Doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0553-r1 Submission April 2011 James Wang, et al, Mediatek COST231 Walfish Ikegame Model for for 11ah Date: 2011-04-25 Authors: Slide.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Submission doc.: IEEE /0244r0 March 2012 Panasonic Slide 1 Experimental results of indoor path-loss in actual European houses Date:
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /1196r1 Submission Data Rate and Spectrum Requirements for IEEE aj (45 GHz) Date: Authors: Haiming Wang (SEU)Slide.
Doc.: IEEE /0272r0 Submission February 2011 Ron Porat, Broadcom Outdoor Path Loss Models for ah Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0296r0 March 2015 Cagatay Capar, EricssonSlide 1 Long range indoor channel measurements for the 60 GHz band Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0436r0 Submission February 2011 Mediatek Path Loss and Delay Spread Models for 11ah Date: Authors: Slide 1.
1. Outdoor Propagation Models
Propagation loss models Lab 4 Engr. Mehran Mamonai.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/613r0 May 2015 Chinghwa Yu et al, MediaTek Inc.Slide 1 Box 5 Calibration Result Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0705r2 Submission Control PHY Design for 40-50GHz Millimeter Wave Communication Systems Authors: May 2015 Slide 1Jianhan Liu (MediaTek)
Doc.: IEEE /xxxx Submission Control PHY Design for 40-50GHz Millimeter Wave Communication Systems.pptx Authors: May 2015 Slide 1Jianhan Liu, et.
Summary of Path Loss in Propagation
Doc.: IEEE /1187r1Sep 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
802.11ax scenario 1 CCA Date: Authors: March 2015
+50dBm TX TPO: 100Watts (+50dBm) Start with a Transmitter.
Ron Milione Ph.D. W2TAP W2TAP InformationModulatorAmplifier Ant Feedline Transmitter InformationDemodulatorPre-Amplifier Ant Feedline Receiver Filter.
Doc.: IEEE /0323r0 SubmissionRon Porat, BroadcomSlide 1 Views on ah Use Cases Date: Authors: March 2011.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1455r0 Nov 2011 Fei Tong,Les Smith, CSRSlide ah network outdoor deployment issues Date: 2011-Nov-03 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0705r1 Submission Control PHY Design for 40-50GHz Millimeter Wave Communication Systems Authors: May 2015 Slide 1Jianhan Liu, et.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0627r0 May 2014 Josiam et.al., SamsungSlide 1 Outdoor Channel Models for System Level Simulations Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0143r0 Submission January 2004 Steve Brunson & Bob Soranno (JHU/APL)Slide 1 Improved Adjacent Channel Rejection Parameters to solve.
Doc.: IEEE /0935r0 Submission July 2012 Vinko Erceg, Broadcom 6-10GHz UWB Link Budget and Discussion Date: Authors: Slide 1.
IEEE q Submission Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title:Considerations.
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks(WPANs) Submission Title: Link Budget for m Date Submitted: 5 March 2012.
Submission doc.: /1320r00 Bo, Sun (ZTE Corp), et al Slide 1 11aj 45GHz Link Budget for use cases discussion Date: Authors: Nov 2012.
Doc.: ax Submission July 2014 Slide 1 Proposed Calibration For MAC simulator Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /270 Submission July 2003 Liang Li, Helicomm Inc.Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Doc.: IEEE /0637r0 Submission May 2014 James Wang et. al., MediaTekSlide 1 Spatial Reuse and Coexistence with Legacy Devices Date:
RF Propagation No. 1  Seattle Pacific University Basic RF Transmission Concepts.
Doc.: IEEE /089 Submission January 2002 Steve Halford, IntersilSlide 1 Maximum Received Power for g Steve Halford Mark Webster.
Doc.: IEEE /0799r2 Submission June 2014 Nihar Jindal, Broadcom Modifications to Simulation Scenarios and Calibration Process Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0307r0 Submission January 2014 Nihar Jindal, Broadcom PHY Calibration Results Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE / ax Submission M. Shahwaiz Afaqui DSC calibration results with NS-3 Authors: Nov
Doc.: IEEE /0161r1 Submission doc.: IEEE /1031r0 Measurement results for OBSS in home network scenarios Date: September 2009.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/1338r0 November 2012 Matthew Fischer, BroadcomSlide 1 Frequency Selective Transmission Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0568r0 Submission April 2011 Shusaku Shimada 1 Industrial Channels of Usecase 1d/2 Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE / ax Submission M. Shahwaiz Afaqui DSC calibration results with NS-3 Authors: Nov
Doc.: IEEE b Submission Jan 2013 Link Budget Calculation for NICT proposal ( b) IEEE P802.22b Wireless RANs Date:
Design WLAN Politeknik Telkom Design WLAN Step to design WLAN : 1. Location Survey 2. Topology 3. Distance calculating 4. Antenna design 5. Towering.
Doc.: IEEE /0645 Submission May 2012 Open-Loop Link Margin Index for Fast Link Adaptation Date: Authors: Slide 1Yong Liu, Marvell,
Doc.: IEEE /1229r0 Submission ah M2M Channel Access Performance Date: September 2011 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE Submission Nov 2014 Link Budget Analysis for 40-50GHz Indoor Usage Date: Authors: Slide 1Jianhan Liu, Mediatek Inc.
8.5 SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS
Submission doc.: IEEE /0871r1 Jul Jiyong Pang, et. al. Huawei Further Calibration Results towards Integrated System Level Simulation Date:
Antenna Polarization and Beamforming for 11ay
Doc.: IEEE /0216r1 Submission February 2012 James Wang et al, MediaTekSlide 1 Comment Resolution Receiver Parameters Date: Authors:
Numericals.
Doc.: IEEE /0015r1 Submission Large-Scale Characteristics of 45 GHz Based on Channel Measurement Authors/contributors: Date: Presenter:
InterDigital, Inc. Submission doc.: IEEE /0911r1 July 2016 Link Level Performance Comparisons of Open Loop, Closed Loop and Antenna Selection.
The essentials of building wireless networks Sebastian Büttrich, NSRC edit: xxxx 2010
COST 231 Walfisch-Ikegami Propagation Model
The essentials of building wireless networks
TG ax A Unified Approach to Spatial Reuse
Performance Evaluation of OBSS Densification
July 2010 doc.: IEEE July 2010 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title:
6-10GHz Rate-Range and Link Budget
OFDMA Performance Analysis
Submission Title: Link Budget for m
Performance Simulations
Large-Scale Characteristics of 45 GHz Based on Channel Measurement
Update on “Channel Models for 60 GHz WLAN Systems” Document
July 2008 doc: IEEE c Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Responses to.
Per-User Data Rate, Band and Bandwidth Options for VHT
Increased Network Throughput with Channel Width Related CCA and Rules
TG ax A Unified Approach to Spatial Reuse
802.11ax scenario 1 CCA Date: Authors: March 2015
Box 5 Calibration Result
802.11ax scenario 1 CCA Date: Authors: March 2015
Interference Analysis for Residential Environments
TG ax A Unified Approach to Spatial Reuse
DSC Calibration Result
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /0553-r1 Submission April 2011 James Wang, et al, Mediatek COST231 Walfish Ikegame Model for for 11ah Date: Authors: Slide 1

doc.: IEEE /0553-r1 Submission Path Loss Model LTE macro model Link Budget was presented 4/18/11 by Ron (Broadcom) Deficiencies with LTE macro model: –Antenna cannot be below the building e.g. meter to pole Use Case 1 –How about AP to AP and STA to STA ? April 2011 James Wang et al (MediaTek)Slide 2 where h is base station antenna height above building

doc.: IEEE /0553-r1 Submission Walfisch-Ikegami Path Loss Model Frequency f ( MHz) Height of the transmitter h tx ( m) Height of the receiver h rx (1...3 m) Distance d ( m) Mean value of building heights h roof Mean value of widths of streets w Mean value of building separation b April 2011 James Wang, Vish Ponnampalam, MediatekSlide 3

doc.: IEEE /0553-r1 Submission Case 1 AP to STA (AP Ant. above Building) Input Parameters Distance1000meter Unit PA 30.0 dBm Total Transmit Power30.0 dBm TX Antenna Gain 1.5 dBi EIRP31.5 dBm Propagation Mode Walfish-Ikegami LOSMetropolitan Path Loss, Free Space, dB dB Diffraction Loss (Rooftop L rts ), dB dB Multi-Screen Diffraction Loss, dB dB Total Path Loss RX Antenna Gain 1.5 dBi Polarization Loss 0.0 dB Rcvr Signal Power dBm Symbol Rate200.0 kHz RX NF 7.0 dB Required Eb/No4.5 kbps Fading Margin 3.0 dB Implementation Loss3.0 dB Received Sensitivity dB Shadowing Std Dev8.00 dB Margin based on Received Power dB April 2011 James Wang et al (MediaTek)Slide 4 Building Height = 12 m AP Antenna = 17 m STA height = 1.5 m Note: It might not be realistic to assume AP antenna is 15 meter above roof. It can be costly and AP can see lots of interference. In practice, you want to have antenna just high enough.

doc.: IEEE /0553-r1 Submission Case 2 AP to STA (AP Ant. below Building) Input Parameters Distance420meter Unit PA 30.0 dBm Total Transmit Power30.0 dBm TX Antenna Gain 1.5 dBi EIRP31.5 dBm Propagation Mode Walfish-Ikegami LOSMetropolitan Path Loss, Free Space, dB dB Diffraction Loss (Rooftop L rts ), dB dB Multi-Screen Diffraction Loss, dB dB Total Path Loss RX Antenna Gain 1.5 dBi Polarization Loss 0.0 dB Rcvr Signal Power dBm Symbol Rate200.0 kHz RX NF 7.0 dB Required Eb/No4.5 kbps Fading Margin 3.0 dB Implementation Loss3.0 dB Received Sensitivity dB Shadowing Std Dev8.00 dB Margin based on Received Power dB April 2011 James Wang et al (MediaTek)Slide 5 Building Height = 12 m AP Antenna = 8 m STA height = 1.5 m

doc.: IEEE /0553-r1 Submission AP to AP and STA to STA Do we need to consider the path loss for these two cases ? COST231 Walfisch-Ikegami model is limited to antenna height (base station) >= 4 meters, antenna height ( handset) < 3 meters April 2011 James Wang et al (MediaTek)Slide 6