Håkon Dahl-Olsen, Sridharakumar Narasimhan and Sigurd Skogestad Optimal output selection for batch processes.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Self-Optimizing Control of the HDA Process Outline of the presentation –Process description. –Self-optimizing control procedure. –Self-optimizing control.
Advertisements

Economic Growth and Dynamic Optimization - The Comeback - Rui Mota – Tel Ext April 2009.
1 Optimal input design for online identification : a coupled observer-MPC approach by: Saida Flila, Pascal Dufour, Hassan Hammouri 10/07/2008 IFAC’08,
1 CONTROLLED VARIABLE AND MEASUREMENT SELECTION Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)
1 Effective Implementation of optimal operation using Self- optimizing control Sigurd Skogestad Institutt for kjemisk prosessteknologi NTNU, Trondheim.
Solving Engineering Problems by Using Computer A Case Study on Fed-Batch Bioreactor.
CHAPTER 5 The Production Process and Costs Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior.
NORM BASED APPROACHES FOR AUTOMATIC TUNING OF MODEL BASED PREDICTIVE CONTROL Pastora Vega, Mario Francisco, Eladio Sanz University of Salamanca – Spain.
Development of Dynamic Models Illustrative Example: A Blending Process
Explicit Non-linear Optimal Control Law for Continuous Time Systems via Parametric Programming Vassilis Sakizlis, Vivek Dua, Stratos Pistikopoulos Centre.
Colloquium on Optimisation and Control University of Sheffield Monday April 24 th 2006 Sensitivity Analysis and Optimal Control Richard Vinter Imperial.
Dynamic Optimization Dr

1 M. Panahi ’Plantwide Control for Economically Optimal Operation of Chemical Plants’ Plantwide Control for Economically Optimal Operation of Chemical.
Introduction to API Process Simulation
CHEN RONG ZHANG WEN JUN.  Introduction and Features  Price model including Bayesian update  Optimal trading strategies  Coding  Difficulties and.
1 Single-cycle mixed-fluid LNG (PRICO) process Part II: Optimal operation Sigurd Skogestad & Jørgen Bauck Jensen Quatar, January 2009.
THEORETICAL MODELS OF CHEMICAL PROCESSES
GHGT-8 Self-Optimizing and Control Structure Design for a CO 2 Capturing Plant Mehdi Panahi, Mehdi Karimi, Sigurd Skogestad, Magne Hillestad, Hallvard.
1 Self-optimizing control: Simple implementation of optimal operation Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian University of Science.
1 Active constraint regions for optimal operation of a simple LNG process Magnus G. Jacobsen and Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering NTNU.
1 Coordinator MPC for maximization of plant throughput Elvira Marie B. Aske* &, Stig Strand & and Sigurd Skogestad* * Department of Chemical Engineering,
Offset Free Tracking with MPC under Uncertainty: Experimental Verification Audun Faanes * and Sigurd Skogestad † Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian.
BsysE595 Lecture Basic modeling approaches for engineering systems – Summary and Review Shulin Chen January 10, 2013.
The Production Process and Costs
1 Outline Skogestad procedure for control structure design I Top Down Step S1: Define operational objective (cost) and constraints Step S2: Identify degrees.
Optimal Nonlinear Neural Network Controllers for Aircraft Joint University Program Meeting October 10, 2001 Nilesh V. Kulkarni Advisors Prof. Minh Q. Phan.
Temperature Controller A model predictive controller (MPC) based on the controller proposed by Muske and Rawlings (1993) is used. For the predictions we.
1 1 V. Minasidis et. al. | Simple Rules for Economic Plantwide ControlSimple Rules for Economic Plantwide Control, PSE & ESCAPE 2015 SIMPLE RULES FOR ECONOMIC.
1 Single-cycle mixed-fluid LNG (PRICO) process Part II: Optimal operation Sigurd Skogestad & Jørgen Bauck Jensen Qatar, January 2009.
Solution of a Partial Differential Equations using the Method of Lines
Lecture 7 and 8 The efficient and optimal use of natural resources.
Optimal Operation of a Wastewater Treatment Unit Using Advanced Control Strategy Emad Ali Chemical Engineering Department King Saud University.
1 A Plantwide Control Procedure Applied to the HDA Process Antonio Araújo and Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian University.
1 Practical plantwide process control. Extra Sigurd Skogestad, NTNU Thailand, April 2014.
1 Outline About Trondheim and myself Control structure design (plantwide control) A procedure for control structure design I Top Down Step 1: Degrees of.
1 E. S. Hori, Maximum Gain Rule Maximum Gain Rule for Selecting Controlled Variables Eduardo Shigueo Hori, Sigurd Skogestad Norwegian University of Science.
1 Active constraint regions for economically optimal operation of distillation columns Sigurd Skogestad and Magnus G. Jacobsen Department of Chemical Engineering.
Integrated Process Networks: Nonlinear Control System Design for Optimality and Dynamic Performance Michael Baldea a,b and Prodromos Daoutidis a a University.
1/31 E. S. Hori, Self-optimizing control… Self-optimizing control configurations for two-product distillation columns Eduardo Shigueo Hori, Sigurd Skogestad.
Linearizability of Chemical Reactors By M. Guay Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta, Canada Work Supported.
1 Self-optimizing control From key performance indicators to control of biological systems Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian.
Controllability Analysis for Process and Control System Design
Review of PMP Derivation We want to find control u(t) which minimizes the function: x(t) = x*(t) +  x(t); u(t) = u*(t) +  u(t); (t) = *(t) +  (t);
Control Structure Design: New Developments and Future Directions Vinay Kariwala and Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering NTNU, Trondheim,
Optimal Path Planning on Matrix Lie Groups Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics Sung K. Koh U n i v e r s i t y o f P e n n s y l v a n i a.
1 Outline About Trondheim and myself Control structure design (plantwide control) A procedure for control structure design I Top Down Step 1: Degrees of.
AUTOMATIC CONTROL THEORY II Slovak University of Technology Faculty of Material Science and Technology in Trnava.
Sensitivity Analysis for the Purposes of Parameter Identification of a S. cerevisiae Fed-batch Cultivation Sensitivity Analysis for the Purposes of Parameter.
1 Self-optimizing control From key performance indicators to control of biological systems Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian.
1 Combination of Measurements as Controlled Variables for Self-optimizing Control Vidar Alstad † and Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering,
Standards Certification Education & Training Publishing Conferences & Exhibits Automation Connections ISA EXPO 2006.
1 Visit at Perstorp Daniel Greiner Edvardsen (Master student) Johannes Jäschke (PhD) April 14th, 2010.
1 Self-optimizing control: Simple implementation of optimal operation Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian University of Science.
Coordinator MPC with focus on maximizing throughput
Enzyme Kinetics Enzyme Kinetics:
Throughput maximization by improved bottleneck control
Recent Development of Global Self-Optimizing Control
Extended Baum-Welch algorithm
Optimal control T. F. Edgar Spring 2012.
Sigurd Skogestad Institutt for kjemisk prosessteknologi
Example regulatory control: Distillation
CONTROLLED VARIABLE AND MEASUREMENT SELECTION
Example regulatory control: Distillation
Example regulatory control: Distillation
Example regulatory control: Distillation
Production and Operations Management
Outline Control structure design (plantwide control)
Capacity Planning For Products and Services
Presentation transcript:

Håkon Dahl-Olsen, Sridharakumar Narasimhan and Sigurd Skogestad Optimal output selection for batch processes

Outline Batch optimization Implementation schemes Variable selection method Reactor case study Summary

Batch optimization Minimum time to given specification Maximum product in fixed time

Dynamic optimization

Implementation Online optimization: measurements used to update model Self-optimizing control: good outputs give near optimal performance

Variable selection Unconstrained degrees of freedom Based on Pontryagin’s minimum principle Look for variables which give small deviation from optimality when controlled at fixed reference, even under disturbances

Maximum gain rule Loss is defined in terms of value of the Hamiltonian The loss is time-varying

Maximum gain rule Need to relate variations in inputs to variations in outputs

Maximum gain rule for dynamic optimization Assume the model is scaled such that δy max ≈1 Select y’s to minimize the following expression along the nominal trajectory

How to obtain G How does variations in inputs map to the states? Neighboring optimal control gives δu(t) = K(t)δx(t) We estimate G by

Example Maximize production of product P in a fed-batch bioreactor with fixed final time of 150 hours Reaction is driven by the presence of a substrate S, which is consumed in the biomass generation The biomass concentration is constrained Bioreactor Srinivasan, B., D. Bonvin, et al. (2002). "Dynamic optimization of batch processes II. Role of measurements in handling uncertainty." Comp. chem. eng. 27:

Example X < 3.7 Biomass concentration S Substrate concentration P Product concentration VVolume u < 1 Substrate feedrate Bioreactor u [L/h] S in =200 g/L Controller Measurements

Example X < 3.7 Biomass concentration S Substrate concentration P Product concentration VVolume u < 1 Substrate feedrate Bioreactor

Biomass growth rate Bioreactor

Consider gain magnitude Transformation of input: ξ=√u H ξξ is constant Minimizing of 1/K 2 corresponds to maximizing K 2 Bioreactor

S Comparison of gains X P V Bioreactor

Simulation results

Summary Maximum gain rule extended to dynamics Variational gain from neighboring optimal control theory Method works well for a small case study