IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria Examples. THE IUCN CATEGORIES  A. Declining Population  B. Small Distribution and Decline or Fluctuation  C.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Biodiversity.
Advertisements

IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) Red List Case Studies.
IUCNs Red List of Ecosystems: An Evolving Tool for Risk Assessment to Support Priority Setting & Landscape Action Edmund Barrow (Ecosystem Management Programme),
The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species IUCN Red List Categories.
The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ Red List Criteria: Criteria C, D and E.
The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ Red List Criteria: Criterion B.
We are working on a contract with National Grid to undertake a first year of survey for wild blue lupines and Karner blue butterflies/Frosted Elfins under.
Landscape Level Conservation Planning for prioritizing conservation action in Mozambique Bruno Nhancale, PhD Conservation Science workshop, 21 st April.
WALLACE RESOURCE LIBRARY Lecture 06 – Endemism and Biodiversity Hotspots WALLACE RESOURCE LIBRARY Lecture 06 – Endemism and Biodiversity Hotspots This.
CONSERVATION AND BIODIVERSITY 4.2 Evaluating Biodiversity and Vulnerability.
Section 2: Biodiversity at Risk
The IUCN Red List categories Dr. Esko Hyvärinen Senior Environmental Adviser Ministry of the Environment, Finland Syktyvkar, Republic of Komi, Russia,
458 Estimating Extinction Risk (the IUCN criteria) Fish 458; Lecture 24.
A State of the world’s birds report Critically Endangered birds: a global audit.
Chapter 11 Sustaining Terrestrial Biodiversity: The Ecosystem Approach Amy Kinnear and Emily Bold 3 rd hour.
Species at Risk.  Plant and animal that has a low or declining population  May be at risk of extinction  Species that is sensitive to human disturbance.
KAREN E10-1 Endangered Species. Summary An endangered species is a population of organisms which is facing a high risk of becoming extinct because it.
IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) Introduction to the IUCN Red Listing Process.
Reserves and National Parks Textbook chapter- Conservation of Biodiversity Textbook chapter- Conservation of Biodiversity.
Preventing Endangered Species Listings with the Tongass Conservation Strategy Steve Brockmann U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Alliance for Zero Extinction Conserving Sites for the World’s Most Imperiled Species.
Factors of Extinction Why are some species more or less prone to extinction?
The 2010 Red List of Finnish species: the assessment work in practice Ilpo Mannerkoski Finnish Environment Institute Syktyvkar
The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ Using the IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional Levels.
Mechanisms of Species Loss Fri. Feb. 11
Assessment of beetles and birds: Problems and solutions Ilpo Mannerkoski Finnish Environment Institute Syktyvkar
KENYA WILDLIFE SERVICE. Large Carnivore Conflict Management in Kenya Implementing National Carnivore Conservation Strategies Charles Musyoki, PhD Kenya.
Salmon in the Russian Far East: Distribution, abundance and status Salmonid Specialist Group.
Human Disturbances to Ecosystems Sustaining Biodiversity.
Threat status Europe Least concern Protected by EU Nature Directives and 2 international agreement(s) Protected in 1140 Natura 2000 sites Lives in forest.
Conservation Assessment and Management Plan/ Prioritization (C.A.M.P. ) A methodology for Rapid Assessment of Conservation Status.
The World Conservation Union (IUCN) Red List Criteria are used to determine extinction risk and set numerical thresholds for qualification for three globally.
Conservation of Migratory Birds s amateur birders noticed decline in migratory songbirds, not as many seen in favorite birding spots over many years.
Perissodactyla. Origin Equidae Tapiridae Rhinocerotidae.
Figure 6.1 The major threats for plants, mammals and birds that are considered vulnerable to extinction.
Red List Assessment of CWRs in Spain. Implications for genetic reserve conservation. José M. Iriondo and Lori J. De Hond Universidad Politécnica de Madrid.
Monitoring for Conservation Planning and Management Elizabeth Kennedy Conservation International 5-8 June 2007 Intervention Monitoring Exchange, Wang Lang.
Rare, Threatened, & Endangered Wildlife What causes some species to become rare or extinct? How does management of rare, threatened, & endangered species.
The global status of dugongs. Conservation significance of dugongs Only member of family Dugongidae Only strictly marine herbivorous mammal Largest population.
Monday, December 8 th, Write A if you agree with a statement, write D if you disagree with the statement and correct the statement StatementAgree.
Chapter 18 Conservation of Biodiversity. The 6 th Mass Extinction Extinction- when there are no longer any of the species in the world. We are currently.
Causes of Extinction. Non-human causes of extinction: Volcanic events Ocean temperature change Sea level changes Meteorites Glaciations Global climate.
Identifying Species Targets at the Landscape/ Seascape Scale.
CONSERVATION AND BIODIVERISTY. BIODIVERISITY EVOLUTION SPECIATION MUTATIONSNATURAL SELECTION GEOGRAPHIC ISOLATION GENETIC DRIFT.
IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) Definitions of terms used in the IUCN Categories & Criteria Location.
Starter Write down four factors that you think will make a species more prone to extinction. Think about endangered species that you know and species that.
Prioritization. 128 KBAs were divided into four (4) priority levels/tiers Data used: (no population data available for most species)  extent of occurrence/area.
Designing Protected Areas
Regional or Local Biodiversity: Biodiversity at regional level is better understood by categorizing species richness into four types. Whittaker (1972)
5 THREATS TO BIODIVERSITY By: Candice Waddle ES 225: Tashi Land Module 2 – Homework “The Arts” Resources Listed in the Notes.
CEPF Strategic Funding Direction 3 Meeting: 28 th June, 2006 Outcomes Monitoring: Status & trends in biodiversity Establishing standard regional monitoring.
Carlos Romao / Annemarie Bastrup-Birk 13 th meeting Standing Forestry Committee Brussels, 18 September 2015 State of nature in the EU - focus on forest.
IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) risk of extinction The IUCN Red List assessment estimates risk of extinction What is the likelihood.
Starter Write down four factors that you think will make a species more prone to extinction. Think about endangered species that you know and species that.
9th WGEA Meeting, Brasilia1 Biodiversity: Some Key Trends Worldwide by Carolle Mathieu 9 th WGEA meeting, Brasilia 31 May, 2004.
Joint Meeting of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists
CHAPTER 38 Conservation Biology
You will be given the answer. You must give the correct question.
Final ESA Listing Determination for Nassau Grouper
National Marine Science Centre, Southern Cross University, Australia
National Marine Science Centre, Southern Cross University, Australia
CRITERION B: RESTRICTED GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION THEORY AND EXAMPLES
CASE STUDIES – RED LIST OF ECOSYSTEMS
Endangered Species By: GG.
CRITERION E: QUANTITATIVE RISK ANALYSIS
Mammals Birds Insects Fish
Biodiversity at Risk.
Pilbara leaf-nosed bat
European Red List of Habitats
Presentation transcript:

IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria Examples

THE IUCN CATEGORIES  A. Declining Population  B. Small Distribution and Decline or Fluctuation  C. Small Population Size and Decline  D. Very Small or Restricted  E. Quantitative Analysis

Ancistrocladus robertsoniorum J. Léonard Case study 1 Family: Ancistrocladaceae Common Name: unknown Distribution: Kenya - K7 (Kwale District)

Liana growing up to 30 m and found in moist, semi- deciduous, lowland forest. The population is restricted to 3 locations, all within national and forest reserves, and has an area of occupancy less than 500 km 2. Extent of occurrence is unknown. This species is locally common, although the total number of mature individuals within the population is unknown. The plant is not harvested despite being thought to have some insecticidal properties. Habitat is legally protected, although this protection is not enforced - the main threat to the species is habitat degradation caused by increasing human demand for land for cultivation. Frequent fires during dry seasons may also be a threat to this species.

Questions Is there enough information to assess the species? Is it Extinct or Extinct in the Wild? Does the plant qualify for any of the categories of threat? Case study 1 Yes No

A. Declining Population B. Small Distribution and Decline or Fluctuation C. Small Population Size and Decline D. Very Small or Restricted E. Quantitative Analysis IUCN Criteria Case study 1

A. Declining Population B. Small Distribution and Decline or Fluctuation C. Small Population Size and Decline D. Very Small or Restricted E. Quantitative Analysis IUCN Criteria Case study 1

B. Small Distribution Extent of occurrence less than 100 km 2 Extent of occurrence less than 5000 km 2 Extent of occurrence less than km 2 Or Area of occupancy less than 10 km 2 Area of occupancy less than 500 Km 2 Area of occupancy less than 2000 km 2 Critically Endangered EndangeredVulnerable Case study 1

B. Small Distribution Extent of occurrence less than 100 km 2 Extent of occurrence less than 5000 km 2 Extent of occurrence less than km 2 Or Area of occupancy less than 10 km 2 Area of occupancy less than 500 km 2 Area of occupancy less than 2000 km 2 Critically Endangered EndangeredVulnerable Case study 1

B. Criterion Small Distribution Severely fragmented or few locations Extreme fluctuation Continuing Decline Case study 1

B. Criterion Small Distribution Severely fragmented or few locations Extreme fluctuation Continuing Decline Case study 1

B2. Small Area of Occupancy Area of occupancy less than 500 km 2 Endangered B2ab(iii) Case study 1

A. Declining Population B. Small Distribution and Decline or Fluctuation C. Small Population Size and Decline D. Very Small or Restricted E. Quantitative Analysis IUCN Criteria Case study 1

Final Listing: Ancistrocladus robertsoniorum J. Léonard Endangered B2ab(iii) Case study 1 Area of occupancy less than 500 km 2 Severely fragmented (< 5 locations) Continuing decline in area, extent and quality of habitat

Ficus faulkneriana C.C. Berg Case study 2 Family: Moraceae Common Name:Mkuyu (Usamba) Mvumo (Swahili) Distribution: Kenya, Tanzania - K7 (Kwale district), T3 (Pangani, Korogwe)

An epiphytic/strangler tree found growing in coastal scrub and wet forest areas. The fragmented population was known to occur at 4 locations, with an additional site where one collection was made in Only 3 locations are now known and the extent of occurrence is estimated at less than 20,000 km 2 with a total area of occupancy less than 10 km 2. Ongoing loss of habitat and fragmentation are reported as the main threats to the population which currently has less 50 mature individuals (only 4 recorded in Dzirihini and Gongoni Forest Reserve, Kenya). Habitat is highly degraded with danger of complete clearance. Population decline attributed to habitat degradation.

Questions Is there enough information to assess the species? Is it Extinct or Extinct in the Wild? Does the plant qualify for any of the categories of threat? Case study 2 - Yes - No

A. Declining Population B. Small Distribution and Decline or Fluctuation C. Small Population Size and Decline D. Very Small or Restricted E. Quantitative Analysis IUCN Criteria Case study 2

A. Declining Population B. Small Distribution and Decline or Fluctuation C. Small Population Size and Decline D. Very Small or Restricted E. Quantitative Analysis IUCN Criteria Case study 2

B. Small Distribution Extent of occurrence less than 100 km 2 Extent of occurrence less than 5000 km 2 Extent of occurrence less than km 2 Or Area of occupancy less than 10 km 2 Area of occupancy less than 500 Km 2 Area of occupancy less than 2000 km 2 Critically Endangered EndangeredVulnerable Case study 2

B. Small Distribution Extent of occurrence less than 100 km 2 Extent of occurrence less than 5000 km 2 Extent of occurrence less than km 2 Or Area of occupancy less than 10 km 2 Area of occupancy less than 500 Km 2 Area of occupancy less than 2000 km 2 Critically Endangered EndangeredVulnerable Case study 2

B. Criterion Small Distribution Severely fragmented or few locations Extreme fluctuation Continuing Decline Case study 2

B. Criterion Small Distribution Severely fragmented or few locations Extreme fluctuation Continuing Decline Case study 2

Red Listing Critically Endangered B2ab(ii,iii,iv,v) Case study 2 Area of occupancy less than 10 Km 2 Severely fragmented Continuing decline in: area of occupancy; area, extent and quality of habitat; number of locations or subpopulations; number of mature individuals

A. Declining Population B. Small Distribution and Decline or Fluctuation C. Small Population Size and Decline D. Very Small or Restricted E. Quantitative Analysis IUCN Criteria Case study 2

A. Declining Population B. Small Distribution and Decline or Fluctuation C. Small Population Size and Decline D. Very Small or Restricted E. Quantitative Analysis IUCN Criteria Case study 2

C. Criterion Population Figures Critically Endangered <250 Endangered<2 500 Vulnerable< Case study 2

C. Criterion Population Figures Critically Endangered <250 Endangered<2 500 Vulnerable< Case study 2

C. Criterion Small Population Continuing decline of at least 25% within 3 years or 1 generation Case study 2 Continuing decline in numbers of mature individuals & at least one of a or b ….

C. Criterion Small Population Case study 2 Continuing decline in numbers of mature individuals & at least one of a or b …. Continuing decline of at least 25% within 3 years or 1 generation

C2. Continuing decline and one of a or b C2a Population structure in form of: (i) no subpopulation > 50 mature individuals OR (ii) 90% in one subpopulation Case study 2 C2b Extreme fluctuations in numbers of mature individuals OR

C2. Continuing decline and one of a or b C2a Population structure in form of: (i) no subpopulation > 50 mature individuals OR (ii) 90% in one subpopulation Case study 2 C2b Extreme fluctuations in numbers of mature individuals OR

Ficus faulkneriana C.C. Berg Critically Endangered C2a(i) Case study 2

A. Declining Population B. Small Distribution and Decline or Fluctuation C. Small Population Size and Decline D. Very Small or Restricted E. Quantitative Analysis IUCN Criteria Case study 2

A. Declining Population B. Small Distribution and Decline or Fluctuation C. Small Population Size and Decline D. Very Small or Restricted E. Quantitative Analysis IUCN Criteria Case study 2

D. Criterion Critically Endangered 50 Endangered 250 Vulnerable D D2 acute restriction in area of occupancy or in the number of locations

Case study 2 D. Criterion Critically Endangered 50 Endangered 250 Vulnerable D D2 acute restriction in area of occupancy or in the number of locations

Ficus faulkneriana C.C. Berg Critically Endangered D Case study 2

Final Listing: Ficus faulkneriana C.C. Berg Critically Endangered B2ab(i,ii,iii,iv,v); C2a(i); D Case study 2

Ziziphus robertsoniana Beentje Case study 3 Family: Rhamnaceae Common Name: unknown Distribution: Kenya, Tanzania - K7 (Kwale district), T3

A tree (6-16 m tall) growing in moist, semi-deciduous lowland forest. Extent of occurrence is recorded as less than 1,000 km 2. The species is known to exist in 5 locations in Kenya. The Tanzanian population is unknown. Information on the number of mature trees in the population is largely anecdotal: it is thought that a large proportion of the population is juvenile with very few reproducing adults present. All the Kenyan locations are subject to ongoing encroachment and their long-term security remains unknown. The status of the Tanzanian sites is unknown. Main threats to this species are ongoing loss and degradation of forest areas, and competition from invasive plant species.

Questions Is there enough information to assess the species? Is it Extinct or Extinct in the Wild? Does the plant qualify for any of the categories of threat? Case study 3 - Yes - No

A. Declining Population B. Small Distribution and Decline or Fluctuation C. Small Population Size and Decline D. Very Small or Restricted E. Quantitative Analysis IUCN Criteria Case study 3

A. Declining Population B. Small Distribution and Decline or Fluctuation C. Small Population Size and Decline D. Very Small or Restricted E. Quantitative Analysis IUCN Criteria Case study 3

B. Small Distribution Extent of occurrence less than 100 km 2 Extent of occurrence less than 5000 km 2 Extent of occurrence less than km 2 Or Area of occupancy less than 10 km 2 Area of occupancy less than 500 Km 2 Area of occupancy less than 2000 km 2 Critically Endangered EndangeredVulnerable Case study 3

B. Small Distribution Extent of occurrence less than 100 km 2 Extent of occurrence less than 5000 km 2 Extent of occurrence less than km 2 Or Area of occupancy less than 10 km 2 Area of occupancy less than 500 Km 2 Area of occupancy less than 2000 km 2 Critically Endangered EndangeredVulnerable Case study 3

B. criterion Small Distribution Severely fragmented or few locations Extreme fluctuation Continuing Decline Case study 3

B. criterion Small Distribution Severely fragmented or few locations Extreme fluctuation Continuing Decline Case study 3

Red Listing Endangered B1ab(i,ii,iii,iv,v) Case study 3 Extent of occurrence less than 5000 Km 2 Severely fragmented (< 5 locations) Continuing decline in: extent of occurrence; area of occupancy; area, extent and quality of habitat; number of locations or subpopulations; number of mature individuals

A. Declining Population B. Small Distribution and Decline or Fluctuation C. Small Population Size and Decline D. Very Small or Restricted E. Quantitative Analysis IUCN Criteria Case study 3

Final Listing: Ziziphus robertsoniana Beentje Endangered B1ab(i,ii,iii,iv,v) Case study 3

WORKING GROUPS SESSION