Stephan I. Tzenov STFC Daresbury Laboratory,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We have focused largely on a kinematics based approach to beam dynamics.  Most people find it more intuitive, at least when first.
Advertisements

Lect.3 Modeling in The Time Domain Basil Hamed
EMMA Magnet Design Ben Shepherd Magnetics and Radiation Sources Group ASTeC STFC Daresbury Laboratory.
Synchrotron Radiation What is it ? Rate of energy loss Longitudinal damping Transverse damping Quantum fluctuations Wigglers Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP)
Accelerators 2006 Roger Barlow 1: Wakefields 2: The NS-FFAG.
Analytical Treatment of Some Nonlinear Beam Dynamics Problems in Storage Rings J. Gao Laboratoire de L’Accélérateur Linéaire CNRS-IN2P3, FRANCE Journées.
Transverse optics 2: Hill’s equation Phase Space Emittance & Acceptance Matrix formalism Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP) 17 January 2012 Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP)
M. LindroosNUFACT06 School Accelerator Physics Transverse motion Mats Lindroos.
A new algorithm for the kinetic analysis of intra-beam scattering in storage rings. P.R.Zenkevich*,O. Boine-Frenkenheim**, A. Ye. Bolshakov* *ITEP, Moscow,
Basic Mathematics Rende Steerenberg BE/OP CERN Accelerator School Basic Accelerator Science & Technology at CERN 3 – 7 February 2014 – Chavannes de Bogis.
NON-SCALING FFAGs: questions needing answers Andy Wolski The Cockcroft Institute, and the University of Liverpool Department of Physics. BASROC-CONFORM.
Analytical Estimation of Dynamic Aperture Limited by Wigglers in a Storage Ring 高傑 J. Gao 弘毅 Laboratoire de L’Accélérateur Linéaire CNRS-IN2P3, FRANCE.
Lecture 3 - E. Wilson - 22 Oct 2014 –- Slide 1 Lecture 3 - Magnets and Transverse Dynamics I ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2014 E. J. N. Wilson.
The EMMA Project Rob Edgecock STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory & Huddersfield University.
The EMMA Project Rob Edgecock STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory & Huddersfield University *BNL, CERN, CI, FNAL, JAI, LPSC Grenoble, STFC, TRIUMF.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
Symplectic Tracking Routine Malte Titze, Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin, TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you delete this.
2002/7/04 College, London Beam Dynamics Studies of FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
Particle dynamics in electron FFAG Shinji Machida KEK FFAG04, October 13-16, 2004.
1 Status of EMMA Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 23 April, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
T. Satogata / Fall 2011 ODU Intro to Accel Physics 1 Introduction to Accelerator Physics Old Dominion University Nonlinear Dynamics Examples in Accelerator.
Novel Constant-Frequency Acceleration Technique for Nonscaling Muon FFAGs Shane Koscielniak, TRIUMF, October 2004 Classical scaling FFAGs (MURA) have geometrically.
The Two-Body Problem. The two-body problem The two-body problem: two point objects in 3D interacting with each other (closed system) Interaction between.
Studies on Lattice Calibration With Frequency Analysis of Betatron Motion R. Bartolini DIAMOND Light Source Ltd FMA workshop, Orsay, LURE, 1 st and 2 nd.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
1 EPIC SIMULATIONS V.S. Morozov, Y.S. Derbenev Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility A. Afanasev Hampton University R.P. Johnson Muons, Inc. Operated.
Serge Andrianov Theory of Symplectic Formalism for Spin-Orbit Tracking Institute for Nuclear Physics Forschungszentrum Juelich Saint-Petersburg State University,
EMMA Horizontal and Vertical Corrector Study David Kelliher ASTEC/CCLRC/RAL 14th April, 2007.
Design of an Isochronous FFAG Ring for Acceleration of Muons G.H. Rees RAL, UK.
1 MODELING MATTER AT NANOSCALES 4. Introduction to quantum treatments The variational method.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
Double RF system at IUCF Shaoheng Wang 06/15/04. Contents 1.Introduction of Double RF System 2.Phase modulation  Single cavity case  Double cavity case.
Characteristic vibrations of the field. LL2 section 52.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Containing a.
Phy 303: Classical Mechanics (2) Chapter 3 Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Mechanics.
E Levichev -- Dynamic Aperture of the SRFF Storage Ring Frontiers of Short Bunches in Storage Rings INFN-LNF, Frascati, 7-8 Nov 2005 DYNAMIC APERTURE OF.
Zeuten 19 - E. Wilson - 1/18/ Slide 1 Recap. of Transverse Dynamics E. Wilson – 15 th September 2003  Transverse Coordinates  Relativistic definitions.
Tuesday, 02 September 2008FFAG08, Manchester Stephan I. Tzenov1 Modeling the EMMA Lattice Stephan I. Tzenov and Bruno D. Muratori STFC Daresbury Laboratory,
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  In our earlier lectures, we found the general equations of motion  We initially considered only the linear fields, but now we will.
By Verena Kain CERN BE-OP. In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories.
Chapter 10 Rüdiger Schmidt (CERN) – Darmstadt TU , version E 2.4 Acceleration and longitudinal phase space.
Lecture 4 - E. Wilson - 23 Oct 2014 –- Slide 1 Lecture 4 - Transverse Optics II ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2014 E. J. N. Wilson.
E. Todesco, Milano Bicocca January-February 2016 Appendix A: A digression on mathematical methods in beam optics Ezio Todesco European Organization for.
Lecture 4 - E. Wilson –- Slide 1 Lecture 4 - Transverse Optics II ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2009 E. J. N. Wilson.
Lecture 4 Longitudinal Dynamics I Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis Directorate Office, CERN Department of Physics, University of Oxford ACAS School for Accelerator.
1 Tracking study of muon acceleration with FFAGs S. Machida RAL/ASTeC 6 December, ffag/machida_ ppt.
WIR SCHAFFEN WISSEN – HEUTE FÜR MORGEN Motion in an Undulator Sven Reiche :: SwissFEL Beam Dynamics Group :: Paul Scherrer Institute CERN Accelerator School.
Numerical Simulations for IOTA Dmitry Shatilov BINP & FNAL IOTA Meeting, FNAL, 23 February 2012.
Lecture 5 - E. Wilson - 6/29/ Slide 1 Lecture 5 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2014 E. J. N. Wilson.
Canonical Variables in MAD John Jowett J.M. Jowett, MAD-X meeting, 7/11/
Classical Mechanics Lagrangian Mechanics.
Longitudinal Dynamics of Charged Particle
Multi-Turn Extraction studies and PTC
Laboratoire de L’Accélérateur Linéaire
1 Thursday Week 2 Lecture Jeff Eldred Review
Quantum Two.
Lecture 4 - Transverse Optics II
Electron Rings Eduard Pozdeyev.
November 14, 2008 The meeting on RIKEN AVF Cyclotron Upgrade Progress report on activity plan Sergey Vorozhtsov.
Lecture 4 - Transverse Optics II
November 7, 2008 The meeting on RIKEN AVF Cyclotron Upgrade Progress report on activity plan Sergey Vorozhtsov.
G. A. Krafft Jefferson Lab Old Dominion University Lecture 3
Accelerator Physics G. A. Krafft, A. Bogacz, and H. Sayed
Accelerator Physics Coupling Control
Physics 417/517 Introduction to Particle Accelerator Physics
Lecture 5 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2009 E. J. N. Wilson.
Lecture 2 - Transverse motion
CCLRC Daresbury Laboratory
Lecture 5 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2015 E. J. N. Wilson.
Lecture 8 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS HT E. J. N. Wilson.
Presentation transcript:

Hamiltonian Description of the Dynamics of Particles in Non Scaling FFAG Machines Stephan I. Tzenov STFC Daresbury Laboratory, Accelerator Science and Technology Centre FFAG 2007, Grenoble, France 12 – 17 April 2007

Contents of the Presentation Introduction from First Principles The Synchro-Betatron Formalism and the Reference Orbit Accelerated Orbit and Dispersion The Betatron Motion and Twiss Parameters The Reference Orbit and Acceleration The Phase Motion Conclusions and Outlook 12 – 17 April 2007 FFAG 2007, Grenoble, France

Introduction from First Principles The milestone for analytical description of beam dynamics in both isochronous cyclotrons and FFAG machines is the Hamiltonian: where Expanding the square root in the small relative coordinate and momentum variables, we have the Hamiltonian decomposition: 12 – 17 April 2007 FFAG 2007, Grenoble, France

Introduction Continued… The coefficients a's have a very simple meaning: 12 – 17 April 2007 FFAG 2007, Grenoble, France

Introduction Continued… while the coefficients b’s can be expressed in terms of a’s as follows: Here the prime denotes differentiation with respect to the longitudinal variable s. In other words, this implies that provided the vertical component of the magnetic field and its derivatives with respect to the horizontal coordinate x are known in the median plane, one can in principle reconstruct the entire field chart. 12 – 17 April 2007 FFAG 2007, Grenoble, France

The Synchro-Betatron Formalism and the Reference Orbit The vertical component of the magnetic field in the median plane of the machine can be expressed as where The flutter function is periodic in the azimuthal variable, so that it can be expanded in a Fourier series: 12 – 17 April 2007 FFAG 2007, Grenoble, France

The Synchro-Betatron Formalism Continued… Let us introduce the relative variation of the vertical component of the magnetic field in the median plane under deviation from a fixed radius R Here we have denoted 12 – 17 April 2007 FFAG 2007, Grenoble, France

The Synchro-Betatron Formalism Continued… In the case of N-fold symmetry, the flutter function consists of a structural part including harmonics of the type n = kN and the rest (a non structural part), which is usually considered as a perturbation. Let us now write the first several coefficients a’s A design (reference) orbit with a reference momentum and reference angular velocity is defined according to the relation 12 – 17 April 2007 FFAG 2007, Grenoble, France

The Synchro-Betatron Formalism Continued… Using the explicit form of the mean field and the fact that it is a linear function in radius (in the case of EMMA), we obtain where for brevity we have denoted Typical range of angular velocity is from 1.9422 GHz – 995.3 MHz for energies in the range 10 MeV – 20 MeV, respectively. In terms of the azimuthal variable as an independent variable, we can rewrite the Hamiltonian as follows 12 – 17 April 2007 FFAG 2007, Grenoble, France

The Synchro-Betatron Formalism Continued… Here we have introduced the following notations: The reference orbit can be defined via a canonical transformation FFAG 2007, Grenoble, France 12 – 17 April 2007

The Synchro-Betatron Formalism Continued… The equations determining the reference orbit read as How the above formalism work for EMMA? The vertical component of the magnetic field in the median plane can be written as where d is the offset from the benchmark radius in the defocusing qudrupoles. Further, With the above in hand, one can express the Fourier decomposition of the flutter and its derivatives, the deviation from a fixed radius, deviation from the ideal isochronous field, etc. 12 – 17 April 2007 FFAG 2007, Grenoble, France

Accelerated Orbit and Dispersion Consider a canonical transformation specified by the generating function aiming at cancelling the first term in the linear part of the Hamiltonian. We have The latter defines the so-called "accelerated orbit" rather than equilibrium orbit, because it is superimposed on the reference orbit, which is NOT a closed curve. The equations determining the accelerated orbit are The new Hamiltonian can be written as 12 – 17 April 2007 FFAG 2007, Grenoble, France

Accelerated Orbit and Dispersion Continued… Taking into account additionally the reference orbit, and assuming that the deviation of the energy with respect to the reference one is small, we can cast the above Hamiltonian in the form FFAG 2007, Grenoble, France 12 – 17 April 2007

Accelerated Orbit and Dispersion Continued… The last canonical transformation aimed at cancelling the linear part of the Hamiltonian is Taking into account that the dispersion function D satisfies the set of equations the new Hamiltonian can be expressed as 12 – 17 April 2007 FFAG 2007, Grenoble, France

The Betatron Motion and Twiss Parameters The total Hamiltonian describing the betatron oscillations can be obtained by adding terms quadratic in coordinates and momenta encountered in the third order Hamiltonian to the second order Hamiltonian. The result is: where A generic Hamiltonian of the above type can be transformed to the normal form 12 – 17 April 2007 FFAG 2007, Grenoble, France

The Betatron Motion and Twiss Parameters Continued… by means of a canonical transformation specified by the generating function: The old and the new canonical variables are related through the expressions The phase advance and the generalized Twiss parameters are defined as The corresponding betatron tunes are determined according to the expression 12 – 17 April 2007 FFAG 2007, Grenoble, France

The Reference Orbit and Acceleration We will solve explicitly the equations determining the accelerated orbit in the case where the accelerating force exerted by the cavities is considered in the kick approximation. We can write Here is the cavity voltage, is the RF frequency, Nc is the number of cavities and is the corresponding cavity phase. We introduce a new variable It is straightforward to write the transfer map for the interval just before entering the k-th cavity to the location just before entering the (k+1)-st cavity. It has the form 12 – 17 April 2007 FFAG 2007, Grenoble, France

The Reference Orbit and Acceleration Continued… The reference orbit map is a generalized Standard Map, which is known to exhibit the so-called accelerator modes. To find the accelerator modes, we expand the relevant variables in a formal small parameter according to the relations: Order by order one finds: Performing further analysis, one can find the amplitude equation governing the nonlinear acceleration regime. It is of the form: Highly nontrivial problem, which is now in progress. 12 – 17 April 2007 FFAG 2007, Grenoble, France

The Phase Motion Clearly, the phase motion depends only on the horizontal degree of freedom. The total Hamiltonian after extracting the accelerated orbit can be written as The equations of motion with account of the accelerated orbit only read as A more rigorous treatment is achieved if the dispersion effects are included in the analysis. All these are now in progress. It should be mentioned that the phase motion in FFAG accelerators is HIGHLY NONTRIVIAL. 12 – 17 April 2007 FFAG 2007, Grenoble, France

Conclusions and Outlook A close parallel between isochronous cyclotrons and FFAG accelerators has been established. The transversal motion in both machines is very similar and can be studied from a unified point of view. However, the longitudinal dynamics differs. While in isochronous cyclotrons the source of phase motion is the deviation of the real magnetic field from the isochronous one, in FFAG machines the phase motion is an essential part of the dynamics. A computer code FFEMMAG to simulate the linear dynamics in FFAG machines is now under development. It will calculate the reference orbit of EMMA, the median plane footprint, the lattice functions and dispersion. Future work also includes dynamic aperture module, resonance crossing part, as well as a module to simulate space charge effects, which have proven to be very essential in EMMA. 12 – 17 April 2007 FFAG 2007, Grenoble, France

Acknowledgements Bruno Muratori is acknowledged as a principal collaborator in the development of the FFEMMAG computer code, as well as for his enthusiasm during the learning process dedicated to the principles and operation of FFAG machines. Special thanks for many illuminating and fruitful discussions are due to: Neil Bliss Neil Marks Susan Smith James Jones 12 – 17 April 2007 FFAG 2007, Grenoble, France