Superconducting Tokamak T-15 Upgrade G.S. Kirnev, V.A. Alkhimovich, O.G. Filatov 1), V.V. Ilin, D.P. Ivanov, P.P. Khvostenko, N.A. Kirneva, D.A. Kislov,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Physics Basis of FIRE Next Step Burning Plasma Experiment Charles Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory U.S.-Japan Workshop on Fusion Power Plant.
Advertisements

ARIES-Advanced Tokamak Power Plant Study Physics Analysis and Issues Charles Kessel, for the ARIES Physics Team Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory U.S.-Japan.
Stability, Transport, and Conrol for the discussion Y. Miura IEA/LT Workshop (W59) combined with DOE/JAERI Technical Planning of Tokamak Experiments (FP1-2)
ASIPP Characteristics of edge localized modes in the superconducting tokamak EAST M. Jiang Institute of Plasma Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences The.
I. Opening I-1. Welcome address U.Stroth I-2. Logistics M.Ramisch I-3. Opening remarks H.Yamada II. Definition of the goal of CWGM5 II-1. Brief review.
ICC2004 Madison, Wisconsin The Multi-Pinch Experiment Outline PROTO-SPHERA purpose & aims Theoretical basis & analysis Multi-Pinch: a step towards PROTO-SPHERA.
The Reversed Field Pinch: on the path to fusion energy S.C. Prager September, 2006 FPA Symposium.
ELECTRON CYCLOTRON SYSTEM FOR KSTAR US-Korea Workshop Opportunities for Expanded Fusion Science and Technology Collaborations with the KSTAR Project Presented.
Introduction to Spherical Tokamak
Physics Analysis for Equilibrium, Stability, and Divertors ARIES Power Plant Studies Charles Kessel, PPPL DOE Peer Review, UCSD August 17, 2000.
Physics of fusion power
Physics of fusion power
Proposals for Next Year’s MFE Activities C. Kessel, PPPL ARIES Project Meeting, Sept. 24, 2000.
Optimization of a Steady-State Tokamak-Based Power Plant Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA IEA Workshop 59 “Shape and.
IPP Stellarator Reactor perspective T. Andreeva, C.D. Beidler, E. Harmeyer, F. Herrnegger, Yu. Igitkhanov J. Kisslinger, H. Wobig O U T L I N E Helias.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 8 : The tokamak continued.
IAEA 2004 ICRH Experiments on the Spherical Tokamak Globus-M V.K.Gusev 1, F.V.Chernyshev 1, V.V.Dyachenko 1, Yu.V.Petrov 1, N.V.Sakharov 1, O.N.Shcherbinin.
D. Borba 1 21 st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Chengdu China 21 st October 2006 Excitation of Alfvén eigenmodes with sub-Alfvénic neutral beam ions in.
1 MHD for Fusion Where to Next? Jeff Freidberg MIT.
Predictive Integrated Modeling Simulations Using a Combination of H-mode Pedestal and Core Models Glenn Bateman, Arnold H. Kritz, Thawatchai Onjun, Alexei.
1 ST workshop 2008 Conception of LHCD Experiments on the Spherical Tokamak Globus-M O.N. Shcherbinin, V.V. Dyachenko, M.A. Irzak, S.A. Khitrov A.F.Ioffe.
Y. Sakamoto JAEA Japan-US Workshop on Fusion Power Plants and Related Technologies with participations from China and Korea February 26-28, 2013 at Kyoto.
1 ST workshop 2005 Numerical modeling and experimental study of ICR heating in the spherical tokamak Globus-M O.N.Shcherbinin, F.V.Chernyshev, V.V.Dyachenko,
Advanced Tokamak Plasmas and the Fusion Ignition Research Experiment Charles Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Spring APS, Philadelphia, 4/5/2003.
ASIPP EAST Overview Of The EAST In Vessel Components Upgraded Presented by Damao Yao.
TOTAL Simulation of ITER Plasmas Kozo YAMAZAKI Nagoya Univ., Chikusa-ku, Nagoya , Japan 1.
JT-60U Resistive Wall Mode (RWM) Study on JT-60U Go Matsunaga 松永 剛 Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Naka, Japan JSPS-CAS Core University Program 2008 in ASIPP.
Overview of MHD and extended MHD simulations of fusion plasmas Guo-Yong Fu Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Princeton, New Jersey, USA Workshop on ITER.
1 Modeling of EAST Divertor S. Zhu Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Excitation of ion temperature gradient and trapped electron modes in HL-2A tokamak The 3 th Annual Workshop on Fusion Simulation and Theory, Hefei, March.
V.I. Vasiliev, Yu.A. Kostsov, K.M. Lobanov, L.P. Makarova, A.B. Mineev, D.V.Efremov Scientific Research Institute of Electrophysical Apparatus, St.-Petersburg,
Physics of fusion power Lecture 10: tokamak – continued.
Discussions and Summary for Session 1 ‘Transport and Confinement in Burning Plasmas’ Yukitoshi MIURA JAERI Naka IEA Large Tokamak Workshop (W60) Burning.
NSTX-U NSTX-U PAC-31 Response to Questions – Day 1 Summary of Answers Q: Maximum pulse length at 1MA, 0.75T, 1 st year parameters? –A1: Full 5 seconds.
Current Drive for FIRE AT-Mode T.K. Mau University of California, San Diego Workshop on Physics Issues for FIRE May 1-3, 2000 Princeton Plasma Physics.
MHD Limits to Tokamak Operation and their Control Hartmut Zohm ASDEX Upgrade credits: G. Gantenbein (Stuttgart U), A. Keller, M. Maraschek, A. Mück DIII-D.
OPERATIONAL SCENARIO of KTM Dokuka V.N., Khayrutdinov R.R. TRINITI, Russia O u t l i n e Goal of the work The DINA code capabilities Formulation of the.
ARIES-AT Physics Overview presented by S.C. Jardin with input from C. Kessel, T. K. Mau, R. Miller, and the ARIES team US/Japan Workshop on Fusion Power.
PF1A upgrade physics review Presented by D. A. Gates With input from J.E. Menard and C.E. Kessel 10/27/04.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 9 : The tokamak continued.
DIII-D SHOT #87009 Observes a Plasma Disruption During Neutral Beam Heating At High Plasma Beta Callen et.al, Phys. Plasmas 6, 2963 (1999) Rapid loss of.
Recent Results of KSTAR
ASIPP Long pulse and high power LHCD plasmas on HT-7 Xu Qiang.
OPERATIONAL SCENARIO of KTM Dokuka V.N., Khayrutdinov R.R. TRINITI, Russia O u t l i n e Goal of the work The DINA code capabilities Formulation of the.
Progress on NSTX towards steady state at low aspect ratio D. A. Gates, Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory on behalf of the NSTX Research Team Supported.
EJD IAEA H-mode WS,, September 28, Overview Introduction — steady-state performance requirements -Global DIII-D and NSTX progress Plasma control.
Measurements of plasma turbulence by laser scattering in the Wendelstein 7-AS stellarator Nils P. Basse 1,2, S. Zoletnik, M. Saffman, P. K. Michelsen and.
ITER STEADY-STATE OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS A.R. Polevoi for ITER IT and HT contributors ITER-SS 1.
JT-60U -1- Access to High  p (advanced inductive) and Reversed Shear (steady state) plasmas in JT-60U S. Ide for the JT-60 Team Japan Atomic Energy Agency.
RFX workshop / /Valentin Igochine Page 1 Control of MHD instabilities. Similarities and differences between tokamak and RFP V. Igochine, T. Bolzonella,
PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION International Plan for ELM Control Studies Presented by M.R. Wade (for A. Leonard)
Improved performance in long-pulse ELMy H-mode plasmas with internal transport barrier in JT-60U N. Oyama, A. Isayama, T. Suzuki, Y. Koide, H. Takenaga,
Integrated Simulation of ELM Energy Loss Determined by Pedestal MHD and SOL Transport N. Hayashi, T. Takizuka, T. Ozeki, N. Aiba, N. Oyama JAEA Naka TH/4-2.
045-05/rs PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Taming The Physics For Commercial Fusion Power Plants ARIES Team Meeting.
20th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, 2004 Naka Fusion Research Establishment, Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute Stationary high confinement plasmas.
SMK – APS ‘06 1 NSTX Addresses Transport & Turbulence Issues Critical to Both Basic Toroidal Confinement and Future Devices NSTX offers a novel view into.
Advanced Tokamak Modeling for FIRE C. Kessel, PPPL NSO/PAC Meeting, University of Wisconsin, July 10-11, 2001.
Latest Results from the Globus-M Spherical Tokamak Yu.V. Petrov 1, A.G. Barsukov 2, V.K. Gusev 1, F.V. Chernyshev 1, I.N. Chugunov 1, V.E. Golant 1, V.V.
ZHENG Guo-yao, FENG Kai-ming, SHENG Guang-zhao 1) Southwestern Institute of Physics, Chengdu Simulation of plasma parameters for HCSB-DEMO by 1.5D plasma.
FY WEP TSG Goals & WEP-Relevant Diagnostic Upgrades NSTX Supported by WEP TSG Meeting September 14,
1 ASIPP Sawtooth Stabilization by Barely Trapped Energetic Electrons Produced by ECRH Zhou Deng, Wang Shaojie, Zhang Cheng Institute of Plasma Physics,
Long Pulse High Performance Plasma Scenario Development for NSTX C. Kessel and S. Kaye - providing TRANSP runs of specific discharges S.
Status of Upgrading Project of Tokamak T-15 E. Azizov 1), P. Khvostenko 1), I. Anashkin 1), V. Belyakov 2), E. Bondarchuk 2), O. Filatov 2), V. Krylov.
NIMROD Simulations of a DIII-D Plasma Disruption S. Kruger, D. Schnack (SAIC) April 27, 2004 Sherwood Fusion Theory Meeting, Missoula, MT.
A.D. Turnbull, R. Buttery, M. Choi, L.L Lao, S. Smith, H. St John
Influence of energetic ions on neoclassical tearing modes
Stabilization of m/n=1/1 fishbone by ECRH
Modelling of pulsed and steady-state DEMO scenarios G. Giruzzi et al
No ELM, Small ELM and Large ELM Strawman Scenarios
Presentation transcript:

Superconducting Tokamak T-15 Upgrade G.S. Kirnev, V.A. Alkhimovich, O.G. Filatov 1), V.V. Ilin, D.P. Ivanov, P.P. Khvostenko, N.A. Kirneva, D.A. Kislov, V.A. Kochin, G.P. Kostin, B.V. Kuteev, V.M. Leonov, V.E. Lukash, S.Yu. Medvedev, V.A. Mikhailichenko, A.V. Nikolaev, G.E. Notkin, V.D. Pustovitov, P.V. Savrukhin, V.P. Smirnov, M.M. Sokolov, V.S. Strelkov, G.N. Tilinin, A.S. Trubnikov, S.V. Tsaun, A.E. Ugrovatov, E.P. Velikhov, V.A. Vershkov, A.V. Zvonkov Nuclear Fusion Institute, RRC "Kurchatov Institute", Moscow, Russia 1) D. V. Efremov Scientific Research Institute of Electrophysical Apparatus, Metallostroy, , St. Petersburg, Russia

Abstract. The plans of upgrading the superconducting tokamak T-15 and the program of physics and technology research for the period from 2008 to 2022 are outlined. The technical modernization of the T-15 is aimed at formation of the elongated divertor configuration, increase of the plasma discharge duration up to 1000 s and the total heating power to 20 MW. Upgrade will allow fusion oriented research on the T-15 supporting the ITER and DEMO projects. Acknowledgements. This work is supported by Scientific School grant References. [1] BONDARCHUK, E. N., et al., Nuclear Technology Symposium, Utreht, Netherlands, v.2 (1988) 256. [2] ROZHANSKY, V., et al., Nucl. Fusion 41 (2001) 387. [3] PEREVERZEV, G.V., et al., Kurchatov Institute Report IAE-5358/6. [4] ZVONKOV, A.V., et al., Plasma Physics Reports 24 (1998) 389. [5] DEGTYAREV, L., et al., Comput. Phys. Commun. 103, 10 (1997).

Main technical objectives of the T-15 upgrade. substantial modernization of all technological systems with increase of their reliability; creation of the elongated separatrix magnetic configuration in the existing vacuum chamber; creation of equilibrium control system for elongated plasma; design, manufacturing and installation of the divertor in the existing vacuum chamber; modernization of the heating and current drive systems, increase of the heating power up to about 20 MW and pulse duration to 1000 s; design and manufacturing of the system of integrated control of stability, equilibrium, heating and confinement of high temperature plasma in real time using feedback control. Physical program of T-15 will be oriented on studies of: -quasi-stationary plasma discharge with high level of plasma heating and current drive; -real-time control of MHD activity and current and pressure profiles; -problems of divertor and plasma periphery; -plasma interaction with different materials including graphite, tungsten and lithium; -technology of the first wall maintenance; -energy and particle transport and turbulence.

a=78 cm, R=240 cm Magnetic system –Nb 3 Sn Last experimental campaign – 1995 Status of the T-15 (limiter configuration). ParameterDesignAchieved Magnetic field, T Plasma current, MA1.41 Pulse duration, s51.5 NBI, MW60.6 ECRH, MW51.5 DESIGN AND ACHIEVED PARAMETERS OF THE TOKAMAK T-15 (LIMITER CONFIGURATION) [1]. Start

Status of the T-15 upgrade. DESIGNED PARAMETERS OF THE TOKAMAK T-15 (DIVERTOR CONFIGURATION). ParameterValue Magnetic field, T3.5 Plasma current, MA1 Pulse duration, s5 / 25 / 1000 Minor radius, m0.42 Major radius, m2.43 Aspect ratio5.8 Elongation1.47 Triangularity (average)0.25 DivertorSingle-null NBI, MW9 ECRH, MW7 LHRH, MW4 The existing system of poloidal magnetic fields will be modified to provide the plasma elongation K ~ 1.5 and triangularity  ~ 0.3. The additional poloidal field coils will be installed inside the vacuum chamber to update the PC-system. Three coils at the bottom of the chamber form the divertor zone. The coil at the top will allow the triangularity control. Passive copper plates and active correction coils will be installed in the vacuum chamber at the outboard side of torus for VDE-stabilization of the plasma column and for active MHD experiments.

Magnetic divertor configuration of T-15. The magnetic configuration, divertor coil parameters and the target plate geometry will be optimized to provide flexibility of plasma shaping and divertor flow control. Also the specifications of divertor regimes (attached/detached) will be defined: divertor layout, X-point position, divertor leg length, pumping slots geometry, pumping speed, cryopanels allocation. Simulations of the SOL and divertor regions will be produced using two-dimensional divertor code B2SOLPS [2]. Preliminary estimations show that the detachment control is possible at the pumping speed higher than 100 m 3 /s ELONGATED MAGNETIC CONFIGURATION OF THE T-15.

The tokamak T-15 upgrade with divertor.

Milestones of T-15 tokamak upgrade. First stage ( ). Re-equipment of the engineering and diagnostic systems, integrated tests of the facility with circular limiter configuration, and installation of new in-vessel elements of the divertor, equilibrium and control systems. Plasma heating will be provided by neutral beam injectors (NBI) and gyrotrons (ECRH). Auxiliary heating power will be 16 MW with pulse duration 5 s (NBI 9 MW, ECRH 7 MW). Second stage ( ). Experiments with elongated configurations and divertor at pulse duration up to 25 seconds. Heating power will be increased up to 20 MW. This will allow us to operate the tokamak in basic regimes. Third stage ( ). Modifications of the magnetic, heating and current drive systems essential for operation at 1000 s pulse duration are planned simultaneously with experimental program. Superconducting coils of poloidal field and thermal shield elements will be designed and installed within this period.

Method of heating NBI, MW999 ECRH, MW777 LHRH, MW44 Duration, s Design parameters of the plasma heating systems. Combination of neutral beams, electron cyclotron and low hybrid waves injection with total power up to 20 MW will be used for plasma heating and current drive. The heating complex will consist of 3x3MW NBI, 7x1MW gyrotrons and 2x2MW klystrons developed for long pulse duration: 5 (stage I), 25 (stage II), 1000 (stage III) seconds. The evolution of heating systems.

Basic scenarios of the tokamak T-15 upgrade. Three different scenarios reflect opportunities of T-15 operation in high performance modes: - high plasma density (regime I); - low density with fully non-inductive current (regime II); - high β N with fully non-inductive current (regime III). CALCULATED PLASMA PARAMETERS FOR THREE DIFFERENT REGIMES OF THE T-15. RegimeIIIIII I p, MA110.5 B t, T n, m (0.8 n Gr ) 3.56 (0.2 n Gr ) 7.2 (0.8 n Gr ) βTβT βNβN βpβp lili I OH (%) I bs (%) I CD (%) (I bs + I CD )/ I  Calculations of basic plasma scenarios and parameters were performed using the transport code ASTRA [3]. H-mode confinement scaling was used for plasma transport description. The efficiency of the current drive by EC waves was evaluated by the code OGRAY [4]. The heating power was assumed to be equal 16 MW for all cases (9MW NBI and 7 MW ECR).

In high density regime with the plasma current 1 MA, the density n e =1.44х10 20 м -3 (0.8 of the Greenwald density n Gr ) and the heating power 16 MW it is possible to reach core plasma temperatures T e, T i > 3 keV. Normalized beta is rather high (2.4) in this regime and it is close to that in the ITER inductive scenario. Reducing the plasma density to n e =0.5х10 20 м -3 results in the temperature rise above 6 keV. Basic scenarios of the tokamak T-15 upgrade. Regime I. Radial profiles of the density, electron and ion temperature and safety factor in regime I.

Availability of fully non-inductive regimes is significant for long pulse operation of T-15. The nominal 1 MA total current can be maintained using 9 MW NBICD and 7 MW ECCD for the density 3.6x10 19 m -3. The fraction of bootstrap current amounts to f b =0.2 in this regime. Non-inductive currents I cd generated by ECCD and NBI make possible the control of plasma current profiles in a wide range. In particular, the profiles with reversed shear can be created. Basic scenarios of the tokamak T-15 upgrade. Regime II. Radial profiles of the total current (J tot ), non-inductive current (J CD ) and bootstrap current (J bs ) in regime II.

Figure demonstrates possibilities of plasma operation with fully non- inductive current (0.5 MA) at high plasma density (0.8 n G ) and high normalized beta  N = Such regime where  N exceeds the ideal no- wall limit will be used for stability studies. In order to sustain high-β steady state operation in such regimes we plan to use ECCD for neoclassical tearing mode control and in-vessel coils for suppression of resistive wall modes. Radial profiles of the density, electron and ion temperature and safety factor in regime III. Basic scenarios of the tokamak T-15 upgrade. Regime III.

Radial profiles of the pressure gradient for regimes I, II and III. Expected profiles of the plasma pressure are marked by blue solid lines. Green dashed lines denote ballooning limits of the pressure gradients. The plasma pressure gradient for regimes I and II are below the ballooning limits. In regime III with high  N the pressure profile is close to marginal stability of the ballooning modes. Regime II is characterized by very large bootstrap current in the pedestal region that drives n=5 ideal mode. Strong type I ELMs extending up to q min location may be expected. MHD stability of the basic regimes. MHD plasma stability with respect to no-wall external kink, ballooning and Mercier instabilities was simulated by the code KINX [5].

Radial profiles of the normal displacement  of the n=1 mode (color lines) and the safety factor q (black line) calculated for regime III. Regime III is strongly unstable against n = 1 external mode. The mode n = 1 couples to m = 2 and 3 "infernal" harmonics. Therefore excitation of the external kink modes could be expected and experiments on the stability control and RWM suppression can be carried out. MHD stability of the basic regimes.

Conclusions. The upgrade of T-15 and directions of the experimental program for period of next 15 years are proposed. The successfully operated toroidal magnetic coils, vacuum vessel, basics of major technological systems will be kept as the basis of the device. The upgrade is aimed at creation of the device with noncircular cross section, divertor, plasma parameters interesting for fusion program and opportunities of long pulse operation. Modification of the T-15 tokamak will allow operation with large aspect ratio plasma with minor radius ~ 0.5 m. This tokamak will extend operational domain of ITER complementary machines. The national fusion research center will be established in RRC Kurchatov Institute on the basis of tokamak T-15 upgrade. It will integrate activity on tokamak research and magnetic fusion technology development in Russia and support staff training programs for ITER and DEMO.