Columbia University. Data source LibQUAL Service Quality Survey –Administered on a three-year cycle since 2003 –Adequacy Gap Scores from the 22 core questions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The LibQual+ CUL Assessment Working Group Jeff Carroll Joanna DiPasquale Joel Fine Andy Moore Nick Patterson Jennifer Rutner Chengzhi Wang January.
Advertisements

1 What Do Users Think of Us? Mining Three Years of CUL LibQUAL Data Liane O’Brien, Linda Miller, Xin Li May 21, 2008.
Studying Distance Students: Methods, Findings, Actions Fifteenth Distance Learning Services Conference Memphis, Tennessee April 20, 2012 Beth Avery and.
Reading Rodski: User Surveys Revisited The 25 th IATUL Annual Conference Krakow 2004 Dr. Grace Saw University of Queensland Cybrary Brisbane, Australia.
Measuring the Perceived Value of your IT Service Marin Stanek Director of Communications & Support A brief overview of TechQual+ Project
LibQUAL+ in the UK & Ireland: five years experience J. Stephen Town and Selena Lock, Cranfield University.
Bound for Disappointment Faculty and Journals at Research Institutions Jim Self University of Virginia Library USA 7 th Northumbria Conference Spier, South.
Library Service Quality Survey Results Yeo Pin Pin Li Ka Shing Library April 2013.
Listening To Our Users Queen’s 2010
Using Assessment Data to Improve Library Services Christopher Stewart Dean of Libraries, Illinois Institute of Technology Charles Uth, Head of Collection.
Navigating the Computer Science Literature With a little help from University Libraries Janet Fransen Engineering Librarian
DigiQUAL™ Regrounding LibQUAL+® for the Digital Library Environment: An Analysis of the DigiQUAL® Data Presented at 9 th Northumbria by.
1 Wymagania informacyjne uzytkownikow bibliotek akademickich 21 wieku Maria Anna Jankowska University of Idaho Library Biblioteki XXI wieku. Czy przetrwamy?
Julia Bauder, Grinnell College & Jenny Emanuel, University of Illinois Be Where our Faculty Are: Emerging Technology Use and Faculty Information Seeking.
ARL perspectives on accuracy in web analytics reporting on digital libraries CNI Fall 2013 Task Force Meeting Washington, DC December 9, 2013.
Using the Columbia Libraries CUSSW Orientation Presented by Alysse Jordan, MILS Social Work Librarian.
TM Project web site Quantitative Background for LibQUAL+ for LibQUAL+  A Total Market Survey Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson January.
LibQUAL+ and Beyond: Using Results Effectively 23 rd June 2008 Dr Darien Rossiter.
LibQUAL + ™ Data Summary An overview of the results of the LibQUAL+™ 2003 survey with comparisons to the 2001 survey.
LibQUAL Tales from Past Participants Vanderbilt University Library Flo Wilson, Deputy University Librarian
Alice’s Adventures in LibQual-Land Kitty Tynan Assistant Director for Public Services CUA Libraries All illustrations from The Victorian Web: A Tenniel.
L IB -V ALUE : T EACHING & L EARNING Rachel A. Fleming-May, Assistant Professor School of Information Sciences, The University of Tennessee.
UAA/APU CONSORTIUM LIBRARY 2008 LIBQUAL RESULTS. Number of Respondents UAAAPU Undergraduate1,388 Graduate267 Faculty233 Library Staff33 Staff157 Total2,078.
The votes are in! What next? Introduction to LibQUAL+ Workshop University of Westminster, London 21st January 2008 Selena Killick Association of Research.
WVU Libraries LibQual Surveys 2003, 2005, 2007 “ The WVU library system is outstanding. I honestly cannot think of anything that needs improvement within.
Reliability and Validity of 2004 LibQUAL+™ Scores for Different Language Translations Martha Kyrillidou Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson ALA Annual Conference.
Background on the SCONUL LibQUAL+ implementation Stephen Town, Cranfield University.
New Ways of Listening To Our Users: LibQUAL+ Queen’s.
Charting Library Service Quality Sheri Downer Auburn University Libraries.
Getting Staff Involved in Assessment at the University of Connecticut Libraries Brinley Franklin 17 August 2009.
How to participate in LibQUAL+ and effectively utilise the data.
Data Summary July 27, Dealing with Perceptions! Used to quantifiable quality (collection size, # of journals, etc.) Survey of opinions or perceptions.
LibQual 2013 Concordia University Montréal, Québec.
Faculty Survey Results Buswell Memorial Library, 2014.
The New Library User in Sweden: a LibQUAL+™ study 6th Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measures in Libraries and Information Services.
LibQUAL+ at Cranfield University Selena Lock LibQUAL+ International Results Meeting 17 th July 2006.
Frank Haulgren Collection Services Manager & Assessment Coordinator Western Libraries Lite 2010 Survey Results.
U SING ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUES TO GUIDE LIBRARY SERVICE IMPROVEMENTS Diane Wahl Beth Avery Annie Downey University of North Texas.
Background on the SCONUL LibQUAL+ implementation Stephen Town, Cranfield University.
January 17, 2005 Brinley Franklin Vice Provost, University Libraries University of Connecticut Libraries LibQual+™ Management Information.
UAA/APU CONSORTIUM LIBRARY 2011 LIBQUAL RESULTS APU Faculty Assembly – February 15, 2012.
Service priority alignment in Association of Research Libraries (ARL) member libraries Damon Jaggars & Shanna Smith University of Texas at Austin Jocelyn.
Using LibQUAL+™ Results Observations from ARL Program “Making Library Assessment Work” Steve Hiller University of Washington Libraries ARL Visiting Program.
Effectively utilising LibQUAL+ data J. Stephen Town.
LibQUAL+ Finding the right numbers Jim Self Management Information Services University of Virginia Library ALA Conference Washington DC June 25, 2007.
Re-Visioning the Future of University Libraries and Archives through LIBQUAL+ Cynthia Akers Associate Professor and Assessment Coordinator ESU Libraries.
June 25, 2007 ALA Washington, DC Emmanuel d’Alzon Library Assumption College Using Your LibQUAL+ Results Dr. Dawn Thistle Director of Library Services.
How to participate in LibQUAL+ and effectively utilise the data.
Background on the SCONUL LibQUAL+ implementation Stephen Town, Cranfield University.
Charting Library Service Quality Sheri Downer Auburn University Libraries.
Texas State University LibQUAL Survey 2015 Core Survey Section IC 1-8 Information Control Ray Uzwyshyn Director, Collections and Digital Services Texas.
By N. RAJINI Under the Guidance of M. SURULINATHI Assistant Professor Department of Library and Information Science.
LibQual at UAB Lister Hill Library Pat Higginbottom Associate Director for Public Services
LibQUAL Survey Results Customer Satisfaction Survey Spring 2005 Sidney Silverman Library Bergen Community College Analysis and Presentation by Mark Thompson,
On the road to service improvement: Exploring student understandings of the library Sophie Farrar The University of Notre Dame Australia.
LibQual+ Spring 2008 results and recommendations Library Assessment Working Group 11/19/2008 Library Faculty Meeting.
School of something FACULTY OF OTHER Leeds University Library LibQUAL+ at Leeds - one year on Pippa Jones Head of Customer Services, Leeds University Library.
Using LibQUAL+ to Rethink Public Services June 2003.
Our 2005 Survey Results. “….only customers judge quality; all other judgments are essentially irrelevant” Delivering Quality Service : Balancing Customer.
Listening to the Customer: Using Assessment Results to Make a Difference.
A half decade of partnership and the love affair continues….. LibQual+: A Total Market Survey with 22 Items and a Box ALA Midwinter Meeting January 17,
Library Assessment Tools & Technology
BY DR. M. MASOOM RAZA  AND ABDUS SAMIM
Results and Comparisons for SCONUL
International Results Meeting LibQUAL+TM
LibQUAL+® 2008 A summary of results from the Consortium of Church Libraries and Archives.
LibQUAL+ in the UK & Ireland: five years experience
Preservation efforts in the library community
What Do Users Think of Us? Mining Three Rounds of Cornell LibQUAL Data
Reading Radar Charts.
Presentation transcript:

Columbia University

Data source LibQUAL Service Quality Survey –Administered on a three-year cycle since 2003 –Adequacy Gap Scores from the 22 core questions –Adequacy Gap Score = Perceived Score – Minimum Score

Cornell Liaison Institute

Overall Core 22 Item Score - Faculty

Affect of Service Dimension Score - Faculty

Information Control Dimension Score - Faculty

Library as Place Dimension Score - Faculty

Making electronic resources accessible from my home or office

A library website enabling me to locate information on my own

The printed library materials I need for my work

The electronic information resources I need

Modern equipment that let’s me easily access needed information

Easy-to-use access tools that allow me to find things on my own

Making information easily accessible for independent use

Print and/or electronic journal collections I require for my work

Open-ended question sentiment analysis PositiveNegativeNeutralMixed 1. Affect of Service Information Control Library as Space General About the Survey Total

“The specialist support is excellent.“ Assistant Professor, History

Quality of Resources: Excellent; Quality of Librarians: Outstanding; Quality of Facilities: Excellent. Professor, Sciences

The librarians (from Butler, TC, Science and Engineering, Digital Humanities Center, and RBML) who've helped me with teaching and research projects have been consistently smart, responsive, and fantastic. I can't say enough about what great partners they are. Lecturer, Humanities

I'm extremely grateful to Butler for being at the forefront of the digital humanities, and for enabling me to do my research and writing from everywhere in the world. Professor, Humanities

Columbia libraries are a gold mine to me and I greatly appreciate the materials I can get access to and the assistance I get as and when needed. Adjunct Faculty, International and Public Affairs

The things I am most worried about are: de- accession of print publications, moving books offsite, and repurposing library space for either study spaces and digital projects. Everybody, myself included, likes digital resources, but to me a library is a place that houses BOOKS. Keep Butler this way! Professor, Humanities

Potential areas of impact Independence and sufficiency Interface Discovery Self sufficiency Independence

Feedback: Privacy Policy Feedback
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
About project: SlidePlayer Terms of Service

© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc. All rights reserved.