Jeopardy The LawDataFiscal CentsCEIS PlanExtras Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Final Jeopardy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What is problem-solving? A decision making process that uses data 1. Problem Identification 2. Problem Analysis 3. Plan Development 4. Plan Implementation.
Advertisements

IDEA Final Report Process
Significant Disproportionality and CEIS Special Education Directors Meeting September 2010 Dr. Lanai Jennings Coordinator, Office of Special Programs.
Response to Intervention Funding Issues. The Question Is… Can RTI be an allowable part of a federally funded program? NOT Can federal funds pay for RTI?
Implementing RTI Using Title I, Title III, and CEIS Funds Key Issues for Decision-makers U.S. Department of Education 1.
Disproportionality in Special Education
Implementing RTI Using Title I, Title III, and CEIS Funds
Angela Tanner-Dean Diana Chang OSEP October 14, 2010.
IDEA and NCLB Accountability and Instruction for Students with Disabilities SCDN Presentation 9/06 Candace Shyer.
VESID UPDATES Patricia J. Geary 9/15/06.  Behavioral Interventions  IDEA Federal Regulations  State Assessments  State Performance Plan  Levels of.
The Role of the Educator in the IEP Process. A Little History… The 70’s 1. Public Law : Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.
Significant Disproportionality: Information and Expectations Oregon Department of Education Dianna Carrizales & Sara Berscheit.
Maintenance of Effort IV-B Funding LEA Level Special Education Services Kansas Department of Education Special Education Services.
Special Education Monitoring – IDEA Grant
April 2009 Copyright © 2008 Mississippi Department of Education Instructional Programs and Services Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS) April.
Disproportionality of Racial and Ethnic Groups in Special Education Significant Disproportionality and EIS versus Disproportionate Representation due to.
IDEA Reauthorization and Disproportionality Sammie Lambert, DECS KYCASE Summer Institute Lexington, Kentucky July 16, 2007.
Implementing RTI Using Title I, Title III, and CEIS Funds Key Issues for Decision-makers.
General Universal Level Targeted Level Intensive Level Bonus
UNDERSTANDING SPECIAL EDUCATION FUNDING How to account for IDEIA funds.
Indicator 4A & 4B Rates of Suspension & Expulsion Revised Methodology Identification of Significant Discrepancy DE-PBS Cadre December 1, 2011.
1 Early Childhood Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education Early Childhood Special Education Maria Synodi.
April 2010 Copyright © 2010 Mississippi Department of Education Mattie T. Updated Timeline and Goals.
Accountability for Results State Performance Plan improving educational results and functional outcomes for all children with disabilities…
Disproportionality Solutions Summit: “Turning it Around” **** Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS) U.S. Department of Education:
Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS). 34 CFR § : An LEA may not use more than 15 percent of the amount the LEA receives under Part B of.
Monitoring Significant Disproportionality in Special Education Systems Performance Review & Improvement Fall Training 2011.
1 Accountability Conference Education Service Center, Region 20 September 16, 2009.
Data Analysis & Disproportionality Nancy Fuhrman & Dani Scott Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
Significant Disproportionality Symptoms, Remedies and Treatments.
IDEA & Disproportionality Perry Williams, Ph.D. Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
Diversity in Special Education. What is Diversity Diversity is about difference – students in special education vary in many ways, and those in regular.
State Performance Plan (SPP) Annual Performance Report (APR) Dana Corriveau Bureau of Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education ConnCASEOctober.
Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools Programs for Exceptional Children State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance.
Office of Special Education Significant Disproportionality Teri Johnson Chapman, Ed.S. Director Office of Special Education May 28, 2015.
ANNUAL AND FINAL PERFORMANCE REPORTS 524B FORM REPORTING PERIOD BUDGET EXPENDITURES INDIRECT COST RATE PERFORMANCE MEASURES.
Exceptional Children Division Special Programs and Data Section IDEA Part B Grant Fiscal Monitoring Presented by: Antonia Johnson, IDEA Part B Consultant.
1 Connecticut State Department of Education American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA): Bureau of Special Education Teleconference May 21, 2009.
Data Management for Students with DisabilitiesData Management for Students with Disabilities Rachel Wilkinson – Data Coordinator, TDOERachel Wilkinson.
CT Speech Language Hearing Association March 26, 2010.
Texas State Performance Plan Data, Performance, Results TCASE Leadership Academy Fall 2008.
Kentucky Continuous Monitoring Process Spring 2012.
Utilizing Federal IDEA Special Education Funds Permissively to Serve At-Risk Students in General Education The Fiscal Mechanics of RTI and PBS.
D isproportionality O verrepresentation and Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
Tuesday, April 24, 2012 BUREAU OF INDIAN EDUCATION Division of Performance and Accountability Special Education Program 1.
COORDINATED EARLY INTERVENTION SERVICES CEIS 1.
State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (SPP/APR/CIPP) Buncombe County Schools 2013.
SPECIAL EDUCATION MONITORING – IDEA GRANT Jenifer Spear Office of Special Education Programs.
Title III: 101 Jacqueline A. Iribarren Ph.D. Title III, ESL & Bilingual Ed. Consultant October 20, 2011.
CASE KDE UPDATE Division of Learning Services March 11, 2011.
Equity in IDEA ___________________ NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING Michael Yudin Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services Ruth.
State Advisory Panel & Interagency Coordinating Council Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)Significant Disproportionality & Overview of SAP/ICC Website.
Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story.
Agenda Part I Recap of the Final Rule Part II Standard Methodology Part III Remedies Part IV Dates Part V Questions.
Proposed Significant Disproportionality New Data Collection Presenters: Robert Trombley, Richelle Davis.
Comprehensive CEIS and CEIS: Requirements, Challenges, and Resources
What is “Annual Determination?”
Disproportionality: Tier Two Monitoring Activities
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004
New Significant Disproportionality Regulations
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
CClick here to get started
Data Update State of California
Disproportionality Prevention Support
2019 OSEP Leadership Conference
Significant Disproportionality Fiscal Webinar
Significant Disproportionality Stakeholder Meeting
Significant Disproportionality
MDE Office of Special Education MAASE Updates
Presentation transcript:

Jeopardy The LawDataFiscal CentsCEIS PlanExtras Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Final Jeopardy

$100 Question from “The Law” Districts are required to use 15% of their federal funds to provide CEIS if determined to have significant disproportionality in any one of the following 3 areas.

$100 Answer from “The Law” Identification, Discipline and Placement

$200 Question from “The Law” Two sets of data must be collected from districts that provide CEIS.

$200 Answer from “The Law” The number of children who received CEIS and the number of children who subsequently receive special education services during the preceding two-year period

$300 Question from “The Law” True or False - Other districts, not required by the State, may opt to use up to 15% but are not governed by the same reporting requirements.

$300 Answer from “The Law” False - Optional districts must report the same data!

$400 Question from “The Law” CEIS shall not be provided to these 2 groups of students!

$400 Answer from “The Law” Preschool children and students with disabilities

$500 Question from “The Law” CEIS are provided to assist students in grades ____ with a special emphasis on ____.

$500 Answer from “The Law” K-12 with a special emphasis on K-3

$100 Question from “Data” The State may determine a district as having significant disproportionality for the identification of children with disabilities in 2 broad areas.

$100 Answer from “Data” “All Disabilities” and “Specific Disability Categories”

$200 Question from “Data” All significant disproportionality data are reviewed by these 2 areas.

$200 Answer from “Data” By Race and Ethnicity

$300 Question from “Data” Districts are determined to have significant disproportionality for the placement of children with disabilities in 3 areas.

$300 Answer from “Data” Less than 40% 40 – 79% Separate placement and settings

$400 Question from “Data” Districts are identified as having significant disproportionality for the discipline of children with disabilities relative to these 3 areas.

$400 Answer from “Data” Incidence, Duration and Type

$500 Question from “Data” True or False – If a district provides services for students removed greater than 10 days, then this data will not impact the district’s determination.

$500 Answer from “Data” False – The removal data are separate from this compliance reporting.

$100 Question from “Fiscal Cents” The CEIS funds shall be spent on 2 broad areas.

$100 Answer from “Fiscal Cents” Professional Development and Educational/Behavioral Evaluations, Services, and Supports

$200 Question from “Fiscal Cents” If a district does not use the entire budget allotted for CEIS, then this action must happen.

$200 Answer from “Fiscal Cents” The district must carryover the funds and use them the next fiscal year.

$300 Question from “Fiscal Cents” Upon completion of CEIS, the district must ensure appropriate procurement procedures and the remaining resources should be allocated in this department.

$300 Answer from “Fiscal Cents” The resources should be accounted for in special education.

$400 Question from “Fiscal Cents” True or False – The district is not required to use 15% of the preschool federal funds since the activities are not available for this targeted group.

$400 Answer from “Fiscal Cents” False – The district shall use 15% of ALL SPECIAL EDUCATION FEDERAL FUNDS.

$500 Question from “Fiscal Cents” Allotting CEIS funds for services and personnel previously provided by the district could be an example of this!

$500 Answer from “Fiscal Cents” Supplanting

$100 Question from “CEIS Plan” The district should always review _______ to appropriately identify the need for a particular CEIS!

$100 Answer from “CEIS Plan” Data

$200 Question from “CEIS Plan” Before selecting the intervention, the district should complete a review of ____ to ensure an appropriate decision!

$200 Answer from “CEIS Plan” Research

$300 Question from “CEIS Plan” The district should clearly identify a target audience for the CEIS to include the following!

$300 Answer from “CEIS Plan” School, Grade Levels, Students, etc

$400 Question from “CEIS Plan” To ensure the appropriate children receive CEIS, the district shall have a procedure to do these 3 things!

$400 Answer from “CEIS Plan” Entrance Criteria Progress Monitoring Exit Criteria

$500 Question from “CEIS Plan” True or False – Children may only enter and exit CEIS at the beginning and ending of a fiscal year!

$500 Answer from “CEIS Plan” False – The process should be fluid!

$100 Question from “Extras” True or False – Districts are required to use the 15% for the overidentification and underidentification of children with disabilities.

$100 Answer from “Extras” False – Underidentification does not impact the 15%.

$200 Question from “Extras” True or False – Districts’ evaluation of the CEIS is solely based on significantly disproportionate numbers!

$200 Answer from “Extras” False – Appropriate CEIS may take time to change your district’s numbers.

$300 Question from “Extras” All significantly disproportionate districts are required to complete 3 tasks!

$300 Answer from “Extras” Review policies, procedures and practices Use the 15% of federal funds Publicly report revised policies, procedures and practices

$400 Question from “Extras” True or False – Significant Disproportionality data are reported in the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.

$400 Answer from “Extras” False – This data are not reported in the SPP.

$500 Question from “Extras” CEIS will not be effective if the district does not ensure a plan for this procedure!

$500 Answer from “Extras” Fidelity of Implementation

Final Jeopardy Although significant disproportionality for discipline is determined by incidence, duration and type, name the discreet types of data that are reviewed.

Final Jeopardy Answer In-school suspension Out-of-school suspension Greater than 10 days 10 days or less Total number of removals