USACE Asset Management Risk and Reliability Workshop Condition Index Definitions Primer Allen C. Estes United States Military Academy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Local Agency Bridge (LABP) Program Overview Informational Presentation – January 7, 2011 Carol Olsen, ODOT LGS Bridge Program Manager Local.
Advertisements

LUNENBURG DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Pavement Funding and Maintenance.
A few remarks about the role of infrastructure in the U.S. economy Hartwell C. Herring III, PhD, CPA Professor of Accounting Copyright Hartwell C. Herring.
Pavement Management Program Overview February 10, 2015 Presented By: Christopher J. Ott, E.I.
Presents. Tough Times For Transportation Funding Declining gas tax revenues Declining state revenues Uncertain federal revenue + Increasing construction.
Infrastructure Planning and Funding MID-REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS MID-REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION MARCH 19, 2015 NAIOP-NEW MEXICO CHAPTER.
1 Ports and Harbors – Transitions and Challenges Ms. Doris J. Bautch Commissioner, U.S. Section of PIANC U.S. Maritime Administration Presented at the.
Statewide Transportation Funding At Risk Your Name or Agency Date RTPA RCTF.
Current as of: Feb.06, New Economic Recovery Package: Not the Cure Federal government is working on a one-time economic recovery package Package.
Local Programs Update July 24, 2014 Jennifer B. DeBruhl Director, Local Assistance Division.
[Presentation Date] [Presenter Name, Organization, Title] The Need to Repair & Replace [Your Region’s]Transit Network Presentation to [Organization] [Insert.
National Bridge Inspection Standards (NBIS)
Impacts of “MAP-21”on the National Bridge Inspection Program Tribal Government Coordination Meeting Date August 7, 2014 Presented by: Gary Moss, P.E. Acting.
Asset Management Scott Matthews January 22, 2004.
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS OVERVIEW Lecture 2. n Provide a historical perspective of the evolution of PMS over the last 20 years n Describe the basic.
Infrastructure Management H. Scott Matthews January 15, 2003.
Fleet Safety. Introduction: Why Address Fleet Accidents Frequency of Fleet Accidents (NSC) 22% of workplace fatalities were highway accidents 80-90% were.
Snapshot of Member States’ Feedback after the Minneapolis Bridge Collapse - Summary of Information Collected via Recent Surveys Malcolm Kerley, Chair –
Office of Highway Safety Bridge Inspections Dan Walsh.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to the 2009 APTA Rail Conference presented by William Robert Cambridge Systematics, Inc. June 2009 State-of-the-Art.
U.S Conference of Mayors August 2004 Mayor’s ’04 Metro Agenda Bipartisan Priorities Statement Directed for candidates in Presidential and Congressional.
THE CONDITION OF OUR SURFACE TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE How Do We Adequately Finance Our System?
California’s Infrastructure Crisis. Statewide Transportation System Needs Assessment “California’s transportation system is in jeopardy. Underfunding.
Manage the Facility Condition Index (FCI)
2009 Report Card for America’s Infrastructure Steel Manufacturers Association May 19, 2009 David Mongan.
1 Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management.
% Roads in poor condition Americans traveled 2.85 trillion vehicle-miles in While highway mileage is mostly rural, a majority of road travel (60%)
The Regional Forum for Transportation Planning. Southwestern Pennsylvania 10 Counties >7,000 square miles 2.66 million citizens 548 municipalities 132.
Why PS 3150? Gordon Sparks, Ph.D.,P.Eng Gordon Sparks, Ph.D.,P.Eng.
MnDOT-ACEC Annual Conference March 5,  Capital planning and programming at MnDOT  Major considerations  A more transparent and collaborative.
Michigan’s Roads Crisis: Study Findings, Conclusions and Where Do We Go From Here? Best Practices Conference Rick Olson, State Representative, 55 th District.
Office of Facilities Deferred Maintenance UTSA Strategic Resource Planning Council Deferred Maintenance UTSA Strategic Resource Planning Council March.
NASTO ANNUAL MEETING JUNE 9-11, 2013 MEETING CUSTOMER EXPECTATIONS THROUGH PERFORMANCE MEASURES: VERMONT’S PERSPECTIVE Richard M. Tetreault, P.E. Director/Chief.
Physical Building Audit Physical Building Audit By; Engr.Dr.Attaullah Shah PhD ( Civil) Engg, MSc Engg ( Strs), BSc Engg ( Gold Medalist),), MBA, MA (
FHWA - O FFICE OF A SSET M ANAGEMENT October 14, 2009 Managing our Pavements FHWA Initiatives U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration.
Technology Planning. Primary Elements Stakeholders Leadership team Needs assessment Technology components Work plan Budget Policies Evaluation.
Condition Assessment & Funding Needs for North Carolina’s Highway System Report to the Joint Legislative Transportation Oversight Committee December 12,
hydroAMP asset management framework
Council Policy Forum Feb. 23, 2015 CAPITAL PLANNING & INFRASTRUCTURE.
Maintenance & Rehabilitation Strategies Lecture 5.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers USACE Navigation Data/Information Workshop July 7, 2005 Arlene L Dietz, Director, Navigation Data Center.
Plan and TIP Prioritization Process September 2015.
Data Palooza Workshop May 9, 2013 Rabinder Bains, FHWA – Office of Policy and Government Affairs.
Cost Effective Drainage Structures Henry J. “Hank” Gottschalk, III Technical Resources Engineer Virginia Concrete Conference March 2010.
PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE 1: Part 1: Pavement Preservation Idaho Roads Scholar Program.
3000 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 208 Washington, DC
USACE Asset Management Risk and Reliability Workshop Condition Index Definitions Primer Allen C. Estes United States Military Academy.
It’s About Time: Investing in Transportation to Keep Texas Economically Competitive It’s About Time: Investing in Transportation to Keep Texas Economically.
1 Steve Heminger Executive Director, MTC May 2009.
Minneapolis Regional Chamber of Commerce, Critical Issues Forum Charlie Zelle, Commissioner Minnesota Department of Transportation.
MEC’S BLUEPRINT MISSISSIPPI LONG-TERM TRANSPORTATION/ INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN.
Presents. Tough Times For Transportation Funding Declining gas tax revenues Declining state revenues for aviation, highways and transit Uncertain.
1 An Approach to Levee Assessment and Contingency Planning Presentation to the National Waterways Conference 7 September 2006 Portland, Oregon By Rob Vining.
Utah Research Benefits Value of Research Taskforce July 29, 2015 Cameron Kergaye Utah Department of Transportation.
1 Smart Rivers Conference September 15, 2011 New Orleans, Louisiana “Status of Inland Waterways Infrastructure Funding”
Inland Navigation - A National Perspective Jim Walker USACE, Headquarters November 8, 2007.
Statewide Transportation Funding At Risk Your Name or Agency Date RTPA RCTF.
GE Transportation Freight, Fuel, & Emissions Introduction to Engineering Design EDGSN 100 Section 002 Team Uno: The Bleeding Frogs Britta Beleski (personal.psu.edu/bnb5252)
Port of Pittsburgh Commission James R. McCarville Met Coke Conference – Pittsburgh November 2, 2010 Welcome to the Port of Pittsburgh.
In Numbers Strength COLORADO TRANSPORTATION FUNDING.
May 12, 2006 District Engineer Presentation1 Signing Performance Measures Report 2005 Data.
Road Investment Decision Framework
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Transportation Funding
Duffin Creek WPCP Optimized Renewal Planning & Decision-Making
INTRODUCTION TO THE BRIDGE INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE SYSTEM (BIM)
ITTS FEAT Tool Methodology Review ITTS Member States Paula Dowell, PhD
INTRODUCTION TO THE BRIDGE INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE SYSTEM (BIM)
Civic Facilities Condition Assessments 2016
Comprehensive and Dependable Transportation Plan
Presentation transcript:

USACE Asset Management Risk and Reliability Workshop Condition Index Definitions Primer Allen C. Estes United States Military Academy

What is a Condition Index (CI)? What is their purpose? Two examples –FHWA Highway Bridges –Corps of Engineers Infrastructure Why is this important? Agenda

Numerical score that quantifies the condition of infrastructure Characteristics –Standardized rating system –Data obtained through inspection –Designed to be simple Expresses a qualitative assessment in quantitative terms What is a Condition Index?

Replacement/repair of individual infrastructure Most efficient allocation of maintenance/ repair dollars for a class of infrastructure Means of communication state of infrastructure to decision makers Forecasting future needs – predicts deterioration rates Typically NOT for structural assessment Uses of a Condition Index

Highway Bridges Silver Bridge Collapse December 15, 1967 Rush hour traffic 46 fatalities Congressional inquiries National Bridge Inspection Standards Federal Aid Highway Act of 1970

All states inspect bridges every two years Inspector qualifications Inspector training program Data collection and reporting requirements Special Bridge Replacement Program Federal Aid Highway Act of 1970

592,000 bridges –Over 20 feet in length –Public roads 4 billion vehicles per day 300 million square meters of bridge deck Result: 35 years of data National Bridge Inventory

NBI Rating DescriptionRepair Action 9 Excellent ConditionNone 8 Very Good ConditionNone 7 Good ConditionMinor Maintenance 6 Satisfactory ConditionMajor Maintenance 5 Fair ConditionMinor Repair 4 Poor ConditionMajor Repair 3 Serious ConditionRehabilitate 2 Critical ConditionReplace 1 Imminent FailureClose Bridge and Evacuate 0 FailedBeyond Corrective Action National Bridge Inventory Condition Ratings

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 512 Locks and Dams in National Dam Inventory Database 90% Classified as High Risk Facilities >80% of all Expenditures for Dams and Reservoirs is for Maintenance FY04 Corps of Engineers Budget is $4.3 Billion Over half the locks and dams are over 50 Years old Inland waterways transport $73 billion annually (630 million tons)

USACE Condition Index CI ValueCondition DescriptionZoneAction Excellent; no noticeable defects 1 Immediate Action not required Very good: minor deterioration only Good: some deterioration or defects evident 2 Economic analysis of repair alternatives recommended Fair: moderate deterioration; function still adequate Poor: serious deterioration; function inadequate 3 Detailed evaluation required to determine need for repair, rehabilitation or reconstruction Very Poor: extensive deterioration, barely functional 0-10 Failed: no longer functional

Inspections not mandated – vary from district to district Inspections not resourced No centralized collection of data No emphasis from highest levels Other priorities have taken precedence Shortfall in Corps Approach

What happens when disaster strikes? –What is the state of the Corps infrastructure? –Why haven’t periodic inspections been recorded and systematically collected –Why haven’t we learned from the highway department? ASCE Report Card Why are Condition Indices Important? Important?

2005 Grades Subject2001 Grade 2005 Grade Comments Bridges CC Between 2000 and 2003, the percentage of the nation's 590,750 bridges rated structurally deficient or functionally obsolete decreased slightly from 28.5% to 27.1%. However, it will cost $9.4 billion a year for 20 years to eliminate all bridge deficiencies. Long-term underinvestment is compounded by the lack of a Federal transportation program. Dams DD Since 1998, the number of unsafe dams has risen by 33% to more than 3,500. While federally owned dams are in good condition, and there have been modest gains in repair, the number of dams identified as unsafe is increasing at a faster rate than those being repaired. $10.1 billion is needed over the next 12 years to address all critical non-federal dams-- dams which pose a direct risk to human life should they fail. Navigable Waterways D+D- A single barge traveling the nation's waterways can move the same amount of cargo as 58 semi-trucks at one-tenth the cost--reducing highway congestion and saving money. Of the 257 locks on the more than 12,000 miles of inland waterways operated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, nearly 50% are functionally obsolete. By 2020, that number will increase to 80%. The cost to replace the present system of locks is more than $125 billion. America's Infrastructure G.P.A. = D Total Investment Needs = $1.6 Trillion (estimated 5-year need--does not include security investment needs) A = Excep tional B = Good C = Medio cre D = Poor F = Failin g I = Inco mplet e Each category was evaluated on the basis of condition and performance, capacity vs. need ASCE Report Card

Make condition index inspections mandatory in all districts at specified intervals Start with a few structures Centrally collect/synthesize the data Systematically use the data –Communicate current status –Make decisions –Predict future needs Command emphasis and funding Recommendations