What’s in Your Creek? Results of the 2009 Clackamas Basin Volunteer Monitoring Effort.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lawyer Creek Steelhead Trout Habitat Improvement Project presented by: Lewis Soil Conservation District.
Advertisements

Water Testing!.
Stream Monitoring in Loudoun County David Ward, Water Resources Engineer Department of Building and Development, Department of Building and Development,
Water Monitoring Lab. Why Test Water Quality? Water testing allows scientists and citizens to have a full understanding of what is affecting their stream.
Health of water determined by the balance between physical, chemical and biological variables. Physical variables=temperature, turbidity, and water movement.
Chris Nagai Nick Foster Christen Dschankilic Streams of Science.
H 2 whOa! The Governor’s Institute of Environmental Science & Technology- Water Group.
Water Pollution. Watershed A watershed is an area of land from which all the water drains to the same location, such as a stream, pond, lake, river, wetland.
Assessing Aquatic Ecosystems & Measurement. Aquatic Ecosystem Assessment The health of an aquatic ecosystem can be determined by examining a variety of.
Importance of Protecting Lake Trout. 250,000 lakes in Ontario 1% of these contain lake trout Central/eastern Ontario has >1/3 of lakes Provincial responsibility.
Restoration of Chamberlain Creek Amy Clinefelter Riparian Wetland Research Program Restoration of Chamberlain Creek Amy Clinefelter Riparian Wetland Research.
Fundamentals of River Restoration and Salmonid Fisheries OWEB, 1999, Fundamentals of River Restoration and Salmonid Fisheries OWEB, 1999, Fundamentals.
Water Monitoring. What/Why? Water testing Identifying water content Allows scientists to have a full understanding of what is affecting their stream or.
Water Quality.
Dylan Castle Earth and Physical Science Department Western Oregon University Monmouth, Oregon
Marilyn Murphy, David Plavcan, William Shepard, Donna Suevo, Jeff Thomas, Karen Trozzo, Timothy Woods and David Yezuita West Chester University July 2002.
Water Quality Burroughs Wellcome 2008 Elyse Howdershell Taylor Dozier Chudney Hill Shauntavia Sawyer.
Georgia Adopt-A-Stream Introduction Georgia Adopt-A-Stream 2 Martin Luther King Jr. Dr. SW Suite 1462 East Atlanta, Georgia
Part II: Water Quality Water quality refers to the condition of the water: Is it clean or is it polluted?
Name of presenter Date of presentation.  To help preserve and protect Wisconsin’s over 15,000 lakes and 86,000 miles of rivers.
Impacts of Land Development on Oregon’s Waters 2001.
Materials Transport & NSCD Material Classes Velocity to Transport Relationships York NSCD Restoration PSY CCREP.
REDUCING OUR FOOTPRINT Unit 3-1b How To Measure Water Quality
Guided Notes on the Human Impact on Land Resources
NC Division of Water Quality Water Quality Assessments and Local Watershed Plans.
Oregon Case Studies Ryan Johnson. Studies  The response of impounded sediment to a culvert replacement project on Sutter Creek, a tributary of Honey.
Soil Quality Measurement Unit: Soil Science Lesson 7.
Water quality and indicators are measurements of the substances in water beside water molecules that determine the healthiness of the water or its level.
WATER TEST REVIEW.  What percent of our planet is water?
Environmental Studies IDC3O3 Ms. Nguyen. * Amount of oxygen dissolved in water is a good indicator of water quality and the kinds of life it will support.
METHODS. Physical Methods Steam Profile Discharge Air Temperature Water Temperature Relative Humidity.
Warm-Up  What is it called when water enters the ground?  What do you think affects the rate at which water soaks into the soil? What type of soil do.
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
Kuskokwim Watershed Council Key Parameters for Baseline Water Quality Assessment © David Griso.
Kakanui Rachel Ozanne, Water Quality Scientist. Long-term (SOE) monitoring Water quality ~78 sites Monthly sampling.
Snapshot Event Monitoring Results for the Clackamas River Watershed Presented by PSU SWRP Summer Capstone August
Upper Scioto Watershed By: Nina Zalenski Alice Beckman-Jamison Kathryn Reilly.
Stream Pollution Assessment of Beaver Creek By Joe Wendtland and Loyal Wergedal.
Water Quality Indicators.
Ch. 1: “Watersheds and Wetlands” Lesson 1.5: “Factors That Affect Wetlands and Watersheds” Part 2.
Warm Up Complete the text dependent questions for the Water Scarcity text. Do your own work. Homework: Read 16C-21C answer ?’s 1-3, 5 p22C Read 24C-31C.
New Mexico Watershed Watch Your school name and river name This project funded by the NM Dept. Of Game & Fish and the Sports Fish Restoration Program.
Water Quality Indicators & Water Pollution. EPA - Environmental Protection Agency  Government agency responsible for protecting human health and the.
Water Quality Is it safe and healthy?. ● Certain substances can affect the taste or color of water, but are harmless unless present at very high levels.
Macroinvertebrates Little Creatures that tell us If our natural waterways are healthy.
1. Why is water important? Water shapes Earth’s surface and affects Earth’s weather and climates. Water needed for life. Living things are made up of.
Monitoring Water Quality for ecosystem health. Why Monitor? Under the Clean Water Act, EPA asks VA to enforce laws improving the quality of our streams,
Record notes in your notebook  Record at least 5 facts/ideas in your notebook.  Write down and answer the following questions:  What are“benthic macroinvertebrates”?
Indicators of Water Quality
Unit 7 Hydrosphere Day 11 Focus: Water Quality Indicators Turn in late flash cards 9-19 and projects NOW! Warm-up – ½ sheet – Analyze the table.
TITLE OF YOUR POSTER GOES HERE Student Names go here Science And Math Institute, Tacoma, Washington Abstract Introduction MethodsMethods Continued Discussion.
Dissolved Oxygen Pollution Types.
Effects of Stream Restoration: A Comparative Study of Pine Run in Felton, Pennsylvania Luke Mummert, Department of Biological Sciences, York College of.
Watershed Management Plan Summary of 2014 Activities/Progress Presented by: Matthew Bennett, MS December 2014.
Dodge County Water Monitoring Update
WATER QUALITY.
8.E.1 Understand the hydrosphere and the impact of humans on local systems and the effects of the hydrosphere on humans. 8.E.1.3 Predict the safety and.
Stream Ecology.
Point vs Nonpoint Source Pollution Water Quality Indicators notes
Fundamentals of River Restoration and Salmonid Fisheries OWEB, 1999, Fundamentals of River Restoration and Salmonid Fisheries Dylan Castle.
Watersheds Review Science 8 SOL.
5.2 Detection and Monitoring of Pollution
Using Bugs and GIS to Assess and Manage Watershed Health
INFO FROM: HEALTHY WATER, HEALTHY PEOPLE WATER QUALITY GUIDE
_________: the measure of how _________ water is due to _______________ ____________________. Turbidity cloudy suspended particles Definition:
Warmup QUIZ! Write three facts from the notes you took last night for homework.  Hope you did it!!!
Water quality.
Aquatic Ecology Envirothon
Water Quality Indicators & Water Pollution
Physical Variables of Water Health
Presentation transcript:

What’s in Your Creek? Results of the 2009 Clackamas Basin Volunteer Monitoring Effort.

What is SWRP? Student Watershed Research Project Started 1991  Saturday Academy  National Science Foundation Monitoring program  Watershed education  Data collection

SWRP Goals Accuracy & Reliability Reporting student findings Managing data Providing  Training  Equipment  Technical supplies

The Importance of Continuous Monitoring Urbanization & agriculture Critical habitats  Short term fluctuations Maintaining a record Can help to determine the success or failure of remediation measures

Day In Damascus – July 25, 2009

Day in Damascus – July 25, 2009 Local children interaction  Games & examples Water sample testing  3 hour testing window

Stream Chemistry Results Compared are 11 public sites and 8 private landowner sites Stream chemistry only provides a snapshot of what the overall health of the stream may be

Clackamas Basin sampling area Site Codes CLA – Clackamas River DCR – Deep Creek EGL – Eagle Creek CLE – Clear Creek ECK – Eagle Creek GCK – Goose Creek NFD – North Fork Deep Creek RCK – Rock Creek RCH – Richardson Creek

Temperature standard is < 17.8 ⁰C Only one public site sampled was higher than needed for salmonid breeding, at Goose Creek, which is a stagnant body of water. A trend is difficult to establish here, due to a lack of previously established baselines, but where comparable data exists, temperatures have risen.

Temperature standard is < 17.8 ⁰C NFD003 was the only private site that equaled the highest acceptable temperature in the 2009 survey, showing a 1.8 ⁰ C increase from Site DCR001 showed a decrease of 0.5C between 2008 and 2009, placing it beneath the critical threshold.

Standard for dissolved oxygen is > 8 mg/L All public sites showed sufficient levels of dissolved oxygen, except North Fork Deep Creek, and an unknown tributary that at the time of sampling was an isolated pool.

All private sites sampled in 2009 showed dissolved oxygen levels at or above DEQ standards for fish-bearing streams. All sites on North Fork Deep Creek showed declines in dissolved oxygen between 2008 and Standard for Dissolved Oxygen is > 8 mg/L

Standard for pH is between 6.5 – 8.5 All of the public sites sampled fell within acceptable range, with the exception of unknown tributary, which is slightly acidic at 6.4.

Standard for pH is between 6.5 – 8.5 pH readings at all private sites were within the accepted range. All of the sample sites on Deep Creek and North Fork Deep Creek became more basic between 2008 and 2009.

Standard value equals < 5 N.T.U. Turbidity measurements at the public sample sites were below the 5 NTU mark, with the exception of two stagnant stream sites, Goose Creek and the Unknown tributary of Richardson Creek. Sites NFD004 and RCK000 showed marked decreases in turbidity from 2008 to 2009, though it is possible that a recent storm event increased erosion in 2008 at the time of sampling.

Standard value equals < 5 N.T.U. Site NFD003, RCH001, and both Rock Creek sample sites were above Washington State guidelines for turbidity. However, all North Fork Deep Creek sample sites showed a decrease in turbidity from 2008 to 2009.

Standard Phosphorous concentration is < 0.10 mg/L Clear Creek, Richardson Creek, and Sieben Creek had values above the EPA recommendations at the public sites sampled. Rock Creek site 000 however, showed a near five-fold decrease in phosphorous concentrations, and now falls within acceptable standards.

Standard Phosphorous concentration is < 0.10 mg/L Two of the private sites sampled were above the EPA recommended limit, Deep Creek 001 and the unknown tributary 001 site. All private sites with data available from 2008 showed a significant decline in phosphorous levels in the 2009 study.

Standard for Ammonia concentration is < 0.03 mg/L Ammonia levels in three of the public sites were well above recommended levels, Eagle Creek, North Fork Deep Creek, and unknown tributary 002. There is not sufficient data from 2008 to draw any comparisons at the public sites.

Standard for Ammonia concentration is < 0.03 mg/L All but two of the private sample locations showed elevated levels of ammonia. The Rock Creek location site showed a six-fold increase in ammonia concentration between 2008 and 2009.

Standard Nitrate concentration is < 10 mg/L All public sites measured in 2009 were well below recommended surface level nitrate concentrations. Continuous monitoring could provide trendline data, and warn of long range increases in nitrate concentrations.

Standard Nitrate concentration is < 10 mg/L All private locations sampled were below the recommended surface concentrations in Most of the sites sampled in both 2008 and 2009 showed small increases in nitrate concentrations.

Data summary from public sites TemperatureTurbidityPhosphoruspHDOAmmoniaNitrate Macro status CLA Good CLE Fair CLE ECK Good EGL Exc GCK NFC NFD Poor RCH RCK Fair SEB UNK Average

Data summary from private sites TemperatureTurbidityPhosphoruspHDOAmmoniaNitrate Macro status CLE DCR EGL Exc. EGL NFD NFD NFD RCH RCH RCK RCK UNK Average

Juvenile Salmonid Found dead in North Fork Deep Creek at Boring Trail Station Could be negative sign, indicating poor stream conditions Could be a positive sign that salmon breeding is still occurring here Boring Trail Station is a restoration site

Macroinvertebrates Clackamas River Basin Tim Vidito – Tom Provost – Clayton Buck

What is a Macroinvertebrate? Any small insects with no backbone that can be seen with the naked eye Any small insects with no backbone that can be seen with the naked eye Stonefly Mayfly Caddisfly

Why study Macros? Determine the physical, chemical, and biological quality of a stream Determine the physical, chemical, and biological quality of a stream Reside in small areas throughout their lifespan Reside in small areas throughout their lifespan Show the effects of short and long term pollution Show the effects of short and long term pollution Assess the potential effects water quality can have on humans Assess the potential effects water quality can have on humans

Why is Monitoring Important? Drinking Drinking Swimming Swimming Crop irrigation Crop irrigation “If a stream is safe for macroinvertebrates, it is safe for us” “If a stream is safe for macroinvertebrates, it is safe for us” Technique Technique

Diversity Polluted Stream = high percentage of pollutant tolerant macroinvertebrates and limited amount of pollutant intolerant present Polluted Stream = high percentage of pollutant tolerant macroinvertebrates and limited amount of pollutant intolerant present Healthy Stream = high percentage of pollutant intolerant vs. pollutant tolerant Healthy Stream = high percentage of pollutant intolerant vs. pollutant tolerant Stonefly/Caddisfly vs Damselfly/True Flies Stonefly/Caddisfly vs Damselfly/True Flies

Metric Systems Pollution Sensitive Order Index- Are the Three EPT orders present? Caddisfly, Mayfly, and Stonefly Pollution Sensitive Order Index- Are the Three EPT orders present? Caddisfly, Mayfly, and Stonefly Tolerant Order Index- Are 50 percent or more pollutant tolerant organisms? Tolerant Order Index- Are 50 percent or more pollutant tolerant organisms? ADEQUATELIMITED Sensitive Organisms Present All 3 EPT orders present One or more EPT organisms absent % Tolerant Organisms <50% of total are tolerant >50% of total are tolerant

Pollution Sensitive Order Index Adequate Adequate Eagle Fern Park Eagle Fern Park Landowner at Eagle Creek Landowner at Eagle Creek Barton Park Barton Park Limited Limited Carver Park Carver Park Rock Creek Rock Creek Boring Trail Station Boring Trail Station

Tolerant Order Index Adequate Adequate Eagle Fern Park Eagle Fern Park Carver Park Carver Park Rock Creek Rock Creek Landowner at Eagle Creek Landowner at Eagle Creek Barton Park Barton Park Limited Limited Boring Trail Station Boring Trail Station

Boring Trail Station Dissolved Oxygen 8.3 mg/L Turbidity 3.75 NTU Sensitive Order Index Limited Tolerance Order Index Limited

Carver Park Dissolved Oxygen 8.7 mg/L Turbidity 1.54 NTU Sensitive Order Index Limited Tolerant Order Index Adequate

Rock Creek Dissolved Oxygen 10.0 mg/L Turbidity 1.21 NTU Sensitive Order Index Limited Tolerant Order Index Adequate

Eagle Fern Park Dissolved Oxygen 10.2 mg/L Turbidity 0.8 NTU Sensitive Order Index Adequate Tolerant Order Index Adequate

Landowner Eagle Creek Dissolved Oxygen 10.1 mg/L Turbidity 1.13 NTU Sensitive Order Index Adequate Tolerant Order Index Adequate

Barton Park Dissolved Oxygen 9.5 mg/L Turbidity 1.15 NTU Sensitive Order Index Adequate Tolerant Order Index Adequate

Conclusion Boring Trail Station Improvements Boring Trail Station Improvements Generalized Report- Snapshot Generalized Report- Snapshot Ways to keep stream healthy Ways to keep stream healthy The beginning of a new biological assessment for studying macroinvertebrates over the years The beginning of a new biological assessment for studying macroinvertebrates over the years

Conclusions Several trends are observed in between 2008 and 2009 data among the North Fork Deep Creek data, decreasing dissolved oxygen, increasing pH, and decreased turbidity. All comparable data show a decrease in phosphorous concentration between 2008 and More yearly and seasonal data is needed for adequate comparisons for all sites.

Conclusions Ammonia was a problem at several sites this year, likely due to decreased flow Turbidity was generally lower in 2009 than 2008, possibly due to storm events in 2008 Temperature continues to be problem, with most sites falling within two degrees of the maximum Seasonal fluctuations must be accounted for, and further testing would be useful at times of higher flow

Recommendations Continue monitoring of Clackamas Basin streams Control runoff that leads to excessive sedimentation and nutrient load Remove invasive species and replace with native plants and trees Make sure septic systems are properly maintained Don’t put yard debris, chemicals, or garbage near streams or riparian zones

Continue monitoring of Clackamas Basin streams Monitoring is the first step in ensuring clean water and healthy habitats Can catch potential problems before they become a threat to species like salmon

Urban settings increase storm runoff, causing channelization and erosion

Filtering runoff and “green streets” reduce sedimentation in urban areas

“Ditch Checks” effectively slow water, resulting in lower sediment loads in rural areas.

Contain excessive nutrient load Runoff from fertilizer use, both agricultural and residential is best controlled at the source Reduce the use of fertilizers and pesticides and use more efficient delivery methods.

Methods for improving the efficiency of irrigation systems Contour farming Holding ponds

Temperature control Preserve native riparian cover, and restore it where clearing has taken place Augment summer stream flows and improve efficiency of irrigation systems apps.dataintheclassroom.org/.../level2.html

The threat of inaction Headwaters of the lower Clackamas could cease to be spawning grounds for salmon The quality of drinking water could be affected, even becoming toxic

Healthy Streams Are Important to All of Us!

Ongoing Action The more community participation, the more meaningful the results Land owners can help by volunteering their stream frontage as a sample site Citizens can volunteer to be stream monitors to collect data, helping to make the data more complete and conclusive

Thank you: Clackamas River Basin Council & community partners: Clackamas River Water Water Environment Services

Want to get involved? Contact the Clackamas River Basin Council: By ~ By phone ~