Check lists to mouse clicks Automation Session : WAO2012 1 The Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory is a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) research laboratory,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tevatron Beam Diagnostics: Boosting Collider Performance Vladimir Shiltsev, Ron Moore, Andreas Jansson FNAL/Accelerator Division.
Advertisements

1 Proton Upgrades at Fermilab Robert Zwaska Fermilab March 12, 2007 Midwest Accelerator Physics Collaboration Meeting Indiana University Cyclotron Facility.
RHIC Status Haixin Huang Time Meeting 02/1/2011. Jan. 26 Ring access for six hours to fix jet and many other jobs. Difficulty to provide 28X28 store overnight.
Re-commissioning the Recycler Storage Ring at Fermilab Martin Murphy, Fermilab Presented August 10, 2012 at SLAC National Laboratory for the Workshop on.
Paul Derwent 30 Nov 00 1 The Fermilab Accelerator Complex o Series of presentations  Overview of FNAL Accelerator Complex  Antiprotons: Stochastic Cooling.
F UEC - 6 Oct 06 Recent FNAL Collider Operations Ron Moore Fermilab – Tevatron Dept.
Opportunities for Experiments Based on Stored Muon Beams at Fermilab Milorad Popovic Jean-Francois Ostiguy Fermilab August, 2014.
Automated Beam Steering Software at FNAL Keith Engell Accelerator Controls.
Proton Plans at Fermilab Robert Zwaska - Fermilab Science and Engineering at Henderson- DUSEL Capstone Workshop Stony Brook University May 5, 2006 Outline.
F MI High Power Operation and Future Plans Ioanis Kourbanis (presented by Bruce Brown) HB2008 August 25, 2008.
Antiproton Source Capabilities and Issues Keith Gollwitzer & Valeri Lebedev Accelerator Division Fermilab 1.
F Shot Engineering Accelerator Advisory Committee Elvin Harms Fermilab Beams Division 13 May 2002.
Run II DOE Review - Booster Eric Prebys Booster Group Leader FNAL Beams Division.
INTRODUCTION  RECYCLER BPM – Original system not adequate to measure beam position precisely. It is being upgraded to meet the required physics precision.
Thursday 21/4 07:30: End of fill #1727. Beam dumped. ALICE compensator magnet fault. Delivered ~6.7 pb -1 in 7.5 h. 11:30 Stable beam # bunches/beam.
Proton Study Meeting 4/19/05 Eric Prebys 1 Proton Plan Stage I Eric Prebys.
F All Experimenters' Mtg - 28 Jul 03 Week in Review: 07/21/03 –07/28/03 Keith Gollwitzer – FNAL Stores and Operations Summary Standard Plots.
ION COMMISSIONING REVISITED 1 Thanks to: John Jowett, Walter Venturini. Matteo Solfaroli.
Luminosity expectations for the first years of CLIC operation CTC MJ.
F Proton Plan Eric Prebys, FNAL Accelerator Division.
 Advanced Accelerator Simulation Panagiotis Spentzouris Fermilab Computing Division (member of the SciDAC AST project)
Diagnostics in the Fermilab Proton Source (Linac + Booster) Eric Prebys FNAL Beams Division.
Run II Operational Status and Plans Run II Meeting October 28, 2004 Dave McGinnis.
The Main Injector Beam Position Monitor Front-End Software Luciano Piccoli, Stephen Foulkes, Margaret Votava and Charles Briegel Fermi National Accelerator.
All Experimenters' Mtg - Aug. 04, 2003 Week in Review: 07/28/03 –08/03/03 Doug Moehs – FNAL Stores and Operations Summary Standard Plots.
October 2002 Jean Slaughter SDA – Shot Data Analysis Outline Description of SDA Examples Plans for 2003 SDA is a system for acquiring and analyzing data.
Accelerator Issues Fermilab Antiproton Experiment Keith Gollwitzer Antiproton Source Department Accelerator Division Fermilab.
D. Still-FNAL/Tevatron HALO '03 Tevatron Collider II Halo Removal System Dean Still Fermilab Tevatron Department 5/21/2003 Motives for the Collider Run.
F Proton Plan Eric Prebys, FNAL Accelerator Division.
F All Experimenters' Mtg - 2 Jun 03 Weeks in Review: 05/19/03 –06/02/03 Keith Gollwitzer – FNAL Stores and Operations Summary Standard Plots.
Recent Work Towards Increasing the AP2 & Debuncher Aperture – Keith Gollwitzer – May 9, Recent Work Towards Increasing the AP2 & Debuncher Aperture.
Fermilab Run 2 Accelerator Status and Upgrades
Updated Overview of Run II Upgrade Plan Beam Instrumentation Bob Webber Run II Luminosity Upgrade Review February 2004.
Doug Michael Sep. 16, GeV protons 1.9 second cycle time 4x10 13 protons/pulse 0.4 MW! Single turn extraction (10  s) 4x10 20 protons/year 700.
Main Injector Beam Position Monitor Upgrade: Status and Plans Rob Kutschke All Experimenters’ Meeting April 3, 2006 Beams-doc-2217-v3.
9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements1 Tevatron BPM and BLM requirements Mike Martens.
Proton Plan PMG 2/22/07 E Prebys 1 Proton Plan Status January Eric Prebys.
Status of the Accelerator Complex Keith Gollwitzer Antiproton Source Accelerator Division Fermilab 2009 Fermilab Users’ Meeting.
Users' Mtg - 4 Jun 08 FNAL Accelerator Complex Status Ron Moore Fermilab – AD / Tevatron Dept.
F A Fermilab Roadmap Dave McGinnis May 28, f Fermilab Roadmap - McGinnis Timelines  Divide the road map into three parallel paths  ILC - Energy.
Early Beam Injection Scheme for the Fermilab Booster: A Path for Intensity Upgrade Chandra Bhat Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory DPF2015, ANN ARBOR,
F Record luminosities at the Tevatron & Future potentiality Steve Werkema Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Batavia, Illinois USA Asian Particle Accelerator.
F Possible Proton Capabilities at Fermilab Dave McGinnis April 16, 2007.
Robert R. Wilson Prize Talk John Peoples April APS Meeting: February 14,
F HCP 2007 Performance and Future of the Tevatron Ron Moore Fermilab - Tevatron Dept. Tevatron overview and performance Antiproton source + Recycler overview.
Beam time structures 1 At any particular instance of time there will be only one kind of beam in the MI. It will be either protons or anti-protons. The.
12/16/03Tev BPM requirements1 Tevatron BPM requirements Mike Martens.
F All Experimenters' Mtg - 6 Jan 03 Week in Review: 12/30/02 –1/05/03 Ron Moore – FNAL Store Summary – Best week! > 7 pb -1 Machine Studies/Maintenance.
Measurements of Intense Proton Beams using Optical Transition Radiation Vic Scarpine, Fermilab TIPP 2011 Chicago, IL June 10, 2011.
Guy Crockford, BE/OP/LHC, CERN WAO 2012 Automation in the SPS and LHC and its effect on operator skills The past 20 years have seen great advances in the.
Progress with Beam Report to LMC, Machine Coordination W10: Mike Lamont – Ralph Assmann Thanks to other machine coordinators, EIC’s, operators,
RHIC Status April 8, 2011 RSC Meeting Haixin Huang.
Fermilab Control System Jim Patrick - AD/Controls MaRIE Meeting March 9, 2016.
HB2008 – WG F: 27 Aug. S. Childress – Diagnostics_2MW 1 NuMI Beam Diagnostics and Control Steps to 2 MW S. Childress Fermilab.
Maximum Credible Beam Loss in the Main Injector D. Capista January 26, 2012.
Cons Gattuso 2/23/10 Status/Changes to Pbar Transfer Program.
Friday, Feb 12, 2010 Accelerator Status1 Accelerator Week in Review Part I: Regular 9am Scheduling Meeting –Crew Chief Summary –24 hour machine summaries.
Pre-Meeting Meeting Brian Drendel Accelerator Shift Plot.
SDA- Shot Data Analysis Jean Slaughter DOE Review July 21, 2003.
Operation Status of the RF Systems and Taiwan Photon Source
Automatic emittance measurement in the CERN 1.4 GeV Booster
The Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory is a U. S
Tuesday TOTEM and transverse loss map (1) OK
Summary of Week 16 G. Arduini, J. Wenninger
Reorganizations, Program Changes and Reduced Funding
Summary Thursday h21: Stable beams fill #1303.
Summary for LPC (March 7th, Ralph Assmann)
Summary Tuesday h23: Machine closed. Precycle started.
The Automation of the Sequencing of Accelerator Cycles and Events at Fermilab Stanley Johnson Fermilab Accelerator Operations.
Optimization of JLEIC Integrated Luminosity Without On-Energy Cooling*
Presentation transcript:

Check lists to mouse clicks Automation Session : WAO The Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory is a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) research laboratory, operated under DOE contract by Fermi Research Alliance (LLC), a joint partnership of the University of Chicago and the Universities Research Association (URA).

Abstract Automation Session : WAO Implementing system automation to increase productivity, improve efficiency, ensure repeatability, and reduce errors has become essential for complex accelerator operations. This presentation will address some of the positive and negative effects of automation on operations and operators using experiences and examples from the Fermilab Operations Department.

Overview Automation Session : WAO Intro Machines Operational Modes Automation Examples Accelerator Coordination Collider Anti-Proton Neutrino Production Operations Affects Pros Cons Maybes Summary

Machine Intro Proton Source Provides 8 GeV protons Booster Neutrino Beamline (MiniBoone) 8 GeV protons for neutrino production Main Injector 120 GeV proton for fixed target 120 GeV protons for anti-proton production 120 GeV protons for neutrino production 150 GeV protons and anti-protons for collider 8 GeV anti-protons Switchyard (Fixed Target) 120 GeV protons for Test Facility Anti-Proton Source 120 GeV protons to target 8 GeV anti-protons (pbars) NuMI beamline 120 GeV protons for neutrino production Tevatron Anti-proton on proton collider Recycler Ring 8 GeV anti-proton storage ring Automation Session : WAO2012 4

Operational Modes Automation Session : WAO Collider Store ~16 hours Fixed Target Approx. once per minute Neutrino Production NuMI (MINOS, MINER A) 350 kW ~0.5 Hz BNB (MiniBooNE) Hz Anti-Proton Production (Stacking) ~0.5 Hz rate 30 mA ~ 1hr Anti-Proton Transfer to Recycler (Stashing) 10 minutes Tevatron Shot Set Up ~ 1 hour Repeat ! Store NuMI BNB Stack to 30 mA Pbars in Recycler

Accelerator Coordination Maximize store hours, minimize shot set up time, don’t waste time transitioning between operational modes, and still deliver beam for neutrinos. The first step was better coordination through automation. Automation Session : WAO2012 6

Accelerator Coordination Automation Session : WAO Timeline Generator (TLG) Sets overall Accelerator Complex timing clock events (TCLK) to orchestrate beam delivery from machine to machine. Timelines built with modules Allows quick reconfiguration of operational modes One-Shot function Minimized impact of Shot Set Up and Pbar Transfers on beam delivered for NuMI and Pbar Production Sequencer Loading Increased efficiency of timeline transition during Shot Set Up and Pbar Transfers Replaced Operators building individual timelines for mode changes Increased efficiency and reduced errors Protons on NuMI target during Tevatron shot setup hours Protons on target (10 16 ) 9.07x10 16 POT 8.81x10 16 POT 6.64x10 16 POT Impact thanks to sequencer and timeline changes

Accelerator Coordination Automation Session : WAO State Devices Provide persistent conditions, triggers and informational messages through Accelerator Control Network (ACNET) parameters When a state device is set, it is reflected to the rest of the control system Multicast Registered listeners (Sequencers) Sequencer can set state devices Tevatron States Recycler States

Accelerator Coordination Automation Session : WAO “Smarter” Sequencer Separate sequencer instances for TeV, MI, Pbar, Recycler Sequencer issues high level control commands Changes Timeline Launch programs and scripts for complex operations ( Tev_Auto_Closure) Listens too and sets State Devices to provide synchronization ( V:RRTLG ) Implemented to improve efficiency of Shot Set Up and Pbar Transfers to Recycler

Collider Automation Focus on reducing the shot set up time, and build some tools to be proactive and increase productivity. Automation Session : WAO

Collider Automation Automation Session : WAO Automated Injection Closure program Forward and Reverse injection Tune Tracker (PPLL) Provided continuous measurement of Tev tunes during tune up, ramp and squeeze Monitor tune drift during the store Alarmed when out of tolerance Manual Correction Improved response time to maintain stable tunes throughout the store Chromaticity Tracker Auto Chromaticity Measurement Program Set the chromaticities, and coupling for Tevatron Shot setup

Collider Automation Automation Session : WAO Automated Collimators to remove halo at IP Beam intensity and loss monitor feedback Reduced time from 30 to 10 min. Orbit Stabilization Program Orbit smoothed to a reference orbit file one time at lowbeta, at Int collisions and at the end of a store. During a store, corrects the orbit every 30 sec. Implemented to correct orbit drift due to environmental factors and corrector failures. Proton bunched beam intensity Pbar bunched beam intensity F49 local BLM D49 local BLM

Anti-Proton Automation Increase the repeatability and consistency of the beam conditions for the anti-protons. Normalize the results with automation. Automation Session : WAO

Anti-Proton Automation Automation Session : WAO Beam Line Tuner 120 GeV proton trajectory in 3 beamlines prior to the Pbar target and 8 GeV secondary beam after the target. Replaced Operators target tuning. Stacktail Monitor Regulates stacktail momentum cooling power Core Babysitter Core momentum cooling power regulation

Results Pbar TransferTevatron Shot Set Up Automation Session : WAO

Neutrino Production With all this collider and pbar production who has time to make neutrinos? Automation Session : WAO

Neutrino Production Automation Session : WAO Booster Neutrino Beamline Tuner (MiniBoone) Target position stability 2-5 Hz rate NuMI Beamline Tuner Target position 100µm rms 350 kW beam power on target MINOS, MINER A 700 kW NO A (future)

Affects on Operators/Operations What does this button do? Automation Session : WAO

Affects on Operators/Operations Automation Session : WAO Process/System knowledge suffers. Slows learning. A good operator will learn it. Operations becomes more expert dependent. First response is to call someone. Difficult to operate in a non-standard configuration. Large pbar stack sizes. Requires more attention in training Don’t just know that it works, know how it works.

Affects on Operators/Operations Automation Session : WAO Increase productivity. Focus on areas that have no automation. Expands our responsibility. Different skills are being developed More computer savvy, operators that write their own automation programs. Is this just the evolution of an operator at work?

Summary Automation when it’s done correctly improves reliability, reduces human error, increases productivity, and is a necessity for complex operations. Generally the benefits outweigh the drawbacks, and with effort, attention and training Operations can nearly eliminate them. Automation Session : WAO

Summary Automation Session : WAO Automation Improves reliability Reduces human error Increases accelerator productivity Is a necessity for complex operations Operations/Operators Will adjust and evolve

AUTOMATION Automation Session : WAO : the technique of making an apparatus, a process, or a system operate automaticallyautomatically 2: the state of being operated automatically 3: automatically controlled operation of an apparatus, process, or system by mechanical or electronic devices that take the place of human labor

Thank You. Automation Session : WAO