luminosity calorimeter at ILC I. Božović-Jelisavčić 1, V. Borka 1, W. Lohmann 2, H. Nowak 2 1 INN VINČA, Belgrade 2 DESY, Hamburg.
1 Benchmarking the SiD Tim Barklow SLAC Sep 27, 2005.
Part II ILC Detector Concepts & The Concept of Particle Flow.
Silicon Detector: Simulation & Reconstruction Norman Graf SiD Advisory Meeting September 14, 2009.
Background in the CILD01fw Weekly Detector Meeting May 5, 2009 André Sailer CLIC_01_ILD.
David Attié Club ‘ILC Physics Case’ CEA Saclay June 23, 2013 ILD & SiD concepts and R&D.
SiD’ and CLIC CDR preparations Outline: Introduction Description of SiD’ detector R&D in software/hardware for SiD’ Preparations for the CLIC CDR Conclusions.
August 2005Snowmass Workshop IP Instrumentation Wolfgang Lohmann, DESY Measurement of: Luminosity (precise and fast) Energy Polarisation.
Time development of showers in a Tungsten-HCAL Calice Collaboration Meeting – Casablanca 2010 Christian Soldner Max-Planck-Institute for Physics.
Mark Thomson Timing, Tungsten and High Energy Jets.
1 LumiCal Optimization and Design Takashi Maruyama SLAC SiD Workshop, Boulder, September 18, 2008.
1 Realistic top Quark Reconstruction for Vertex Detector Optimisation Talini Pinto Jayawardena (RAL) Kristian Harder (RAL) LCFI Collaboration Meeting 23/09/08.
About L* i.e. the distance between the end of the last quadrupole “QD0” and the IP Until now, L* has been different for SiD and ILD, -> due to detector.
Analysis of Beamstrahlung Pairs ECFA Workshop Vienna, November 14-17, 2005 Christian Grah.
1http:// 22/4/2010 Introduction WG4 Outline: Mandate of the WG Timescale How to proceed? Vertex detector requirements Collecting input on.
Summary of Simulation and Reconstruction Shaomin CHEN (Tsinghua University)  Framework and toolkit  Application in ILC detector design Jupiter/Satellites,
International Workshop on Linear Colliders, Geneve Muon reconstruction and identification in the ILD detector N. D’Ascenzo, V.Saveliev.
Simulation of Beam-Beam Background at CLIC André Sailer (CERN-PH-LCD, HU Berlin) LCWS2010: BDS+MDI Joint Session 29 March, 2010, Beijing 1.
LCWS2004 Paris 1 Beam background study for GLC Tsukasa Aso, Toyama College of Maritime Technology and GLC Vertex Group H.Aihara, K.Tanabe, Tokyo Univ.
Septembre SLAC BeamCal W. Lohmann, DESY BeamCal: ensures hermeticity of the detector to smallest polar angles -important for searches Serves as.
Beam-Beam Background and the Forward Region at a CLIC Detector André Sailer (CERN PH-LCD) LC Physics School, Ambleside 22st August, 2009.
ILC-ECFA Workshop Valencia November 2006 Four-fermion processes as a background in the ILC luminosity calorimeter for the FCAL Collaboration I. Božović-Jelisavčić,
Hongbo Zhu, Qinglei Xiu, Xinchou Lou (IHEP) On behalf of the CEPC study group ICFA Advanced Beam Dynamics Workshop: Higgs Factory (HF2014) 9-12 October.
CLICdp achievements in 2014 and goals for 2015 Lucie Linssen, CERN on behalf of the CLICdp collaboration CLIC workshop, January 30 th
Coil and HCAL Parameters for CLIC Solenoid and Hadron-calorimetry for a high energy LC Detector 15. December LAPP Christian Grefe CERN.
Update on CLIC_ILD detector studies necessarily incomplete, but attempting to give you a “glimpse” presented by K. Elsener (CERN), for the CLIC detector.
Electron Detection in the SiD BeamCal Jack Gill, Gleb Oleinik, Uriel Nauenberg, University of Colorado ALCPG Meeting ‘09 2 October 2009.
PFAs – A Critical Look Where Does (my) SiD PFA go Wrong? S. R. Magill ANL ALCPG 10/04/07.
1http:// Lucie Linssen LCWS /3/2010 SiD and CLIC Outline: Adaptation of SiD detector for CLIC Use of SiD software for CLIC Tracking.
Andrei Nomerotski, University of Oxford ILC VD Workshop, Menaggio 22 April 2008 SiD Vertex Detector.
LCWS11 – Tracking Performance at CLIC_ILD/SiD Michael Hauschild - CERN, 27-Sep-2011, page 1 Tracking Performance in CLIC_ILD and CLIC_SiD e + e –  H +
Dominik Dannheim (CERN), André Sailer (HU Berlin / CERN) Beam-induced backgrounds in the CLIC detector models ALCPG Workshop March 2011 Eugene,
16 February 2009CLIC Physics & Detectors Konrad Elsener 1... some issues regarding the forward region... (“picking up” from Lucie Linssen, 29 Sept 2008)
The Luminosity Calorimeter Iftach Sadeh Tel Aviv University Desy ( On behalf of the FCAL collaboration ) June 11 th 2008.
Forward Tagger Simulations Implementation in GEMC Moller Shield Tracking Studies R. De Vita INFN –Genova Forward Tagger Meeting, CLAS12 Workshop, June.
Calorimeters Design Issues and Simulation Needs C.Woody Physics Department Brookhaven National Lab EIC Simulation Workshop Oct 9, 2012.
Mark Thomson University of Cambridge Detectors for a Multi-TeV Collider: “what can be learnt from the ILC” ALCPG Meeting, Albuquerque, 29/9/2009.
12/20/2006ILC-Sousei Annual KEK1 Particle Flow Algorithm for Full Simulation Study ILC-Sousei Annual KEK Dec. 20 th -22 nd, 2006 Tamaki.
8/12/2010Dominik Dannheim, Lucie Linssen1 Conceptual layout drawings of the CLIC vertex detector and First engineering studies of a pixel access/insertion.
Muon Collider Physics and Detectors You have heard about the muon collider accelerator initiatives – these need to be informed by the physics needs and.
1/24 SiD FCAL Takashi Maruyama Tom Markiewicz SLAC TILC’09, Tskuba, Japan, April 2009 Contributors: SLAC M. BreidenbachFNALW. Cooper G. Haller K.
Mokka simulation studies on the Very Forward Detector components at CLIC and ILC Eliza TEODORESCU (IFIN-HH) FCAL Collaboration Meeting Tel Aviv, October.
September 2007SLAC IR WS Very Forward Instrumentation of the ILC Detector Wolfgang Lohmann, DESY Talks by M. Morse, W. Wierba, myself.
LumiCal background and systematics at CLIC energy I. Smiljanić, Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences.
09/06/06Predrag Krstonosic - CALOR061 Particle flow performance and detector optimization.
J. S. MarshallPandora PFA1 Pandora Particle Flow Calorimetry Tuesday 29 th January 2013 J. S. Marshall University of Cambridge.
1 LoI FCAL Takashi Maruyama SLAC SiD Workshop, SLAC, March 2-4, 2009 Contributors: SLAC M. BreidenbachFNALW. Cooper G. Haller K. Krempetz T. MarkiewiczBNLW.
Simulation Plan Discussion What are the priorities? – Higgs Factory? – 3-6 TeV energy frontier machine? What detector variants? – Basic detector would.
FCAL Krakow meeting, 6. May LumiCal concept including the tracker R. Ingbir, P.Růžička, V. Vrba.
How well do we need to know the luminosity spectrum at 3 TeV CLIC? Lucie Linssen, CERN on behalf of the CLIC physics and detector study, material principally.
Initial proposal for the design of the luminosity calorimeter at a 3TeV CLIC Iftach Sadeh Tel Aviv University March 6th 2009
HCAL Leakage Studies CLIC Physics & Detector Meeting 10. November 2008 Christian Grefe CERN.
BeamCal Simulation for CLIC
STFC-Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
Forward Tagger Simulations
Layout of Detectors for CLIC
SiD Calorimeter R&D Collaboration
Particle detection and reconstruction at the LHC (IV)
γ γ-> hadron Background Events at CLIC
CLIC detector at SiD meeting 28/3/2010
Studies with PandoraPFA
Calorimetry for a CLIC experiment
Study of e+ e- background due to beamstrahlung for different ILC parameter sets Stephan Gronenborn.
Higgs Factory Backgrounds
Detector Optimization using Particle Flow Algorithm
Presentation transcript:

1Frank Simon ALCPG11, 20/3/2011 ILD and SiD detectors for 1 TeV ILC some recommendations following experience from the CLIC detector study

2Frank Simon ALCPG11, 20/3/2011 Physics observables Get overview of physics observables at 1 TeV (just to get familiar with the new domain) e.g. jet energies and particle energies in jets Minimal distances between leading particles in jets Evolution of angular coverage of the physics wrt 500 GeV case CLIC example: ttbar events at 3 TeV

3Frank Simon ALCPG11, 20/3/2011 Study calorimeter requirements Assess calorimeter performance for the 1 TeV case Mostly to ensure that calorimeter depth is sufficient and that confusion remains limited (in fact already proven for the CLIC case) Solid lines: not tails catcher Markers: with tail catcher PFA study Full ILD-type detector barrel with tungsten HCAL absorbers

4Frank Simon ALCPG11, 20/3/2011 Tungsten for HCAL barrel? Required resolution reached at smaller HCAL outer radius for tungsten than for steel absorber

5Frank Simon ALCPG11, 20/3/2011 Machine-induced backgrounds Understand the main machine backgrounds: Overall limited impact expected given the favorable ILC bunch structure Coherent pairs Ensure that outgoing beam pipe opening and crossing angle of 14 mrad are safe with respect to coherent pairs Incoherent pairs Study of lumical at 1 TeV => may require change in angular range for lumical Study optimal geometry for beamcal Trade-off between acceptance and backscattering Optimise beam-pipe layout (can have a function of absorbing back-scattered background) Verify occupancy in the vertex detector and tracking detectors For direct hits (influence of B-field) and backscattered hits Inner vertex layer may have to be moved to somewhat larger radius γγ to hadron background Only few events/bx expected, though with significant energy/bx (few-10 GeV) Study P t cuts and optimal jet reconstruction algorithm to suppress this background

6Frank Simon ALCPG11, 20/3/2011 Coherent pairs and opening angle CLIC example: Sharp angular cut-off in coherent pairs drives choice of beam pipe opening and choice of crossing angle Thoughts for ILC: “easier” bunch structure, but: long integration times – only a few readouts per train The total occupancies due to all background processes must be evaluated Multi-hit readout capabilities of the on-detector electronics (event buffers) have to be evaluated The electronics shall record the time of each hit (with ~300 ns precision)

7Frank Simon ALCPG11, 20/3/2011 Luminosity spectrum Influence of luminosity spectrum on physics performance: E.g. Influence in measuring masses from and-point spectra Example: CLIC luminosity spectrum and squark end-point spectra

8Frank Simon ALCPG11, 20/3/2011 Software for CLIC For the CLIC CDR: Simulation and Reconstruction needed for 3 TeV Example: ILD - Several issues encountered, all fixed ILD tracking code: Hard-coded momentum “sanity check” caused high energy tracks to disappear Excessive reconstruction times... PandoraPFA for CLIC Background overlay less of a concern for ILC, but due to long readout times, some background will be accumulated: Needs to be studied! ➫ Simulation and Reconstruction proven in multi-TeV environments!