Overview of ONC’s Consumer Preferences Requirements Document A HITSP eTown-Hall Meeting Presenters:Co-Chairs/Facilitators of the Consumer Preferences Tiger.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Legal Work Group Developing a Uniform EHR/HIE Patient Consent Form.
Advertisements

ELTSS Alignment to Nationwide Interoperability Roadmap DRAFT: For Stakeholder Consideration in response to public comment.
Electronic Submission of Medical Documentation (esMD) Face to Face Informational Session esMD Requirements, Priorities and Potential Workgroups – 2:00pm.
Davis Wright Tremaine LLP Non-HIPAA Governmental Regulation of Healthcare Privacy and Security Sixteenth HIPAA Summit/The Privacy Symposium August 21,
Are you ready for HIPPO??? Welcome to HIPAA
NCVHS: Privacy and Confidentiality Leslie P. Francis, Ph.D., J.D. Distinguished Professor of Law and Philosophy Alfred C. Emery Professor of Law University.
Overview of Longitudinal Coordination of Care (LCC) Presentation to HIT Steering Committee May 24, 2012.
Interoperability and Health Information Exchange Workgroup March 10, 2015 Micky Tripathi, chair Chris Lehmann, co-chair.
A Presentation on ONC’s Electronic Consent Management (ECM) Landscape Assessment Joint Meeting of the HITSC TSSWG with the HITSC ASA WG, HITPC PSWG, Interoperability.
S&I Data Provenance Initiative Presentation to the HITSC on Data Provenance September 10, 2014.
Quality Improvement Prepeared By Dr: Manal Moussa.
Electronic Submission of Medical Documentation (esMD) Face to Face Informational Session Charter Discussion – 9:30am – 10:00am October 18, 2011.
HITSP Capabilities Public Review Webinar HITSP Clinical Note Details Extension Public Review Capability 119 Communicate Structured Document Care Management.
E-Referral enabled collaborative health care Opportunities and considerations Presented by: Sasha Bojicic Emerging Technology Group Canada Health Infoway.
1 Health Information Security and Privacy Collaboration (HISPC) National Conference HISPC Contributions to Massachusetts HIE Privacy and Security Progress:
Privacy and Security Tiger Team Recommendations Adopted by The Health IT Policy Committee Relevant to Consumer Empowerment May 24, 2013.
HIT Policy Committee Nationwide Health Information Network Governance Workgroup Recommendations Accepted by the HITPC on 12/13/10 Nationwide Health Information.
July 20, 2007 Healthcare Information Technology Standards Panel Principles for Proper Use of HITSP Interoperability Specifications And Proposal for Proper.
HITSP’s Scope  The Panel’s mission is to assist in the development of a Nationwide Health Information Network (NHIN) by addressing the standards-related.
State Alliance for e-Health Conference Meeting January 26, 2007.
“ Jericho / UT Austin Pilot” Privacy with Dynamic Patient Review April 9, 2013 Presented by: David Staggs, JD, CISSP Jericho Systems Corporation.
S&I Public Health * We will start the meeting 3 min after the hour October 7 th, 2014.
Public Health Data Standards Consortium
Networking and Health Information Exchange Unit 6b EHR Functional Model Standards.
1 HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability Current Framework and Fundamental Concepts  For those unfamiliar with the HITSP Harmonization Framework.
“ Jericho / UT Austin Pilot” Privacy with Dynamic Patient Review April 23, 2013 Presented by: David Staggs, JD, CISSP Jericho Systems Corporation.
HIT Policy Committee NHIN Workgroup Recommendations Phase 2 David Lansky, Chair Pacific Business Group on Health Danny Weitzner, Co-Chair Department of.
HIT Policy Committee Privacy & Security Tiger Team Update Deven McGraw, Co-Chair Center for Democracy & Technology Paul Egerman, Co-Chair June 25, 2010.
Privacy and Security Tiger Team Today’s Discussion: Query/Response Scenarios for Health Information Exchange February 21, 2013.
Data Segmentation for Privacy Agenda All-hands Workgroup Meeting May 9, 2012.
HIT Policy Committee Privacy & Security Workgroup Update Deven McGraw Center for Democracy & Technology Rachel Block Office of Health Information Technology.
Bi-monthly call with NDIIC Joining Prepared for:SAMHSA – OBHITA Team Prepared by:Tony Calice FEI Systems FEI Systems Inc. Copyright All Rights.
0 Connectathon 2009 Registration Bob Yencha Webinar | August 28, 2008 enabling healthcare interoperability.
Public Health Data Standards Consortium
Whose Responsibility is it? Karen Korb TELUS Health Solutions November 24, 2009 Privacy and Confidentiality in the EHR:
January 26, 2007 State Alliance for e-Health January 26, 2007 Robert M. Kolodner, MD Interim National Coordinator Office of the National Coordinator for.
Larry Wolf Certification / Adoption Workgroup May 13th, 2014.
Health eDecisions Use Case 2: CDS Guidance Service Strawman of Core Concepts Use Case 2 1.
Privacy, Security and Data Exchange Committee Annual Report 2009 PHDSC Home Page  PHDSC Annual Meeting November 12, 2009.
Health Delivery Services May 29, Eastern Massachusetts Healthcare Initiative Policy Work Group Session 2 May 29, 2009.
Data Segmentation for Privacy November 16 th, 2011.
HIT Standards Committee Overview and Progress Report March 17, 2010.
1 Privacy Plan of Action © HIPAA Pros 2002 All rights reserved.
Draft Provider Directory Recommendations Begin Deliberations re Query for Patient Record NwHIN Power Team July 10, 2014.
This material was developed by Duke University, funded by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information.
HIT Policy Committee NHIN Workgroup HIE Trust Framework: HIE Trust Framework: Essential Components for Trust April 21, 2010 David Lansky, Chair Farzad.
The Patient Choice Project Project Kickoff December 14 th, 2015.
Health Management Information Systems Unit 3 Electronic Health Records Component 6/Unit31 Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0/Fall 2010.
Electronic Submission of Medical Documentation (esMD)
Healthcare Information Standards Panel 2007,2008, and Beyond John D. Halamka MD Chair, HITSP.
Discussion - HITSC / HITPC Joint Meeting Transport & Security Standards Workgroup October 22, 2014.
Interoperability Roadmap Comments Privacy and Security Workgroup March 16, 2015.
HIT Policy Committee Meeting Nationwide Health Information Network Governance June 25, 2010 Mary Jo Deering, PhD ONC, Office of Policy and Planning NHIN.
The Patient Choice Project Use Case Working Session January 8 th, 2016.
July 27, 2007 HITSP Project Medications Management Use Case Presentation to CCHIT Steve Wagner and Scott Robertson.
Connecting for Health Common Framework: the Model Contract for Health Information Exchange Gerry Hinkley com July 18, 2006 Davis Wright.
Page 1 | Proprietary and Copyrighted Information Structure of the Code Don Thomson, Task Force Chair IESBA Meeting New York, USA September 15-16, 2015.
The Patient Choice Project Use Case Working Session February 12 th, 2016.
The Patient Choice Project Use Case Working Session February 5 th, 2016.
The Patient Choice Project Use Case Working Session January 29 th, 2016.
“ Jericho / UT Austin Pilot” Privacy with Dynamic Patient Review April 30, 2013 Presented by: David Staggs, JD, CISSP Jericho Systems Corporation.
Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology ONC Update for HITSP Board U.S. Department of Health and Human Services John W. Loonsk,
Interoperability Measurement for the MACRA Section 106(b) ONC Briefing for HIT Policy and Standards Committee April 19, 2016.
Query Health Operations Workgroup Standards & Interoperability (S&I) Framework October 13, :00am – 12:00pm ET.
Healthcare Information Technology Standards Panel
HITSP Project Medications Management Use Case Presentation to CCHIT
Current Framework and Fundamental Concepts
Health Information Security and Privacy Collaborative (HISPC) Overview
VERMONT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LEADERS
Alignment of Part 4B with ISAE 3000
Presentation transcript:

Overview of ONC’s Consumer Preferences Requirements Document A HITSP eTown-Hall Meeting Presenters:Co-Chairs/Facilitators of the Consumer Preferences Tiger Team Mureen Allen, MD|Walter Suarez, MD Johnathan Coleman|Elliot Sloane enabling healthcare interoperability Tuesday October 13, 2009 | 11:00 am – 1:00 pm (Eastern) Co-Sponsored by the HITSP Consumer Preferences Tiger Team and the HITSP Education, Communications and Outreach Committee 0 enabling healthcare interoperability

Slide 1 HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability Outline  Overview, Process, Timeline (5 minutes)  Consumer Preferences Defined; What is in scope; What is out of scope (20 minutes)  Stakeholders; Issues and Policy Implications; Perspectives and Scenarios (20 minutes)  Process Diagrams and Information Exchanges (35 minutes)  Functional Needs and Dataset Considerations (35 minutes)  Concluding Comments (5 minutes) [Slides will be available at the HITSP Webinars site -

Slide 2 HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability Learning and Discussion Objectives  During this 120-minute eTown-Hall, participants will: — Learn about the Consumer Preferences (CPs) Requirements Document released by ONC for public comment — Discuss specific areas of the document — Provide comments, questions, requests for clarifications and suggestions for improving the document — Focus discussion on information exchange needs and interoperability issues associated with CPs, as presented in the document  Comments, suggestions, clarifications will be brought to the Consumer Preferences Tiger Team (CP-TT) — CP-TT performing a more in-depth analysis an discussion/comment on the document — Consolidated comments will be prepared and finalized this week  Everyone encouraged to send comments to ONC — - go to ‘Standards and Certification’ on left panel, then ‘Use Cases and Requirements Documents’

Slide 3 HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability Overview  Consumer preferences and, in particular, privacy preferences has been an important priority topic for ONC — – Use Cases included some of the core elements of CPs  2006 Consumer Empowerment  2007 Consumer Access to Clinical Information — 2008 – AHIC recommendations on gaps/extensions included CP — February, 2009 – Consumer Preferences Extension — October, 2009 – Consumer Preferences Requirements Document

Slide 4 HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability National Health IT Process  ONC develops a document defining the scope, business processes, information exchanges, stakeholders, and functional requirements related to consumer preferences  HITSP evaluates the requirements, identifies needs for interoperability standards, evaluates and recommends standards to meet interoperability needs, identifies gaps and a roadmap to address the gaps  Recommended harmonized standards are tested and refined  Standards are incorporated into the Nationwide Health Information Network (NHIN), Health Information Exchanges (HIEs) and Electronic Health Record (EHR) certification requirements

Slide 5 HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability Timeline  Draft document issued October 5; comments due October 16  ONC addresses comments (October/November 2009); a final detailed requirements document is expected by December, 2009  HITSP performs its standards harmonization work between October, 2009 and January, 2010, prepares and delivers HITSP products (Interoperability Specifications, Capabilities, Service Collaborations, and Constructs)

Slide 6 HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability Consumer Preferences Defined (2.0) Per ONC document:  For the purposes of this document, the term “consumer preferences” is used to collectively represent several inter-related capabilities including, but not limited to: — The ability for a consumer to define permissions for who is permitted to access information in their EHR and under what circumstances this access is appropriate, — The ability for a consumer to express preferences for how and under what circumstances their health information would or would not be made available by their healthcare providers, — The ability for a consumer to authorize the release of their health information to another provider or third party; and — The ability to establish various types of consumer preferences including but not limited to consents, advance directives and other potential types outlined in the Dataset Considerations section of the document.

Slide 7 HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability Consumer Preferences Defined (2.0) Consumer expressions of choices, desires or directives in two general areas:  Health information privacy (consents or authorizations)  Establishing access restrictions and management parameters on health information  Defining privacy preference “conditionants” including:  By type of information (all data, segmentation of data)  By role and criteria based access, including type of encounter, embargoed records (VIP, legal restrictions)  By time (start, end, duration)  By level of participation (opt-in, opt-out, with or without additional classifications, with or without additional granularity)  By purpose of use  Content, Communication and Representation  Status and/or designation, including advanced directives, DNR orders, healthcare proxies, living wills, medical surrogates, access to family members  Care or associated services needs and communication needs, including appointment reminders, lab results  Comfort needs, including non-medical dietary restrictions, language needs, cultural needs, clergy preferences

Slide 8 HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability What is IN SCOPE? (2.2)  The Consumer Preferences Requirements Document describes a framework for handling the preferences that consumers may need in order to control access to their information and potentially sensitive health information (SHI). The scope of this Requirements Document includes a high level description detailing: — Key actors involved in the expression and creation of consumer preferences, namely the consumers, providers and organizations handling this information, — Descriptions of the expression, transmission and application of consumer preferences, — How consumer preferences are exchanged between electronic systems, — The exchange of health information authorized by a consumer preference, — The potential types of consumer preferences; — The location of a consumer preference’s origin and storage.

Slide 9 HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability What is OUT OF SCOPE? (2.2)  Certain aspects of the handling of consumer preference data are outside of the scope of this document including:  The details surrounding consumer education processes and requirements,  The process for reconciling situations where multiple preferences exist for one consumer/patient  Policies regarding whether or not a consumer preference is expected to be honored or accepted when sent from one entity to another,  The consequences of not following appropriate consumer preference procedures as prescribed by state, local, or entity policy,  The process and requirements for classifying and segmenting demographic and clinical information supporting consumer preferences regarding what they have deemed as sensitive health information and;  The mechanics of consumer auditing and tracking of this information, this area has been addressed in the 2007 Consumer Access to Clinical Information Use Case.

Slide 10 HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability Facilitated Guide to Q&A  Consumer Preferences Defined  Is definition sufficiently clear?  What are the challenges of combining privacy preferences with content/communication/representation preferences?  Are there areas or ‘conditionants’ of the privacy preferences missing?  Are there other areas within the content preferences that need to be considered?  In Scope / Out of Scope  Are there items currently in scope that need to be clarified or that need to be defined as out of scope?  Are there other/additional items that need to be considered in scope?  Are there items currently out of scope that need to be clarified or that need to be reconsidered as in scope?  Are there other/additional items that need to be defined as out of scope, for clarity purposes?

Slide 11 HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability Consumer Preferences Stakeholders (3.0)

Slide 12 HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability Issues and Policy Implications (4.0)  Consumer Participation  A national policy may be needed to address the variations in policies regarding Opt In/Opt Out, classifications, and granularity requirements  Consumer Education  The consumer must be educated on the content of their electronic health record, their rights and the implications of disclosing or not disclosing their medical information  Access Control and Disclosure  Privacy controls as well as the means for restricting data access are not standardized nor entirely supported by policies or regulations  Segmentation of Health Information  There is a lack of a definition of sensitive health information and how that information might be classified  Liability and Accountability  Additional guidance may be needed to reconcile and resolve situations where consumer preferences are in conflict

Slide 13 HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability Perspectives and Scenarios (5.0)  Perspectives/Roles  Consumer: Any recipient or legal proxy of a recipient of healthcare who wishes to create preferences regarding aspects of their care and how their health-related information (HRI) is accessed or shared. `  Primary Receiving Organization: Any organization (provider, information exchange or other information recipient) who receives and may act on or manage a consumer preference and its related health information.  Secondary Receiving Organization: Any organization (provider, information exchange or other information recipient) who receives from another organization and may act on or manage a consumer preference and its related health information.

Slide 14 HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability Perspectives and Scenarios (5.0)  Scenarios The Process Diagram explains business processes surrounding consumer preferences including descriptions of events and actions. The Diagram is broken into two scenarios and 29 events  Scenario 1: Creation of a Preference – The process by which the consumer creates a preference by expressing their preference an organization.  Scenario 2: Preference Management: Application, Exchange and Replacement – The process by which the an organization identifies and/or retrieves, applies, and exchanges a consumer’s preference to another organization.

Slide 15 HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability Facilitated Guide to Q&A  Stakeholders  Are there differences between stakeholders? Stakeholders missing?  Are the roles/relationships of ALL stakeholders clearly described and noted throughout the document?  Issues and Policy Implications  Comments on the issues and policy implications?  Perspectives and Scenarios  Are the Actors/Perspectives/Roles clear and sufficient? Are there any missing actors or perspectives?  Are the two scenarios sufficient? Is the second scenario too complex by including both the management of consumer perspectives the exchange of consumer perspectives?

Slide 16 HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability Process Diagrams (6.0) – Scenario 1

Slide 17 HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability Process Diagrams (6.0) – Scenario 1

Slide 18 HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability Process Diagrams (6.0) – Scenario 2

Slide 19 HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability Process Diagrams (6.0) – Scenario 2

Slide 20 HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability Information Exchanges (7.0)

Slide 21 HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability Information Exchanges (7.0)

Slide 22 HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability Facilitated Guide to Q&A  Process Diagrams  Are there any elements from the process flow in Scenario 1 not clear, incorrectly positioned or missing?  Any comments on the Scenario 1 Events and Actions?  Are there any elements from the process flow in Scenario 2 not clear, incorrectly positioned or missing?  Any comments on the Scenario 2 Events and Actions?  Information Exchanges  Are there any information exchanges that are not clear, incorrectly positioned or missing from the chart?  Is there a need to clarity any of the 11 legends/descriptions of information exchanges? Any additions/missing ones?

Slide 23 HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability Functional Needs (8.0)  Functional Needs describe the combination of end-user needs and system behaviors that support interoperability and information exchanges  Universal Functional Needs  Identity Verification: Consumer, Primary Receiving Organization, Secondary Receiving Organization  Consumer Functional Needs  Express Preference  Amend Preference  Replace Preference  Primary/Secondary Receiving Organizations Functional Needs  Create Preference  Transmit Preference  View Preference  Store Preference  Apply Preference  Amend Preference  Request Exchange  Request Audit  Replace Preference  Transmit Update of Preference  Reconcile Conflicting Preferences  Acknowledge Receipt of Preference (or Update)  Maintain Audit Log of Preferences  Classify Data

Slide 24 HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability Dataset Considerations (9.0)  General Considerations:  Consumers, at the highest level, require the capability to opt in or opt out of the exchange of their health information.  Consumers may also request that only certain classes of information be shared.  These classes of information and preferences could be classified at varying levels of granularity.  Defining the needed levels of granularity is not focus of this Consumer Preferences Requirements Document.  Data Set Considerations, provides a comprehensive (not exhaustive) framework that can be used to support standards development and to accommodate the major types of consumer preferences

Slide 25 HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability Dataset Considerations (9.0)  Examples of Dataset Types (1):  Identity and Preference Verification  Consumer ID Information - addressed in AHIC Use Cases  Primary/Secondary Organizational ID Information  Consumer Preference Information (identification and audit)

Slide 26 HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability Dataset Considerations (9.0)  Examples of Dataset Types (2):  Data Classification (possible types of consumer preferences/classifications)  Access Restriction & Management  Consent & Disclosure of Information – Sequestering or disclosing PHI and/or sensitive health information (categories may include HIV/AIDS, Mental Health, Substance Abuse, Genetic Information, STDs, etc.)  Role & Criteria Based Access (Organization, Role, Encounter Based Access & Authorization, Embargoed Records, Time Limited Access, etc.)  Content preference – The actual preference surrounding delivering care or associated services  Status and/or designation (advanced directives, DNR, etc)  Care or associated service needs – Communication needs (appointment reminders, lab results, etc)  Comfort Needs or Palliative Care (non-medical dietary restrictions, language needs, cultural needs, etc)

Slide 27 HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability Dataset Considerations (9.0)  Examples of Dataset Types (3):  Components of Access Restrictions/Management and Content Preferences  Level/Status of Participation (opt-in/opt-out, with/without granularity)  Consent Information (by type of requestor, purpose, type of data, etc)

Slide 28 HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability Facilitated Guide to Q&A  Functional Needs  Are there any changes, additions or considerations needed on the Universal Functional Needs?  Are there any changes, additions or considerations needed on the Consumer Functional Needs?  Are there any changes, additions or considerations needed on the Primary/Secondary Receiving Organization Functional Needs?

Slide 29 HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability Facilitated Guide to Q&A  Dataset Considerations  Are there any issues of clarity or scope regarding the general dataset considerations?  Any questions about the Identify and Preferences Verification dataset examples/considerations?  Any questions about the Data Classification – Access Restriction and Management examples/considerations? (i.e., are there other types of data segmentation to consider?)  Any questions about the Data Classification – Content Preferences examples/considerations?  Any questions about the Data Classification – Components of Access Restrictions/Management examples/considerations?

Slide 30 HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability Additional Discussion / Questions