Doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/0840r1 Submission AP Assisted Medium Synchronization Date: 2012-09-17 Authors: September 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0295r0 Submission PRAW Follow Up Date: Authors: March 2013.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0696r2 SubmissionLiwen Chu Etc.Slide 1 Slot-based Power Save without PS-Poll Date: Authors: Date: July, 2012.
Doc.: IEEE /0881r0 Submission July 2012 Anna Pantelidou, Renesas Mobile CorporationSlide 1 PS Mode Enhancements with Timing Indication Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/1329r0 PS-Poll for Downlink Bufferable Units Date: Slide 1Eric Wong, Broadcom November 2012 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1325r0 Submission Nov PS-Poll TXOP Date: Authors: David Xun Yang, Huawei, et. al.Slide 1.
PS-Poll TXOP Using RTS/CTS Protection
Doc.: IEEE /0324r0 Submission Slide 1Michelle Gong, Intel March 2010 DL MU MIMO Error Handling and Simulation Results Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0567r0 Submission Slide 1Michelle Gong, Intel May 2010 DL MU MIMO Analysis and OBSS Simulation Results Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1244r1 Submission Nov.2010 Sun Bo, ZTE CorpSlide 1 Authors: Transmission Mechanism in MU-MIMO Date:
Slide 1 doc.: IEEE /1092r0 Submission Simone Merlin, Qualcomm Incorporated September 2010 Slide 1 ACK Protocol and Backoff Procedure for MU-MIMO.
Doc.: IEEE /0606r1 Submission Uplink Channel Access Date: Authors: May 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1.
Short MAC Header Date: Authors: John Doe, Some Company
MAC Header Compression
Submission doc.: IEEE /1357r3 Nov Slide 1 Dynamic TIM and Page Segmentation Date: Authors: Weiping Sun, Seoul National University.
Doc.:IEEE /0860r0 July 2012 Qualcomm Inc. Collision reduction after TIM Date: Authors:
Doc.:IEEE /861r0 July 2012 EDCA Parameters Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /1431r1 Submission September 2014 Issues on UL-OFDMA Transmission Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1454r0 November 2014 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide ax Power Save Discussion Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0060r1 Submission January 2011 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1 Low Power Capability Support for ah Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0130r0 Submission January 2012 Seunghee Han, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Beacon Reception of Long Sleeper Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0285r0 March 2013 Submission Resource Allocation Frame Format for RAW- based Medium Access Date: Authors: Chittabrata Ghosh,
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/0288r0 TXOP Sharing Operation for Relay Date: Slide 1Eric Wong, Broadcom Authors: March 2013.
Doc.:IEEE /0129r3 May 2012 Santosh Abraham, Qualcomm Inc. Short Beacon Slide 1 Authors:
Target Wake Times Date: Authors: July 2012 Month Year
Doc.: IEEE /117r0 Submission January 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1 TGah TIM Operation Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0880r2 Submission Scheduled Trigger frames July 2015 Slide 1 Date: Authors: A. Asterjadhi, H. Choi, et. al.
Doc.: IEEE /0071r0 January 2013 Submission Channel indication in RAW/TWT Date: Authors: Merlin, Qualcomm Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /1230r1 Submission ah Channel Access Improvement Date: Authors: May 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /1122r0 Submission Identifiers in HE PPDUs for power saving Slide 1 Date: Authors: Alfred Asterjadhi, et. al. September.
Doc.:IEEE /0114r0 January 2012 Low Power Medium Access Date: Slide 1 Authors:
MAC Sublayer MAC layer tasks: – Control medium access – Roaming, authentication, power conservation Traffic services – DCF (Distributed Coordination.
Doc.: IEEE /1324r0 November 2012 Very Low Energy Paging Date: Authors: Slide 1 S. Merlin et al.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0615r0 May 2012 Sudheer Grandhi, InterDigital CommunicationsSlide 1 Considerations for early NAV indication Date:
Doc.:IEEE /1503r1 November 2011 Short Beacon Slide 1 Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1361r0 November 2015 Slide 1 Dmitry Akhmetov (Intel) Energy consumption with Scheduled PSP Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0409r6 Submission July 2012 Shoukang Zheng et. al, I2R, SingaporeSlide 1 Channel Access Supporting Low Power Operation Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1086r0 SubmissionSlide 1 Date: Authors: Improved Virtual Carrier Sensing Mechanism for 45GHz Sep ZTE Corp.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0098r0 January 2016 Assaf Kasher, IntelSlide 1 Channel bonding proposals Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0806r0 SubmissionSlide 1Young Hoon Kwon, Newracom Protection for MU Transmission Date: Authors: July 2015.
Resolutions to Static RTS CTS Comments
Doc.: IEEE /0409r5 Submission May 2012 Shoukang Zheng et. al, I2R, SingaporeSlide 1 Supporting Low Power Operation Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1101r1 Submission Sept Active Polling Date: Authors: Slide 1Yong Liu, Marvell, et. al.
Doc.: IEEE /0624r2 SubmissionLiwen Chu Etc.Slide 1 Scheduled Medium Access For Large Low Power BSS Date: Authors: Date: May, 2012.
DSSS PHY packet format Synchronization SFD (Start Frame Delimiter)
Submission doc.: IEEE /0042r2 January 2016 Geonjung Ko, WILUSSlide 1 BSS Color Settings for a Multiple BSSID Set Date: Authors:
Doc.:IEEE /0129r1 January 2012 S.Abraham, Qualcomm Inc Short Beacon Slide 1 Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0353r1 March 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 MU-RTS/CTS for TWT Protection Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0087r1 January 2016 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 NAV cancellation issues on MU protection Date: Authors:
HE Trigger Frame Format
Supporting Low Power Operation
2200 Mission College Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95054, USA
Discussion on MAC Calibration Power Saving Test
Operation With Small Batteries
Lecture 27 WLAN Part II Dr. Ghalib A. Shah
Operation With Small Batteries
AP access procedure for UL MU operation
Periodic Channel Access
2200 Mission College Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95054, USA
Power Efficient PS Poll
TWT SP initiation and termination and legacy PS
MAC Clarifications Date: Authors: September 2016
Discussion on CR for CID 5066
2200 Mission College Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95054, USA
2200 Mission College Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95054, USA
DL MU-MIMO ack protocol
DL MU MIMO Error Handling and Simulation Results
PS-Poll TXOP Date: Authors: Month Year
80MHz/160MHz Protection Date: Authors: Date: September 2010
TD Control field with Response indication in WUR frame
Channel Access for WUR FDMA
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /0840r1 Submission AP Assisted Medium Synchronization Date: Authors: September 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1

doc.: IEEE /0840r1 Submission Authors: September 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 2

doc.: IEEE /0840r1 Submission Authors: September 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 3

doc.: IEEE /0840r1 Submission Introduction The Synch frame concept was accepted in TGah Specification Framework document (SFD) in the July IEEE meeting [1] : –R.4.2.E: When requested by a STA, the AP sends a synch frame (the frame type is TBD) at the slot boundary or the target wake time of the STA, if the channel is idle, to help the STA quickly synch to the medium. (optional to AP and STA) This is a follow up presentation proposing a frame type for the synch frame (slide 12,13,15) September 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 4

doc.: IEEE /0840r1 Submission Overview In STD , a STA has to follow the rule below: –“A STA that is changing from Doze to Awake in order to transmit shall perform CCA until a frame sequence is detected by which it can correctly set its NAV, or until a period of time equal to the ProbeDelay has transpired.” This is to first have the STA synchronized to the medium and then access the channel in order to prevent potential collisions with transmissions from hidden nodes September 2012 Data Ack STA1 AP STA2 STA2:Doze to Awake ProbeDelay = Max PPDU+SIFS+BA (or ACK) STA2 detects transmission in the channel (synched with the activities in the channel) Data Ack STA2 cannot hear STA1’s transmission STA1 hidden from STA2 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 5

doc.: IEEE /0840r1 Submission Problem It is hard to set the ProbeDelay value to a fixed value due to two conflicting goals: 1) address hidden node problem and 2) minimize power consumption –In STD , ProbeDelay = N/A Data Ack STA1 AP STA2 STA2:Doze to Awake ProbeDelay= Max PPDU+SIFS+BA STA2 detects transmission in the channel (synched with the activities in the channel) Data Ack STA2 cannot hear STA1’s transmission STA1 AP STA2 STA2:Doze to Awake ProbeDelay= Max PPDU+SIFS+BA Data Ack STA2 stays awake sensing the channel to detect potential transmissions from hidden nodes but nothing is on the channel. STA2 stays awake Data STA1 AP STA2 STA2:Doze to Awake ProbeDelay = 0 STA1 and STA2 collide at the AP Data STA2 cannot hear STA1’s transmission STA2’s transmission collides with STA1 Case 1: ProbeDelay = Max PPDU + SIFS + BACase 2: ProbeDelay = 0 Case 1a Case 1b Case 2a Case 2b STA1 AP STA2 STA2:Doze to Awake ProbeDelay = 0 Data STA2 wakes up, sends a packet to the AP and then goes back to sleep (Doze) to minimize power consumption Ack STA2 stays awake STA2 cannot hear STA1’s transmission September 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 6

doc.: IEEE /0840r1 Submission Discussion Case 1: ProbeDelay set to a large value (e.g. ProbeDelay = MaxPPDU + SIFS + BA) –Case 1a: when the channel is busy at the AP addresses hidden node problem –Case 2a: when the channel is idle at the AP STA consumes power sensing the channel for MaxPPDU + SIFS +BA (>20mS or 40mS) just to find that there is nothing in the channel Case 2: ProbeDelay set to a small value (e.g. ProbeDelay = 0) –Case 2a: when the channel is busy at the AP Collision happens at the AP side; does not address the hidden node problem –Case 2b: when the channel is idle at the AP STA consumes minimum power to send a packet without any collision September 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 7

doc.: IEEE /0840r1 Submission AP assisted medium synchronization (adopted in TGah SFD R.4.2.E) Basic idea –An AP indicates to a STA a time slot boundary at which the STA is allowed to start to access the channel STA may request to the AP the time (e.g. target wakeup time (TWT) [1]) at which it wants to access the channel AP can assign time slot boundary per each STA through TIM –If requested by the STA, the AP shall send a short “synch” frame (TBD) at the time slot boundary or the TWT if the channel is idle The short synch frame may use –a legacy frame: CTS, CF-End, QoS+CF-Poll … –a new frame in the NDP format to minimize the channel occupancy –The STA wakes up at its time slot boundary or its TWT to access the channel The channel access follows STD Case 1) If the AP senses that the channel is idle at the slot boundary, the AP transmits a short synch frame. –If the STA receives the short synch frame from the AP at the slot boundary, the STA starts to access the channel right after the reception of the short synch frame –The channel access follows the EDCA rules –The STA does not need to sense the channel for a long ProbeDelay time to synch to the medium Beacon STA wakes up at slot boundary and waits for channel synch Slot boundary Short “synch” frame: AP sends a short frame (TBD) at the slot boundary if the channel is idle to help a station to quickly synch to the medium STA synchs to the channel by receiving the Synch frame from the AP and starts channel access following the DCF rules Data ACK Beacon STA in the awake state receiving a Beacon September 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 8

doc.: IEEE /0840r1 Submission AP assisted medium synchronization (continued) Case 2) If the AP senses that the channel is busy or the AP is in the middle of receiving a packet at the slot boundary, the AP does not generate a short synch frame. -The STA waits until it is synched to the medium by receiving a synch frame or any other frame or until a period of time equal to the ProbeDelay has transpired Observation: –If the channel is busy with many STAs actively accessing the channel, the AP generates fewer synch frames –If the channel is most of the time idle with very few packet transmissions, the AP generates more synch frames Beacon STA wakes up at the slot boundary and waits for a packet to synch to the medium (STA does not hear the Data packet from STAx) STAx -> AP Data ACK STA synchs to the channel by receiving the ACK from the AP Slot boundary Data (STAn->AP) ACK Beacon If the AP senses the channel is busy or is receiving a packet at the slot boundary, the AP does not generate a synch frame. STAx is already transmitting a packet to the AP crossing the next slot boundary (hidden from STAn) September 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 9

doc.: IEEE /0840r1 Submission Assisting Medium Synch for a Long Sleeper (Z-Class Devices[2]) A STA schedules its TWT (target wake time) with the AP When requested by the STA, the AP sends a short synch frame at the TWT if the channel is idle –Reduces the medium synch time  reduces power consumption Beacon STA wakes up before the TWT and waits for channel synch Target Wake Time (TWT) Short “synch” frame (format TBD): 1.AP sends a synch frame at the TWT if the channel is idle to help a station to quickly synch to the channel STA synchs to the channel by receiving a short synch frame from the AP and starts channel access following the EDCA rule UL Data ACK DL ACK STA goes back to sleep Beacon UL Data ACK DL ACK Extra time (i.e. ProbeDelay) needed for the STA for the medium synch when a synch frame is not used Target Wake Time (TWT) 1. With a synch frame at TWT: 2. Without a synch frame at TWT: September 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 10

doc.: IEEE /0840r1 Submission Comparison parametersvaluesunits aSlotTime45uS aSIFSTime64uS aDIFSTime154uS aPreambleLength240uS Battery capacity900mAh Tx power500mW Rx power100mW Sleep power10uW Wake up period60Sec Tx packet size200Bytes Rx packet size200Bytes Ack frame240uS Synch frame240uS Proposed scheme (2) over ProbeDelay Gain over ProbeDelay=5mS : 14~30% longer battery life Gain over ProbeDelay=10mS : 33~71% longer battery life Proposed scheme Not using a synch frame; ProbeDelay: 2.5mS – 20mS a) 1.2mS advanced wakeup due to +-10ppm clock drift a) (1) (2) September 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 11

doc.: IEEE /0840r1 Submission Discussion on “Synch” Frame Option1: CF-End frame –Behavior is the same as the current spec NAV is reset after receiving the CF-End frame Any STA participates in the channel access after receiving the CF-End frame The STA accesses the channel after DIFS + CW Backoff A new NDP CF-End frame may be needed to minimize the channel occupancy Cannot reserve a time duration for one specific STA Option2: (NDP-)CTS frame (preferred) –The NDP type CTS frame (the Short CTS frame) is already defined in TGah SFD [1]. –CTS frame reserves a time interval for a STA that is scheduled to wake up at the slot boundary (or TWT) RA field: the address of the STA that is scheduled to wake up at the slot boundary Duration field: set to an estimated value to protect the transmission from the STA to the AP –The STA accesses the channel after SIFS following the CTS frame Shorter channel access delay compared to the CF-End frame case –The medium can be freed by sending a CF-End frame if the AP does not receive a frame from the STA PIFS after transmitting the CTS frame –Duration field can be set to 0 to have the same effect as using a CF- End frame of Option1 Data ACK CW Backoff DIFS CF-End Target Wake Time STA1  AP Data ACK SIFS CTS(STA1, NAV) Target Wake Time NAV(CTS) SIFS Option1: using CF-End as a synch frame Option2: using (NDP-) CTS as a synch frame STA1  AP NDP-CTS frame September 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 12

doc.: IEEE /0840r1 Submission Discussion on “Synch” Frame (continued) Option3: QoS+CF-Poll frame –RA field: the address of the STA that is scheduled to wake up at the slot boundary –Duration field [ , ]: If TXOP limit > 0: SIFS + TXOP limit If TXOP limit=0: one MPDU of nominal MSDU size + ACK + 2SIFS –A new NDP type QoS+CF-Poll frame may be needed to minimize the channel occupancy Legacy/Short MAC header formats need 30/12 bytes for the QoS+PS- Poll frame –QoS+CF-Poll is a Data Type frame used for channel access during CFP STA1  AP Data ACK SIFS QoS+CF-Poll(STA1, NAV) Target Wake Time NAV(QoS+CF-Poll) SIFS Option3: using QoS+CF-Poll as a synch frame (1) Using the Data Type frame format in STD bytes for the QoS+CF-Poll frame (2) Using the Short MAC header format in TGah SFD r bytes for the QoS+CF-Poll frame September 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 13

doc.: IEEE /0840r1 Submission Summary Synch frame options: –CF-End –NDP-CTS (the Short CTS frame) –QoS+CF-Poll Based on the discussion in slide 12 and 13, the Short CTS frame defined in TGah SFD is recommended as a synch frame. September 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 14

doc.: IEEE /0840r1 Submission Straw Poll Do you support to make the changes below in the TGah SFD R.4.2.E: –“R.4.2.E: When requested by a STA, the AP sends a synch frame (the frame type is TBD) at the slot boundary or the target wake time of the STA, if the channel is idle, to help the STA quickly synch to the medium. (optional to AP and STA) [49, 56] It is recommended that the AP sends a Short CTS frame defined in as a synch frame.” September 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 15

doc.: IEEE /0840r1 Submission References [1] TGah Specification Framework, IEEE /1137r10 [2] “Target Wake Time,” IEEE /823 September 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 16