Xoft Routine Per Article Manufacturing Testing of the Axxent ® Source S. Axelrod, T.W. Rusch, M. Powell; Xoft, Inc., Fremont, CA  Purpose: To select sources.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MOSFET Dosimeters for 50 kVp Electronic Brachytherapy with the Xoft Axxent Source Steve Axelrod, PhD Tom Rusch, PhD Xoft, Inc., Fremont, CA
Advertisements

Quality Management in Diagnostic Imaging
Lecture Notes Part 4 ET 483b Sequential Control and Data Acquisition
Software Quality Assurance Plan
RapidArc plan verification using ArcCHECK™
In the past few years the usage of conformal and IMRT treatments has been increasing rapidly. These treatments employ the use of tighter margins around.
Analysis of Variance Outlines: Designing Engineering Experiments
Measurement Systems Analysis with R&R INNOVATOR Lite TM The House of Quality presents.
FARADAY ROTATION Gennady Voronov In this experiments we experimentally determine the Verdet constant of a glass rod with specification SF-59 to be rad/mT*cm.
Lic. Pedro Antonio Pérez.  To develop a simple and versatile dosimetric method capable of determining changes in matter (Xylenol Orange added Fricke.
Doc.: IEEE /0630r0 Submission May 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 1 Verification of IEEE ad Channel Model for Enterprise Cubical Environment.
Chapter 10 Quality Control McGraw-Hill/Irwin
1 © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004 Technical Note 7 Process Capability and Statistical Quality Control.
L Berkley Davis Copyright 2009 MER301: Engineering Reliability Lecture 16 1 MER301: Engineering Reliability LECTURE 17: Measurement System Analysis and.
Software Quality Control Methods. Introduction Quality control methods have received a world wide surge of interest within the past couple of decades.
Lotte Verbunt Investigation of leaf positioning accuracy of two types of Siemens MLCs making use of an EPID.
What is Data ? Data is a numerical expression of an activity. Conclusions based on facts and data are necessary for any improvement. -K. Ishikawa If you.
Evaluation of various diagnostic x-ray measuring devices MDCH Radiation Safety Section Don Parry, CHP.
69 th Annual International Conference on Mass Properties Engineering Michael Diggs, Melissa Cooley & David Hansch Naval Architects The Use of Inferential.
QUALITY CONTROL OF PHYSICO-Chemical METHODS Introduction :Validation توثيق المصدوقية.
F. Cheung, A. Samarian, W. Tsang, B. James School of Physics, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Chapter 10 Quality Control McGraw-Hill/Irwin
TTMG 5103 Module Techniques and Tools for problem diagnosis and improvement prior to commercialization Shiva Biradar TIM Program, Carleton University.
Position, Velocity and Accleration in a Fan- Cart Regina Bochicchio, Michelle Obama, Hillary Clinton September 11, 2013.
1 © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2006 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Technical Note 8 Process Capability and Statistical Quality Control.
Introduction to Design of Experiments
Data Mining to Aid Beam Angle Selection for IMRT Stuart Price-University of Maryland Bruce Golden- University of Maryland Edward Wasil- American University.
VALIDATION METHODOLOGY
TÍTULO DO TRABALHO NOMES DOS AUTORES ENDEREÇOS E DOS AUTORES INTRODUTION Gammacell 220 Series 39 is a irradiation device purchased by CDTN/CNEN in.
Evaluation of the Performance of the Fast Scanning Platform of an OCT System Malcolm Heard 1, Miguel Herrera 1, Geoffrey Ibbott 1 1 Department of Radiation.
Power Control System for a Concrete Durability Test Cabinet – Phase 2 Jacob Jameson Madhav Kothapalli Thomas Persinger Andrew Versluys.
IMRT QA Plan Site 5%/3mm3%/3mm2%/2mm 0% noise1% noise2% noise0% noise1% noise2% noise0% noise1% noise2% noise HN
L Berkley Davis Copyright 2009 MER301: Engineering Reliability Lecture 16 1 MER301: Engineering Reliability LECTURE 16: Measurement System Analysis and.
Institute for Advanced Radiation Oncology
Fig. 3 shows how a dose distribution that is initially relatively sharp becomes blurred with time, until after 16 hours, virtually no useful information.
1 Chapter 1: Introduction to Design of Experiments 1.1 Review of Basic Statistical Concepts (Optional) 1.2 Introduction to Experimental Design 1.3 Completely.
Analysis of Variance 1 Dr. Mohammed Alahmed Ph.D. in BioStatistics (011)
Development and Implementation of a Remote Audit Tool for High Dose Rate (HDR) 192 Ir Brachytherapy Using Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimetry Kevin.
ELECTRICAL TECHNOLOGY EET 103/4
Introduction The Radiological Physics Center (RPC) anthropomorphic quality assurance (QA) phantom program is one tool the RPC uses to remotely audit institutions.
Economics 173 Business Statistics Lecture 26 © Fall 2001, Professor J. Petry
Adriana S. Forseto1, MD Walton Nosé1,2, MD
Quality Control All activities undertaken to control materials, processes and products in order to ensure quality of conformance Detects defects before.
Quality Control Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill.
Process Capability and Statistical Quality Control.
Rick Walker Evaluation of Out-of-Tolerance Risk 1 Evaluation of Out-of-Tolerance Risk in Measuring and Test Equipment Rick Walker Fluke - Hart Scientific.
1 A latent information function to extend domain attributes to improve the accuracy of small-data-set forecasting Reporter : Zhao-Wei Luo Che-Jung Chang,Der-Chiang.
Poster Design & Printing by Genigraphics ® Matlab-based Nanoscale Device Characterization Paul R. Haugen and Hassan Raza Nanoscale Devices.
The Effects of Small Field Dosimetry on the Biological Models Used In Evaluating IMRT Dose Distributions Gene Cardarelli,PhD, MPH.
Computed tomography. Formation of a CT image Data acquisitionImage reconstruction Image display, manipulation Storage, communication And recording.
MECH 373 Instrumentation and Measurements
Treatment Plan Validation of the Xoft AXXENT™ X-ray Source
Process Capability and Capability Index
1 2 3 INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ROORKEE PROJECT REPORT 2016
McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved
Characterization of the Xoft AXXENT™ X-ray Source
Height and Pressure Test for Improving Spray Application
Instrumentation for Colliding Beam Physics 2017
RSNA Meeting, Chicago, IL
Ray Traces and Pinhole Images of the Xoft Axxent™ X-ray Source
Statistics for the Social Sciences
An Enabling Technology for Creating Sculpted Brachytherapy Dose Patterns With The Xoft Axxent™ System Steve Axelrod, PhD Don Pettibone, PhD Rob Neimeyer.
Paige Thielen, ME535 Spring 2018
A fixture designed to provide high precision, high throughput routine spatial characterization of the Xoft Axxent™ X-ray source Linda Kelley, Steve Axelrod,
Xoft Manufacturing Procedures
Inferential Statistics
Stability of Cortical Responses and the Statistics of Natural Scenes
Dosimetric Measurements
Measurements & Error Analysis
Presentation transcript:

Xoft Routine Per Article Manufacturing Testing of the Axxent ® Source S. Axelrod, T.W. Rusch, M. Powell; Xoft, Inc., Fremont, CA  Purpose: To select sources during routine manufacturing which exhibit reliable stability and match TG-43 parameters to within the error budget criteria for patient treatment.  Materials and Methods: Two formally validated pieces of equipment consisting of hardware and software are used to measure a) the spatial characteristics azimuthal symmetry, polar anisotropy and depth-dose; and b) the x-ray output reproducibility and stability during repeated on-off cycling and an extended on period. Automated software runs the tests, analyzes and evaluates the results, and produces printed reports that form part of the permanent history for each source.  Results: All sources accepted for human use have azimuthal asymmetry ≤ 7%, normalized polar anisotropy in two orthogonal planes ≤ 0.10 of the TG-43 reference, and depth-dose behavior within 0.03 of the TG-43 reference. In addition, when cycled on and off, all sources reproduce their previous output within 2%, with an average standard deviation of ≤ 2% during the on portion of the short cycles. During the 20 minute “on” period, the drift (maximum deviation from start) measured over four 5-minute intervals is ≤ 3%, and the noise (standard deviation of 0.5 second readings) at 10 second intervals is ≤ 0.25%.  Conclusions: Manufacturing testing of every source ensures that those accepted for human use will be stable and have spatial output characteristics consistent with the values used for treatment planning within acceptable errors.  The Xoft Axxent ® Electronic Brachytherapy system is based on a new micro-miniature x-ray source operating at 50 kVp and 300 μA.  The X-ray Source comprises an X-ray tube in a multi-lumen catheter that allows cooling fluid to circulate over the tube. The X-ray tube is ~2.25 mm in diameter x 15mm long and is attached to a high voltage cable and encapsulated within an electrical ground. See Figure 1.  As a brachytherapy source it is characterized under the TG-43 protocol for use with treatment planning systems such as Varian BrachyVision.  Each X-ray source shipped for patient use must have spatial and depth-dose characteristics that match the TG- 43 parameters to within an overall error budget. Furthermore, as an x-ray source that can be turned on and off at will, establishing reproducibility and stability is of great importance.  Xoft has established a manufacturing testing process to ensure that every source meets these requirements.  This series of tests demonstrates the manufacturing testing process for the X-ray source used in the Xoft Axxent ® Electronic Brachytherapy system.  Manufacturing testing of every source ensures that those accepted for human use are stable and have spatial output characteristics consistent with the values used for treatment planning within acceptable errors.  Purpose: This series of tests will demonstrate the manufacturing testing process for the Xoft X-ray source. The testing process measures the spatial and intensity characteristics of every source, rejecting any that fall outside the assigned specifications.  Spatial characteristics: These are measured in a specially constructed water tank system employing a PTW ion chamber encased in a water-tight solid water jacket. The system is mounted on ganged linear and rotary motion stages as described in Rivard, et al.  Data points: Depth-dose data is taken at 5 mm intervals from 10mm to 70 mm. Azimuthal asymmetry is measured at 20 degree intervals at 20 mm from the source, over 360 degrees, in two passes to ensure reproducibility. Polar asymmetry data is taken in 20 degree intervals at 20 mm from the source, from -140 to +140 degrees, also in two passes and is run at two orthogonal angles.  Stability and reproducibility: These are measured in an apparatus that is based on a Standard Imaging HDR well chamber with a custom insert. In the test named “Robustness” the source is turned on and off ten times, the first nine times for 30 seconds, the last time for 20 minutes. The average output for each of the nine cycles is calculated and analyzed for cycle to cycle and overall variation. The 20 minute “on” period is analyzed to determine both the short term (noise) and longer term (drift) variability. The average output over the 20 minute period is combined with the dose in water at 1 cm from the spatial test apparatus to determine the TG-43 dose rate constant Λ.  Software: Both systems are controlled by custom LabVIEW-based software which has been subjected to a rigorous validation process to verify the data acquisition, calculations and reports. In addition, the software was shown to have all features and performance capabilities recorded in the Software Requirements Specification document. References: Rivard MJ, Davis SD, DeWerd LA, Rusch TW, Axelrod S., “Calculated and measured brachytherapy dosimetry parameters in water for the Xoft Axxent X-Ray Source: An electronic brachytherapy source,” Med Phys 33, (2006). INTRODUCTION CONCLUSIONS Poster # SU-FF-T-375 presented at the 49 th Annual Meeting of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine, July 2007, Minneapolis, MN Figure 3. Normalized depth-dose readings for source sn (red), with reference value (blue). Distances shown are in lab system; actual distances are 10 mm greater. Figure 4. Normalized polar output source sn100799, along two orthogonal paths. Angles shown are in lab system, rotated 90° from the source axis. Figure 5. Azimuthal asymmetry of source sn100799, in percent deviation from average. Funding provided by  All sources accepted for human use have azimuthal asymmetry ≤ 7%, normalized polar anisotropy in two orthogonal planes ≤ 0.10 of the TG-43 reference, and depth-dose behavior within 0.03 of the TG-43 reference. Total output must be at least 55,000 U, and the dose rate constant must be within 7% of nominal.  In addition, when cycled on and off, all sources reproduce their previous output within 2%, with an average standard deviation of ≤ 2% during the “on” portion of the short cycles.  During the 20 minute “on” period the drift (maximum deviation from start) measured over four 5 minute intervals is ≤ 3%, and the noise (standard deviation of 0.5 second readings) at 10 second intervals is ≤ 0.25%.  Figure 2 (below) shows output from a source which has passed the Robustness test.  Figures 3, 4 and 5 (right) show depth-dose, polar and azimuthal test data respectively, as examples of the data that are acquired for each source.  Sources that fail any one of the tests are declared not eligible for patient use. Figure 2. Sample output from the Robustness test used to measure stability and reproducibility. MATERIALS AND METHODS Figure 1. Xoft Axxent ® model S700 Electronic Brachytherapy Source ABSTRACT RESULTS  Examples of the data acquired for each source are shown in Figures 2, 3 and 4 (below).