BigCal Reconstruction and Elastic Event Selection for GEp-III Andrew Puckett, MIT on behalf of the GEp-III Collaboration.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Advertisements

SBS Hadron and Electron Calorimeters Mark Jones. SBS Hadron and Electron Calorimeters Mark Jones Overview of GEn, GMn setup Overview of GEp setup The.
SBS Hadron and Electron Calorimeters Mark Jones 1 TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you delete this box.: AAA A.
Jin Huang Los Alamos National Lab.  Cited from March collaboration Meeting EC group Internal Communication Jin Huang 2 Preshower ID power drop significantly.
The performance of Strip-Fiber EM Calorimeter response uniformity, spatial resolution The 7th ACFA Workshop on Physics and Detector at Future Linear Collider.
SPD commissioning Ricci, Míriam, Daniel, Edu, Hugo et al. from 1.
30 March Global Mice Particle Identification Steve Kahn 30 March 2004 Mice Collaboration Meeting.
Directional Detectors and Digital Calorimeters Ed Norbeck and Yasar Onel University of Iowa For the 25 th Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics Big Sky,
Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition.
VELO Testbeam 2006 Tracking and Triggering Jianchun (JC) Wang Syracuse University VELO Testbeam and Software Review 09/05/2005 List of tasks 1)L0 trigger.
FMS review, Sep FPD/FMS: calibrations and offline reconstruction Measurements of inclusive  0 production Reconstruction algorithm - clustering.
The Time-of-Flight system of the PAMELA experiment: in-flight performances. Rita Carbone INFN and University of Napoli RICAP ’07, Rome,
Update on the Gas Ring Imaging Cherenkov (GRINCH) Detector for A 1 n using BigBite Todd Averett Department of Physics The College of William and Mary Williamsburg,
Zhihong Ye Hampton University Feb. 16 th 2010, APS Meeting, Washington DC Data Analysis Strategy to Obtain High Precision Missing Mass Spectra For E
Proton polarization measurements in π° photo-production --On behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III and GEp-2γ collaboration Wei Luo Lanzhou University.
Proton Form Factor ratio GEp/GMp with polarization method --on behalf of Jefferson lab GEp3 collaboration Wei Luo Lanzhou University, China April
The Transverse detector is made of an array of 256 scintillating fibers coupled to Avalanche PhotoDiodes (APD). The small size of the fibers (5X5mm) results.
Proton polarization measurements in π° photo- production --on behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III and GEp-2 γ collaboration 2010 Annual Fall Meeting.
PERFORMANCE OF THE MACRO LIMITED STREAMER TUBES IN DRIFT MODE FOR MEASUREMENTS OF MUON ENERGY - Use of the MACRO limited streamer tubes in drift mode -Use.
Status of W analysis in PHENIX Central Arm Kensuke Okada (RBRC) For the PHENIX collaboration RHIC Spin Collaboration meeting November 21, /21/20091K.Okada.
14/02/2007 Paolo Walter Cattaneo 1 1.Trigger analysis 2.Muon rate 3.Q distribution 4.Baseline 5.Pulse shape 6.Z measurement 7.Att measurement OUTLINE.
Experimental set-up Abstract Modeling of processes in the MCP PMT Timing and Cross-Talk Properties of BURLE Multi-Channel MCP PMTs S.Korpar a,b, R.Dolenec.
S PIN A SYMMETRIES ON THE N UCLEON E XPERIMENT ( E07-003) Anusha Liyanage Experiment Nuclear Physics Group Meeting Hampton University May 11, 2009.
Outrigger Timing Calibration & Reconstruction Milagro – 11/17/03 Shoup – 1 Purpose: To incorporate outrigger hits in event angle fitting Additionally incorporated.
Jin Huang M.I.T. Hall A Analysis Workshop Dec 14, JLab.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 EC / PCAL ENERGY CALIBRATION Cole Smith UVA PCAL EC Outline Why 2 calorimeters? Requirements Using.
Rosen07 Two-Photon Exchange Status Update James Johnson Northwestern University & Argonne National Lab For the Rosen07 Collaboration.
A N DY Status Commissioning with colliding beams (p  +p  at  s=500 GeV) L.C.Bland, for AnDY 8 March 2011 Time Meeting, BNL.
EAS Reconstruction with Cerenkov Photons Shower Simulation Reconstruction Algorithm Toy MC Study Two Detector Configuration Summary M.Z. Wang and C.C.
“End station A setup” data analysis Josef Uher. Outline Introduction to setup and analysis Quartz bar start counter MA and MCP PMT in the prototype.
Start Counter Collaboration Meeting September 2004 W. Boeglin FIU.
1 Energy loss correction for a crystal calorimeter He Miao Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing, P.R.China.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Calibration of the COSY-TOF STT & pp Elastic Analysis Sedigheh Jowzaee IKP Group Talk 11 July 2013.
Shashlyk FE-DAQ requirements Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA FE-DAQ workshop, Bodenmais April 2009.
The Electromagnetic Calorimeter – 2005 Operation J. Sowinski for the Collaboration and the Builders Indiana Univ. Michigan State Univ. ANL MIT BNL Penn.
BigCal Calibration E04-108& Wei Luo Lanzhou University, China January 2008 Hall C Users Meeting.
SksMinus status Hyperball collaboration meeting 2009/3/11 K. Shirotori.
ECAL PID1 Particle identification in ECAL Yuri Kharlov, Alexander Artamonov IHEP, Protvino CBM collaboration meeting
Lecture 9: Inelastic Scattering and Excited States 2/10/2003 Inelastic scattering refers to the process in which energy is transferred to the target,
1 A first look at the KEK tracker data with G4MICE Malcolm Ellis 2 nd December 2005.
Frank L. H. WolfsDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester Status of the TOF February 22, 2001 Straight-line tracking What have we learned?
Proton Charge Form Factor Measurement E. Cisbani INFN Rome – Sanità Group and Italian National Institute of Health 113/Oct/2011E. Cisbani / Proton FF.
Jefferson Laboratory Hall A SuperBigBite Spectrometer Data Acquisition System Alexandre Camsonne APS DNP 2013 October 24 th 2013 Hall A Jefferson Laboratory.
Start and Vertex Detector W. Boeglin, A.Klein Current Design: 3300 scintillating fibers 1mm diameter 3 double layers (1 axial, 2 stereo) cylindrical geometry.
GEp-III in Hall C Andrew Puckett, MIT On behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III Collaboration April 15, 2008.
June 6, 2006 CALOR 2006 E. Hays University of Chicago / Argonne National Lab VERITAS Imaging Calorimetry at Very High Energies.
00 Cooler CSB Direct or Extra Photons in d+d  0 Andrew Bacher for the CSB Cooler Collaboration ECT Trento, June 2005.
SANE Collaboration ( E07-003) Anusha Liyanage Hampton University January 12, 2010 Measurement Of the Proton Form Factor Ratio at High Q 2 by Using The.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
1 Chapter No. 17 Radiation Detection and Measurements, Glenn T. Knoll, Third edition (2000), John Willey. Measurement of Timing Properties.
Hall C Summer Workshop August 6, 2009 W. Luo Lanzhou University, China Analysis of GEp-III&2γ Inelastic Data --on behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III.
PMT time offset calibration (not completed) R.Sawada 27/Dec/2007.
A New Upper Limit for the Tau-Neutrino Magnetic Moment Reinhard Schwienhorst      ee ee
Siena, May A.Tonazzo –Performance of ATLAS MDT chambers /1 Performance of BIL tracking chambers for the ATLAS muon spectrometer A.Baroncelli,
3/06/06 CALOR 06Alexandre Zabi - Imperial College1 CMS ECAL Performance: Test Beam Results Alexandre Zabi on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group CMS ECAL.
1 Methods of PSD energy calibration. 2 Dependence of energy resolution on many factors Constant term is essential only for energy measurement of single.
Proposal for the after-pulse effect suppression  Observation of pulses and after-pulses  Shape measurement  Algorithm  Results  Efficiencies for after-pulse.
SANE Cherenkov - Bigcal Efficiency Update
PCAL Cosmic Ray Tests Progress Report C. Smith μ U V W MODULE 2
THE NEW FOCAL PLANE POLARIMETER
Sergey Abrahamyan Yerevan Physics Institute APEX collaboration
Example of DAQ Trigger issues for the SoLID experiment
HyCal Energy Calibration using dedicated Compton runs
SOS Cerenkov Purpose: provide PID for NA Cerenkov efficiency studies
GEANT Simulations and Track Reconstruction
Wei Luo Lanzhou University 2011 Hall C User Meeting January 14, 2011
SOS Cerenkov Purpose: provide PID for NA Cerenkov efficiency studies
August 19th 2013 Alexandre Camsonne
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Performance test of a RICH with time-of-flight information
Presentation transcript:

BigCal Reconstruction and Elastic Event Selection for GEp-III Andrew Puckett, MIT on behalf of the GEp-III Collaboration

Introduction Experiment E will measure the proton form factor ratio G E /G M to Q 2 of 8.5 GeV 2 using the polarization transfer method. Scattered protons are detected in the HMS using parts of the standard detector package—drift chambers and S1 scintillators. New scintillator S0 forms custom trigger. Transferred polarization is measured using a new FPP built by the collaboration (Dubna). BigCal, a large solid-angle electromagnetic calorimeter, detects the electron in coincidence with the proton and is part of the trigger. Timing and kinematic correlations between BigCal and HMS are used to reject inelastic backgrounds

HMS Detector Package for GEp Scintillators S1 and S0 (new): Trigger and timing HMS Drift Chambers: Track protons FPP Drift Chambers: Track scattered protons CH 2 Analyzer HMS Shower Counter

BigCal—Detect Scattered Electron 1744 lead-glass blocks equipped with PMTs 4” Al absorber in front reduces radiation damage Light source-- Lucite plate illuminated by LED via fiber

Floor Layout of BigCal

HMS Trigger Nominal Settings: 1.Require PMT at both ends of paddle to fire 2.Require S1X and S1Y for “S1” trigger 3.Require S1 and S0 for HMS trigger 4.Two different trigger types for HMS at T.S.—one for each paddle of S0 Different logic was used at different times to check efficiency Non-standard triggering affects TOF calibration

BigCal Trigger Apply high threshold to the analog sum of 64 PMT signals. Summed groups overlap vertically, improving efficiency To get best efficiency for this trigger, phototube gains must be fairly well-matched— calibrate HV using elastic ep.

Coincidence Trigger Trigger signals are timed so that BigCal trigger arrives first, about ns before HMS trigger This way, the HMS scintillators determine the timing of all ADC gates and TDC stops(or starts) for true coin. events. Width of coincidence timing window is  50 ns.

Trigger Rates Rates in this table in kHz

Trigger Rates, cont. Accidental coincidence rate estimate for kin. 5: 11.6 kHz HMS2 triggers (elastic paddle of S0) 621 kHz BigCal triggers True elastic rate < 1 kHz << HMS/BigCal rate Poisson Statistics—probability of random BigCal trigger given HMS trigger:

BigCal Reconstruction Three main tasks for GEp: 1. Energy reconstruction 2. Position reconstruction 3. Timing  Energy calibration can be updated continuously for elastic ep—straight- forward linear system.  Position requires shower shape determination  Timing—offsets and walk corrections

Cluster Finding Strategy 1.Find largest maximum 2.Build a cluster by adding nearest neighbors with hits 3.Work our way outward—allow clusters to expand freely in any direction 4.“Zero” hits in the current cluster 5.Repeat 1-4 with remaining hits until no more “maxima” are found

Energy Reconstruction Electron energy is known to within ~1% from HMS momentum/elastic kinematics Chi-squared minimization gives a system of linear equations in the calibration constants—determine as often as needed for GEp. Have to solve system of 1,744 equations!

BigCal Position Reconstruction Observable quantities are shower “moments”: energy-weighted mean block positions Moments vary with distance of electron impact point from center of max. block.

Shower Shape Determination Distance from block center varies non- linearly with measured moment Fit “S” correction to the distribution of impact point vs. cluster moment. Tracks incident at large angles have distorted shower shape

Position Resolution Using BigCal monte-carlo developed at Protvino, coordinate resolution betwen 4 mm and 1 cm is demonstrated Determination of true shower shape considerably more complicated This example has 4” absorber, ~1.2 GeV electrons

BigCal Timing Blocks are timed in groups of 8: 32x56/8 = 224 TDC channels The major correction to the measured time is an offset for the slightly (or very) different cable lengths. There is also a significant pulse- height dependence to the measured time that can be corrected for. Timing information is also available from TDCs of the sums of 64 used to form the trigger.

Cable Length Offset Hit times relative to BigCal trigger TDC hits come in at a nearly constant time relative to the trigger Find peak position in TDC spectrum to determine offset

Walk Correction Hit time has a significant pulse-height dependence Determine for each group of 8, do simple fit Apply correction to hit times Sample time-walk profiles for groups of 8

Cluster Timing Throw away TDC hits outside a window of about 150 ns (  ± 75 ns of BigCal trigger time). Such hits won't have corresponding ADC hits within the gate. Within clusters, find all TDC hits in corresponding groups of 8. If multiple hits, take the hit which best agrees with the maximum. Compute energy-weighted mean and rms times. Timing resolution ~3 ns

Elastic Event Selection HMS measures proton momentum and angles. With BPM and raster info, we can correct reconstructed target quantities to determine IP Correct BigCal angles using the ray from the HMS vertex to the reconstructed BigCal position In the case of multiple clusters, use HMS to pick the best cluster assuming elastic kinematics:

HMS momentum-angle correlation We can select elastic events by looking at  vs  in the HMS by itself. Some kinematics still have substantial inelastic backgrounds under elastic peak. To put FPP in HMS hut: –No PID capability (no gas/aerogel Cerenkov) –Limited timing resolution (no S2) Need BigCal to clean things up: –See effect of various BigCal cuts in figure-->

HMS momentum-angle correlation

HMS-BigCal Correlation

Remaining Tasks Use survey data to fine-tune geometry definition Check BPM/raster corrections Optimize cluster finding parameters/improve the code Improve/optimize parameter database for large-scale analysis Determine shower shape parameters from the data Write  0 reconstruction code for multi-cluster events

Conclusion BigCal is successfully serving its purpose as electron detector for GEp-III Some work remains to be done on analysis code (clustering/pions/shower shape/etc) but things looking good so far Clean elastic event selection for high Q 2 GEp-III and low-ε GEp-2g