Air Emissions Regulations INTERTANKO Strategy NORTH AMERICAN PANEL MEETING 24 OCTOBER 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
European Cruise Council 2010 Conference
Advertisements

Air Emissions Regulations Update Tripartite meeting 15/16 September 2006; Seoul
ASTM INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS DECEMBER 9, 2009
Overview MARPOL Annex VI Non- MARPOL Actions
Air Emissions from Ships
European Commission: 1 Air emissions from ships – and overview of European policy Progress amending EC sulphur in fuel directive to include MARPOL Annex.
Freight by Water Conference Teesside 7 September 2012 Sulphur Directive Impacts.
Hellenic Forum Athens 6 March 2007 Peter M. Swift.
USE OF MDO BY SHIPS PART OF A HOLISTIC APPROACH BUNKER SUMMIT – GREECE 2007
Environmental Performance and Energy Efficiency of Supply Chains: Carbon Footprint Project Progress Update Angelina Ermakov, Transportation Working Group.
Environmental Bunker legislation and the Potential Impact on the Vancouver Market May 2014 May
UPDATE ON THE REVISION OF MARPOL ANNEX VI LATIN AMERICAN PANEL March 12-13, 2008 Miami Beach, Florida.
UPDATE ON THE REVISION OF MARPOL ANNEX VI NORTH AMERICAN PANEL March 17, 2008 Stamford, CT.
| 1 | 1 REDUCING THE IMPACT OF SHIPPING ON THE ENVIRONMENT DECARBONISATION.
Air Emissions from Ships. Society is driving the requirement for ships to reduce harmful air emissions from engine exhausts.
1 MARPOL – Annex VI Control of Air Pollution from Ships from Ships and its Current Revision process Dr. Tim Gunner, Technical Consultant, Intertanko.
NAMEPA 2014 Annual Conference New York City Canada and North American Emission Control Area RDIMS #
NAMEPA 2014 World Maritime Day Observance Cozumel, Mexico Canada's Experience with the North American Emission Control Area RDIMS #
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NORTH AMERICAN EMISSION CONTROL AREA IN THE UNITED STATES Walker B. Smith, Director Angela Bandemehr, Project Manager U.S. EPA Office.
INTERTANKO Asian Panel Tokyo 18 September 2007
AIR EMISSIONS from OCEANGOING VESSELS INTERTANKO Houston Tanker Event 2007 AIR EMISSIONS from OCEANGOING VESSELS INTERTANKO Houston Tanker Event 2007 Keith.
IMO requirements to reduce emission to air from ships by Manager Research and Projects Gdansk April 2008 ‘
Air pollution from ships: recent developments by Lex Burgel by Lex Burgel.
In-session workshop on means to reach emission reduction targets (Kyoto AWG) Bangkok 1-3 April 2008 Topic 4: Greenhouse gases, sectors and source categories.
Canadian Experience in Implementing the North American Emission Control Area (ECA) Mexico City, Mexico May 19, 2015.
Tanker performance and Annex VI compliance Manager Research and Projects St. Petersburg 25 November 2008 Vostoc Capital’s The.
Marine Services Sustainable Shipping Conference Sustainable Energy in Marine Transportation Zabi Bazari and Gill Reynolds Lloyd ’ s Register EMEA IMarEST.
Marine Fuels Where are we? Where are we going? How will we get there?
An International Fund for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Ships INTERTANKO ISTEC & Executive Committees Dubai, January 2009 Christian BREINHOLT Director.
Håkon B. Thoresen, DNV Petroleum Services, Norway 31 Jan 2011 Fuel Quality - Update INTERTANKO Bunker Sub-committee, London.
Anti-Trust/Competition Law Compliance Statement INTERTANKO’s policy is to be firmly committed to maintaining a fair and competitive environment in the.
IBC 2009 APRIL 23, 2009 FACING THE CHALLENGES TO REDUCE AIR EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.
1 INTERTANKO – Latin American Panel Meeting Miami Beach, Florida 12 March 2008 Tom Kirk ABS Americas Director, Technology & Business Development ABS Class.
Leading the way; making a difference INTERTANKO HELLENIC - MEDITERRANEAN PANEL Athens, March 2012 Update on the Environmental Committee’s Activities by.
The INTERTANKO option to meet stricter Annex VI requirements to reduce emission to air from ships by Manager Research and Projects.
NORTH AMERICAN PANEL OCTOBER 7, 2009 INTERTANKO OVERVIEW REPORT JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.
Ballast Water Management DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR
The INTERTANKO option for the revision of Annex VI - IMO regulation for the Prevention of Air Pollution from ships by Manager.
Dr. Satoshi Inoue Professor, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies Emeritus Secretary General, International Association of Ports & Harbors (IAPH)
IFLOS SUMMER ACADEMY 2008 Panel Discussion “SHIP AIR EMISSIONS” Peter M. Swift, MD, INTERTANKO.
Leading the way; making a difference GHG EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY STANDARDS FOR INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING LATIN AMERICAN PANEL Buenos Aires.
Dr. Haakon-Elizabeth Lindstad and Professor Gunnar. S. Eskeland
Tripartite Meeting Tokyo, September 2007 Ship Recycling An Overview of Regulatory and Industry Developments Presented by INTERTANKO and ICS on behalf of.
Leading the way; making a difference EXPONAVAL – TRANSPORT 2014 December 3, 2014 Environmental Regulatory Challenges Facing the Maritime Industry JOSEPH.
IBIA ANNUAL CONVENTION SEPTEMBER 11, 2007 REDUCING AIR EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS JOSEPH ANGELO DIRECTOR, REGULATORY AFFAIRS AND THE AMERICAS.
Leading the way; making a difference Lunchtime Seminar October 10, 2012 Ballast Water Management JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.
AIR EMISSIONS FROM SHIPPING Reducing Atmospheric Pollution Globally: Kristian R. Fuglesang The distillate solution.
Hellenic Forum 27 March 2008 Athens Peter M. Swift.
AIR EMISSIONS LATIN AMERICAN PANEL Buenos Aires 5th November 2014
Leading the way; making a difference North American Panel October 29, 2014 AIR EMISSIONS/ FUEL QUALITY JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.
UNSD Recent international developments in Energy Statistics.
BUNKERWORLD – MARINE FUEL SUSTAINABILITY FORUM OCTOBER 25, 2007
Leading the way; making a difference NOx Tier III requirements 1. 1.The NOx Tier III enforcement date of 1 January 2016 is kept for already designated.
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS UPDATE ON IMO DEVELOPMENTS NORTH AMERICAN PANEL OCTOBER 7, 2009 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS UPDATE ON IMO DEVELOPMENTS.
Leading the way; making a difference BUNKER QUALITY LATIN AMERICAN PANEL Buenos Aires 5th November 2014 Dragos Rauta INTERTANKO.
Leading the way; making a difference Ballast Water Management State of Affairs October 2013 Tim Wilkins INTERTANKO Technical Seminar Busan, 21 October.
Tanker performance and Annex VI compliance Manager Research and Projects St. Petersburg 25 November 2008 Vostoc Capital’s The.
Sustainable Seaborne Transport — Our Common Challenge Shipping Emissions — What are the next steps? Peter M. Swift Managing Director, INTERTANKO.
Greek Shipping Summit 2007 Athens 8 November 2007 Peter M. Swift.
FFSA Insurance and Legal Committee The Tanker Industry Today “Key Issues” 12 February 2008 Peter M Swift.
What have we learned in the meantime?
To Satisfaction of the Administration Seminar on the Implementation of measures to ensure that safety standards are “to the Satisfaction of the Administration.
EEB Clean Air Seminar 20 Nov Lisbon Air Pollution from ships Portuguese perspective.
NORTH AMERICAN PANEL OCTOBER 22, 2007 REDUCING AIR EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.
MARITIME AIR EMISSIONS Lloyd’s List events 11 December 2007 Distillates THE Solution THE holistic solution for the revision of MARPOL Annex VI Peter.
INTERTANKO PRIORITIES TECHNICAL ISSUES
The Shipboard Energy Efficiency Management Plan (SEEMP)
Baltic Sea cooperation for reducing ship and port emissions through knowledge- & innovation-based competitiveness BSR InnoShip Baltic Sea cooperation for.
IMO work to address GHG emissions from ships
IMO GLOBAL SULPHUR LIMIT 2020, IMPACTS TO MAJOR FLAGS AND MEASURES TO HELP SHIPOWNERS AND OPERATORS 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Air Emissions Regulations INTERTANKO Strategy NORTH AMERICAN PANEL MEETING 24 OCTOBER 2006

BACKGROUND ANNEX VI ADOPTED IN 1997 AT IMO INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCEANNEX VI ADOPTED IN 1997 AT IMO INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ENTERED INTO FORCE MAY 2005ENTERED INTO FORCE MAY 2005 (US CURRENTLY NOT A PARTY) MEPC 53 (JULY 2005) AGREES TO REVIEW/REVISION OF ANNEX VIMEPC 53 (JULY 2005) AGREES TO REVIEW/REVISION OF ANNEX VI WORKING GROUP TO MEET IN OSLO, NORWAY FROM NOVEMBERWORKING GROUP TO MEET IN OSLO, NORWAY FROM NOVEMBER

INTERTANKO EXCOM Discussions & Agreements Air emissions from ships: a major issue for governments, port and coastal authorities and the IMO; a high priority for environmentalist organisationsAir emissions from ships: a major issue for governments, port and coastal authorities and the IMO; a high priority for environmentalist organisations Governments have high expectations - threat of unilateral regimesGovernments have high expectations - threat of unilateral regimes INTERTANKO should actively contribute to the revision processINTERTANKO should actively contribute to the revision process INTERTANKO should develop a strategy in promoting its policies and also in gaining support from the shipping communityINTERTANKO should develop a strategy in promoting its policies and also in gaining support from the shipping community

INTERTANKO EXCOM Discussions & Agreements Secretariat develops a Strategy PaperSecretariat develops a Strategy Paper Invites ISTEC input on technical and operational aspectsInvites ISTEC input on technical and operational aspects Strategy draft Paper & ISTEC input to be presented to EXCOMStrategy draft Paper & ISTEC input to be presented to EXCOM

Principles for an INTERTANKO Strategy Ensure a solid platform of requirementsEnsure a solid platform of requirements Be realistic and feasibleBe realistic and feasible Be simple and straightforward to the extent that they do not complicate ship operationsBe simple and straightforward to the extent that they do not complicate ship operations Seek a long term and positive reduction of air emissions from ships, andSeek a long term and positive reduction of air emissions from ships, and Contribute to a long term and a predictable regulatory regimeContribute to a long term and a predictable regulatory regime Regulations based on a fuel standard rather than an emissions performance standard, and thus reduce the onus of responsibility on the owner/operator for verification and compliance.Regulations based on a fuel standard rather than an emissions performance standard, and thus reduce the onus of responsibility on the owner/operator for verification and compliance.

ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS “Clean” fuels and/or alternative solutions such as:“Clean” fuels and/or alternative solutions such as: Exhaust gas scrubbers - Scrubber technologies are not yet proven and have their own environmental as well as economic and availability challengesExhaust gas scrubbers - Scrubber technologies are not yet proven and have their own environmental as well as economic and availability challenges Selective Cathalytic Reducing System (SCR) – technologies yet to be proven as reliableSelective Cathalytic Reducing System (SCR) – technologies yet to be proven as reliable “Cold ironing” - with associated problems including the lack of an international standards for voltage/frequency of power, of shore/ship connection systems and compatibility with shipboard requirements for power supply for hydraulic power sources (compressors needing up to several MW of power)“Cold ironing” - with associated problems including the lack of an international standards for voltage/frequency of power, of shore/ship connection systems and compatibility with shipboard requirements for power supply for hydraulic power sources (compressors needing up to several MW of power)

ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION Two tier global cap for sulphur:Two tier global cap for sulphur: –[2010] – Distillate with 1.0% S content –[2015] – Distillate with 0.5% S content (new engines) Removing the SECA provisionRemoving the SECA provision Reconsider the current provisions for rule complianceReconsider the current provisions for rule compliance

ISTEC DISCUSSIONS Under the circumstances & from a technical/operational point of view, best solution for ship operatorsUnder the circumstances & from a technical/operational point of view, best solution for ship operators Advantage since ships would use one fuel type onlyAdvantage since ships would use one fuel type only Modern refineries – no residsModern refineries – no resids Modifications like change of fuel pumps, etc. are not considered majorModifications like change of fuel pumps, etc. are not considered major Use of lower BN lube/cylinder oil not a technical challengeUse of lower BN lube/cylinder oil not a technical challenge ISTEC WG on technical aspectsISTEC WG on technical aspects FULL SUPPORTFULL SUPPORT

FURTHER ACTION Draft submission to IMODraft submission to IMO Invite RT to consider and eventual joinInvite RT to consider and eventual join Submit paper to IMO & Press ReleaseSubmit paper to IMO & Press Release Meetings with the EU Comission & EMSAMeetings with the EU Comission & EMSA Meetings with Administrations that play a key role in IMOMeetings with Administrations that play a key role in IMO Meeting with OCIMFMeeting with OCIMF