P5 Meeting - Jan. 28-29, 20031 US LHC The Role of the LHC in US HEP Dan Green US CMS Program Manager January 28, 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
U.S. Department of Energy Brookhaven Science Associates BNL’s Role in High Energy Physics Thomas B.W. Kirk Associate Director for High Energy and Nuclear.
Advertisements

Position of the Czech Republic on the European Strategy in Particle Physics Current main activities in particle physics * Plans for the future Recommendations.
European Strategy for Particle Physics 2013 Preparatory group->Strategy group Individual town meetings Town meeting in Krakow: september 2012 Drafting.
DOE/NSF U.S. CMS Operations Program Review Closeout Report Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory March 10, 2015 Anadi Canepa, TRIUMF Anna Goussiou, University.
Beyond the ALCPG David B. MacFarlane Associate Laboratory Director for PPA.
Committee on Science, Engineering and Public Policy Board on Physics and Astronomy Committee on Setting Priorities for NSF’s Large Research Facility Projects.
HEPAP SUBPANEL Synopsis of the Long Range Plan for U.S. High Energy Physics Jon Bagger / Barry Barish Presentation to HEPAP October 29, 2001.
U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science Dr. Raymond Orbach February 25, 2003 Briefing for the Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee FY04 Budget.
February 19, 2008 FACET Review 1 Lab Overview and Future Onsite Facilities Persis S. Drell DirectorSLAC.
This is the last message in this gathering of North American PI’s with an interest in the INFN hosted SuperB project. I will try to deal with issues on.
UCSB CDF Group, DOE Site visit, Jan 18, J. Incandela 1 Top Physics at CDF ++ Top Quark and New Physics with an eye toward the LHC Work completed.
Interdisciplinary and Interagency Cooperation in High Energy Physics Barry Barish BPA 5-Nov-02.
DATA PRESERVATION IN ALICE FEDERICO CARMINATI. MOTIVATION ALICE is a 150 M CHF investment by a large scientific community The ALICE data is unique and.
International collaboration in high energy physics experiments  All large high energy physics experiments today are strongly international.  A necessary.
October 24, 2000Milestones, Funding of USCMS S&C Matthias Kasemann1 US CMS Software and Computing Milestones and Funding Profiles Matthias Kasemann Fermilab.
12 Dec 2005 J. Schukraft1 ALICE USA ALICE position towards US participation EU participation in emcal Requirements Formal steps & schedule.
HEPAP and P5 Report DIET Federation Roundtable JSPS, Washington, DC; April 29, 2015 Andrew J. Lankford HEPAP Chair University of California, Irvine.
Institute for Anything of the University of Everything Claudia-Elisabeth Wulz New Physics at the LHC C.-E. Wulz (Institute of High Energy Physics) 1 Institute.
A Communication Strategy for the FCC study James Gillies, Head of Communication, CERN FCC week 2015, 25 March 2015.
24 April 2015 FY 2016 Budget Request to Congress for DOE’s Office of Science Dr. Patricia M. Dehmer Acting Director, Office of Science
SLUO LHC Workshop: Closing RemarksPage 1 SLUO LHC Workshop: Closing Remarks David MacFarlane Associate Laboratory Directory for PPA.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy RHIC Users Meeting BNL; June 8, 2006 Gulshan Rai RHIC/AGS Users Meeting Gulshan Rai Program Manager for Heavy.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Peter Bond Deputy Director for Science and Technology October 29, 2005 New Frontiers at RHIC Workshop.
BESAC Dec Outline of the Report I. A Confluence of Scientific Opportunities: Why Invest Now in Theory and Computation in the Basic Energy Sciences?
P5 and the HEP Program A. Seiden Fermilab June 2, 2003.
Contractor Assurance System Peer Review April Page 1 NSTAR 2011 May 16, 2011 Jefferson Lab Hugh Montgomery.
US CMS/D0/CDF Jet/Met Workshop – Jan. 28, The CMS Physics Analysis Center - PAC Dan Green US CMS Program Manager Jan. 28, 2004.
DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, US CMS US CMS M&O Planning Dan Green US CMS Project Manager DOE/NSF Lehman Review, May 8-10, 2001.
1 HiGrade Kick-off Welcome to DESY Hamburg Zeuthen.
Recommendations on the scientific programme The PAC endorsed the main lines of the proposed long-term programme. The draft document is expected.
24-Aug-11 ILCSC -Mumbai Global Design Effort 1 ILC: Future after 2012 preserving GDE assets post-TDR pre-construction program.
BNL Tier 1 Service Planning & Monitoring Bruce G. Gibbard GDB 5-6 August 2006.
11 DOE Office of Science High Energy Physics Program AAAC Meeting October 15, 2009 National Science Foundation Dennis Kovar Associate Director of the Office.
DESY Photon Science XFEL official start of project: 5 June 2007 FLASH upgrade to 1 GeV done, cool down started PETRA III construction started 2 July 2007.
US LHC Accelerator Research Program Jim Strait For the BNL-FNAL-LBNL LHC Accelerator Collaboration DOE Meeting 18 April 2003 brookhaven - fermilab - berkeley.
Report from Fermilab Presentation to ICFA Symposium Daegu, Korea September 2005 Pier Oddone.
LIGO-G M Organization and Budget Gary Sanders NSF Operations Review Caltech, February 26, 2001.
1 BNL LARP Accelerator Physics Program Resources BNL role in national program BNL Accelerator Physics Program.
H.A. Neal, Status of the US LHC Research Program, Presentation to HEPAP, March 6, Status of the U.S. LHC Research Program A Presentation to HEPAP.
Director’s Comments on the BNL Strategic Plan RHIC/AGS Users Meeting May 29, 2008 Steve Vigdor, filling in for Sam Aronson.
J. Strait Fermilab 16 October 2006 Consideration on LHC upgrade from A US perspective.
Workshop on Women in Science and Engineering Latifa Elouadrhiri Jefferson Lab November 16, 2009.
1 Report of PAC for Particle Physics T. Hallman Presented by P. Spillantini JINR Scientific Council Meeting June 3-4, 2004 Dubna, Russia.
Outline  Introduction  Higgs Particle Searches for Origin of Mass  Grid Computing Effort  Linear Collider Detector R&D  Conclusions A Quest for the.
US LHC Accelerator Research Program (LARP) Background  Proposed in 2003 to coordinate efforts at US labs related to the LHC accelerator (as opposed to.
John Womersley 22 July John Womersley Where have I been? U of Florida Postdoc Florida State Assistant Professor Fermilab Scientist.
Department of Energy Office of Science  FY 2007 Request for Office of Science is 14% above FY 2006 Appropriation  FY 2007 Request for HEP is 8% above.
Sep/19/2008 Su Dong Stanford Student Orientation: Accelerator based Particle Physics1 Accelerator Based Particle Physics Su Dong Stanford Student Orientation.
Jefferson Lab’s Enabling Technologies: A Call for Strategic Planning W. OREN JLAB Engineering Division 9 February 2012.
News Y2K June 25, Summary of June 12 Face-to-Face Meeting.
Glion Colloquium / June Accelerating Science and Innovation R.-D. Heuer, CERN HL-LHC, Aix-les-Bains, 1 Oct ECFA HL-LHC Experiments Workshop.
John Womersley 1/13 Fermilab’s Future John Womersley Fermilab May 2004.
Open Science Grid in the U.S. Vicky White, Fermilab U.S. GDB Representative.
U.S. Activities on the High-Luminosity LHC: LARP Sustainability & Evolution as a Construction Project HiLumi-LARP Collaboration Meeting October 26, 2015.
P5 Report: The Particle Physics Roadmap 1 A. Seiden Fermilab May 14, 2007.
BNL Overview DOE Annual HEP Program Review Brookhaven National Laboratory April 17-19, 2006 Sam Aronson.
University Research Model Committee - Key points/issues - Other points/issues - New ideas - “University Model” issues in the report - Findings and Recommendations.
Nigel Lockyer Fermilab Operations Review 16 th -18 th May 2016 Fermilab in the Context of the DOE Mission.
FNAL Users’ Meeting– June Fermilab Users’ Meeting CMS Physics from Early LHC Running Dan Green Fermilab For the CMS Collaboration.
CMS Crosscut Operations and Research, Theory, Computing, University Involvement C. Young and B. Zhou.
CPM 2012, Fermilab D. MacFarlane & N. Holtkamp The Snowmass process and SLAC plans for HEP.
MAC meeting (12-13 January 2010) Machine Advisory Committee participants: B.Sharkov (ITEP/FAIR) P.Belochitskii (CERN) S.Ivanov (IHEP, Protvino) M.Steck.
1 CF lab review ; September 16-19, 2013, H.Weerts Budget and Activity Summary Slides with budget numbers and FTE summaries/activity for FY14 through FY16.
FNAL SCRF Review R. Kephart. What is this Review? FNAL has argued that SCRF technology is an “enabling” accelerator technology (much like superconducting.
Presentation to The US CMS Collaboration
DOE/NSF Lehman Review, May 8-10, 2001
LHC Science Goals & Objectives
MICE Project in the US: Completion of Efforts
HEP with Accelerators Outline Physics in progress Organization
SOLID Collaboration Meeting
Presentation transcript:

P5 Meeting - Jan , US LHC The Role of the LHC in US HEP Dan Green US CMS Program Manager January 28, 2003

P5 Meeting - Jan , US LHCOutlineOutline US LHC - Physics and Technology US Construction Projects - Leadership US LHC Planning for the Physics – The Research Program (RP) SoftWare and Computing (SWC) Maintenance and Operations (M&O) LHC Long Term Program – LHC Upgrades and Physics Reach.

P5 Meeting - Jan , US LHC LHC Physics - Priority HEPAP Subpanel on Long Range Planning Report puts a high priority on the Physics of the LHC (all quotes in this talk are from the Subpanel Report).

P5 Meeting - Jan , US LHC LHC - SM Higgs The LHC detectors are designed to find the SM Higgs. Low mass is covered by , ttH(bb), qqH(WW*,  ). A low mass Higgs has many accessible decay modes  couplings measured.

P5 Meeting - Jan , US LHC LHC - SUSY HEPAP Subpanel Report recognizes the importance of the SUSY search at LHC. Mass coverage up to ~ 3 TeV -> either prove or disprove SUSY hypothesis. Energy matters! One month at 1/10 design luminosity extends mass reach by a lot. LHC experiments must be ready on “week one” for new Physics.

P5 Meeting - Jan , US LHC LHC – Computing Grids The IT tools developed for LHC physics analysis are and will be vital to the advancement of global science. Grid computing will make a major impact in many areas of business and commerce. The leading role of LHC was recognized in the HEPAP Subpanel Report.

P5 Meeting - Jan , US LHC US and the LHC Accelerator HEPAP Subpanel Report recognizes that LHC accelerator work in the US (BNL, FNAL, and LBNL) sustains the enabling technology of future accelerators.

P5 Meeting - Jan , US LHC US LHC – Education and Outreach US LHC is very active in Education and Outreach work. Examples are Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU), Research Experience for Teachers (RET), and Quarknet (third year, 36 centers in the US)

P5 Meeting - Jan , US LHC US Role in the LHC Program The US is investing 531 M$, plus the efforts of many talented HEP physicists, in the LHC. The NP community may soon join. US physicists have achieved leadership roles in detector construction (e.g. R. Loveless – CMS ME), software and computing (e.g. D. Stickland – CMS SWC), and high- field superconducting quadrupole construction. It is essential to capitalize on that investment by ensuring that US physicists also play a leadership role in the analysis and publication of LHC data.

P5 Meeting - Jan , US LHC US Leadership in ATLAS, CMS HEPAP Subpanel Report recognizes US leadership and the need to sustain it during the Research program.

P5 Meeting - Jan , US LHC US LHC Construction Projects The 531 M$ investment has been wisely used. The Projects are on schedule (for 2005 ~ completion) and on budget. The US LHC Projects are progressing steadily toward completion.

P5 Meeting - Jan , US LHC U.S. ATLAS Institutions

P5 Meeting - Jan , US LHC Scientific Effort on ATLAS US ATLAS effort will ramp up by a factor ~ 2 by FY07 in anticipation of first LHC beam

P5 Meeting - Jan , US LHC US CMS 387 Members from 38 Institutions The US community is about 20 % of the entire LHC collaborations and is the largest single country within the collaborations. The US LHC collaborations are large and will continue to grow as the time for first beam approaches.

P5 Meeting - Jan , US LHC US LHC and the RP US CMS has made a survey of intent. It appears US CMS will grow by a factor ~ 2 by FY07. In addition, new groups will join before first beam.

P5 Meeting - Jan , US LHC LHC and US Demographics There are ~ 2000 HEP physicists (DOE+NSF), ~ 1500 experimenters. US LHC is presently ~ 300 and would need to redirect to ~ 600 grad students + postdocs + faculty. The US LHC community will be a substantial fraction of US HEP accelerator based experimenters by first beam.

P5 Meeting - Jan , US LHC Planning for the Physics The LHC schedule has slipped ~ 2 years. The US has maintained its schedule to complete in ~ SWC has already begun because U.S. physicists contribute to insure participation in the physics. The involvement is driven by the desire to do physics on day 1. In addition, considerable time is required to create and deploy the new, absolutely necessary Grid architecture. M&O has begun as needed in order to commission detector and accelerator systems built and delivered by the US. Again, we want to commission the detector to be ready for physics (for example a SUSY search) immediately after beam arrives.

P5 Meeting - Jan , US LHC LHC Physics in the US In US CMS, planning is in place for a “collaboratory” or virtual laboratory. Elements are Virtual Control Room (commissioning, shifts) and Physics Analysis Center ( teleconf, analysis groups). This support goes directly and solely to US HEP physicists.

P5 Meeting - Jan , US LHC US CMS M&O Estimated Personnel Needs Note the roll off of construction and the ramp up of M&O starting in FY05. BaBar Reality check – eng + techs

P5 Meeting - Jan , US LHC US ATLAS - Tier 1 Facility Staffing

P5 Meeting - Jan , US LHC US LHC Accelerator BNL – FNAL - LBNL The Construction Project is completing. The collaboration proposes to apply their expertise to LHC machine commissioning. Also they propose to develop Upgrades to extend the performance and physics reach of the LHC. These efforts give forefront research opportunities to US accelerator physicists and possibilities to extend US leadership in state-of-the art- accelerator technology, e.g. SC magnets.

P5 Meeting - Jan , US LHC US LHC Accelerator Research Program (RP) The US national labs have made a significant investment in and are making a significant contribution to the construction of the LHC. Leadership in IR design and construction Boost to accelerator technology at US labs. We should exploit and extend this investment by continuing the collaboration with CERN into commissioning, operating, and doing R&D for upgrades for the LHC program.

P5 Meeting - Jan , US LHC US LHC Accelerator RP The RP includes design of new IR for a high luminosity upgrade of LHC. The US labs are uniquely positioned to take an early lead in R&D for high performance Nb 3 Sn quads. The quads to be delivered in 2005 were designed in For a 2015 installation, design and R&D should begin no later than 2005 and be complete by 2011.

P5 Meeting - Jan , US LHC U.S. ATLAS Research Program US ATLAS has made resource loaded schedules for M&O, SWC, and Upgrade R&D. That planning leads to the US ATLAS RP Needs shown. The current cost estimates exceed the funding guidance – or budget authority - from DOE and NSF (BA) shown for comparison.

P5 Meeting - Jan , US LHC Cost Estimates for the RP The US LHC community has carefully estimated and scrubbed the costs for the Research Program. The US ATLAS + US CMS + Accelerator community estimate that more than 80 M$ support is needed in FY07 and beyond. Present planning within the guidance provided in the Budget Authority delays R&D for upgrades, slows the SWC ramp up, and reduces the contingency fund to a level which limits management agility.

P5 Meeting - Jan , US LHC HEP Funding DOE HEP funding is ~ constant at ~ 700 AY M$. The US LHC community, a large fraction of all US HEP accelerator based physicists, requests of DOE ~ AYM$ for US ATLAS, US CMS and the LHC Accelerator RP. From NSF the estimate is AYM$. Clearly the LHC is a great bargain.

P5 Meeting - Jan , US LHC Research Program - Upgrades HEPAP Subpanel Report gives strong support to LHC Upgrades. The present Budget Authority makes strong Upgrade R&D impossible in a timely fashion. Note that an upgrade is a very cost effective way to maximize the Physics output of the pre-existing LHC complex

P5 Meeting - Jan , US LHC LHC Upgrades The guidance – or Budget Authority - on RP funding means we must delay Upgrade R&D. Additional U.S. funds will also be needed after the R&D to upgrade the LHC and its detectors if the U.S. is to provide its appropriate share.

P5 Meeting - Jan , US LHC P5 and the LHC RP Construction Projects Research Program R&D in support of Upgrades P5 Prepare TDR for major Upgrade of LHC and/or detectors

P5 Meeting - Jan , US LHC LHC Physics and Upgrade In general mass reach is increased by ~ 1.5 TeV (25 %) for Z’, heavy SUSY squarks or gluinos or extra dimension mass scales. A ~ 20% measurement of the HHH coupling is possible for Higgs masses from ~150 to 200 GeV. However, to realize these improvements we need to launch the necessary accelerator R&D and maintain the capabilities of the LHC detectors by upgrading them in a modest fashion.

P5 Meeting - Jan , US LHCSummarySummary The Physics program available at the LHC is absolutely first class – with discovery potential and precision measurements possible. The technical edge given by advanced detectors, high field magnets and grid computing enables the LHC program and its US participants to stay on the frontier of our science. US physicists are in leadership positions in the LHC. This is made possible by the DOE/NSF investment. The gains realized from US investment are, and will continue to be, a great bargain. In order to realize that benefit, there must be sustained attention to the Research Program. Strong participation in the Physics analysis and Upgrades are crucial if the US is to maintain its leadership.