Glasgow University Seminar October 2006 A Novel Photon Polarimeter Joseph Santoro CUA Glasgow University Seminar October, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
POLARIMETRY of MeV Photons and Positrons Overview Beam Characterization – undulator photons – positrons Basics of the Transmission Method – for photon.
Advertisements

Eurotag Development of the European Tagged photon facilities. Spokesperson: Ken Livingston, Glasgowurl: Upgrade to 250MeV.
Eurotag Workshop Sept 1 st - 2 nd 2008 Ken Livingston, University of Glasgow Overview of I3HP, JRA, Eurotag Summary of Eurotag objectives Aims of this.
Hadron physics with GeV photons at SPring-8/LEPS II
Compton polarimetry for EIC Jefferson Lab Compton Polarimeters.
Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization A. Somov, Jefferson Lab GlueX Collaboration Meeting September
Hall D Photon Beam Simulation and Rates Part 1: photon beam line Part 2: tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Beam Line and Tagger Review.
Upcoming Review of the Hall D Photon Beam and Tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut, for the GlueX collaboration GlueX Collaboration Meeting.
C x and C x for K + Λ and K +  o Photo-production R. Bradford Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester R. Schumacher Department of.
Tagger hodoscope and photon beam monitoring D.Sober, F.Klein (CUA) Tagger Review, Jan.23-24, 2006.
The Tagger Microscope Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Tagger - Photon Beamline ReviewJan , 2005, Newport News presented by GlueX.
Photon Source and Tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut GlueX Detector ReviewOctober 20-22, 2004, Newport News presented by GlueX Tagged Beam.
 *(1520) CrossSection Zhiwen Zhao Physics 745. Λ BARYONS (S = − 1, I = 0) Λ 0 = u d s Λ(1520) D 03 I( J P ) = 0( 3/2 − ) Mass m = ± 1.0 MeV [a]
Tagging spectrometer and photon beamline Review January 23-24, Response to Questions Bremsstrahlung Tagging Spectrometer and Photon Beam Review.
Study of two pion channel from photoproduction on the deuteron Lewis Graham Proposal Phys 745 Class May 6, 2009.
Bogdan Wojtsekhowski, Jefferson Lab Experimental search for A’ for APEX collaboration 1.
Proton polarization measurements in π° photo-production --On behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III and GEp-2γ collaboration Wei Luo Lanzhou University.
M. Woods (SLAC) Beam Diagnostics for test facilities of i)  ii) polarized e+ source January 9 –11, 2002.
PAIR SPECTROMETER DEVELOPMENT IN HALL D PAWEL AMBROZEWICZ NC A&T OUTLINE : PS Goals PS Goals PrimEx Experience PrimEx Experience Design Details Design.
Experiment HUGS 2011 – Jefferson Laboratory Hussein Al Ghoul Department Of Physics Florida State University ᵠ.
Optics and magnetic field calculation for the Hall D Tagger Guangliang Yang Glasgow University.
The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.
HYP03 Future Hypernuclear Program at Jlab Hall C Satoshi N. Nakamura Tohoku University 18 th Oct 2003, JLab.
Polarisation transfer in hyperon photoproduction near threshold Tom Jude D I Glazier, D P Watts The University of Edinburgh.
T.C. Jude D.I. Glazier, D.P. Watts The University of Edinburgh Strangeness Photoproduction At Threshold Energies.
M. Dugger, Jlab User Meeting, June First data with FROST First data with FROST Michael Dugger* Arizona State University *Work at ASU is supported.
Recoil Polarimetry in Meson Photoproduction at MAMI Mark Sikora, Derek Glazier, Dan Watts School of Physics, University of Edinburgh, UK Introduction The.
Status of the Beamline Simulation A.Somov Jefferson Lab Collaboration Meeting, May 11, 2010.
25/07/2002G.Unal, ICHEP02 Amsterdam1 Final measurement of  ’/  by NA48 Direct CP violation in neutral kaon decays History of the  ’/  measurement by.
A study of systematic uncertainties of Compton e-detector at JLab, Hall C and its cross calibration against Moller polarimeter APS April Meeting 2014 Amrendra.
COMPTON POLARIMETRY Collected data Cavity power Status on counting methods Systematic errors and hardware issues.
Graphic from poster by Sarah Lamb, UConn Honors Program event Frontiers in Undergraduate Research, April 2009 Collimator subtends
Scintillation hodoscope with SiPM readout for the CLAS detector S. Stepanyan (JLAB) IEEE conference, Dresden, October 21, 2008.
Experimental Setup of the H8-RD22 Experiment Massimiliano Fiorini (on behalf of the H8-RD22 Collaboration) University of Ferrara – INFN Ferrara CARE HHH.
H8-RD22 Experiment to test Crystal Collimation for the LHC Organized by: Walter Scandale Conducted at CERN Geneva, 27 September 2006 Participants included:
Status of Møller Polarimeter Peter-Bernd Otte September 23, th Collaboration Meeting, Mainz.
Hadron physics Hadron physics Challenges and Achievements Mikhail Bashkanov University of Edinburgh UK Nuclear Physics Summer School I.
Compton polarimetry for EIC Jefferson Lab Compton Polarimeters.
PrimEx collaboration meeting Energy calibration of the Hall B bremsstrahlung tagging system using magnetic pair spectrometer S. Stepanyan (JLAB)
The FROST Experiment Franz Klein for the g9 (FROST) run group CLAS Collaboration Meeting/CLAS12 Workshop Paris 2011.
Electron Detection for Compton Polarimetry Michael McDonald Outline -Compton Effect -Polarimetry -Detectors -Diamond Results.
Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering on the neutron Malek MAZOUZ LPSC Grenoble EINN 2005September 23 rd 2005.
May 17, 2006Sebastian Baunack, PAVI06 The Parity Violation A4 Experiment at forward and backward angles Strange Form Factors The Mainz A4 Experiment Result.
Overview of the GlueX Tagger and Photon Beamline..
1 G9a -FROST. 2 Experiments FROST New generation of CLAS photoproduction experiments with FROzen Spin Polarized Target (FROST) E02-112: γp→KY (K + Λ,
Latifa Elouadrhiri Jefferson Lab Hall B 12 GeV Upgrade Drift Chamber Review Jefferson Lab March 6- 8, 2007 CLAS12 Drift Chambers Simulation and Event Reconstruction.
Photo-production of strange mesons with polarized photons and targets Eugene Pasyuk Jefferson Lab XIV International Seminar on Electromagnetic Interactions.
SLAC, September 25, 2009 Searching for a U -boson with a positron beam Bogdan Wojtsekhowski Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility  The light.
Compton polarimetry for EIC. Outline Polarized electron beam Compton process Compton polarimeters at Jefferson Laboratory – Parity experiments at Jlab.
Photon Source and Tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut GlueX Detector ReviewOctober 20-22, 2004, Newport News presented by GlueX Tagged Beam.
Magnetized hadronic calorimeter and muon veto for the K +   +  experiment L. DiLella, May 25, 2004 Purpose:  Provide pion – muon separation (muon veto)
Status of Beam Asymmetry Measurements for Meson Photoproduction ASU Meson Physics Group Hadron Spectroscopy WG Meeting – June 2009 Status of Beam Asymmetry.
**PhD Dec (CLAS Analysis Note). OZI evading/respecting process 49.2 ± 0.6 % 34 ± 0.5 % Experimentally this decay mode is (15.3 ± 0.4) % mode is.
00 Cooler CSB Direct or Extra Photons in d+d  0 Andrew Bacher for the CSB Cooler Collaboration ECT Trento, June 2005.
Polarisation transfer in hyperon photoproduction near threshold Tom Jude D I Glazier, D P Watts The University of Edinburgh.
 0 life time analysis updates, preliminary results from Primex experiment 08/13/2007 I.Larin, Hall-B meeting.
What canlearn from about Ken Livingston, University of Glasgow, Scotland.
1 First Results of the SLD Cerenkov Polarimeter at the DESY test beam Oleg Eyser Daniela K äfer, Christian Helebrant, Jenny List, Ulrich Velte*
Photon Source and Tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut GlueX Detector ReviewOctober 20-22, 2004, Newport News presented by GlueX Tagged Beam.
SPring-8 レーザー電子光 ビームラインでの タギング検出器の性能評価 核物理研究センター 三部 勉 LEPS collaboration 日本物理学会 近畿大学 1.レーザー電子光 2.タギング検出器 3.実験セットアップ 4.エネルギー分解能 5.検出効率とバックグラウンドレート.
Mott Electron Polarization Results Riad Suleiman July 10, 2013.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy The Department.
Overview of recent photon beam runs at CLAS CLAS12 European Workshop, Feb , Genoa, Italy Ken Livingston, University of Glasgow Tagged photons.
1 Report on analysis of PoGO Beam Test at Spring-8 Tsunefumi Mizuno July 15, 2003 July 21, 2003 revised.
CsI(Tl) Calorimeter and status of the E166 experiment E166 experiment CsI ( Tl) calorimeter construction. Test beam results vs. Geant4 simulation Schedules.
Timelike Compton Scattering at JLab
A compact pair polarimeter and spectrometer
CLAS, Hall-B Tagged linear and circularly polarised photons
Polarimetry Ken Livingston Sept 2012
Hall “12 GeV” May 27, 2003 NAPP 2003: J.J. LeRose.
Presentation transcript:

Glasgow University Seminar October 2006 A Novel Photon Polarimeter Joseph Santoro CUA Glasgow University Seminar October, 2006

Glasgow University Seminar October 2006 WARNING IN THIS TALK, POLARIZATION WILL BE SPELLED WITH A “Z”!!

Glasgow University Seminar October 2006 Overview 1.Intro: Polarized photons and pair production 2.Polarimetry: Polarization estimation vs. polarization measurements 3.The Hall B polarimeter 4.Results from g8b polarized photon run

Glasgow University Seminar October 2006 Polarized Photons Circular PolarizationLinear Polarization X y E E y X P P tt Peaks and troughs are 90 ◦ out of phase Produced as long as the incident electron beam is polarized Produced via coherent brem. (goniometer) or via Compton backscattering Peaks and troughs are 0 ◦ out of phase

Glasgow University Seminar October 2006 Pair production e + e - production plane is correlated with the polarization of the incoming photon Yang, Berlin, and Madansky 1950 Olsen, Maximon 1961

Glasgow University Seminar October 2006 Why do we care about Polarized Photons? A polarized photon beam is important for Baryon spectroscopy experiments (such as CLAS)  Theoretical calculations can include photon polarization   Asymmetry  (polarization-dependent) can be more sensitive than    measurement is experimentally easier than  (No acceptance calculation !!)  One part of obtaining double polarization observables (Beam-Target and Beam-Recoil or Beam-Meson)  Extraction of 6 more SDME’s than unpolarized data  Much higher sensitivity to N* interference effects

Glasgow University Seminar October 2006 Drift Chambers TOF Cherenkov Electromagnetic Calorimeter A touch of CLAS

Glasgow University Seminar October 2006 Polarized Photon Beamline Tagger Photon Polarimeter Goniometer CLAS Pair Spectrometer Electron Beam e-e- e+e+ Actually bends in z

Glasgow University Seminar October 2006 Polarized Photons at CLAS The polarized photons are produced in one of two linearly polarized orientations, which are parallel or perpendicular to the horizontal plane in the lab. The fine adjustment required to produce the coherent photon spectrum (on the order of μradians) is achievable with the Goniometer. Electron beam Coherent bremsstrahlung γ-rays produced by an electron beam on 50μm diamond crystal mounted on “Goniometer”. The Goniometer is aligned to the incident electron beam through a series of photon intensity scans. θ INCOH θ COH

Glasgow University Seminar October 2006 Polarimetry

Glasgow University Seminar October 2006 Estimating Photon Polarization The polarization can be estimated by a fit to the coherent energy spectrum Enhancement Data for PERP Calculation Polarization Photon Energy (MeV) Polarization from calculation Polarization from calculation Coherent Spectrum Photon Energy (MeV) Primary coherent edge K. Livingston

Glasgow University Seminar October 2006 Measuring Photon Polarization Need a minimum of 3 MSDs to resolve ambiguity in position of e + e - pair e-e- e+e+  Measure  polarization P  from pair production Pair polarimeters based on magnetic separation (circa 1960) of the e + e - pair sacrifice analying power Microstrip detectors get rid of the magnetic field!!!! or more specifically….. B. Wojtsekhowski, et. al. “A pair polarimeter For linearly polarized photons” NIM 515 (2003)

Glasgow University Seminar October 2006 Hall B Photon Polarimeter Top View Schematic The photon with polarization e, parallel to the X-axis, is incident on the thin converter along the z-axis and produces an e+ e- pair. The crossing points of the e+e-(P,N) and the angle between the polarization plane and the e+e- production plane ±±

Glasgow University Seminar October 2006 Active Target and Veto Counter Beam Active Target Veto counter Entrance window VC 1x1cm, 100  m-thick scintillator AT 1x1cm, 50  m-thick scintillator Photo-coupling to the PMTs through a reflective light box

Glasgow University Seminar October 2006 Silicon Microstrip Detectors 2x256 and 2x384 strips 50  m pitch On-board preamplifier chips

Glasgow University Seminar October 2006 MSD Housing

Glasgow University Seminar October 2006 All put together  The idea is take measurements with the detector at 0 ◦ and rotated by 90 ◦ at each E   +- ≈ m e c 2 /E  E  = 2.5 GeV r e+e- ~ 800  m

Glasgow University Seminar October 2006 Electronics and Readout 1. 2(3) PCB-mounted preamplifier chips 2. Custom-made signal control box (Ribbon to LEMO) 3. 2 CAEN V550 flash ADC cards and V551 B sequencer Each strip has one FADC channel and is read out sequentially

Glasgow University Seminar October 2006 Triggering on e + e - pairs e+ e- delayed Active Target Pair Spectrometer MSD  ~200 ns ~1ms readout / deadtime

Glasgow University Seminar October 2006 Trigger Flow Chart

Glasgow University Seminar October 2006 Position Distributions DEAD Noisy strips Optimal One-track events used for independent detector alignment Need at least 3 working detectors to simultaneously resolve the position of e + e - pair

Glasgow University Seminar October 2006 Distribution of pairs Circular distribution reflects the photon beam profile

Glasgow University Seminar October 2006 From Data to Asymmetry We need to know the polarization a priori at least once before we use the polarimeter!!! Polarimeter was “calibrated” with 100% polarized Compton back scattered photons at Spring-8 facility to obtain an “Analysing Power” A=0.11 Analysing power is a combo of MSD and converter thickness (multiple scattering) We actually measure product of analysing power and asymmetry   K. De Jager, et. al. “A pair polarimeter for linearly polarized, high-energy photons” Eur Phys J A (2004) 19,

Glasgow University Seminar October 2006  -Asymmetry   eff Proof of principle experiment Independent measurement of PARA and PERP polarization was desirable but unattainable A = (from SPRING-8 test) CHECK OUT CLAS NOTE !!

Glasgow University Seminar October 2006 Polarimeter++ Polarimetry is highly desirable for the upcoming FROST experiment but first some things need to be fixed: AT/VC need to be redesigned to provide better light collection Motor control assembly and detector housing needs to be redesigned, with two different motors and optical encoder position readback Replace 4 panel single-sided MSD design with 2 panel design incorportating a double-side and single sided panel

Glasgow University Seminar October 2006 Summary and Conclusions A scheme for photon polarimetry, based on field-free detection of an e+e- pair was presented Tested for the first time during the g8b experiment and due to “technical difficulties”, the test turned into a proof-of-principle experiment Comparisons were made between a calculation/fit to the coherent spectra and an effective asymmetry A future polarimeter design (FROST) will incorporate a new housing design, motor rotation mechanism and 2 MSD panels instead of 4.