2015 University of Waterloo Clean Snowmobile. Philosophy  Develop a platform that meets competition objectives while providing a significant design challenge.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2014 Clean Snowmobile Challenge
Advertisements

Clean Snowmobile Challenge 2001 Seth MillhornDon Hancock Shawn KimbleyHeber Lemmon Zack BeelerJeremy Staab Patrick HessPhil Auth Karen DenBraven Making.
Direct Injection Reduced Emissions Improved Efficiency Presented By: Andrew Findlay Justin Johnson.
University of Buffalo, SUNY 2005 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge.
University of Minnesota Clean Snowmobile Team. Overview Our team Original snowmobile Design objectives Development process Current snowmobile 2.
Bi Fuel Automotive Technologies Who we Are Fyda Energy Solutions is in a partnership with Prins and American Alternative Fuel bringing practical Alternative.
0 BNSF Railway Alternative Fuels for Locomotives Discussion Points June 8 th, 2011.
Diesel Engines Transportation Mr. O’Rourke. History Invented in the 1890’s in Germany by Rudolf Diesel. Invented because of the inefficiency of steam.
Unit A 6-1 Mechanical Systems and Technology. Problem Area 6 Agricultural Power Systems.
© 2012 Delmar, Cengage Learning Intake and Exhaust Systems/ Turbochargers and Superchargers Chapter 42.
Direct Solution Design review Stake Holders  Sponsor: NIATT  Client: Karen DenBraven  Customer: UI CSC Team, Competition judges,
U NIVERSITY O F W ATERLOO T EAM E CO -S NOW. T EAM B ACKGROUND Team Eco-Snow is a student organization at the University of Waterloo The project is managed.
1 Presenters: Ozzie Goodman Zak Parker. Design Objectives  Create Efficient Snowmobile Fueled by 16%-32% Isobutanol  Emissions Reductions  Noise 
Engine Size and Measurements
Design Intent  Improve upon the Best Available Technology (BAT) standard of the power sports industry to enhance fuel efficiency while reducing emissions.
University of Wisconsin - Platteville 2014 Clean Snowmobile Team
Performance engine preparation Engine realities Production engines used as a base Designed for WOT 10% of the time RPM limits & improved components are.
University Of Maine Clean Snowmobile The Rock!. Introduction Maine – New England Snowmobiling! The Economic Impact –3000 full time equivalent jobs* –Jobs.
Development of a Flexible Fueled Snowmobile for the 2015 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge.
Different Types of IC Engine Rated by their maximum horsepower Three Types –Reciprocating –Rotary –Sustained Combustion.
2006 Michigan Tech Clean Snowmobile Matt Prusak - Team Leader Wes Barrett – Vice President.
Presented By Dillon Savage & Crystal Green UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO TWO-STROKE WITH DIRECT INJECTION AND SOUND REDUCTION.
Minnesota State University, Mankato X treme  AET Program  1989  TAC-ABET Accredited  140 Majors  The Team  Seven Seniors  Ten Undergraduates 
University Of Maine Clean Snowmobile The Rock!. Introduction Maine – New England Snowmobiling! The Economic Impact –3000 full time equivalent jobs* –Jobs.
Kettering University Clean Snowmobile Challenge March 23 rd – April 1 st, 2001 Presented by: Kyle Schwulst and Andrew Stahr.
University of Wisconsin Madison Presented by: Eric Schroeder Adam Schumacher 2005 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Design Presentation.
2005 Michigan Tech Clean Snowmobile Greg Davis David Meyer Advisor: Dr. Bernhard Bettig Incorporation of a High Performance, Four-Cylinder, Four-Stroke.
2015 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Rich Stueber Pryce Nutting.
The Diesel Engine The Combustion Cycle The four-stroke combustion cycle of the diesel engine is composed of the intake stroke, compression stroke, power.
Kettering University Presenters: Chad Swartz John Stimpson.
University of Minnesota Duluth 2014 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Joe Lofgren Brandon Salaba Kyle Schroer Kyle Levanen Dylan Dahlheimer UMD University.
Direct Injection Reduced Emissions Improved Efficiency Presented By: Andrew Findlay Russell Schiermeier.
University of Minnesota Duluth 2015 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Presented by: Dylan Dahlheimer Ryan Schefers Brenden Bungert Mark Boeckmann UMD University.
Development of a Flexible Fueled Snowmobile for the 2014 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge.
Minnesota State University Mankato Dylan Brandt, Nick Perkins, Abdulsalam Hamud, Wayne Minnichsoffer, Andrew Pickle.
Clean Snowmobile Challenge 2005 Minnesota State University, Mankato.
VARIABLE VALVE TIMING Submitted by: DIVYA CHAUDHARY 09ITMG1128ECE.
Lightweight Fuel Efficient Engine Package. Team Members Evan See, ME Chris Jones, ME John Scanlon, ME Stanley Fofano, EE Taylor Hattori, ME Brittany Borella,
Re-Engineering a 2015 Polaris Indy 2016 SAE Clean Snowmobile Competition Presented by: Pryce McDaniel, Josh McCoy, Mike Waloch 3/7/16.
FIVE STROKE I.C. ENGINE fi
Development of a Flexible Fueled Snowmobile for the 2016 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge.
University of Minnesota Clean Snowmobile Team. Overview Our Team Goals Design Objectives Development Process Current Snowmobile.
2016 University of Waterloo Clean Snowmobile. Philosophy ●Embrace design challenges ●Engage students and public through originality ●Open and safe learning.
University of Waterloo 2014 Clean Snowmobile. Strategy Four-stroke engine Weber MPE 750 Turbo (2 cyl) Lightweight cross-country chassis Better control.
Variable Geometry Turbocharger
University of Wisconsin-Platteville
Jeff Robinson Eric Gleich
University of Wisconsin Platteville 2017 CSC Diesel Team
Team Members Jacob Schofield - President Nels Eide – Driveline / Testing Mark Boeckmann - Engine Keith Propson – Sound / Exhaust.
University of Wisconsin - Platteville 2017 Clean Snowmobile Team
Clarkson University Electric Knights E54
Re-Engineering a 2015 Polaris Indy
Presented By Ian Sullivan
SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Design Presentation
University at Buffalo SAE Clean Snowmobile Team
2018 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Design Presentation
Clarkson Winter Knights
SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Design Presentation
Engine Operation Four-Stroke Cycle.
Who We Are Samuel Wick – President Blake Thurnbeck – Engine Packaging
Variable Geometry Turbocharger
University of Wisconsin-Platteville Clean Snowmobile
2017 University of Waterloo E62 Clean Snowmobile
2019 SAE CLEAN SNOWMOBILE CHALLENGE DESIGN PRESENTATION
SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge
University of Wisconsin-Platteville CSC CI Team
SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Design Presentation
University of Wisconsin – Platteville 2019 SI Snowmobile Team
University at Buffalo SAE Clean Snowmobile Team
Last Year’s Foundation
Presentation transcript:

2015 University of Waterloo Clean Snowmobile

Philosophy  Develop a platform that meets competition objectives while providing a significant design challenge and engaging student and public interest by being unconventional and exciting.  Provide an open and friendly environment in which students can gain experience and develop skills that will enrich their undergraduate experience and benefit them professionally.

Base Snowmobile  2013 Polaris Rush 600  Upgraded to align with 2014 Pro-R Model  Competition MSRP requires current model  Donated by Polaris Industries

Engine Selection  Weber MPE 750 Turbo  Originally used in Polaris FST models  750cc, 2 cylinder, four-stroke  7750rpm  Over 130hp limit  Less disincentive to de-tune

Design Process  Six criteria chosen to weigh against CSC scoring  Weighting represents impact based on prior experience  Used to evaluate relative merit of various design alternatives Efficiency20% Emissions21% Weight16% Power8% Noise18% Reliability17%

2015 Design  Miller Cycle conversion  Electronic throttle control  Stoichiometric calibration with three-way catalytic converter  2.86” pitch track  Large diameter rear idler wheels  Balanced approach of engine, control, and driveline efficiency  Systems with modularity and little inter-dependence  Contingency if a system was delayed/failed

Miller Cycle  Trade displacement (power) for efficiency  Power drops by ~15%, efficiency gain of ~3%  Expansion ratio is greater than compression ratio  More work per unit of air-fuel charge  Efficiency gain when maintaining trapped compression ratio  Achieved with higher compression piston and custom camshaft with late intake valve closing  Good way of increasing efficiency of a turbocharged engine without knocking

Miller Cycle  11:1 Piston  Forged aluminum  Lateral gas ports for top ring  Large accumulator groove between rings  Increased wrist pin lubrication  Custom Camshaft  Added 15° intake valve duration, retarded by 13.5°  Tradeoff between available grinds, approaching desired intake valve closure, and maintaining valve overlap

Miller Cycle  Snowmobiler Perspective  Better fuel economy  Engine still just as durable  Outfitter/Dealer Perspective  Modification is largely invisible to user  Engine durability  Environmental/Landowner Perspective  More complete burn (specific emissions)  More efficient (overall emissions)  Quieter (less effective displacement)

Electronic Throttle Control  Electronic Throttle Control ‘decouples’ user power demand from powertrain response  Reduce throttling losses  Can ‘damp’ transient response  Allows drastically different powertrain response without changing engine calibration  Same steady-state performance  Throttling losses in SI are significant at part load  Throttle opening is usually tied to power demand from rider  Good for normally aspirated systems  Turbocharged engines have other means of power modulation (wastegate or variable nozzle)  Counter-intuitive that turbocharger is ‘fighting’ throttle at part-load  Mechanical throttle control also transfers harsh transients from rider over bumps, etc

Electronic Throttle Control Motec M400 ECU Processes analog values from request unit Translation table, with throttle safety switch Motec DBW4 Independent feedback control of throttle bodies Emphasis on safety CAN Network Decentralized control Allows dedicated data-logger CAN Cable

Electronic Throttle Control

 Dealer/Outfitter/Manufacturer Perspective  System is modular (upgrade path, assembly line)  System is invisible to the user  System can be marketed as high-tech  Opportunity for different response based on rider experience  Environmental perspective  A ‘BAT’ package can use a smoother throttle response to reduce emissions from harsh transients  Snowmobiler Perspective  Improved fuel economy  Extraordinarily responsive if so desired  Extraordinarily forgiving if so desired  Expensive components are protected inside the snowmobile  Familiar throttle cable feel

Emissions After-Treatment  Three-Way Catalytic Converter  Effective way of dramatically reducing tailpipe emissions  Widely available technology  Integrated into muffler  Muffler fits inside sled – no more mogul-buster!  Completed assembly is ~11lb  No impedance of snowmobile manoeuverability  Next iteration will deal with increased backpressure

Drivetrain  Large diameter rear idler wheels  Reduce bearing and track losses at rear axle  Inelastic behaviour of track under bending strain  Proportional to strain, therefore proportional to curvature (inverse of wheel radius)  Rear idler wheels are the point of greatest curvature (7.125” diameter)  8” wheel reduces losses by around 10%

Drivetrain  2.86” Pitch Track  Camoplast ICE Attak XT, 120”  1.2” lug, pre-studded, 37lb  3lb savings over 2.52” pitch version (121”)  Use of pre-studded track allows for increased traction and control  Only 2lb heavier than the stock track for Pro-R

Challenges Encountered  Limited dynamometer availability  University requires their (part-time) operator present  Many teams vying for dyno time  Very little dynamometer tuning was performed  Cut short by alternator pulley excitement  Fabrication delays  Decreased occupancy limit in student machine shop with highest demand ever  Understaffing of engineering machine shop  Several critical components weren’t completed until last week

Summary  Snowmobiler Perspective  Four-stroke reliability and longevity  Capable of high performance  Premium suspension  Familiar look and feel  Dealer/Outfitter/Manufacturer Perspective  Modularity and configurability  Reliability/longevity  Environmental Perspective  Reduced fuel consumption  Reduced emissions

Questions?