Ross Jian Yu (Huawei Technologies) doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/0051r0 Submission Jan 2014 Slide 1 Wireless Office Scenario with Interference Date: 2014-01-23.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Submission doc.: IEEE /0859r0 July 2014 Hakan Persson, Ericsson ABSlide 1 Proposing a Stadium Scenario Date: Authors:
Advertisements

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0086r2 Jan 2014 Tsugu Aoki, ToshibaSlide 1 Outdoor AP measurement in Tokyo Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1387r0 Submission Nov Yan Zhang, et. Al.Slide 1 HEW channel modeling for system level simulation Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0116r1 SubmissionYakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 1 Long-Term SINR Calibration for System Simulation Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0381r0 March 2014 Filip Mestanov, Ericsson ABSlide 1 Stadium scenario for HEW Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1225r1 Considerations on CCA for OBSS Opearation in ax Date: Slide 1Huawei Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0543r0 Submission May 2015 TG ax Scenarios Proposed additions for frequency re-use Date: Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/613r0 May 2015 Chinghwa Yu et al, MediaTek Inc.Slide 1 Box 5 Calibration Result Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /568r0 Submission Frequency Selective Scheduling (FSS) for TGax OFDMA May 2015 Slide 1 Date: Authors: Kome Oteri (InterDigital)
Doc.: IEEE /0861r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury Impact of CCA adaptation on spatial reuse in dense residential scenario Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0085r1 Jan 2015 John Son, WILUS InstituteSlide 1 Legacy Fairness Issues of Enhanced CCA Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1443r0 SubmissionEsa Tuomaala Adapting CCA and Receiver Sensitivity Date: Authors: Slide 1 November 2014.
Doc.: IEEE /1420r1Nov 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Impact of Preamble Error on MAC System Performance Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE /0833r0 July 2014 Pengfei Xia, Interdigital CommunicationsSlide 1 Residential Scenario Sensitivity and Transmit Power Control.
802.11ax scenario 1 CCA Date: Authors: March 2015
Doc.: IEEE /0053r0 Submission Jan Zhang Jiayin (Huawei Technologies)Slide 1 Further Considerations on Calibration of System Level Simulation.
Doc.: IEEE /0116r0 SubmissionYakun Sun, et. Al.Slide 1 Long-Term SINR Calibration for System Simulation Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0782r0 Submission July 2009 Carlos Cordeiro, IntelSlide 1 Spatial Reuse and Interference Mitigation in 60 GHz Date: Authors:
Doc. No. IEEE hew-r1 Submission July 2013 Klaus Doppler, NokiaSlide 1 Evaluation Criteria and Simulation Scenarios Date: July 16, 2013 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1153r0 Submission September 2013 Laurent Cariou (Orange)Slide 1 Simulation scenario proposal Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0486r1 Submission May 2013 Ron Porat, Broadcom HEW- Metrics, Targets, Simulation Scenarios Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0612r0 May 2014 Jiyong Pang, et. al. HuaweiSlide 1 Calibration Procedures towards Integrated System Level Simulation Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1081r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury HEW Simulation Methodology Date: Sep 16, 2013 Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: ax Submission Sept 2014 Slide 1 Effect of CCA in residential scenario part 2 Date: Authors:
Doc.:IEEE /0536r0 Submission May 11th, 2009 Slide 1 OBSS issue in ac Authors: Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0578r0 May 2014 Frank LaSita, InterDigitalSlide 1 Residential Scenario CCA/TPC Simulation Discussion Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0723r1 SubmissionSlide 1 HEW SG Evaluation Methodology Overview Date: Authors: Minyoung Park (Intel Corp.) July 2013.
Doc.: ax Submission July 2014 Slide 1 Proposed Calibration For MAC simulator Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0889r0 Submission June 2014 Nihar Jindal, Broadcom Performance Gains from CCA Optimization Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0786r0 Submission July 2013 Wu TianyuSlide 1 Discussions on System Level Simulation Methodology Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0523r0 Submission April 2014 Imad Jamil (Orange)Slide 1 MAC simulation results for Dynamic sensitivity control (DSC - CCA adaptation)
Doc.: IEEE /0757r0 Submission July 2013 Ron Porat, Broadcom Evaluation Methodology and Simulation Scenarios Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /610r1 Submission Vida Ferdowsi, Newracom May 2015 Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Vida Ferdowsi Daewon Lee Reza Hedayat.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0372r2 Slide 1 System Level Simulations on Increased Spatial Reuse Date: Authors: Jinjing Jiang(Marvell) March.
Doc.: IEEE /0799r2 Submission June 2014 Nihar Jindal, Broadcom Modifications to Simulation Scenarios and Calibration Process Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0680r1 SubmissionJiyong Pang, Huawei TechnologiesSlide 1 Reference Box5 Calibration Assumptions and Parameters Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0542r0 SubmissionSimone Merlin, QualcommSlide 1 HEW Scenarios and Goals Date: Authors: May 2013.
Doc.: IEEE /0814r0 Submission July 2015 Simulation Results for Box5 Calibration Ke Yao, et, al. (ZTE) Slide 1 Date: Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
Doc.: IEEE /0307r0 Submission January 2014 Nihar Jindal, Broadcom PHY Calibration Results Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE / ax Submission M. Shahwaiz Afaqui DSC calibration results with NS-3 Authors: Nov
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1079r0 September 2013 Joseph Levy, InterDigital Communications Inc.Slide 1 Outdoor Stadium Simulation Details Discussion Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0161r1 Submission doc.: IEEE /1031r0 Measurement results for OBSS in home network scenarios Date: September 2009.
Discussion on ax functional requirements
Doc.: IEEE / ax Submission M. Shahwaiz Afaqui DSC calibration results with NS-3 Authors: Nov
Doc.: IEEE /1083r0 SubmissionSlide 1 HEW SG Simulation Scenarios Date: Authors: David Yang (Huawei) Sep 2013.
Doc.: IEEE /1000r1 Submission Aug 2013 Simone Merlin (Qualcomm)Slide 1 Simulation Scenarios Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1373r1 November 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 Updated Box 5 Calibration Results Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0889r3 Submission June 2014 Nihar Jindal, Broadcom Performance Gains from CCA Optimization Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /1226r0 Submission Sep 2014 Slide 1 SLS Box 1&2 Calibration Results Date: Authors: Russell Huang (MediaTek)
Submission doc.: IEEE /0871r1 Jul Jiyong Pang, et. al. Huawei Further Calibration Results towards Integrated System Level Simulation Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1383r0 November 2013 Wookbong Lee, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 System Level Simulation Parameters Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0499r1 Submission May 2009 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Simulation Scenario Floor Plans Date: Authors:
Simulation results for spatial reuse in 11ax
Simulation Scenarios Date: Authors: Aug 2013 May 2013
Outdoor AP measurement in Tokyo
HEW SG Evaluation Methodology Overview
TGad interference modeling for MAC simulations
Simulation Results for Box5
Marvell Semiconductor
Box5 Calibration Results
Box5 Results of 11ac SS6 Date: Authors: Jan 2015 Sept 2014
Considerations on CCA for OBSS Opearation in ax
802.11ax scenario 1 CCA Date: Authors: March 2015
802.11ax scenario 1 CCA Date: Authors: March 2015
Simulation Scenarios Date: Authors: Aug 2013 May 2013
System Level Simulator Evaluation with/without Capture Effect
TG ax Scenarios Proposed additions for frequency re-use
DSC Calibration Result
Consideration on System Level Simulation
802.11ax scenario 1 CCA Date: Authors: March 2015
Presentation transcript:

Ross Jian Yu (Huawei Technologies) doc.: IEEE /0051r0 Submission Jan 2014 Slide 1 Wireless Office Scenario with Interference Date: Authors:

Ross Jian Yu (Huawei Technologies) doc.: IEEE /0051r0 SubmissionSlide 2 Abstract This presentation provides a scenario for wireless office with interference. This scenario is a supplement and modification to the enterprise wireless office scenario introduced in [1], and aims to include several interferences. Jan 2014

Ross Jian Yu (Huawei Technologies) doc.: IEEE /0051r0 SubmissionSlide 3 Jan Introduction 2.Motivation 3.Interference Classifications 4.Small and Medium Enterprise 5.Mixed Enterprise Office Scenario with Interference Outline

Ross Jian Yu (Huawei Technologies) doc.: IEEE /0051r0 SubmissionSlide 4 Jan 2014 Introduction

Ross Jian Yu (Huawei Technologies) doc.: IEEE /0051r0 SubmissionSlide 5 Jan 2014 Scenario Name TopologyManagement Channel Model Homogeneity ~Traffic Model 1 Residential A - Apartment bldg. e.g. ~10m x 10m apts in a multi-floor bldg ~10s of STAs/AP, P2P pairs UnmanagedIndoorFlatHome 2 Enterprise B - Dense small BSSs with clusters e.g. ~10-20m inter AP distance, ~100s of STAs/AP, P2P pairs ManagedIndoorFlat Enterprise 3 Indoor Small BSS Hotspot C - Dense small BSSs, uniform e.g. ~10-20m inter AP distance ~100s of STAs/AP, P2P pairs Mobile 4 Outdoor Large BSS Hotspot D - Large BSSs, uniform e.g m inter AP distance ~100s of STAs/AP, P2P pairs Managed Outdoor FlatMobile 4a Outdoor Large BSS Hotspot + Residential D+A Managed + Unmanaged Hierarchical Mobile + Home Scenarios Summary Ref: [1]

Ross Jian Yu (Huawei Technologies) doc.: IEEE /0051r0 SubmissionSlide 6 Jan 2014 Motivation

Ross Jian Yu (Huawei Technologies) doc.: IEEE /0051r0 SubmissionSlide 7 Jan 2014 Motivation Comments to consider interference in scenario 2 [1]: - [SM23] As this scenario comprises one floor only, it seems important to add additional sources of interference. - [DY] Interference cannot be omitted, especially for the case of small / medium companies, which only rent several rooms of one floor and have some small companies around. Actually, most of the companies are small/medium in the world. - [Jason] I think that Interfering scenario including P2P links and unmanaged stand-alone APs should be considered. There are also some proposals for interference in scenario 2 [6][7]

Ross Jian Yu (Huawei Technologies) doc.: IEEE /0051r0 SubmissionSlide 8 Jan 2014 Interference Classifications

Ross Jian Yu (Huawei Technologies) doc.: IEEE /0051r0 SubmissionSlide 9 Jan 2014 Interference Classifications Four kinds of interferences are introduced in [1]:  Considered in the proposed scenario: 1.Interference with unmanaged networks (unmanaged P2P links). 2.Interference between APs belonging to different managed ESS due to the presence of multiple operators.  Not Considered in the proposed scenario: 3.Interference between APs belonging to the same managed ESS due to high density deployment (OBSS interference, in high SNR conditions). 4.Interference with unmanaged stand-alone APs.

Ross Jian Yu (Huawei Technologies) doc.: IEEE /0051r0 SubmissionSlide 10 Jan 2014 Small and Medium Enterprise

Ross Jian Yu (Huawei Technologies) doc.: IEEE /0051r0 SubmissionSlide 11 Jan 2014 Small and Medium Enterprise (SME) Actually, most of the companies are micro/small/medium in the world. Table : Enterprise size class analysis of key indicators, non-financial business economy, EU-27, 2009 [2] We can see that N small :N med ≈ 6:1, where N small : number of small enterprises N med : number of medium enterprises

Ross Jian Yu (Huawei Technologies) doc.: IEEE /0051r0 SubmissionSlide 12 Jan 2014 Number of Employees in SME MicroSmallMediumLarge Europe USA China Canada<50/ Australia New Zealand <1919 Mean Ref: [3-5] Micro enterprises can be covered in the residential scenario, hence we concentrate on the small and medium enterprises.

Ross Jian Yu (Huawei Technologies) doc.: IEEE /0051r0 SubmissionSlide 13 Jan 2014 Decisions on Number of Offices No. of Emplo yees No. of Cluster s per BSS Cubic Size(m 2 ) Office Size (m 2 ) No. of offices Scenario 2 in [1] x220x208 Small Enterpri se x220x201 Medium Enterpri se x220x202~4 Also, from the previous figure [2], we see that N small :N med ≈ 6:1.

Ross Jian Yu (Huawei Technologies) doc.: IEEE /0051r0 SubmissionSlide 14 Jan 2014 Wireless Office with Interference

Ross Jian Yu (Huawei Technologies) doc.: IEEE /0051r0 SubmissionSlide 15 Jan 2014 Topology for SME  There are eight BSSs in one floor, same as Scenario 2 in [1].  According to the results in slide 13, there is one medium enterprise, which consists of 2 BSSs (BSS1 and BSS2) for example, and six small enterprises, each of which consists of 1 BSS (BSS3 to BSS 8).  As there exists seven different enterprise (represented by seven different colors), hence there can exist interferences between APs from different managed ESSs. BSS3BSS4 BSS2BSS1 20 m BSS7BSS8 BSS6BSS5

Ross Jian Yu (Huawei Technologies) doc.: IEEE /0051r0 SubmissionSlide 16 Jan 2014 STAs Clusters (Cubicle) and AP Positions within a BSS with unmanaged P2P links With unmanaged P2P link Without unmanaged P2P links

Ross Jian Yu (Huawei Technologies) doc.: IEEE /0051r0 SubmissionSlide 17 Jan 2014  P P2P (e.g., 2) pairs of unmanaged P2P links are uniformly distributed within a BSS.  P P2P is usually very small, and hence the probability that two pairs of unmanaged P2P links exist in the same cubic is very small.  The unmanaged P2P links are optional. We may not consider this case and thus simplify the scenario. In this case, P P2P =0.  The number of STAs composing unmanaged P2P links: N P2P =2*P P2P. STAs Clusters (Cubicle) and AP Positions within a BSS with unmanaged P2P links (cont’d)

Ross Jian Yu (Huawei Technologies) doc.: IEEE /0051r0 SubmissionSlide 18 Jan 2014 Topology Topology DescriptionOffice floor configuration (see Figures 5-9)  8 offices (Each medium enterprise consists of 2~4 big offices. Each small enterprise consists of 1 office. E.g., BSS 1 and 2 are possessed by one medium enterprise, BSS 3 to 8 are possessed by 6 different small enterprises.)  64 cubicles per offices Unmanaged networks  P P2P (e.g., 2) pairs of unmanaged P2P links are uniformly distributed within an office APs locationEach AP is located at the center of the office Installed on the ceiling at (x=10,y=10,z=3) AP Type{HEW} STAs locationSTA1: Smartphone or tablet STA2: monitor STA3: laptop STA4: hard disk Managed STAs are placed randomly in each cubicle (x,y,z=1.2) Unmanaged STAs: The unmanaged P2P pairs with STAs placed 0.5m apart are placed randomly in a BSS (x,y,z=1.2).

Ross Jian Yu (Huawei Technologies) doc.: IEEE /0051r0 SubmissionSlide 19 Jan 2014 Number of STAs and STAs type N (e.g., 4) STAs in each cubicle. STA_1 to STA_{N-M}: HEW STA_{N-M+1} to STA_{N} : non-HEW (N = TBD, M = TBD) Unmanaged STAs: N P2P (e.g., 4) STAs in a BSS. STA_{64N+1} to STA_{64N+N P2P - M P2P }: HEW STA_{64N+N P2P -M P2P +1} to STA_{64N+N P2P }: non-HEW (N P2P = TBD, M P2P = TBD) Non-HEW = 11b/g (TBD) in 2.4GHz Non-HEW = 11ac (TBD) in 5GHz Channel Model AP-AP: TGn Model D AP-STA: TGn Model D STA-STA: TGn Model D Indoor: AP/STA: TGn/TGac channel model D STA/STA: TGn/TGac channel model B Penetration LossesPenetration Losses: 7 dB / wall Topology (cont’d)

Ross Jian Yu (Huawei Technologies) doc.: IEEE /0051r0 SubmissionSlide 20 Jan 2014 PHY parameters BW:All BSSs either all at 2.4GHz, or all at 5GHz [20MHz BSS at 2.4GHz, 80 MHz BSS at 5GHz] MCS:[Up to MCS 9, BCC] GI:[Long] Data Preamble:[11ac] STA TX power[21dBm] AP TX Power[24dBm] P2P STAs TX power[21dBm] AP #of TX antennas{4} AP #of RX antennas{4} STA #of TX antennas{1, 2} STA #of RX antennas{1, 2} Paramters for P2P (if different from above) P2P STAs TX power PHY Parameters

Ross Jian Yu (Huawei Technologies) doc.: IEEE /0051r0 SubmissionSlide 21 Jan 2014 MAC Parameters MAC parameters Access protocol parameters: [EDCA with default EDCA Parameters set] Primary channels Channelization is TBD. Aggregation:[A-MPDU / max aggregation size / BA window size, No A-MSDU, with immediate BA] Max # of retries[10] RTS/CTS Threshold[TBD] Rate adaptation method[Ideal] AssociationX% of STAs associate with the AP based on highest RSSI; 100-X% of STAs are not associated. Paramters for P2P (if different from above) Primary channelsTBD

Ross Jian Yu (Huawei Technologies) doc.: IEEE /0051r0 SubmissionSlide 22 Summary 1. We introduced the mixed enterprise office scenario with interference. 2. This simulation scenario is made based on a survey about the small and medium companies. 3. Three kinds of interferences are considered: a) Interference from P2P links b) Interferences between APs within different managed ESSs Jan 2014

Ross Jian Yu (Huawei Technologies) doc.: IEEE /0051r0 SubmissionSlide 23 References [1] hew-simulation-scenarios-document-template [2] _and_medium-sized_enterprises [3] [4] [5] qCvzAvjpsvzxlLQm7Jupx5NxHAD8SBKlz2GgT3aU7vOONhjiV_J e9ielCEtAq [6] hew-some-simulation-scenarios-for-hew [7] hew-simulation-scenario-for-unplanned-wi-fi-network Jan 2014

Ross Jian Yu (Huawei Technologies) doc.: IEEE /0051r0 SubmissionSlide 24 Jan 2014 More Topologies BSS3BSS4 BSS2BSS1 20 m BSS7BSS8 BSS6BSS5  Different locations of the small and medium enterprises can also be considered. BSS3BSS4 BSS2BSS1 20 m BSS7BSS8 BSS6BSS5

Ross Jian Yu (Huawei Technologies) doc.: IEEE /0051r0 SubmissionSlide 25 Jan 2014 More Dense Scenarios APs locationFour APs are located in the office Installed on the ceiling at (x=5,y=5,z=3), (x=15,y=5,z=3) (x=5,y=15,z=3), (x=15,y=15,z=3) Channel Model (TBD) AP-AP: TGn Model D AP-STA: TGn Model D STA-STA: TGn Model D Indoor: AP/STA: TGn/TGac channel model D STA/STA: TGn/TGac channel model B

Ross Jian Yu (Huawei Technologies) doc.: IEEE /0051r0 SubmissionSlide 26 Jan 2014 More Dense Scenarios with unmanaged P2P links