Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Framework for the Ecological Assessment of Impacted Sediments at Mining Sites in Region 7 By Jason Gunter (R7 Life Scientist) and.
Advertisements

What’s Mud Got to Do With It? Stephen J. Klaine, Ph.D. Department of Biological Sciences Clemson University
Bureau of Water Overview Wastewater issues Drinking water issues Wrap up topics.
What is NPDES? “National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System”
Robinson Creek and Tooley Creek Watershed Management Plan Presented By: Jason Cole, M.Sc., P.Geo Rob Frizzell, M.Sc., P.Geo Municipality of Clarington.
Stream Monitoring in Loudoun County David Ward, Water Resources Engineer Department of Building and Development, Department of Building and Development,
When It Rains, It Drains An Overview: The Lower Providence Township Storm Water Management Program.
Lec 12: Rapid Bioassessment Protocols (RBP’s)
Indiana 6217 Coastal Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Program – What it is, and What it Means!
Breakout II – Eco 2. QUESTIONS? Discharge to Ocean –Inland surface waters –Ocean –recharge to g/w aquifers Are discharges affecting ecosystem health?
Final stuff: n Lab practical –Coleoptera, Hemiptera n Final exam: Fri May 2:15 –Assessment with Invertebrates n Lecture material (IDEM protocol) n.
The relationship between riparian areas and biological diversity A comparison of streams in eastern Colorado and southwestern Virginia By Ann Widmer
L-THIA Long-Term Hydrologic Impact Assessment Model ….provides relative estimates of change of runoff and non point source pollutants caused due to land.
EEP Watershed Planning Overview August 12, Ecosystem Enhancement Program Nationally recognized, innovative, non-regulatory program formed in July.
Breewood Stream Restoration Montgomery County Capital Improvement Project to Stabilize the Breewood Tributary November 14, 2012 Sligo Middle School.
West Virginia University Natural Stream Restoration Program An Interdisciplinary Program Focusing on Research, Education, and Professional Services in.
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES) Permit.
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Water Quality Associated with Urban Runoff: Sources, Emerging Issues and Management Approaches Martha Sutula and Eric Stein Biogeochemistry and Biology.
Introduction to PA Act 167 Stormwater Management Planning Little Juniata River Watershed April 21, 2005.
IMPACTS OF LAND DEVELOPMENT ON OREGON’S WATERS 2001 This slide show was borrowed from the internet but we added our own research when we presented it.
Impacts of Land Development on Oregon’s Waters 2001.
CALIFORNIA’S BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT PROGRAM April 5, 2005 Jim Harrington WPCL Bioassessment Laboratory.
CoastalZone.com The Use of Ecological Risk Assessments in a Watershed Level Context Thorne E. Abbott CoastalZone.com.
Final stuff: n Lab practical: Apr 29 n Final exam: due Fri May 2:15.
Water Quality Management Plan Update Board of Directors March 25, 2009.
Indiana’s Coastal Nonpoint Pollution Control Program Coastal Advisory Board Meeting April 18, 2007.
Assessing Linkages between Nearshore Habitat and Estuarine Fish Communities in the Chesapeake Bay Donna Marie Bilkovic*, Carl H. Hershner, Kirk J. Havens,
National Aquatic Resource Surveys Wadeable Streams Assessment Overview November, 2007.
Laguna Creek Watershed Council Development of the Laguna Creek Watershed Management Action Plan & It’s Relevance to the Elk Grove Drainage Master Planning.
Fish Assemblages of the Wabash River Mark Pyron. Wabash River Fishes 1.Large river 2.High diversity 3.History of human impact 4.Fish assemblages respond.
Water Quality Partnership Meeting LOTT Alliance Regional Service Center November 18, 2010 Rob Duff and Josh Baldi Washington State Department of Ecology.
Biologically based urban response models for the South Atlantic gulf and Tennessee River basins T.F. Cuffney, E.M. Giddings, and M.B. Gregory North Carolina.
Urban Water Research Todd Rasmussen Associate Professor of Hydrology The University of Georgia, Athens and Pending Director, Urban Water Research Institute.
Volunteer-collected data can provide important baseline information to assist with decision making and improve watershed management. In this study, data.
Identifying Changes to Stream Condition caused by Urbanization How understanding the responses can improve ecological risk characterization
National Monitoring Conference May 7-11, 2006
New Development and Significant Development 12/21/20151 New Development & Significant Redevelopment.
State of the Streams Loudoun County: 2005 Loudoun Strategic Watershed Management Planning Conference February 23, 2006 Presented by: Darrell Schwalm Loudoun.
An Introduction to NC’s Water Quality Program and *Nonpoint Source Pollution Division of Water Quality WQ Planning Branch NC Department of Environment.
Ch. 1: “Watersheds and Wetlands” Lesson 1.5: “Factors That Affect Wetlands and Watersheds” Part 2.
A quantification of groundwater seepage during drought and its importance for water quality modeling in the St. Vrain watershed Hannah Chapin Thomas Gerber.
76. The central U.S. law regulating water quality is the Clean Water Act (CWA), adopted in The Act initially focused on point sources, which it.
A Tool to Evaluate the Health of Streams and Rivers within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Katie Foreman 1, Claire Buchanan 2, Adam Griggs 2, Andrea Nagel.
HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Presentation John M. Carlock, AICP Deputy Executive Director, Physical Planning Hampton Roads.
The Clean Water Act (1977, 1981, 1987) By: Jonas Szajowitz.
Using Regional Models to Assess the Relative Effects of Stressors Lester L. Yuan National Center for Environmental Assessment U.S. Environmental Protection.
The Jordan Cove Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline and Terminal.
Record notes in your notebook  Record at least 5 facts/ideas in your notebook.  Write down and answer the following questions:  What are“benthic macroinvertebrates”?
Aquatic Resource Monitoring Overview Anthony (Tony) R. Olsen USEPA NHEERL Western Ecology Division Corvallis, Oregon (541)
Introduction to Environment. Environment : from the French word ‘environner ‘- to encircle or surround Whatever is around us constitutes our Environment.
Dr. Thomas Hardy Chief Science Officer River Systems Institute Texas State University.
The Chesapeake Bay: How is it Doing? An Overview of The Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
Effects of Stream Restoration: A Comparative Study of Pine Run in Felton, Pennsylvania Luke Mummert, Department of Biological Sciences, York College of.
GIS M ETHODOLOGY Swearing Creek Watershed Restoration Plan 8/26/2015 Piedmont Triad Regional Council.
New York’s Chesapeake Bay WIP
Mulberry River Watershed
An Introduction to NC’s Water Quality Program and
Fun with Macroinvertebrates
WATER QUALITY Vol 3: Biological Characteristics
Sacramento County Stormwater Quality Program
Henrico County Stream Assessment / Watershed Management Program
Biological Assessment of Pond Health
Mulberry Watershed Management Plan
Using Benthic Macroinvertebrate Populations to Assess Campus
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
Aquatic Ecology Envirothon
DETERMINING STREAM QUALITY
Moving Our Coastal Lakes Into a Healthier and More Resilient Future
Sacramento County Stormwater Quality Program
Presentation transcript:

Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate index. In general, insects and fish were determined to be less diverse and abundant, and more tolerant of pollution while habitat was more degraded in highly developed areas than those in less developed areas. Ecological Engineering: Science to Policy Assessment Using data from the 20 sites in South Georgia, percent urban land use (mostly paved areas with little vegetative cover) was correlated with overall results of biological and habitat assessments. While the biological response of benthic macroinvertebrates to physical habitat at sub-watershed and watershed scales was not clearly correlated, there was a clear relationship between biological response and urban land use in the 0% to 5% range. These findings indicated that the most damage to the stream environment was done in the first stages of development, from non-urban land use to urban land use. As land is developed further (higher % urban landuse), biological scores level off slightly, but still continue to fall, further emphasizing that initial development causes the most damage to benthic macroinvertebrate communities. Analysis Non-point Source Pollution Policy In Georgia Georgia’s water policy is heavily focused on non-point source pollution. The Georgia Environmental Protection Division (GAEPD) has instituted national policies such as Erosion and Sedimentation Controls, Phase I and Phase II Stormwater Permitting, Total Maximum Daily Load Programs, Source Water Assessments, and Well Head Protection Programs to address non-point source pollution. The GAEPD has also adopted a program dealing with comprehensive watershed studies or watershed assessments. Watershed Assessments are driven by the Clean Water Act (National Pollution Discharge Elimination System) and focus on determining watershed health and establishing measures for watershed protection. Successful completion of a watershed assessment is a condition of an NPDES permit for wastewater treatment plants. A watershed assessment has several components including assessment, analysis, and recommendations for watershed protection. This poster focuses on Ecological Engineering applications in these components of watershed assessment studies. Application The South Georgia Coastal Plain: A Case Study Action One of the most important components of a watershed assessment is taking action to maintain and improve watershed health. Through the results and recommendations of the watershed assessment, local officials can formulate guiding documents for watershed protection. These documents must be approved by the GAEPD and will serve as a component and condition of NPDES permits for wastewater treatment facilities. Recently, the case study city incorporated management recommendations, based on ecological engineering principles, into their watershed protection plan. They included: improving aquatic ecosystems, restoring and protecting wildlife habitat, and educating the general public involving the environment and ecological concerns in their watershed. Recommendations for the management of these Coastal Plain watersheds were developed based on assessment and analysis of the streams’ ecosystems. The recommendations targeted undeveloped areas, especially those in close proximity to streams, that may be slated for development. The focus of these recommendations was primarily stream protection during the first stages of construction, including: installing, maintaining, and monitoring erosion and sedimentation controls, installing and maintaining vegetated buffers where applicable, controlling stormwater runoff, and educating local officials and the general public about stream and stream bank ecosystems. Other recommendations were more geared toward maintaining/improving stream health in areas already impacted by development. Hillary S. Tanner, David K. Gattie, and J. Victoria Collins University of Georgia, Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering Twenty aquatic sites were monitored, within a 1504 km watershed in the Coastal Plain of Georgia. These sites were sampled to assess biotic response of benthic macroinvertebrate populations and communities to changes in habitat and surrounding land use. The 20 sites ranged from 1.2% to 37% urbanization (indicated by impervious surface). Biological response was measured using metrics (outlined in the U.S. EPA’s Session: From Science to Policy: Ecological Services Decision Support Systems EPT vs. %-Urban r = %-Urban Landuse EPT HBI vs. %-Urban r = %-Urban Landuse HBI