Christopher Nantista ILC10 Beijing, China March 27, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
M. Ross Project Advisory Committee Review 13 December, 2012 KEK Main Linac Layout – Two variants for two different types of sites GDE PAC Review.
Advertisements

Breakdown Rate Dependence on Gradient and Pulse Heating in Single Cell Cavities and TD18 Faya Wang, Chris Nantista and Chris Adolphsen May 1, 2010.
PETS components and waveguide connections CLIC Workshop 2007 David Carrillo.
5th Collaboration Meeting on X-band Accelerator Structure Design and Test Program. May 2011 Review of waveguide components development for CLIC I. Syratchev,
KCS Ongoing R&D Christopher Nantista SLAC LCWS11 Granada, Spain September 29, …… …… …… … ….
Integration of Cavities and Coupling Coil Modules Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting March 28 – April 1, 2004.
Status of the 201 MHz Cavity and Coupling Coil Module Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Video Conference March 10, 2004.
Design of Standing-Wave Accelerator Structure
Christopher Nantista ML-SCRF Technology Meeting July 28, 2010 REPORT.
Christopher Nantista SLAC TILC09 Tsukuba, Japan April 20, 2009.
Test Facilities Sami Tantawi SLAC. Summary of SLAC Facilities NLCTA (3 RF stations, one Injector, one Radiation shielding) – Two 240ns pulse compressor,
RF COMPONENTS USING OVER-MODED RECTANGULAR WAVEGUIDES FOR THE NEXT LINEAR COLLIDER MULTI- MODED DELAY LINE RF DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM S. G. Tantawi, N. M.
ENGINEERING DESIGN AND FABRICATION OF PETS V. Soldatov¹, D. Gudkov¹, I. Syratchev², A. Samoshkin¹, G. Riddone², A. Olyunin¹, S. Atieh² 1 – JINR, Dubna,
Status of vacuum & interconnections of the CLIC main linac modules C. Garion TE/VSC TBMWG, 9 th November 2009.
Christopher Nantista Chris Adolphsen SLAC TILC09 Tsukuba, Japan April 20, 2009.
30 GHz waveguide line modification towards 12 GHz.
Christopher Nantista ILC 2 nd Baseline Assessment Workshop (BAW-2) SLAC January 18, …… …… …… … ….
Christopher Nantista 2011 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas (ALCPG11) University of Oregon, Eugene March 20, …… …… …… … ….
KCS Operational Issues Chris Adolphsen, Chris Nantista and Faya Wang GDE PAC Review at KEK 12/12/12.
201 MHz NC RF Cavity R&D for Muon Cooling Channels
RF Distribution Alternatives R.A.Yogi & FREIA group Uppsala University.
Fermilab I. Terechkine1 RF Phase Shifter R&D Proton Driver Review March 15, 2005 T. Barrak, B. Foster, I. Gonin, M. Huening, V. Kashikhin, T. Khabiboulinne,
Test Facilities and Component Developments Sami Tantawi SLAC May 15, 2008.
Chris Adolphsen 10/03/09 MLI and HLRF Summary. Vladimir Kashikhin.
Christopher Nantista ARD R&D Status Meeting SLAC February 3, …… …… …… … ….
Proposed TDR baseline LLRF design J. Carwardine, 22 May 2012.
Clustered Surface RF Production Scheme Chris Adolphsen Chris Nantista SLAC.
Klystron Cluster RF Distribution Scheme Chris Adolphsen Chris Nantista SLAC.
X-Band RF Structure and Beam Dynamics Workshop, December 2008 CERN experience with 12 GHz high power waveguide components Igor Syratchev (CERN)
Linac R&D Update May 15, L-Band Source Consists of a LLRF system (VME/Epics based), a SNS High Voltage Converter Modulator (on loan), a Thales 2104C.
Vladimir Kashikhin. FLASH Cavity Gradient Stability Comparison of beam-off measurements of pulse-to-pulse cavity gradient jitter during the flattop.
Thickness of the Kamaboko Tunnel Shield Wall under Different Assumptions Ewan Paterson Technical Board June 23,
Klystron Cluster RF Distribution Scheme Chris Adolphsen Chris Nantista SLAC.
Modulator and overmoded RF components status for the 12GHz Test Stand at CERN - RF meeting – 17/03/2010.
Americas Region: T4CM Status and Plans H. Carter TD SRF Dev. Dept. July 14, 2006.
Power Distribution System R&D at SLAC Christopher Nantista ILC08 Chicago, Illinois November 18,
KSC Operation Control of Cavity Gradients Failure Analysis Near and Long Term R&D Effect on Beam Emittance Chris Adolphsen SLAC 9/7/2010 Going Native in.
Linac RF Source Recommendations for Items 22,23,24,46,47 Chris Adolphsen.
Ding Sun and David Wildman Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee
Aug 23, 2006 Half Current Option: Impact on Linac Cost Chris Adolphsen With input from Mike Neubauer, Chris Nantista and Tom Peterson.
TE 01 -TE 02 DLDS Elements BINP-KEK
Power Distribution System (PDS) Design and R&D Status Christopher Nantista SLAC SCRF Fermilab April 24, 2008.
The Design and Analysis of Multi-megawatt Distributed Single Pole Double Throw (SPDT) Microwave Switches Sami G. Tantawi, and Mikhail I. Petelin Stanford.
1Matthias LiepeAugust 2, 2007 Future Options Matthias Liepe.
The NLC RF Pulse Compression and High Power RF Transport Systems Sami G. Tantawi, G.Bowden, K.Fant, Z.D.Farkas, W.R.Fowkes J.Irwin, N.M.Kroll, Z.H.Li,
Evaluation of the TE 12 Mode in Circular Waveguides for Low-Loss High Power Transportation Sami G. Tantawi, C. Nantista K. Fant, G. Bowden, N. Kroll, and.
KCS and RDR 10 Hz Operation Chris Adolphsen BAW2, SLAC 1/20/2011.
Thickness of the Kamaboko Tunnel Shield Wall under Different Assumptions Ewan Paterson ADI Meeting July 2, ADI Meeting Ewan Paterson 7/2/15.
CRYOGENICS FOR MLC Cryogenic Principle of the Module Eric Smith External Review of MLC October 03, October 2012Cryogenics for MLC1.
KCS Main Waveguide Testing Chris Adolphsen Chris Nantista and Faya Wang LCWS12 Arlington, Texas October 25, 2012.
Jan Low Energy 10 Hz Operation in DRFS (Fukuda) (Fukuda) 1 Low Energy 10Hz Operation in DRFS S. Fukuda KEK.
A Multi-Moded RF Delay Line Distribution System for the Next Linear Collider S. G. Tantawi, G. Bowden, Z.D. Farkas, J. Irwin, K. Ko, N. Kroll, T. Lavine,
HLRF R&D Towards the TDR Christopher Nantista ML-SCRF Webex meeting June 29, 2011.
Summary of Relative RF Distribution Costs with Gradient Considerations (Work in Progress) Chris Adolphsen SLAC.
ALBA RF Systems Francis Perez.
Nextef status and expansion plans Shuji Matsumoto for KEK Nextef Group /5/51 4th X-band Structure Collaboration Meeting, CERN.
RFQ coupler S. Kazakov 07/28/2015. Requirements: Coupler requirements Expected problems: Heating (loop, ceramic window, etc.) Multipactor Solutions: Appropriate.
High-efficiency L-band klystron development for the CLIC Drive Beam High-efficiency L-band klystron development for the CLIC Drive Beam CLIC workshop,
Christopher Nantista SLAC Project X Workshop November 12, 2007 Fermilab.
HLRF: KCS option Christopher Nantista SLAC ILC ML&SCRF Baseline Technical Review KEK, Tsukuba, JAPAN January 19, …… …… …… … ….
L-Band RF System & Main Linac Integration Programs
ILC High Power Distribution
High efficiency work and MBK development for accelerators
Klystron Cluster System (KCS)
Development of X-band 50MW klystron in BVERI
Klystron Cluster System Development
Application of moderate (5 MW) X-band power sources for the CLIC accelerating structures testing program and other projects I. Syratchev, CERN.
Chris Adolphsen Sergei Nagaitsev
Application of the moderate peak power (6 MW) X-band klystron’s cluster for the CLIC accelerating structures testing program. I. Syratchev.
12 GHz High Power RF components requirements for CEA activities
Presentation transcript:

Christopher Nantista ILC10 Beijing, China March 27, 2010

Two Tunnels to One Tunnel RDR BASELINE: dual tunnels STRAWMAN BASELINE: single tunnel (KCS or DRFS) Klystron Cluster Scheme option moves high power rf production from underground to surface. It is brought through shafts into the main feed waveguides at intervals of approximately 2.4 km. Additional equipment from service tunnel should fit, with appropriate radiation shielding, beneath the cryomodule support. main HPRF waveguide beam tunnel service tunnel penetrations (every ~38 m) RF power production is distributed along the length of the linac in a separate service tunnel. KCS option, American version

downstream upstream shaft CTO surface rf power cluster building surface From 2 groups of ~35 klystrons & modulators clustered in a surface building, ~330 MW is combined into each of 2 overmoded, low-loss waveguides Through a single shaft, these waveguides are run upstream & downstream to power ~2.4 km of linac total. Power is extracted through graduated-coupling tap-offs to feed 3-cryomodule (26-cavity) rf units through local power distribution systems. service tunnel eliminated underground heat load greatly reduced Klystron Cluster Layout accelerator tunnel TE 01 waveguide

Power is tapped off from the circular TE 01 mode, in 10MW increments, into a coaxial region, without breaking azimuthal symmetry (no surface E fields). A wrap-around mode converter extracts this power from the coaxial TE 01 mode into two output waveguides (5MW each), analogous to klystron output arms. The various required coupling designs (~3-50%) differ only in a) gap width (~3-8”) and b) matching ridge. The same devices are used in reverse for combining power into the pipe. Appropriately shorting the left port creates a mode launcher (or any coupling). Coaxial Tap Off (CTO)

Nominal Parameters # of KCS per main linac9 # of rf units/tap-offs per system32 # of cryomodules per system96 # of cavities per system832 # of klystrons/modulators per system36 (one off)* peak rf power per system (MW) strawman half current option * To feed ~32 rf units, 2 extra units of power (  340 MW) cover extra transmission loss and 2 more, with one off, provide redundancy for a single unit failure per cluster.

560 3-CM rf units, 280 per linac 31 per cluster → 9.03 clusters, 5 shafts per linac km km km Typical KCS: 30 rf units, 32 klystrons worth of power, 34 klystrons/cluster km km km Typical KCS: 31 rf units, 33 klystrons worth of power, 35 klystrons/cluster ~76m~228m Shaft Location beam -- main shaft -- additional KCS shaft The RDR shaft location would require three additional shafts, for a total of 6, for the KCS. Shifting the main shafts would accommodate KCS implementation with only two additional shafts per main linac. 28 ~684m ~380m beam 28 ~1.064km Typical KCS: 28 rf units, 30 klystrons worth of power, 32 klystrons/cluster

Current Test Program Prototype CTO and main overmoded circular waveguide. Cold test CTO in launching mode. Test waveguide under vacuum. Test transmission efficiency of waveguide between two CTO’s Test CTO at full power level to be seen by rectangular ports (klystron limited). Test waveguide as a resonant line up to maximum field levels to be seen. Redo tests under 14.5 psig pressure, as possible alternative to vacuum. ^ ~45%

Prototype “Big Pipes” for KCS Tests m (18.9”) m (8’) Four 8’ sections (9.75 m total) of 0.48 m-diameter waveguide (WC1890). Fabricated from formed aluminum sheets, welded and machined. one-side double grooved flanges: vacuum/pressure seal – Viton® O-rings rf seal – Bal Seal® canted coil contact spring

WC1890 Metrology QC results: RADIUS

WALL THICKNESS Inner radius variation basically met tolerance of ~1 mm. Flange o.d.-i.d. concentricity within <~0.015”, well within tolerance. Wall thickness falls short in places of the 0.375” specification. Some anomalous spots were found, going as low as 0.120” (tube #4). Pipes are being hydrotested to 1.5 times operating pressure of 14.5 psig and cleaned for vacuum. Anchored restraints are being designed to assure safety under vacuum. A replacement is being made for tube #4.

Two welded aluminum 3-dB CTO’s are being fabricated and expected to be shipped next month. CTO’s and Auxiliary Parts Two circular step tapers to connect to main waveguide are in fabrication at SLAC. End caps for launching and resonant coupling. (to be final machined after cold-testing with shims) launchercoupler 13.75” → 18.90”

Vacuum Pumping 20 l/s ion pumps will be used on vacuum ports built into window adaptors on either side of each CTO. SLAC L-band vacuum window pressure WR650 crushed indium wire vacuum Two 100 l/s ion pumps will pump through a special pump-out insert in the middle of the large circular waveguide run. After UHV cleaning, the pipe sections will be connected and pre baked with heat tape and insulation with pumping through an end cap to outgas the surface.

CTO cold tests Experimental Assemblies m m input assembly transmission tests resonant line tests Location: Roof of NLCTA bunker Power source: SNS modulator and Thales “5 MW” klystron

Further Work Further work can be done toward establishing the feasibility of the Klystron Cluster Scheme, including: demonstrating the matched tap-off function with a third CTO demonstrating power combining designing a very high-power TE 01 mode bend demonstrating transmission efficiency of such a bend demonstrating power (field) handling of such a bend studying the effect of KCS granularity on emittance preservation developing a TE 01 mode diagnostic directional coupler for the big pipe studying the combining scheme/efficiency studying coupling errors, mode conversion, line resonances…

Phase shifter range of 0°–90°, the above arrangement allows full range power division. If  1 and  2 are moved equally in opposite senses, the output phases are unaffected. Phase Shifter for Local Power Tailoring With a 20% spread in accepted cavity gradient capacity, efficiency could be increased by incorporating at least pairwise adjustability in the local PDS.

No breakdown detected during 8 hours running at 1bar N 2. max reflection: ~0.025% (-36 dB) mean loss: ~0.51% ( dB) Phase Shifter Prototype cold tests: high-power test: 8 more are in fabrication for Fermilab NML CM2 PDS. Teflon spacers will be replaced with s.s. and rad hard epoxy will be used to affix fingers.

Klystron and Modulator Integrated uptimes, to date: Month Klys. Mod. Total Hrs Total Days Testing continues of: SLAC 120 kV Marx Modulator and Toshiba 10 MW 6-beam MBK min. value to define kly "on”: 1 MW min. value to define mod "on”: 100 kV