Target Magnets & Shielding Bob Weggel Particle Beam Lasers, Inc. Magnet Optimization Research Engineering, LLC. March 5, 2012 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Q1 for JLAB’s 12 Gev/c Super High Momentum Spectrometer S.R. Lassiter, P.B. Brindza, M. J. Fowler, S.R. Milward, P. Penfold, R. Locke Q1 SHMS HMS Q2 Q3.
Advertisements

Mercury Chamber Update V. Graves NF-IDS Meeting October 4, 2011.
MUTAC Review, 9 April MuCOOL and MICE Coupling Magnet Status Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Berkeley CA
Optimisation of Roebel cable for HTS accelerator magnets
1Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy NF/IDS Hg Vessel Layout 30 Jun 09 Cryostat 2 Front Drain Mercury Vessel Concept Matthew F. Glisson.
IR Magnets for SuperKEKB KEK, Norihito Ohuchi 1.IR Magnets (ES, QCS, QC1) 2.Interference between Magnet-Cryostats and Belle 3.Summary SuperB.WS05.Hawaii.
Preliminary Analysis of the Target System Magnets 1.Version with a 6-T copper magnet insert 2.Version with a 6-T high-temperature superconductor insert.
1 The Genoa Tracker Solenoids and their Contribution toward a New Design Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and Pasquale Fabbricatore.
IDS-NF Target Studies H. Kirk (BNL) July 8, 2009.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory Comparison of final focus magnetic systems for the Assisted Pinched Transport and the RPD-2002 J. Barnard,
Talk outline 1 st talk: –Magnetic forces –Quench in the absorber cryostat 2 nd talk: –Shielding of magnetic fringe fields.
Above: On-axis field profiles of resistive, superconducting and all magnets, and bore-tube radius r = 7.5 (B/20T) −½ cm. Above: Hoop strain ε θ in resistive.
Update of the ARIES-CS Power Core Configuration and Maintenance X.R. Wang S. Malang A.R. Raffray and the ARIES Team ARIES Meeting Madison, Wisconsin September.
Aug 29, 2006S. Kahn T HTS Solenoid1 A Proposal for a 50 T HTS Solenoid Steve Kahn Muons Inc. August 29, 2006.
Status of the Polarized 3He Target
Superconducting Large Bore Sextupole for ILC
Progress on the MuCool and MICE Coupling Coils * L. Wang a, X. K Liu a, F. Y. Xu a, A. B. Chen a, H. Pan a, H. Wu a, X. L. Guo a, S. X Zheng a, D. Summers.
1 Design of Solenoid and iron yoke for GLD KEK Hiroshi Yamaoka Ken-ichi Tanaka July 13, ‘05.
Zhiwen Zhao (UVa), Paul Reimer (ANL) SoLID Collboration Meeting 2013/03.
E. Todesco PROPOSAL OF APERTURE FOR THE INNER TRIPLET E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland With relevant inputs from colleagues F. Cerutti, S. Fartoukh,
Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Further optimization of the solenoid design A.Efremov, E.Koshurnikov, Yu.Lobanov, A.Makarov, A.Vodopianov GSI, Darmstadt,
Magnets for muon collider ring and interaction regions V.V. Kashikhin, FNAL December 03, 2009.
SuperB Meeting, May 2008 Status of the magnetic design of the first quadrupole (QD0) for the SuperB interaction region S. Bettoni on behalf of the whole.
Review of Recent IDS120 Target Concepts Van Graves October 31, 2013.
IDS120j WITHOUT GAPS AND WITH MAXIMUM SIZE GAPS ( aka ''NIGHTMARE'' CASE SCENARIO ) SC#4, SC#7 AZIMUTHAL DPD DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS. Nicholas Souchlas,
20to2T5m100cm Images Van Graves February 13, 2014.
Focusing Lens for the SSR1 Section of PXIE Preliminary analysis of main options 3/13/2012I. Terechkine1.
DEPOSITED POWER STUDIES FOR THE MC/NF TARGET STATION. Nicholas Souchlas (PBL) (MAP CONFERENCE SLAC 2012) 1 DEPOSITED POWER STUDIES FOR THE MC/NF TARGET.
IDS120j WITH GAPS SC#3 AZIMUTHAL DPD DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS WITH MAX GAPS SC#3, SC#4 AZIMUTHAL DPD DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS, DP AND SC TOTAL DP WITH VARYING.
Zian Zhu Magnet parameters Coil/Cryostat/Support design Magnetic field analysis Cryogenics Iron yoke structure Mechanical Integration Superconducting Magnet.
Support and magnet coil KEK Hiroshi Yamaoka Nov. 10, ‘04.
February 13, 2012 Mu2e Production Solenoid Design V.V. Kashikhin Workshop on Radiation Effects in Superconducting Magnet Materials (RESMM'12)
Eddy current modelling for ILC target ILC meeting 31 st Jan- 3 rd Feb 2007 IHEP-Beijing James Rochford.
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS: NEW Hg MODULE mars1510 ( DESKTOP ) vs. mars1512 ( PRINCETON CLUSTER ) Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (3/28/2012) 1.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory High-Field Solenoids for a MC Final Cooling System AAC 2012 Austin, Texas June 11-15, 2012.
Nov 9, 2005S. Kahn -- Solenoid Proposal1 High Field Solenoid Discussions at BNL Steve Kahn Muons Inc. Nov 9, 2005.
Kinetic Energy Spectra of pi +, pi -, mu +, mu - and sum of all from the 20to4T5m Configuration X. Ding Front End Meeting June 23,
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS ( 20 cm GAPS AND 15.8 g/cc W BEADS ) AZIMUTHAL DPD DISTRIBUTION STUDIES FOR: BP#1, SH#1, SHVS#1/LFL, SC#1+SC#2, BeWind.
Meshed with no iron for comparison Used Willy’s conceptual design for iron pieces Not optimized in any way Used thin and thick pieces Compared fields (BMOD.
Multiprocessing/MARS15(2012)/Princeton Cluster (IDS120j w/t Resistive Magnets: New Hg Module) X. Ding UCLA (4/11/2013)
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS MODIFYING Hg MODULE Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (11/1/2012) 1.
ILC IR FINAL FOCUS & EXTRACTION MAGNETS Prepared by Andy Marone ILC Workshop, Sept
IDS120j WITH AND WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS PION AND MUON STUDIES WITHIN TAPER REGION, III ( 20 cm GAPS BETWEEN CRYOSTATS ) Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (9/4/2012)
MBA Magnets MultiBend Achromat Magnets 8/14/2015 Review By Mark Jaski.
Stresses and Deformations in 14 T Nb 3 Sn Solenoid of 0.8 m I.R. and 1.0 m O.R. & Half Length Bob Weggel 10/7/10.
IDS120i GEOMETRY. SIMULATIONS FOR 60%W+40%He SHIELDING WITH STST SHIELDING VESSELS. Hg vs. Ga DEPOSITED POWER DISTRIBUTION. (using Ding's optimized parameters)
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS SEMGENTATION STUDIES FOR BEAM PIPE BEYOND FIRST CRYOSTAT ( 20 cm GAPS AND 15.8 g/cc W BEADS ) Nicholas Souchlas, PBL.
Muons, Inc. 14 Jan 2010 S. Kahn--IR Quads 1 IR Quadrupoles with Exotic Materials Steve Kahn, Muons Inc. Bob Palmer, BNL Don Summers, Ole Miss.
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS SEMGENTATION STUDIES FOR BP#2 WITHIN FIRST CRYOSTAT AND RIGHT FLANGE OF Hg POOL INNER VESSEL ( 20 cm GAPS AND 15.8 g/cc.
Advanced Photon Source Undulator Technology for Ultimate Storage Rings (USRs) By Mark Jaski.
Answers to the review committee G. Ambrosio, B.Bordini, P. Ferracin MQXF Conductor Review November 5-6, 2014 CERN.
SAMURAI magnet Hiromi SATO SAMURAI Team, RIKEN Requirements Geometry Magnetic field Superconducting coil and cooling system Present status of construction.
HTS and LTS Magnet Design and Prototyping for RAON
PRESSURE VESSEL. 1.Determine the bursting steam pressure of a steel shell with diameter of 10 inches and made of ¼ in thick steel plate. The joint efficiency.
ENERGY FLOW AND DEPOSITION IN A 4-MW MUON-COLLIDER TARGET SYSTEM
What is the volume of a hula hoop?
Gersemi Cryostat Mechanical analysis
Update on PANDA solenoid design
Bunching system for SPES project
Positron production rate vs incident electron beam energy for a tungsten target
Preliminary result of FCC positron source simulation Pavel MARTYSHKIN
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS: NEW Hg MODULE
Question 3 The proponents should show more details about the modification of the detector system to be built in P42 Answers 3-1. Liquid-Hydrogen Target.
1 Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (11/15/2011)
1 Nicholas Souchlas (PBL) (MAP CONFERENCE SLAC 2012)
BESIII Collaboration Meeting, June 5~6, 2002, Zian Zhu
Magnetic gap calculation
CEPC Collider Magnets CHEN, Fusan November 13, 2018.
IR Beam Transport Status
S. Bettoni on behalf of the whole team
Presentation transcript:

Target Magnets & Shielding Bob Weggel Particle Beam Lasers, Inc. Magnet Optimization Research Engineering, LLC. March 5,

Isometric View of Three Target-Magnet Designs Design IDS120h (top), IDS120i (middle) & IDS120j (bottom) [courtesy Van Graves] 2

Cross Sections of Target-Magnet Designs [courtesy Van Graves] IDS120h: I.R.’s step down gradually from 120 cm to 45 cm; minimal gaps between coils IDS120i: Large gaps between cryostats; I.R.’s = [120, 100, 80, 60] cm; gaps at [3, 9, 15] m IDS120j: 3 coils per cryostat; I.R.’s = [120, 90, 70, 50] cm; gaps at [4,10,15] m; z max = 20 m 3

Cross section of Coils & Shielding Vessels of IDS120h Tubes & flanges: = 7.85 g/cm 3 ; shielding = 10 g/cm 3 ; Outer ≈ 30 tons/m; Inner ≈ 8 tons/m. 4

Isometric View of Meshed Shielding Vessels of IDS120h 5

Sag of Shielding Vessel vs. Length L & Wall Thickness t O.R. max = 114 cm; I.R. min = 60 cm; γ = 7.85 g/cm 3 ; γ shielding = 10 g/cm 3 ; t in = ½t out ; ~30 tons/m. With t out = 4 cm, t in = 2 cm & L = [6, 7, 8, 9] m, sag FEM = [1.5, 2.5, 4.1, 6.4] mm  Limit L to 8 m. 6

Sag of Shielding Vessel vs. Length L & Wall Thickness t O.R. max = 58 cm; I.R. min = 16 cm; t out = 4 cm; t in = 2 cm; γ = 7.85 g/cm 3 ; γ shielding = 10 g/cm 3 ; ~8 tons/m. When L = [6, 6½, 7, 7½, 8] m, sag = [2.0, 2.9, 4.0, 5.4, 8.0] mm  Limit L to 7 m. 7

8

Normalized Maximum Hoop Stress σ* ≡ σ max / (B 1 j 1 a 1 ) a 1 ≡ I.R. of coil; a 2 ≡ O.R. of coil; B 1 ≡ B(r=a 1 ), B 2 ≡ B(r=a 2 ); j 1 ≡ current density 9

On-Axis Field Profile B(z)of Target Magnet IDS120j = 20 T over the 75-cm length centered at z = −37.5 cm. B(z=15 m) ≈ 1.5 T. 10

11

12

Field Magnitude |B| ≡ (B r 2 +B z 2 ) ½ of Target Magnet IDS120j Maximum field = 20.4 T; contours at 1.5 T and integer values from 1 T through 20 T 13

Hoop Strain σ hoop in Magnet of Copper Hollow Conductor 700-MPa coil banding limits σ hoop in each coil to 0.35%; contour interval = 0.02%. 14

σ hoop in Copper & Nb 3 Sn Magnets (Most-Upstream Cryostat) Maximum hoop strain in each coil is 0.35%; contour interval = 0.02%. 15

σ hoop in Coils of Cryostat #2 (NbTi Conductor) Maximum hoop strain in each coil is 0.35%; contour interval = 0.02%. 16

σ hoop in in Coils of Cryostat #3 (NbTi Conductor) Maximum hoop strain in each coil is 0.35%. 17

σ hoop in Coils of Cryostat #4 (NbTi Conductor) Maximum hoop strain in two upstream coils = 0.35%; max.(σ hoop ) in downstream coil also is 0.35% if one adds an identical set of coils downstream. 18

Target Magnet “DS120j5”: Optimized I.R. of Flanking Coils I.R.’s of coils in cryostats #2-#4 are [120, 90, 116] cm, [76, 70, 75] cm & [67, 50, 67] cm. 19

On-Axis Field Profile B(z)of Target Magnet IDS120j5 Maximum field error is nearly 30% less than in design IDS120j. 20