Philosophical Method  Logic: A Calculus For Good Reason  Clarification, Not Obfuscation  Distinctions and Disambiguation  Examples and Counterexamples.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Basic Terms in Logic Michael Jhon M. Tamayao.
Advertisements

Discrete Mathematics University of Jazeera College of Information Technology & Design Khulood Ghazal Mathematical Reasoning Methods of Proof.
Rules of Inferences Section 1.5. Definitions Argument: is a sequence of propositions (premises) that end with a proposition called conclusion. Valid Argument:
Higher / Int.2 Philosophy 5. ” All are lunatics, but he who can analyze his delusion is called a philosopher.” Ambrose Bierce “ Those who lack the courage.
Euler’s circles Some A are not B. All B are C. Some A are not C. Algorithm = a method of solution guaranteed to give the right answer.
Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 More Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking
Chapter 1 The Logic of Compound Statements. Section 1.3 Valid & Invalid Arguments.
CS128 – Discrete Mathematics for Computer Science
This is Introductory Logic PHI 120 Get a syllabus online, if you don't already have one Presentation: "Good Arguments"
Uses for Truth Tables Determine the truth conditions for any compound statementDetermine the truth conditions for any compound statement Determine whether.
Logic 3 Tautological Implications and Tautological Equivalences
LogicandEvidence Scientific argument. Logic Reasoning –Deductive –Inductive.
Essential Deduction Techniques of Constructing Formal Expressions and Evaluating Attempts to Create Valid Arguments.
Essential Deduction Techniques of Constructing Formal Expressions Evaluating Attempts to Create Valid Arguments.
Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Geometry 1.0 – Students demonstrate understanding by identifying and giving examples of inductive and deductive reasoning.
Building Logical Arguments. Critical Thinking Skills Understand and use principles of scientific investigation Apply rules of formal and informal logic.
Discussion #9 1/9 Discussion #9 Tautologies and Contradictions.
Deductive reasoning.
Reasoning
Critical Thinking: A User’s Manual
1.5 Rules of Inference.
Causality, Reasoning in Research, and Why Science is Hard
2.5 Verifying Arguments Write arguments symbolically. Determine when arguments are valid or invalid. Recognize form of standard arguments. Recognize common.
CSCI 115 Chapter 2 Logic. CSCI 115 §2.1 Propositions and Logical Operations.
March 3, 2015Applied Discrete Mathematics Week 5: Mathematical Reasoning 1Arguments Just like a rule of inference, an argument consists of one or more.
Chapter 2 The Logic of Quantified Statements. Section 2.4 Arguments with Quantified Statements.
Reasoning Top-down biases symbolic distance effects semantic congruity effects Formal logic syllogisms conditional reasoning.
The Inverse Error Jeffrey Martinez Math 170 Dr. Lipika Deka 10/15/13.
Unit 1D Analyzing Arguments. TWO TYPES OF ARGUMENTS Inductive Deductive Arguments come in two basic types:
Deductive Reasoning Chapter 2 Lesson 4.
Question of the Day!  We shared a lot of examples of illogical arguments!  But how do you make a LOGICAL argument? What does your argument need? What.
Reasoning.
Critical Thinking (do quiz on page 21). Characteristics of a Good Critical Thinker (p. 23, 27) Truth Seeking Open Minded Analytic Systematic Persistent.
READING #4 “DEDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS” By Robert FitzGibbons from Making educational decisions: an introduction to Philosophy of Education (New York & London:
Chapter 3: Introduction to Logic. Logic Main goal: use logic to analyze arguments (claims) to see if they are valid or invalid. This is useful for math.
Section 2-2: Conditional Statements. Conditional A statement that can be written in If-then form symbol: If p —>, then q.
Aerospace Engineering Laboratory I
Theory of Knowledge Ms. Bauer
The construction of a formal argument
DEDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS The aim of this tutorial is to help you learn to recognize, analyze, and evaluate deductive arguments.
Syllogisms and Three Types of Hypothetical Syllogisms
Propositions and Arguments. What is a proposition? A proposition is a predicative sentence that only contains a subject and a predicate S is P.
Symbolic Logic ⊃ ≡ · v ~ ∴. What is a logical argument? Logic is the science of reasoning, proof, thinking, or inference. Logic allows us to analyze a.
Section 2.3: Deductive Reasoning
 Induction is the process of drawing a general conclusion from incomplete evidence.  You consider evidence you have seen or heard to draw a conclusion.
CT214 – Logical Foundations of Computing Darren Doherty Rm. 311 Dept. of Information Technology NUI Galway
Deductive Reasoning. Inductive: premise offers support and evidenceInductive: premise offers support and evidence Deductive: premises offers proof that.
Deductive reasoning.
Arguments with Quantified Statements
2. The Logic of Compound Statements Summary
a valid argument with true premises.
Lecture Notes 8 CS1502.
Logic.
Formal Logic CSC 333.
Inductive / Deductive reasoning
Jeffrey Martinez Math 170 Dr. Lipika Deka 10/15/13
Introduction to Logic PHIL 240 Sections
Validity and Soundness
Logic, Philosophical Tools Quiz Review…20 minutes 10/31
3.5 Symbolic Arguments.
CS 220: Discrete Structures and their Applications
Thinking Critically Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.
Inference Rules: Tautologies
The Method of Deduction
SUMMARY Logic and Reasoning.
Argumentation.
Propositional Logic 1) Introduction Copyright 2008, Scott Gray.
Evaluating Deductive Arguments
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Presentation transcript:

Philosophical Method  Logic: A Calculus For Good Reason  Clarification, Not Obfuscation  Distinctions and Disambiguation  Examples and Counterexamples  Revealing Our Deepest Convictions  Testing Our Principles and Definitions

Logic: Primary Philosophical Tool  Logic Gives Us Rules For Reasoning  Arguments And Their Parts  Premises  Sub and Main Conclusions  Note: Relation Between Premises and Conclusion Is What Matters  Calculus For Generating New Beliefs On Basis Of Old Ones

Types Of Argument: Two Main Forms Of Inference  Deductive Inference  Validity: If The Premises Are True, The Conclusion Must Be True  Distinguishing Validity From Truth  Arguments: Valid Or Invalid; Not True Or False  Premises: True Of False; Not Valid Or Invalid  Logicians Care More About Truth Preservation Than Truth  Soundness: Valid AND True Premises

Logical Schema  Symbolic Variables  Some Common Deductive Forms:  Categorical Syllogism  Modus Ponens  Modus Tollens

Non-Deductive Reasoning  Inductive Inference  Probability: If The Premises Are True, The Conclusion is Probably True  Inference To Next Case  Universal Generalization  Inference To Best Explanation  Appealing To Best Hypothesis  Fallacies