Carl R. Long EDU-505 Future of Education Dr. Therese M. Ajtum-Roberts Ed.D

Navy College Program 2017 Educational opportunities ‐ Academic Advisors  Provides assistance ‐ Knowledge level testing  Preparing for the future History/Mission ‐ V 12 Program ‐ Mission – Academic support Technology ‐ Testing ability  CLEP and CPST ‐ Future expansion

Navy College Program 2017 Trends to Advance ‐ Plan for future  Technological advances,  Economical/budgetary issues, and  Public policy making Scanning for the Future ‐ Obsolescence ‐ Environmental Options ‐ Embracing Change

Navy College Program 2017 Five-Year Vision ‐ Scenarios ‐ Blended solution  Testing on line  Web/pod casts ‐ Challenges to the vision  No money in budget for change  We are a military installation, college is on your own time  Pilfering of tablets and other PC devices  Extra man-hours to handle additional workload  Who is doing this? We are not creating another position

Navy College Program 2017 ‐ Opportunities for the vision  Saving money by reducing overall organization  Expanding minds, expands potential  Barcoding/scanners prevents theft  Virtual/online learning can be whenever, not confined to 8 hour day  Invest in a sailors future, and he/she will invest in the Navy Preparations for the Future ‐ No easy task ‐ Philosophical change

Navy College Program 2017 ‐ Implemented immediately ‐ Budget and resources in place ‐ Buy-in from management ‐ Spread the word All Hands on Deck ‐ Achieving the goals posed ‐ Stresses its importance ‐ Data collection ‐ Feedback loop

Navy College Program 2017 References ‐ Alison, C. (03 Dec 2006). V 12 Program. Retrieved from ‐ Betts, K., Hartman, K., & Oxholm, C. (2009). Re-examining & repositioning higher education: Twenty economic and demographic factors driving online and blended program enrollments. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(4), 3-23 ‐ EdSource (2006). The School District Budget Process. Questions and Answers about California schools. November ‐ Farkas, S. Duffett, A. (2012). How Americans Would Slim Down Public Education. Downloaded from ‐ Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S.,Cummins, M., Estrada, V., Freeman, A., and Ludgate, H. (2013). NMC Horizon Report: 2013 Higher Education Edition.

Navy College Program 2017 References ‐ Kroll, A. (2013). Back to $chool: College Is the Past, Prison Is the Future. New Labor Forum22(2) 39–43. Reprints and permissions:sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: / ‐ Mietzner, D. and Reger, G. (2005). Advantages and disadvantages of scenario approaches for strategic foresight. Technology Intelligence and Planning, (1), 220–239 ‐ Richards,L. O’Shea, J. Connolly, M. (2004). Managing the concept of strategic change within a higher education institution: the role of strategic and scenario planning techniques. Strategic Change.13, 345–359 doi: /jsc.690 ‐ Preston, C., Mowbray, L. (2008). Teaching Science: The Journal of the Australian Science Teachers Association, Jun2008, Vol. 54 Issue 2, p p

Navy College Program 2017 References ‐ Strong, K. Fink, B.(2007). Using learning communities to foster futuring: the bowling green state university experience. Futures Research Quarterly, ‐ United States Navy (modified 25 October 2013). Retrieved from