Accreditation Visit: OMG! What if they ask me a question?? Accreditation Tri-Chairs: Kelly Irwin Ginni May Don Palm Fall 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presented by Dr. Tanmay Pramanik Overview of On-Site Team Evaluation.
Advertisements

September 8, /8/2014 Margarita Pillado -- Faculty Accreditation Coordinator -- Los Angeles Pierce College 1.
Accreditation Climate Survey MC GAP May 1, Overview  Administered Fall 2012 via  Directly linked to the Accreditation Standards  Modeled.
ASCCC Accreditation Institute 2013 Marybeth Buechner, Sacramento City College Dolores Davison, Foothill College Roberta Eisel, Citrus College, facilitator.
1 Preparing for Institutional Self Study Dr. Barbara Beno, President Dr. Steve Maradian, Vice President 20 June 2008.
Fall 2013 Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges Western Association of Schools and Colleges D ISCUSSION WITH E XPERTS.
1 Preparing for Institutional Self Study Dr. Deborah G. Blue, Vice President Mr. Jack Pond, Vice President Fall 2005.
Faculty WASC Information Session January 18, 2011.
Accreditation: Evolution and New Challenges 2015 Accreditation Institute Constance M. Carroll, Ph.D. Chancellor San Diego Community College District 1.
A Presentation for Peralta Community College District Governing Board By Thomas E. Henry, PCCD Fiscal Adviser November 10,
Accreditation Update COLLEGE of Alameda Spring 2015.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
All College Day August 24, Accreditation is for everyone REAFFIRMED.
Dr. Timothy S. Brophy Director of Institutional Assessment University of Florida GRADUATE AND PROFESSIONAL PROGRAM ASSESSMENT PLANS.
Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges of the Western Association of Schools and Colleges.
Accreditation Institute – 2013 Pearl Cheng – Trustee, Foothill-De Anza Community College District Dolores Davison – Foothill Community College Richard.
Presentation for Flex Day June 7, 2011 LATTC Accreditation
2013 A CCREDITATION S ELF S TUDY K ICKOFF M AY 2, 2011 Presented by Chairs: Aimee Myers, Faculty Chair Laurie Thiers, Classified Chair Brian Haley, Management.
1 Cosumnes River College’s Institutional Self Study Norv Wellsfry Fall 2007.
SACS Reaffirmation Robert B. Bradley October 2013 THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY 1.
Dr. Marybeth Buechner Dean of Planning, Research & Institutional Effectiveness Sacramento City College Los Rios Community College District.
ANDREW LAMANQUE, PHD SPRING 2014 Status Report: Foothill Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
Accreditation in a Multi-College District Accreditation Institute Academic Senate for California Community Colleges February 11, 2012, 1:00-2:00pm John.
THE ASSESSMENT TWO-STEP: It’s more than a line dance.
Accreditation Update COLLEGE of Alameda Fall 2014.
Working with Trustees to Address Standard IV Recommendations What are the roles we play?
All College Day August 23, 2013 The Homestretch to Reaffirmation! REAFFIRMED.
Dr. Constance Ray Vice President, Institutional Research, Planning, & Effectiveness.
 SACSCOC REAFFIRMATION FALL  OBJECTIVES: 1.List key facts related to the SACSCOC reaffirmation process. 2.Verbalize understanding of SACSCOC Principles.
What CIOs Need to Know.  Meridith Randall – ACCJC ALO for 17 years for 3 different colleges; never had a college receive a sanction; has written multiple.
UWF SACS REAFFIRMATION OF ACCREDITATION PROJECT Presentation to UWF Board of Trustees November 7, 2003.
ACCREDITATION, SELF-STUDIES, AND FACULTY ROLES
Accreditation Kevin Bontenbol Julie Bruno Michelle Grimes-Hillman 1.
Los Angeles Mission College Institutional Self Study for Reaffirmation of Accreditation
WASC “All Hands” Meeting Overview and Update November 12, 2007 D. Jonte-Pace.
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
Assessment Committee 20 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
A STUDENT’S GUIDE ACCREDITATION WHAT IS ACCREDITATION? The process by which a college is certified by a regional accrediting agency, such as the.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
1 Preparing for Institutional Accreditation Evaluation Dr. Barbara Beno, President Deborah G. Blue, Vice President Dr. Lily Owyang, Associate Vice President.
Accreditation Overview Winter 2016 Mallory Newell, Accreditation Liaison Office.
Accreditation 101 Julie Bruno, Sierra College Glenn Yoshida, Los Angeles Southwest College Roberta Eisel, Citrus College, facilitator Susan Clifford, ACCJC,
What is Regional Accreditation? Regional Accreditation is a time-tested model of professional peer review that supports education excellence. Accreditation.
Accreditation Self-Study Progress Update Presentation to the SCCCD Board of Trustees Madera Center October 5, 2010 Tony Cantu, Fresno City College Marilyn.
MT. SAN JACINTO COLLEGE Accreditation Self Study Report 2011 presented by Rebecca Teague, Accreditation Liaison Officer Steering & Standard Chair Committee.
October 20 – November 6, 2014 Alovidin Bakhovidinov Alina Batkayeva
October 14, 2014 Reaffirmation of UofL.
Evaluator Training Workshop March 1, 2012 Jeff Jordan Vice President for Student Life Seattle Pacific University.
Assessment Committee 20 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Conversation with the SLOA&C March 20, 2015 Professional Development Day SJCC Presenters: C. Cruz-Johnson, S. Datta, and R. Gamez Paving the Way for Student.
Classified Leadership Institute 2016 Hope Ell Theresa Rees Misty Burruel Sherrie Guerrero ACCREDITATION, PROGRAM REVIEW, AND THE CLASSIFIED PROFESSIONAL.
 Julie Bruno, Sierra College  Roberta Eisel, Citrus College  Fred Hochstaedter, Monterey Peninsula College.
Institutional Self Study in Support of Reaffirmation of Accreditation Laney College 900 Fallon Street Oakland, CA Accrediting Commission for Community.
1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.
MSJC Accreditation Classified Professional Day – March 22,2017
Learning by Doing: Participating on an Evaluation Team
Hot Topics in Distance Education
Curriculum and Accreditation
Assessment Committee The ISER What you need to know. 9/14/2018
Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update
Zaida O’Connor, ASCCC Accreditation Committee, College of the Canyons
Accreditation 101 Tim Brown, ACCJC Commissioner
Accreditation and curriculum
Safety Advisory Committee The ISER What you need to know. 9/12/2018
PORTERVILLE COLLEGE ACCREDITATION OVERVIEW Fall 2017
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study)
ISER Committee Presentation-College Council
The Infamous/Famous Accreditation Process!
CURRICULUM AND ACCREDITATION
Institutional Self Evaluation Report Team Training
Presentation transcript:

Accreditation Visit: OMG! What if they ask me a question?? Accreditation Tri-Chairs: Kelly Irwin Ginni May Don Palm Fall 2015

OMG! What if they ask me a question?? 2

Questions that will be answered today: What is accreditation? What is an accreditation visit? Who will be on the team? How will the visit affect my work? What are they looking for? What might they ask us?

What is Accreditation? Accreditation provides the recognition that education provided by the college meets acceptable levels of quality. Being accredited tells the public and our students that we meet the standards needed for our graduates to gain admission to other reputable institutions of higher learning or to achieve credentials for professional practice. It allows SCC to be eligible to offer federal financial aid to students.

ACCJC Accreditation Requirements Eligibility Requirements Standards Policies Recommendations can result from accreditation reports or visits.

Key theme: Continuous Quality Improvement—how are we using information (data in many forms) to review our processes and improve the college (instruction, student services, and the educational environment)? 6

ACCJC Accreditation Standards Standard I: Institutional Mission and Effectiveness Standard II: Student Learning Programs and Services Standard III: Resources Standard IV: Leadership and Governance 7

Standard I: Institutional Mission and Effectiveness Mission ◦ Defines our educational purposes, student populations, etc. (Who are we and what do we do?) Improving Institutional Effectiveness ◦ Using data to plan for improvement

Standard II: Student Learning Programs and Services Instructional Programs ◦ Degrees, certificates, SLOs, etc. Student Support Services ◦ Counseling, A&R, FA, Orientation, Career services, DSPS, EOPS, etc. Library and Learning Support Services ◦ Library, tutoring, computer labs, information competency, etc. 9

Standard III: Resources Human Resources ◦ Hiring process and policies, determining needed hires, qualifications of personnel, evaluation of personnel, etc. Physical Resources ◦ Sufficient facilities, evaluation of facilities needs, etc. Technology Resources ◦ Sufficient IT resources, evaluation of IT resource needs, planning for upgrades, DE resources, etc. Financial Resources ◦ Fiscal stability, financial planning, accurate information, etc.

Standard IV: Leadership and Governance Decision-making Roles and Processes ◦ Dialogue about college goals, participation in decision- making, governance roles, evaluation of processes, etc. Board and Administrative Organization ◦ Board of Trustees policies and roles, BoT ethics and responsibilities, etc.

What is an accreditation visit? A team of 8 to 13 peer evaluators visit the college for about 4 days to confirm that the college meets the ERs, Standards, and Commission Policies. The visit occurs after the team has read the college’s Self Evaluation Report. 12

The Accreditation Visit Before the visit During the visit After the visit

Before the Accreditation Visit The College: Preparation begins two years before visit Self evaluation report is sent to the team in advance Visit is about a week long Evidence is critical The visiting team: Starts a more than a month before the visit Reads the self-evaluation carefully Spends a lot of time on the website Identifies areas of concern and draft recommendations before they come to the college (they will check on these before making conclusions).

During the Accreditation Visit Typically, each team member focuses on one or two sections of the standards They will have a list of whom they want to visit. They will also talk to people who ask to talk with them. They will look at many kinds of evidence; some evidence will be provided on paper, some as electronic copies. They will be thorough and look at more than just examples of documents, plans, etc. They may visit meetings and classes (face to face and/or DE).

After the Accreditation Visit The team will recommend and then the Commission will take action to do one of the following: Reaffirm accreditation Reaffirm accreditation with Follow-up report Reaffirm accreditation, Follow-up report & visit Defer a decision on reaffirmation of accreditation Issue Warning Impose Probation Show Cause Terminate Accreditation

Reasons for sanction: The most common problems for the colleges on sanction as of Jan 2013 are: ◦ Board roles and responsibilities (17 colleges), ◦ Planning using assessment results (16) ◦ Financial management (13). The ACCJC Spring 2013 newsletter also notes that deficiencies in the following areas are “emerging reasons for sanction” including: ◦ Student Learning Outcomes (9 colleges) ◦ Student Services (7) ◦ Employee Evaluation (7) ◦ Use of Research for Improvement (7) ◦ Mission (7) ◦ Miscellaneous HR deficiencies (8) ◦ Distance Education (5)

Who will be on the team? The Chair is usually a college president or district chancellor. The team assistant is someone chosen by the Chair to assist the Chair and the team. The team members consist of administrators, faculty, board members, and occasionally a classified college employee – all from various colleges in the ACCJC regional area. 18

How will the visit affect my work? Your work should carry on as usual. Team members may come to your work area and ask you questions. Just another day… 19

What are they looking for? Evidence and verification that the college does what they say they do, Evidence that the college follows their policies and processes, Evidence that the college provides quality education and student services, Evidence that the college meets ERs, Standards, and Commission Policies. 20

What is evidence? Institutional databases, research reports and fact books Faculty and student handbooks Catalogues Policy statements Program review documents Planning documents Minutes Syllabi, course outlines, rubrics and other class documents Etc.

What might they ask us? …and do we have to provide them with the answer? The team can ask for anything. If you are unsure of how to respond, let the team member know this, and let them know that you will contact your supervisor, and get back to them ASAP. 22

College reports to ACCJC Midterm Report Annual Report Annual Fiscal Report SLO Report Substantive Change Proposals Self-evaluation Report (This is the big one)

Key points Accreditation requirements: ◦ Must be met at all times. ◦ Require the college to demonstrate “organizational effectiveness and educational quality”. ◦ Require “systematic assessments” that allow the college to improve. ◦ Apply to every college process, action, service and program.

Emerging Emphases Student Achievement measures Use of assessment results in integrated planning Making information available to the public

Measures of student achievement and assessment of learning outcomes: College completion “Quality of graduates” Assessment of course SLOs “Institutionally-set standards” – course success, Fall to Fall persistence, numbers of degrees and certificates, and number of transfers.

Use of assessment results in integrated planning : Measures of student achievement and SLO assessment need to have a clear connection to planning processes. 27

Making information available to the public: This includes making the information available ‘one click away’ from the college homepage. This is aligned with new emphases from the CCCCO and the Federal Government.

Ensuring quality regardless of modality or location: Student outcomes, student success, services available, etc. should be equivalent for all locations or modalities of a course or program. Careful attention to distance education.

Questions? 30

References ndex.html ndex.html