Pathwise Mentoring UA Fort Smith College of Education Laura Witherington Spring 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ALAMEDA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Superintendent Search.
Advertisements

Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluation Guidelines. The single most influential component of an effective school is the individual teachers within that school.
TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.
PORTFOLIO.
Ib Ia Teachers lead in their classroom. Take responsibility for all students’ learning Communicate vision to students Use data to organize, plan, and set.
Elementary School Counselor
Charlotte Danielson’s The Four Domains of Teaching Responsibility
California Standards for the Teaching Profession
PATHWISE CLASSROOM OBSERVATION SYSTEM
Coastal Plains RESA Assessment Literacy: Formative Instructional Practices March 27, April 23, April 30, May 7 Session One: Modules 1 & 2 Session Two:
Designing Instruction Objectives, Indirect Instruction, and Differentiation Adapted from required text: Effective Teaching Methods: Research-Based Practice.
Co-Teaching as Best Practice in Student Teaching Conclusion 1.
SEED MAT Mentor Training MAT Overview Roles and Responsibilities Internship Realities Internship Rotation Cycles Danielson Frameworks.
Understanding the EPC Rating rubrics
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
7/14/20151 Effective Teaching and Evaluation The Pathwise System By David M. Agnew Associate Professor Agricultural Education.
How to prepare and what to expect  For schools and their faculty to determine who you are and what you believe in to get an idea about whether you are.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Domain II Creating and Environment for Learning
Teacher Evaluation Ashley Greene 10/29/13.
By Laura Nicole Bramlett Watkins
Teacher Certification Next Steps……. How certification works within your current practice Student Growth Criterion 3: Recognizing individual student learning.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Department of Public Instruction Standard V: Teacher.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
DISTRICT CFASST MEETING #2
Improving relevant standards. Aims and objectives Familiarize ourselves with best practice standards of teaching To think about how we can implement the.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.
Teacher and Principal Evaluation A new frontier….
FEBRUARY KNOWLEDGE BUILDING  Time for Learning – design schedules and practices that ensure engagement in meaningful learning  Focused Instruction.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
DVC Essay #2. The Essay  Read the following six California Standards for Teachers.  Discuss each standard and the elements that follow them  Choose.
Understanding Teachers Standards. Objectives of the session To develop an understanding of the teachers standards To start thinking about the relevant.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.
Presented by: Dr. Richard M. Cash Visible Differentiation: Supporting Teachers Through Observation.
Positive Behavior Intervention and Supports: A Brief Introduction.
Standards Aligned System What is SAS? A collaborative product of research and good practice Six distinct elements Clear Standards Fair.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Introduction to Teacher Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
Summative vs. Formative Assessment. What Is Formative Assessment? Formative assessment is a systematic process to continuously gather evidence about learning.
A Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson’s Model SHS – Professional Development 14 November 2012 ( Brenda Baker/Marnie Malone)
EVAL Self Assessment (Adapted from LaConner School Improvement Presentation) Your Name Your District Your Date.
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements: Evidence.
Ontario Ministry of Education Caring and Safe Schools on Ontario: Supporting Students with Special Education Needs Through Progressive Discipline K-12.
ISLLC Standard #3 Planning for School – wide Behavior Management
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
Writing a Professional Development Plan.  Step 1–Identify Indicators to be Assessed  Step 2 –Determine Average Baseline Score  Step 3 –Develop a Growth.
Office of Service Quality
Office of Service Quality
A TAP Story: A. A. Nelson Elementary School Jacqueline Smith, Principal A.A. Nelson Elementary School TAP Leadership Team Teddy Broussard, State TAP Director.
An Overview of Revisions to the Rhode Island Model
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
NM Teacher Evaluation Planning & Preparation Creating an Environment of Learning Professionalism Teaching for Learning Evaluation.
Designing Quality Assessment and Rubrics
By: Miss Michelle M. Brand Pine Grove Area Elementary School PSCA President-Elect.
Standard One: Engaging & Supporting All Students in Learning
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Comprehensive Planning
california Standards for the Teaching Profession
Analyzing Student Work Sample 2 Instructional Next Steps
CWT workshop 2.
Those Who Can, Teach 10th Edition Kevin Ryan and James M. Cooper
Presentation transcript:

Pathwise Mentoring UA Fort Smith College of Education Laura Witherington Spring 2009

Western Arkansas Education Renewal Zone Director, Laura Witherington Assistant, Penny Casey Partnering universities and schools for comprehensive reform and improvement

Expectations On handout 2, respond to the questions about expectations for Pathwise, teaching, and mentoring. We will share responses later. You will turn in this information.

Goals for these sessions You will know the four domains. You will know the nineteen criteria. You will be able to articulate how each of the nineteen criteria impact student learning. You will be able to articulate how each criterion should be integrated and implemented in your teaching.

What is Pathwise? Arkansas Pathwise Mentoring Model

What can new teachers expect? The school milieu: The shock of the familiar Administrators: A mixed bag Peers: A mixed blessing Students: Friends or fiends? Instruction: So much more to learn! Parents: Allies with different agendas

With the new Arkansas Mentoring Model, beginning teachers can also expect…... Support and guidance Professional growth and development Collaborative problem-solving Focused feedback $2,000 to support the growth of each new teacher, each school year during induction year(s)

Expectations Revealed

The Domains What is “good teaching?” What are some elements? How do we know it when we see it? In groups, brainstorm for the elements of good teaching and how we can recognize it.

The Domains APlanning B Environment CInstruction DProfessionalism

Domain A: Planning A1: Becoming familiar with relevant aspects of students’ background knowledge and experiences A2: Articulating clear learning goals for the lesson that are appropriate to the students A3: Demonstrating an understanding of the connections between the content that was previously learned, the current content, and the content that remains to be learned in the future A4: Creating or selecting teaching methods, learning activities, and instructional materials or other resources that are appropriate to the students and aligned with the goals of the lesson A5: Creating or selecting evaluation strategies that are appropriate for the students and that are aligned with the goals of the lesson

A1: Background Knowledge How do we define background knowledge and experiences? Why is knowledge of student backgrounds important? How does a teacher collect information on student backgrounds? To what degree do we need to know about students’ backgrounds?

A2: Learning Goals What is the difference between goals and activities? How do you know your goals are appropriate for your students? How can you differentiate goals for individual students or groups of students?

A3: Connections How does your lesson relate to past instruction? How does your lesson relate to future instruction? How does your fit within the discipline?

A4: Methods, Activities, and Materials How can you justify your methods, activities and materials as appropriate for The lesson goals? The content? The students? How can you justify using the same methods, activities, and materials for all students? Or, how can you use methods, activities, and materials to differentiate instruction?

A5: Evaluation How can you show your evaluation is aligned with your learning goals? How can I show my evaluation strategies are appropriate for individual students or groups of students? How can I ensure the evaluation is systematic? How can I use the evaluation for planning in the future?

Describe your most memorable teacher. We will share responses with the group.

Domain B: Environment B1: Creating a climate that promotes fairness. B2: Establishing and maintaining rapport with students. B3: Communicating challenging learning expectations to each student. B4: Establishing and maintaining consistent standards of classroom behavior. B5: Making the physical environment as safe and conducive to learning as possible.

B1: Fairness What does “fair” mean? How can you avoid unfair treatment of students? How can you keep students from treating each other unfairly? How can you promote fairness among students?

B2: Rapport What does it mean to establish rapport? How does a teacher establish rapport? How can a teacher establish rapport with individuals and with the entire class?

B3: Challenging Expectations What are some ways that we unconsciously communicate to students that we don’t believe they are capable of success? How can we communicate our confidence in students’ success to the entire class? How can we communicate our confidence in students’ success to individuals?

B4: Classroom Behavior How can teachers prevent disruptive behavior? How should teachers respond to disruptive behavior? How can teachers be consistent in their responses to disruptive behavior? How can teachers’ responses to disruptive behavior demonstrate respect for students?

B5: Physical Environment What are potential unsafe classroom circumstances, and how can we avoid them? How can the physical environment be altered to accommodate all students? How can the teacher alter the physical environment to facilitate learning?

Homework Review Kowalski data collection and sort the data by the criteria in Domains A and B. For two of the sorted pieces of data, write a paragraph that describes how Mr. Kowalski did or did not meet the standard. Note any questions you have about the Pathwise Overview, Domain A, or Domain B.