L. M. Camarinha-Matos © L. M. Camarinha-Matos WP5 – STATUS OVERVIEW WP5 meeting – Paris, 28-29 June 2004 Luis M. Camarinha-Matos

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Institute of Statistics, Geography and Informatics (INEGI) Implementation of SDMX in Mexico.
Advertisements

E-Learning Models Desk Study Chris Fowler. Purpose To explain our current thinking and specification of the E-Learning Models Advisor.
Modelling with expert systems. Expert systems Modelling with expert systems Coaching modelling with expert systems Advantages and limitations of modelling.
Chapter 11 Designing the User Interface
Episode 3 / CAATS II joint dissemination event Gaming Techniques Episode 3 - CAATS II Final Dissemination Event Patricia López Aena Episode 3 Brussels,
Workpackage 2: Norms
Episode 3 / CAATS II joint dissemination event Lessons Learnt Episode 3 - CAATS II Final Dissemination Event Philippe Leplae EUROCONTROL Episode 3 Brussels,
Enhancing Data Quality of Distributive Trade Statistics Workshop for African countries on the Implementation of International Recommendations for Distributive.
Introduction to Research Methodology
Learning Objectives, Performance Tasks and Rubrics: Demonstrating Understanding and Defining What Good Is Brenda Lyseng Minnesota State Colleges.
Using the Semantic Web to Construct an Ontology- Based Repository for Software Patterns Scott Henninger Computer Science and Engineering University of.
Requirements Engineering n Elicit requirements from customer  Information and control needs, product function and behavior, overall product performance,
Decision Making: An Introduction 1. 2 Decision Making Decision Making is a process of choosing among two or more alternative courses of action for the.
Introduction and Overview “the grid” – a proposed distributed computing infrastructure for advanced science and engineering. Purpose: grid concept is motivated.
Knowledge Acquisitioning. Definition The transfer and transformation of potential problem solving expertise from some knowledge source to a program.
Lecture 13 Revision IMS Systems Analysis and Design.
UGDIE PROJECT MEETING Bled September WP6 – Assessment and Evaluation Evaluation Planning  Draft Evaluation plan.
Designing and Developing Interactive Multimedia EDCI 663 Educational Technology Purdue University.
Klassificering af Inf. Systemer Baseret på: Luis M. Camarinha-Matos & Hamideh Afsarmanesh: Collaborative networks: a new scientific discipline.
Chapter 10: Architectural Design
Proposal Strengths and Weakness as Identified by Reviewers Russ Pimmel & Sheryl Sorby FIE Conference Oct 13, 2007.
Object-Oriented Analysis and Design
Chapter : Software Process
Formal Methods 1. Software Engineering and Formal Methods  Every software engineering methodology is based on a recommended development process  proceeding.
I NTRODUCING FRONTIERS Richard Walker 13 January, 2011.
Introduction to Interactive Media 02. The Interactive Media Development Process.
CR Toolkit Workshop CR Stakeholder Identification Tool ICMM Toolkit# 1 & 2 Trainers: Joe Samara and Merikas Timori Date: 07 th August 2013 Venue: CR Conference.
Object-oriented methodology object models use case modeling unified modeling language the data dictionary the cornucopia case portfolio project Systems.
Research Writing and Scientific Literature
CSI315 Web Applications and Technology Overview of Systems Development (342)
Ontology Development Kenneth Baclawski Northeastern University Harvard Medical School.
VTT-STUK assessment method for safety evaluation of safety-critical computer based systems - application in BE-SECBS project.
WP8: Knowledge Sharing Lead: UDE Partners: UMA, CICE, MTA KSZI, FR, RICYT Month 1 - Month 36.
Introduction to Interactive Media The Interactive Media Development Process.
Assessing the Suitability of UML for Modeling Software Architectures Nenad Medvidovic Computer Science Department University of Southern California Los.
Transregional Workshop – Sofia, October 30, 2008 R4R Tools and Methodologies.
Software Requirements Engineering CSE 305 Lecture-2.
Assessing Quality for Integration Based Data M. Denk, W. Grossmann Institute for Scientific Computing.
Programming in Java Unit 3. Learning outcome:  LO2:Be able to design Java solutions  LO3:Be able to implement Java solutions Assessment criteria: 
Domain Modeling In FREMA David Millard Yvonne Howard Hugh Davis Gary Wills Lester Gilbert Learning Societies Lab University of Southampton, UK.
Principles, Practices and Dynamics of Research Management LECTURE-4 Research Design Kazi Nurmohammad Hossainul Haque Senior Lecturer, Civil Service College.
RHS 303. TRANSITION OF THEORY AND TREATMENT nature of existence and gives meaning to and guides the action Philosophical Base: Philosophy of occupational.
Illustrations and Answers for TDT4252 exam, June
Lecture 5: Writing the Project Documentation Part III.
Combining Theory and Systems Building Experiences and Challenges Sotirios Terzis University of Strathclyde.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe UNECE Transport Division 1 TRANS-EUROPEAN RAILWAY (TER) PROJECT 2 nd Expert Group Meeting (Budapest, 23 September.
ECOLEAD 1 Jermol/JSI © Jermol/JSI Training activities WP7 Mitja Jermol Jozef Stefan Institute (JSI)
Most of contents are provided by the website Introduction TJTSD66: Advanced Topics in Social Media Dr.
Software Architecture Evaluation Methodologies Presented By: Anthony Register.
Work package 4 Hospital care WP Leader: Giacomo Pignataro Università di Catania.
Environment and Disaster Planning Hari Srinivas, GDRC Rajib Shaw, Kyoto University Contents of the presentation: -What is the problem? -Precautionary Principles.
The Systems Development Environment Systems Analysis and Design II.
Add your Logo in the slide master menu GLOBAQUA Meeting, January 13th-14th, Freising IMPLICATIONS Module Reporting back Implications Module: WP8, WP9,
UML - Development Process 1 Software Development Process Using UML.
Lecture №4 METHODS OF RESEARCH. Method (Greek. methodos) - way of knowledge, the study of natural phenomena and social life. It is also a set of methods.
Building Systems for Today’s Dynamic Networked Environments A Methodology for Building Sustainable Enterprises in Dynamic Environments through knowledge.
Prepared by /Dr.Amira Yahia.. Introduction  Research proposals are an integral part of most studies, and are typically prepared after a researcher has.
Design Evaluation Overview Introduction Model for Interface Design Evaluation Types of Evaluation –Conceptual Design –Usability –Learning Outcome.
Investigate Plan Design Create Evaluate (Test it to objective evaluation at each stage of the design cycle) state – describe - explain the problem some.
Writing Learning Outcomes Best Practices. Do Now What is your process for writing learning objectives? How do you come up with the information?
Stages of Research and Development
Systems integration and Testing INSE 6421
Usage scenarios, User Interface & tools
Nursing Process Applied to Community Health Nursing
Profiling based unstructured process logs
THIS IS TO EVIDENCE YOUR WORK AND GET THE BEST GRADE POSSIBLE
WP4 Measurements & social indicators.
KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT (KM) Session # 37
Department of Computer Science Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan
Presentation transcript:

L. M. Camarinha-Matos © L. M. Camarinha-Matos WP5 – STATUS OVERVIEW WP5 meeting – Paris, June 2004 Luis M. Camarinha-Matos

L. M. Camarinha-Matos © L. M. Camarinha-Matos WP5 – OBJECTIVES Establish a sound theoretical foundation for collaborative networked organizations and to promote and assess the adoption of formal and semi-formal modeling methods and tools in the consolidation of the existing and emerging fragmented knowledge in this area Establish a new scientific discipline of Collaborative Networks

L. M. Camarinha-Matos © L. M. Camarinha-Matos Design Implement Models Implementations WP5 – WHY No common “reference” “Supervise”

L. M. Camarinha-Matos © L. M. Camarinha-Matos Design Implement Simulate / Evaluate Reference Models Definitions Models Implementations WP5 – WHY

L. M. Camarinha-Matos © L. M. Camarinha-Matos Abstract Emerging manifestations Reference Models Definitions WP5 – WHY Explain Scenarios

L. M. Camarinha-Matos © L. M. Camarinha-Matos Abstract Design Implement Simulate / Evaluate Emerging manifestations Reference Models Definitions WP5 – WHY Explain Scenarios Models Implementations

L. M. Camarinha-Matos © L. M. Camarinha-Matos WP5 – RESULTS D51.1 – Report identifying and characterizing the main modeling needs in CNOs. Month 6 D51.2 – Map of applicability of tools and approaches, based on the assessment experiments (“shopping list”. Month 15. Formal and semi-formal modelling foundation Set of modelling tools, applicability map, modelling approach, illustrations Models interoperability basis Rules / guidelines for combining different modelling approaches / formalisms Soft modelling foundation Modeling tools and approaches to capture “soft aspects” in CNOs (e.g. social actors relationships, incomplete knowledge) Reference models for CNOs Abstract (generic) models of CNOs that can be the basis for models instantiation for different manifestations of CNOs Initial results

L. M. Camarinha-Matos © L. M. Camarinha-Matos Informal Formal Models Traditional CN Emerging CN Directions in CN Understanding MODELING DIRECTIONS Consolidating SC EE VO VL ER

L. M. Camarinha-Matos © L. M. Camarinha-Matos “Pool” of potentially useful modeling tools / theories Modelling “purposes” Identification & structuring Models’ interoperability Mapping Pool of external experts Reference models for CNOs Most promising (after hands-on assessment) A B WP 5 – INITIAL ACTIVITIES

L. M. Camarinha-Matos © L. M. Camarinha-Matos WP 5 – STATUS - A Activity A: Portfolio of tools and approaches Key idea Key references Possible experts OK OK, but not enough URLs Not OK, mostly “local” experts 30 entries A few not adequate descriptions (3 or 4) Several delays, but overall satisfactory

L. M. Camarinha-Matos © L. M. Camarinha-Matos WP 5 – HOMEWORK A

L. M. Camarinha-Matos © L. M. Camarinha-Matos PORTFOLIO OF TOOLS – APPLICATION ? Traditional CNOs Emerging CNOs UNDERSTANDING CONSOLIDATING Graph theory Formal theories Formal Engineering Methods Temporal & modal logic Federated systems Dynamic ontologies Metaphors Semiotics Knowledge mapping Soft computing MAS Social Network Analysis Network Analysis ML / Bayesian Networks Synergetics Game theory Complexity theories Self- organizing systems Portfolio theory Real options theory Transaction costs theory Trust building models Memetics Scopos theory Distributed groups dynamics Bench- marking Diversity in work teams Decision support InformalFormal Text & web mining MA Dependence theory

L. M. Camarinha-Matos © L. M. Camarinha-Matos PORTFOLIO OF TOOLS – CLASSIFICATION ? Other WPs ?

L. M. Camarinha-Matos © L. M. Camarinha-Matos PORTFOLIO – ANOTHER CLASSIFICATION ? (AS) TOOLS THEORIES Metaphors Federated systems Soft computing Graph theory Formal Engineering Methods Temporal & modal logic Network Analysis ML / Bayesian Networks Decision support Knowledge mapping MAS Social Network Analysis Game theory Bench- marking Text & web mining ??? Synergetics Self- organizing systems Portfolio theory Real options theory Transaction costs theory Memetics Scopos theory Distributed groups dynamics Complexity theories Semiotics MA Dependence theory Formal theories Dynamic ontologies Diversity in work teams Trust building models

L. M. Camarinha-Matos © L. M. Camarinha-Matos Finish / revise characterization of tools / theories Provide references easily available (preferably URL) Carefully identify external experts Local experts “International” experts Are they still active and publishing in the area? Are they mainly researchers or also “business” people? Have they done any development in CNOs or related areas? Is it foreseen they have any potential interest in the area? Revise / refine application diagram Revise and finish classification Initial screening of most promising tools / theories PORTFOLIO – WHAT NEXT ? PARIS

L. M. Camarinha-Matos © L. M. Camarinha-Matos WP 5 – STATUS - B Activity B: Collect modelling “purposes” PurposeWhat is modelled A few contributions Uninova VTT (WP3) JSI UvA (WP2) In a very preliminary stage – requiring substantial work

L. M. Camarinha-Matos © L. M. Camarinha-Matos MODELING PURPOSES - VBE

L. M. Camarinha-Matos © L. M. Camarinha-Matos MODELING PURPOSES - VOM

L. M. Camarinha-Matos © L. M. Camarinha-Matos MODELING PURPOSES - PVC

L. M. Camarinha-Matos © L. M. Camarinha-Matos MODELING PURPOSES – II & CNO

L. M. Camarinha-Matos © L. M. Camarinha-Matos MODELING PURPOSES – TASKS Revise terminology Check consistency & completeness Define importance level Identify inter-relationships PARIS 1st attempt

L. M. Camarinha-Matos © L. M. Camarinha-Matos Initial elaboration of some informal definitions before an attempt to formalize them is made. “Cleaned up” concepts and definitions to be used in the project. CNO CLEARINGHOUSE - Base concepts (=> “components”) - Base ontologies (=> taxonomies, properties, relationships) - Structural models (=> structured concepts) - Behavioral models

L. M. Camarinha-Matos © L. M. Camarinha-Matos THEMATIC WORKSHOPS Focused on one or a few theories / tools Involving invited external experts Plan: Topic(s) ? [organize list] When ? Where ? Who ? Which preparation ?

L. M. Camarinha-Matos © L. M. Camarinha-Matos WP5 - WORKPLAN Current tasks

L. M. Camarinha-Matos © L. M. Camarinha-Matos WP5 – SUB-PROJECT 5.1 Task Identify and characterize the modeling purposes Uninova (L), UvA (C), VTT, BIBA, JSI Task Hands-on assessment of promising modeling approaches Uninova (L), JSI (C), BIBA, UvA, external experts Task Establish a map between modeling purposes and promising modeling tools - UvA (L), Uninova (C), VTT, BIBA, JSI Task 51.4 – Attempt to formalize existing empirical knowledge BIBA (L), VTT (C), Uninova, UvA, JSI Task Promote education and increasing awareness Uninova (L), JSI (C), UvA, BIBA

L. M. Camarinha-Matos © L. M. Camarinha-Matos Task Identify and characterize the modeling purposes Task Hands-on assessment of promising modeling approaches Task Promote education and increasing awareness Collection of modeling purposes Portfolio of tools & theories Assessed tools & theories CNO Clearinghouse D51.1 WP5 – FIRST TASKS & RESULTS

L. M. Camarinha-Matos © L. M. Camarinha-Matos D TOC 1.INTRODUCTION 2.WHY A THEORETICAL FOUNDATION FOR CNOS 3.MODELING PURPOSES 4.PORTFOLIO OF TOOLS AND THEORIES 5.NEXT PHASES 6.CONCLUSIONS 7.REFERENCES

L. M. Camarinha-Matos © L. M. Camarinha-Matos WP5 – BOOK ? COLLABORATIVE NETWORKS A theoretical foundation A “mechanism” to focus contributions A “mechanism” to induce quality A channel for impact creation Target reader ?

L. M. Camarinha-Matos © L. M. Camarinha-Matos WP5 – HANDS-ON EXPERIMENTS Small experiments: adapting existing methods that can map most of the required modeling characteristics, and understanding their applicability - Individual partners experiments - Sub-groups [bi- or tri-lateral activities] - Sub-groups with external experts [thematic workshops] Basic research on open issues (... Task 51.4)... It can start earlier than month 12

L. M. Camarinha-Matos © L. M. Camarinha-Matos WP5 – HANDS-ON EXPERIMENTS Small experiments: Partners interests? Partners plans? Common “work methodology”? Scenario-based? Topic-based? Common reporting format? How to share experiences? Assessment criteria ? [Month 4 – 15]

L. M. Camarinha-Matos © L. M. Camarinha-Matos WP5 – HANDS-ON EXPERIMENTS Basic research on open issues – An example [Uninova] What are value systems ? Attributes / Variables Relations, Operations Transactions ? ? Benefits analysis Task dependence Indicators Integrated concept ? Useful for decision-making? Useful for simulation / Prediction? [Basys’04 paper]

L. M. Camarinha-Matos © L. M. Camarinha-Matos WP5 – HANDS-ON EXPERIMENTS Basic research on open issues Other cases: - Already started ? - Planned ?