Deutscher Wetterdienst Vertical localization issues in LETKF Breogan Gomez, Andreas Rhodin, Hendrik Reich.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
30 th September 2010 Bannister & Migliorini Slide 1 of 9 High-resolution assimilation and weather forecasting Ross Bannister and Stefano Migliorini (NCEO,
Advertisements

An optimal estimation based retrieval method adapted to SEVIRI infra-red measurements M. Stengel (1), R. Bennartz (2), J. Schulz (3), A. Walther (2,4),
Effects of model error on ensemble forecast using the EnKF Hiroshi Koyama 1 and Masahiro Watanabe 2 1 : Center for Climate System Research, University.
Assimilating Sounding, Surface and Profiler Observations with a WRF-based EnKF for An MCV Case during BAMEX Zhiyong Meng & Fuqing Zhang Texas A&M University.
Performance Characteristics of a Pseudo-operational Ensemble Kalman Filter April 2006, EnKF Wildflower Meeting Greg Hakim & Ryan Torn University of Washington.
Brian Ancell, Cliff Mass, Gregory J. Hakim University of Washington
To understand the differing localization strength, consider two grid points, observation at grid point 1. K for grid point 2: (d 12 = distance between.
Advanced data assimilation methods- EKF and EnKF Hong Li and Eugenia Kalnay University of Maryland July 2006.
Progress in Cloudy Microwave Satellite Data Assimilation at NCEP Andrew Collard 1, Emily Liu 4, Yanqiu Zhu 1, John Derber 2, Daryl Kleist 3, Rahul Mahajan.
Experimenting with the LETKF in a dispersion model coupled with the Lorenz 96 model Author: Félix Carrasco, PhD Student at University of Buenos Aires,
UNBIASED ESTIAMTION OF ANALYSIS AND FORECAST ERROR VARIANCES
Current Status of the Development of the Local Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter at UMD Istvan Szunyogh representing the UMD “Chaos-Weather” Group Ensemble.
WRF/DART Forecasts from Weather Research and Forecasting model, assimilation from Data Assimilation Research Testbed. DART is general purpose ensemble.
Francesca Marcucci, Lucio Torrisi with the contribution of Valeria Montesarchio, ISMAR-CNR CNMCA, National Meteorological Center,Italy First experiments.
EnKF Overview and Theory
Observing Strategy and Observation Targeting for Tropical Cyclones Using Ensemble-Based Sensitivity Analysis and Data Assimilation Chen, Deng-Shun 3 Dec,
Advances in the use of observations in the ALADIN/HU 3D-Var system Roger RANDRIAMAMPIANINA, Regina SZOTÁK and Gabriella Csima Hungarian Meteorological.
Eidgenössisches Departement des Innern EDI Bundesamt für Meteorologie und Klimatologie MeteoSchweiz Statistical Characteristics of High- Resolution COSMO.
WWOSC 2014, Aug 16 – 21, Montreal 1 Impact of initial ensemble perturbations provided by convective-scale ensemble data assimilation in the COSMO-DE model.
ISDA 2014, Feb 24 – 28, Munich 1 Impact of ensemble perturbations provided by convective-scale ensemble data assimilation in the COSMO-DE model Florian.
Computational Issues: An EnKF Perspective Jeff Whitaker NOAA Earth System Research Lab ENIAC 1948“Roadrunner” 2008.
Five techniques for liquid water cloud detection and analysis using AMSU NameBrief description Data inputs Weng1= NESDIS day one method (Weng and Grody)
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss High-resolution data assimilation in COSMO: Status and.
Ocean Data Variational Assimilation with OPA: Ongoing developments with OPAVAR and implementation plan for NEMOVAR Sophie RICCI, Anthony Weaver, Nicolas.
MPO 674 Lecture 20 3/26/15. 3d-Var vs 4d-Var.
Stephanie Guedj Florence Rabier Vincent Guidard Benjamin Ménétrier Observation error estimation in a convective-scale NWP system.
Hybrid Variational/Ensemble Data Assimilation
Data Assimilation Using Modulated Ensembles Craig H. Bishop, Daniel Hodyss Naval Research Laboratory Monterey, CA, USA September 14, 2009 Data Assimilation.
Ensemble Data Assimilation for the Mesoscale: A Progress Report Massimo Bonavita, Lucio Torrisi, Francesca Marcucci CNMCA National Meteorological Service.
Assimilating chemical compound with a regional chemical model Chu-Chun Chang 1, Shu-Chih Yang 1, Mao-Chang Liang 2, ShuWei Hsu 1, Yu-Heng Tseng 3 and Ji-Sung.
MODEL ERROR ESTIMATION EMPLOYING DATA ASSIMILATION METHODOLOGIES Dusanka Zupanski Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere Colorado State University.
HIRLAM 3/4D-Var developments Nils Gustafsson, SMHI.
11 Background Error Daryl T. Kleist* National Monsoon Mission Scoping Workshop IITM, Pune, India April 2011.
Data assimilation and forecasting the weather (!) Eugenia Kalnay and many friends University of Maryland.
Multivariate Data Assimilation of Carbon Cycle Using Local Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter 1 Ji-Sun Kang, 1 Eugenia Kalnay, 2 Junjie Liu, 2 Inez Fung,
6/29/2010 Wan-Shu Wu1 GSI Tutorial 2010 Background and Observation Error Estimation and Tuning.
Covariance Modeling “Where America’s Climate, Weather, Ocean and Space Weather Services Begin” JCSDA Summer Colloquium July 27, 2015 Presented by John.
Development and Testing of a Regional GSI-Based EnKF-Hybrid System for the Rapid Refresh Configuration Yujie Pan 1, Kefeng Zhu 1, Ming Xue 1,2, Xuguang.
Ensemble data assimilation in an operational context: the experience at the Italian Weather Service Massimo Bonavita and Lucio Torrisi CNMCA-UGM, Rome.
Eidgenössisches Departement des Innern EDI Bundesamt für Meteorologie und Klimatologie MeteoSchweiz First Experience with KENDA at MeteoSwiss Daniel Leuenberger,
Ensemble Kalman Filter in a boundary layer 1D numerical model Samuel Rémy and Thierry Bergot (Météo-France) Workshop on ensemble methods in meteorology.
Lennart Bengtsson ESSC, Uni. Reading THORPEX Conference December 2004 Predictability and predictive skill of weather systems and atmospheric flow patterns.
Assess Observation Impacts in the Hybrid GSI-EnKF Data Assimilation Systems for NCEP Global Forecast System Model Through OSE and Ensemble Based Observation.
Introduction of temperature observation of radio-sonde in place of geopotential height to the global three dimensional variational data assimilation system.
Local Predictability of the Performance of an Ensemble Forecast System Liz Satterfield and Istvan Szunyogh Texas A&M University, College Station, TX Third.
Use ensemble error covariance information in GRAPES 3DVAR Jiandong GONG, Ruichun WANG NWP center of CMA Oct 27, 2015.
Implementation and Testing of 3DEnVAR and 4DEnVAR Algorithms within the ARPS Data Assimilation Framework Chengsi Liu, Ming Xue, and Rong Kong Center for.
The Infrastructure, Design and Applications of Observing System Simulation Experiments at NASA's Global Modeling and Assimilation Office By Ronald M. Errico.
NCAR April 1 st 2003 Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Data Assimilation in AMPS Dale Barker S. Rizvi, and M. Duda MMM Division, NCAR
Current modification gridinfo.f90Add new subroutine: getgridinfo_reg --- calculate the pressure in each sigma level and the virture temperature gridio.f90Add.
2007/3/19 MRI, Tsukuba Recent developments of the local ensemble transform Kalman filter (LETKF) at JMA Takemasa Miyoshi (NPD/JMA) Collaborators: Shozo.
A Random Subgrouping Scheme for Ensemble Kalman Filters Yun Liu Dept. of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland Atmospheric and oceanic.
The operational Meteo-France ensemble 4D-Var (L. Berre, G. Desroziers, and co-authors) Ensemble assimilation (operational with 6 members…) :
Examination of Observation Impacts Derived from OSEs and Adjoint Models Ron Gelaro and Yanqiu Zhu NASA Global Modeling and Assimilation Office Ricardo.
1 3D-Var assimilation of CHAMP measurements at the Met Office Sean Healy, Adrian Jupp and Christian Marquardt.
The application of ensemble Kalman filter in adaptive observation and information content estimation studies Junjie Liu and Eugenia Kalnay July 13th, 2007.
LOCAL ENSEMBLE KALMAN FILTER (LETKF) ANALYSIS OF LOOP CURRENT & EDDY IN THE GULF OF MEXICO Fanghua Xu 1, Leo Oey 1, Yasumasa Miyazawa 2, Peter Hamilton.
ENSEMBLE KALMAN FILTER IN THE PRESENCE OF MODEL ERRORS Hong Li Eugenia Kalnay.
Korea Institute of Atmospheric Prediction Systems (KIAPS) ( 재 ) 한국형수치예보모델개발사업단 LETKF 앙상블 자료동화 시스템 테스트베드 구축 및 활용방안 Implementation and application of LETKF.
© Crown copyright Met Office Mismatching Perturbations at the Lateral Boundaries in Limited-Area Ensemble Forecasting Jean-François Caron … or why limited-area.
ECMWF/EUMETSAT NWP-SAF Satellite data assimilation Training Course Mar 2016.
Jeffrey Anderson, NCAR Data Assimilation Research Section
Jeffrey Anderson, NCAR Data Assimilation Research Section
Middle-Range Ensemble Forecast at CPTEC/INPE - Current Activities
Vertical localization issues in LETKF
FSOI adapted for used with 4D-EnVar
PP Kenda : Status Report christoph.
Comparison of different combinations of ensemble-based and variational data assimilation approaches for deterministic NWP Mark Buehner Data Assimilation.
Data Assimilation Initiative, NCAR
Project Team: Mark Buehner Cecilien Charette Bin He Peter Houtekamer
Presentation transcript:

Deutscher Wetterdienst Vertical localization issues in LETKF Breogan Gomez, Andreas Rhodin, Hendrik Reich

Deutscher Wetterdienst  Perform single observation experiments and study the vertical impact. In situ observations and radiances.  First attempt to understand the behavior of the LETKF.  Explore the fundamental limitations of EnKF or LETKF algorithms (i.e. un-localized obs. such as radiance obs.) Objectives

Deutscher Wetterdienst LETKF – Localized Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter Horizontal Vertical Integral gives one number, but where to apply it! Vloc Similar to a Gaussian but function equals 0 at aprox. 3 times Vloc Localization function Analysis are independent for every grid point

Deutscher Wetterdienst Background Ensemble B-matrix 128 random perturbations 3DVAR first guess 128 ensemble members. (Same error covariance statistics as 3DVAR) + 3DVAR and LETKF should give equal results for a large (infinity) number member of ensemble members. This means that, for comparison purposes, 3dvar can be regarded as the reference to match.

Deutscher Wetterdienst  Objective is to study the impact of a surface pressure observation on a vertical profile.  A single surface observation from a rawinsonde is chosen at a random location. Single sfc pressure observation  LETKF and 3DVAR allows to select the prognostic variable to analyze. (geopot. height or temperature).  Finally different vertical localization values are chosen to see the different impacts: 1.00, 0.60, 0.30, 0.15 (Those are eq. to the sigma of a gaussian distribution in log(P)). Parameters to study

Deutscher Wetterdienst Assimilated in Geopot. height Assimilated in Temperature Geopot. height increments Temperature increments Assimilation in Geop. height or Temperature values Single sfc pressure Obs

Deutscher Wetterdienst  Objective is to study the impact of a radiance observation on a vertical profile.  A single random location is chosen and only some channels are studied. AMSUA: 5, 7 and AMSUB: 3, 4, 5.  Different vertical localization values: 10.0, 1.2, 0.6, 0.3.  Only geopotential height values are used this time. Radiance observations

Deutscher Wetterdienst Nominal height values for radiances AMSUA7 Sensitivity functions for temperature and relative humidity AMSUB4 Sensitivity functions for temperature and relative humidity

Deutscher Wetterdienst Standard Deviation AMSUA5 - Temperature Increments match 3dvar between 0.6 and 1.2 AMSUB4 - RH Increments already have a good agreement with 3dvar between 0.3 and 0.6 AMSUA5AMSUA7AMSUB3AMSUB4AMSUB5 StdDev StdDev is higher for AMSUA than AMSUB (Values in LogP comparable to Vloc)

Deutscher Wetterdienst In situ and radiance observations Geopotential height / Temperature Relative humidity Tropics Extratropics Vertical correlation length scale in LogP AMSUAAMSUB5 StdDev Standard deviation in LogP

Deutscher Wetterdienst In situ and radiance observations  Objective is to study the impact of a radiance observation on a vertical profile.  We want to threat this observations with different vlocs values as they are of a different physical kind.  Different vertical localization values (10.0, 1.2, 0.6, 0.3, 0.15) are used for an in-situ obs. meanwhile a radiance observation has a fixed value of 1.2. (Fertig et al. 2007)  AMSUA5 and an artificial rawinsonde measurement at 800HPa were used. ( We impose a obs. minus first guess equal to the standard error of each observation.)

Deutscher Wetterdienst Temperature increments AMSUA5 + Temp 800HPa The over-shooting is reduced, while still matching the in-situ observation. But still we can have some balance problems when Vloc is small for in-situ observations.

Deutscher Wetterdienst Some problems found AMSUB3 Noisy increments. Many member are close to zero! AMSUB5 Relative Humidity Increments

Deutscher Wetterdienst  One should consider which diagnostic variables are used in the analysis. (In this case geopotential height or temperature, may be others)  A method to estimate the nominal height of radiance observations has been proposed. Satisfactory results so far. Summary and Conclusions

Deutscher Wetterdienst Summary and Conclusions  Localization of non local observations (radiances)  Non linearity (relative humidity increments)  Localization of variables of very different length scales.  Single location experiments: need to do global experiments with a full set of observation and perform some statitistics (e. g. RMSE) Aspects not handled satisfactorily yet.

Deutscher Wetterdienst Thank you

Deutscher Wetterdienst Apendix - Nominal height for radiance obs.