Within Subjects Designs AKA Repeated Measures Design Remember matched groups design? –Allowed more power if you matched on correct variable –Within Subjects.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN.  Three conditions  Covariation  Time-order relation  Elimination of plausible alternatives.
Advertisements

The Basics of Experimentation I: Variables and Control
Age Differences in Emotion Recognition of Briefly Presented Faces Lisa Emery, Kory Morgan, Kaitlyn Pechanek & Caitlin Williams Reprints may be obtained.
Algebra Problems… Solutions Algebra Problems… Solutions © 2007 Herbert I. Gross Set 4 By Herb I. Gross and Richard A. Medeiros next.
Chapter 9: Within Designs
Analysis of frequency counts with Chi square
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS Criteria for Experiments
Basics of Experimentation (1) Experimental Design: Which to Choose and Why?
Single-Factor Experiments What is a true experiment? Between-subjects designs Within-subjects designs.
Experimental Design: Between and Within factors Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology.
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS What Is Required for a True Experiment? What Are the Independent and Dependent Variables? What Is a Confounding Variable? What Are.
Single-Factor Experiments What is a true experiment? Between-subjects designs Within-subjects designs Designs to avoid (not true experiments)
Experiment Design 5: Variables & Levels Martin, Ch 8, 9,10.
Experimental Design: Between and within factors Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology.
Experimental Design: Between and Within factors Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology.
Lecture 12 Psyc 300A. Review: Inferential Statistics We test our sample recognizing that differences we observe may be simply due to chance. Significance.
© 2001 Dr. Laura Snodgrass, Ph.D.1 Basic Experimental Design Common Problems Assigning Participants to Groups Single variable experiments –bivalent –multivalent.
Factorial Experiments Factorial Design = experiment in which more than one IV (factor) at a time is manipulated Uses all possible combinations of the levels.
Experimental Design: Between and within factors Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology.
EKMAN’S FACIAL EXPRESSIONS STUDY A Demonstration.
Recognizing Emotions in Facial Expressions
Algebra Problems… Solutions Algebra Problems… Solutions © 2007 Herbert I. Gross Set 5 By Herbert I. Gross and Richard A. Medeiros next.
STAR PORTAL GRADEBOOK. Let’s Get Into the Gradebook! At the Teacher Schedule page, click once on the Gradebook link to open to the page for the corresponding.
Matched Group, Natural Group, Repeated Measures. Matched Groups Design Different subjects serve at the different levels of the IV however the subjects.
PSYC2030 Exam Review #2 March 13th 2014.
Research Methods in Psychology
Design Experimental Control. Experimental control allows causal inference (IV caused observed change in DV) Experiment has internal validity when it fulfills.
Single-Factor Experimental Designs
Control in Experimentation & Achieving Constancy Chapters 7 & 8.
Experimental Design: One-Way Correlated Samples Design
Extending the Definition of Exponents © Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved next #10 Taking the Fear out of Math 2 -8.
A Within-Subjects Experiment: Homophone Priming of Proper Names
Experimental Design. Threats to Internal Validity 1.No Control Group Known as a “one-shot case study” XOXO (IV)(DV)
Psych 5500/6500 Other ANOVA’s Fall, Factorial Designs Factorial Designs have one dependent variable and more than one independent variable (i.e.
Experimental Design: Part I MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 3, 2010.
Chapter Six: The Basics of Experimentation I: Variables and Control.
1 Within subjects designs 1. Definition 2. Reasons for using within subjects designs 3. Stage of Practice effects A. Definition B. Two types of practice.
 Descriptive Methods ◦ Observation ◦ Survey Research  Experimental Methods ◦ Independent Groups Designs ◦ Repeated Measures Designs ◦ Complex Designs.
ALTERNATING TREATMENT DESIGNS and YOU! Tristram Jones, Ph.D. Kaplan University PS512 Unit V.
COLD READING UNIT. WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT WHEN YOU HEAR “COLD READING?”
ALTERNATING TREATMENT DESIGNS and YOU! Tristram Jones, Ph.D. Kaplan University PS512 Unit V.
Experiment Basics: Designs Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology.
LECTURE 11 Chapter 11 Repeated Measures / Within Subs Design 1.Control error variance = individual diff. No diff. due to sampling error! 2. Fewer subjects.
Ekman’s Facial Expressions Study A Demonstration.
Facial Expressions and Emotions Mental Health. Total Participants Adults (30+ years old)328 Adults (30+ years old) Adolescents (13-19 years old)118 Adolescents.
Experiment Basics: Designs Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology.
7 Control Techniques in Experimental Research.
Experiment Basics: Designs
Experiment Basics: Designs
Repeated Measures Designs
Research Methods: Concepts and Connections First Edition
Experimental Design-Chapter 8
Within subjects designs
Research design I: Experimental design and quasi-experimental research
Within- Subjects Design
7 How to Decide Which Variables to Manipulate and Measure Marziyeh Rezaee.
Within- Subjects Design
Experiment Basics: Designs
Solving Radical Equations
Statistics for the Social Sciences
Experiment Basics: Designs
Control error variance = individual diff.
Experiment Basics: Designs
Single-Variable, Correlated-Groups Designs
Chapter 13 Group Differences
Correlated-Groups and Single-Subject Designs
Repeated Measures Balancing Practice Effects with an Incomplete Design
Experiment Basics: Designs
Experiment Basics: Designs
Experiment Basics: Designs
Presentation transcript:

Within Subjects Designs AKA Repeated Measures Design Remember matched groups design? –Allowed more power if you matched on correct variable –Within Subjects Designs can be considered the ultimate way of matching.

Reasons to use Within Subjects Designs 1. Requires fewer subjects 2. Often more convenient or efficient ludwig and DeWitt (1993) 3. More sensitive (has more power) Infant smiles 4. Sometimes the question requires a within Ss Design Learning studies – acquisition

Issue to worry about with within Ss designs Progressive Error –Test person over and over again –Might get better Practice effects –Might get worse Fatigue effects Which threat to internal validity are we talking about? –Maturation

Progressive Error Kahneman, Fredrickson, Schreiber, and Redelmeier (1993) –Pain Perception –Hypothesis It is the final moments of a painful episode that we remember the most. Duration of pain plays a smaller role

Potential Design Long trial –Keep hand in 14 degree Celsius water for 60s Then leave hand in for an additional 30 seconds while temperature is raised 1 degree to 15 degrees 7 minute break Short trial –Keep hand in 14 degree Celsius water for 60s Asked participants which trial they would prefer to repeat –69% chose Long trial. Supports notion that final moments are more memorable. (14 degrees vs 15 degrees) –IV? DV? –Any issues?

Actual Design Randomly assigned participant to one of two balancing conditions Half of Ss –Long/break/Short 72% 28% Other half of Ss –Short/break/Long 33% 67% Collapse across balancing condition –69% prefer long trial

Balancing Progressive Error Subject x Subject Balancing –progressive error is balanced for each participant –each participant experiences the conditions of the experiment more than once, and in a different order each time –Each person experiences a balanced presentation of conditions

Balancing Progressive Error Across Subjects Balancing –progressive error is balanced across different participants –Each participant only experiences each condition of the experiment one time. –different participants experience different orders of conditions –Thus, an individual participant would not be balanced, but after we average across participants the design would be balanced. Which balancing technique was used in the cold water (pain) experiment? –Subject x Subject or Across Subjects?

Balancing Progressive Error Subject x Subject –Block Randomization –ABBA counterbalancing Across Subjects –Complete (All Possible Orders) –Partial Counterbalancing Latin Square Systematic Sequential Rotation

example of subject x subject balancing Sackheim, Gur, and Saucy (1978) –does one side of our face express more emotion? brain lateralization –left brain –right brain »contralateral –composite pictures left composite right composite normal –six emotions happy, sad, surprise, fear, anger, and disgust

Latin Square 1) Randomly order the conditions of the experiment –we will do a study with 6 conditions Let’s say 6 perfumes or colognes –Perfume and cologne A, B, C, D, E, F –F=1 –C=2 –B=3 –E=4 –A=5 –D=6

Latin Square To generate the first order use the following rule –1, 2, N, 3, N-1, 4, N-2, 5, N-3, N – refers to the number of conditions in the study With 6 conditions our rule would be –1, 2, N, 3, N-1, 4 So our first row (first order of conditions would be). –1, 2, 6, 3, 5, 4 or F, C, D, B, A, E Now to generate the other conditions we simply add 1 to each column –1, 2, 6, 3, 5, 4 or F, C, D, B, A, E –2, 3, 1, 4, 6, 5 C, B, F, E, D, A –3, 4, 2, 5, 1, 6 B, E, C, A, F, D –4, 5, 3, 6, 2, 1 E, A, B, D, C, F –5, 6, 4, 1, 3, 2 A, D, E, F, B, C –6, 1, 5, 2, 4, 3 D, F, A, C, E, B

Latin Square Notice each condition occurs in each of the six possible positions (columns) –F, C, D, B, A, E –C, B, F, E, D, A –B, E, C, A, F, D –E, A, B, D, C, F –A, D, E, F, B, C –D, F, A, C, E, B Also notice that each condition occurs after each of all of the other conditions –F, C, D, B, A, E –C, B, F, E, D, A –B, E, C, A, F, D –E, A, B, D, C, F –A, D, E, F, B, C –D, F, A, C, E, B

Systematic Sequential Rotation Randomly order the conditions –1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 or F, C, B, A, E, D Now simply add 1 to each column until you have 6 rows –1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 or F, C, B, A, E, D –2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 1 or C, B, A, E, D, F –3, 4, 5, 6, 1, 2 or B, A, E, D, F, C –4, 5, 6, 1, 2, 3 or A, E, D, F, C, B –5, 6, 1, 2, 3, 4 or E, D, F, C, B, A –6, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 or D, F, C, B, A, E

Systematic Sequential Rotation Notice each condition still occurs in each of the six possible conditions –F, C, B, A, E, D –C, B, A, E, D, F –B, A, E, D, F, C –A, E, D, F, C, B –E, D, F, C, B, A –D, F, C, B, A, E However each condition is no longer preceded by each of the other conditions. It is always the same condition that precedes. –F, C, B, A, E, D –C, B, A, E, D, F –B, A, E, D, F, C –A, E, D, F, C, B –E, D, F, C, B, A –D, F, C, B, A, E