ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 2  Spring 2005 Paste a photo of team members with completed project here. Annotate this photo with names of team members.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 6  Spring 2010 Digital Sound Projection.
Advertisements

ECE 477 Design Review Team 13  Spring 2006 Elmer Chao (not pictured), Matt Cozza (not pictured), Joe Waugh (not pictured), Evan Zelkowitz (not pictured)
Team 7 / May 24, 2006 Web Based Automation & Security Client Capstone Design Advisor Prof. David Bourner Team Members Lloyd Emokpae (team Lead) Vikash.
S.W.A.T (Security Watching All the Time) Jeff Shin Tyler Stubbs Paul Kasemir Pavel Mayyak.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 7  Spring 2011 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members. Stuart Pulliam Will Granger Linda.
Jordan Wagner Justin Spencer Mark Sears John Jachna.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 14  Spring 2006 Jason, Nathanael, David, David.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 01  Fall 2013 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 4  Spring 2008 Zach Dicklin Amy Ritter Ian Bacon Eric Yee.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 14  Spring 2005 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members.
Solar Telematics System ECE 477 Design Review, Team 8, Spring 2012 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members. Craig Lechlitner,
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 16 − Spring 2013 Scott Stack Neil Kumar Jon Roose John Hubberts.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 09  Spring 2010 Luke Ethan Andy Dhruv.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 11  Spring 2005.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 8  Fall Outline Project overviewProject overview Block diagramBlock diagram Professional componentsProfessional.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 1  Fall 2005 Kwun Fung Yau Chad Carrie Zubin Rupawala Manoj Jacob.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 7  Spring 2011 Paste a photo of team members with completed project here. Annotate this photo with names of team members.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 2  Fall Outline Project overviewProject overview Project-specific success criteriaProject-specific success criteria.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 9  Fall 2005 Tim Miller Clif Barnes Drew Heinrich Steven Kady.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 7  Fall 2005 Tarun Siripurapu Nichole Mattson Colleen Shea Siddharth Sen.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 9  Fall 2004 Paste a photo of team members with completed project here. Annotate this photo with names of team members.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 2  Spring Outline Project overviewProject overview Project-specific success criteriaProject-specific success criteria.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 14  Spring 2005 BENNY PARICHEY RAKESH ANUBHAV.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 11  Fall 2005 ChadJeffMel Maruf.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 6  Spring 2005 Mike Lowe Eric SuJohn Parlindungan KamBiu Chan.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 12  Spring 2010 Paste a photo of team members with completed project here. Annotate this photo with names of team members.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 2  Spring 2006 Prashant Grimella Andy Brezinsky Tim Sendgikoski Clark Malmgren.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 14  Spring 2013 Paste a photo of team members with completed project here. Annotate this photo with names of team members.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 3  Spring 2005 Paste a photo of team members with completed project here. Annotate this photo with names of team members.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 12  Spring 2013 Xirong Ye Zongyang Zhu Chun Ta Huang Libo Dong.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 14  Spring 2012.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 10  Spring 2005 Jer-Wei Lam (Sean) Jacinto Chang Ming Sum Wong Kevin Muthuri Team Lead Web:
ECE 477 Design Review Team 8(SLOW)  Spring 2006.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 01  Spring 2014 Paste a photo of team members with completed project here. Annotate this photo with names of team members.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 7  Spring 2008 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 3  Spring Outline Project overviewProject overview Project-specific success criteriaProject-specific success criteria.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 4  Spring Outline Project overviewProject overview Block diagramBlock diagram Design challengesDesign challenges.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 11  Fall 2004 Jeff Killen Brandon Ade Drew Whipple Matt Compton.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 4  Spring 2006 Justin Thacker, Matt Kocsis, Ian Snyder, Dustin Poe.
1 © 2008 RoboRubik ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 11 – Spring 2008 Tyler Heck Dave Bukiet Erik Carron Casey Kloiber.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 1  Spring 2013 Zelun Tie Xin Jin Ranmin Chen Hang Xie.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 7  Spring 2005.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 01  Spring 2010 Mike Wei Jon SchwarzCarlo Mesina Bill Bergquist.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 9  Fall 2005 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members. Tim Miller Clif Barnes Drew Heinrich.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 10  Spring 2009 Scott Shaw Hussain Vasi Matt Sbai John Fawcett.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 4  Spring 2011 Petra M. Alex B. Alex G. Kim S.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 4 Spring Outline Project overviewProject overview Block diagramBlock diagram Design challengesDesign challenges.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 5  Spring Outline Project overviewProject overview Project-specific success criteriaProject-specific success criteria.
ECE 477 FINAL PRESENTATION TEAM 6  SPRING OUTLINE  Project overview  Block diagram  Design challenges  Individual contributions  Project demonstration.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 1  Spring 2009 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members.
ECE 477 Senior Design Group 10  Spring 2006 Jonathan Jared Jennifer Josh.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 22  Spring 2013 Paste a photo of team members with completed project here. Annotate this photo with names of team members.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 01  Fall Outline Project overviewProject overview Block diagramBlock diagram Design challengesDesign challenges.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 13  Spring 2008 Varun Srichand Anvesh Madhu.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 9  Fall 2009 DART.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 3  Spring 2005 “VoIP Connect” Ankur TrushalAshish Dushyant.
<Add team picture or relevant project picture here>
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 04  Spring 2010
ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 2  Spring 2005
ECE 477 Design Review Group 3  Fall 2005
ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 5  Spring 2005
ECE 477 Design Review Group 10  Spring 2005 I, Robotic Waitress
ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 3  Fall 2005
ECE 477 Design Review Group 10  Spring 2005 I, Robotic Waitress
ECE 477 Design Review Team 5  Fall 2006
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 1  Spring 2008
ECE 477 Design Review Team ??  Fall 2012
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 15  Spring 2010
ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 10  Spring 2005
Presentation transcript:

ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 2  Spring 2005 Paste a photo of team members with completed project here. Annotate this photo with names of team members.

Outline Project overviewProject overview Block diagramBlock diagram Professional componentsProfessional components Design componentsDesign components Success criteria demonstrationsSuccess criteria demonstrations Individual contributionsIndividual contributions Project summaryProject summary Questions / discussionQuestions / discussion

Project Overview Home security/monitoring systemHome security/monitoring system Highly flexible and expandable systemHighly flexible and expandable system –swappable cards/expansion slots Real time monitoring and alertsReal time monitoring and alerts –Status – Security is important to everybodySecurity is important to everybody

Block Diagram

Professional Components Constraint analysis and component selection rationaleConstraint analysis and component selection rationale Patent liability analysisPatent liability analysis Reliability and safety analysisReliability and safety analysis Ethical and environmental impact analysisEthical and environmental impact analysis

Constraint Analysis MicrocontrollerMicrocontroller –Ethernet interface –Simplicity in coding Dynamic C vs. CDynamic C vs. C Sensors Sensors –Powered by 12 V –Relays

Patent Liability Analysis Possible Doctrine of Equivalents InfringementPossible Doctrine of Equivalents Infringement –4,204,201 – Modular alarm System Patent is expiredPatent is expired –4,465,904 – Programmable alarm system Patent is expiredPatent is expired –4,567,557 – Building intelligence system Patent is expiredPatent is expired –4,581,606 – Central monitor for home security Patent is expiredPatent is expired Possible Literal InfringementPossible Literal Infringement –None

Reliability/Safety Analysis Four critical components analyzedFour critical components analyzed –Freescale MC9S12NE64 – MTTF 20.8 years –Atmel MEGA88 – MTTF 58.3 years –Sensor circuitry – MTTF 100 years –Horn circuitry – MTTF 1122 years High criticality failuresHigh criticality failures –Loss of sensor monitoring SoftwareSoftware Optical isolator failureOptical isolator failure

Ethical/Environmental Analysis Ethical IssuesEthical Issues –Prevent tampering with wires –Installation guidelines –Warning labels to prevent box from being tampered with –Alarm functioning in extreme conditions –Contents of case be secure Environmental IssuesEnvironmental Issues –PCB fabrication and disposal Lead and hazardous materialLead and hazardous material –Disposal of case Steel must be recycledSteel must be recycled –Disposal of smoke detector –Disposal of battery backup

Design Components Packaging design considerationsPackaging design considerations Schematic design considerationsSchematic design considerations PCB layout design considerationsPCB layout design considerations Software design considerationsSoftware design considerations

Packaging Design 1'x1'x6” 14 gauge steel box1'x1'x6” 14 gauge steel box Hinged and lockedHinged and locked Wall mountable, recessed designWall mountable, recessed design 20 in 2 for routing cables20 in 2 for routing cables External keypad mountExternal keypad mount

Schematic/Theory of Operation

Printed Circuit Board Different voltages on boardDifferent voltages on board Placement of Ethernet jacks and serial portPlacement of Ethernet jacks and serial port Kept bypass capacitors as close as possible to the main microcontrollerKept bypass capacitors as close as possible to the main microcontroller Avoided 90 degree tracesAvoided 90 degree traces Power was routed at the edges of the boardPower was routed at the edges of the board Special considerations were taken for the Ethernet connectorSpecial considerations were taken for the Ethernet connector

Main Circuit Board

Sensor Module Board

Keypad Module Board

Keypad PCB

Software Design Freescale HC9S12NE64Freescale HC9S12NE64 –Startup Code – Runs initialization code –Ethernet – Read and write Ethernet packets –HTTP – Contains code to run HTTP server –UDP – Sends and receives information from the Java applet to the microcontroller –SMTP – Sends through an SMPT server –Flash – Erases and writes to flash

Software Design Atmel ATMEGA88Atmel ATMEGA88 –Startup Code – Runs initialization code –Keypad – Controls the logic from receiving key presses –Keypad Status LED – Displays system status

Success Criteria Demonstrations 1.Ability to use a keypad to disarm the system - demo demo 2.Ability to detect smoke, intrusion, motion, glass break, etc. - demo demo 3.Ability to send calls as alerts if sensors are tripped - demo demo 4.Ability for real time monitoring & configuration of system via internet - demo demo 5.Ability to display status via LED - demo demo

Individual Contributions Team Leader – Brian StratmanTeam Leader – Brian Stratman Team Member 2 – Jacob SchroederTeam Member 2 – Jacob Schroeder Team Member 3 – Blake ShelbyTeam Member 3 – Blake Shelby Team Member 4 – Michael TammenTeam Member 4 – Michael Tammen

Team Leader – Brian Stratman Component Selection RationaleComponent Selection Rationale SoftwareSoftware –Design of structure –Implementation SchematicSchematic System DebuggingSystem Debugging

Member 2 – Jacob Schroeder Team WebpageTeam Webpage SoftwareSoftware –Java Applet –Message protocol –Static webpage –Backend server Patent Liability AnalysisPatent Liability Analysis Packaging DesignPackaging Design

Member 3 – Michael Tammen Schematic / PCB layoutSchematic / PCB layout PCB solderingPCB soldering Hardware debuggingHardware debugging Reliability and safety analysisReliability and safety analysis User ManualUser Manual

Member 4 – Blake Shelby Schematic / PCB layoutSchematic / PCB layout PCB solderingPCB soldering Hardware debuggingHardware debugging Environmental impact analysisEnvironmental impact analysis User ManualUser Manual

Project Summary What we have learnedWhat we have learned –Better understanding of how to take a design to fabrication –Actual understanding of how to use parts in a design rather than just knowing how they work

Project Summary Second iteration changesSecond iteration changes –Sensors wired directly to HC12

Questions / Discussion