Evaluation: what next? Dr Fiona Fylan Director of Brainbox Research & Leader in Psychology, Leeds Metropolitan University Beth Fylan Social Researcher.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dr Linda Allin Division of Sport Sciences The value of real life evaluation research for student learning and employability in Sports Development.
Advertisements

A Strategy to Enhance Assessment and Feedback Sheila Oliver Director of Assessment School of Dentistry.
GETTING IT RIGHT. Today we will - review or refresh your approach to making funding bids by: Not sure? Ask! And this is to remind me and you please to.
Efficiency Improvement Programme Survive, Re-Grow & Thrive! Peer-Led Challenge.
Supporting continuous improvement in the replication process Getting to Grips with Replication Seminar 3: Monitoring, evaluation & continuous improvement.
The French Youth Experimentation Fund (Fonds d’Expérimentation pour la Jeunesse – FEJ) Mathieu Valdenaire (DJEPVA - FEJ) International Workshop “Evidence-based.
Social Accounting and Audit (SAA) and the Social Audit Network An introduction…
Return On Investment Integrated Monitoring and Evaluation Framework.
IHS Special Diabetes Program Competitive Grants Part 2: Refining Idea Maps Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Planning Cynthia C. Phillips, Ph.D. Lisa Wyatt.
Challenge Questions How good is our operational management?
Pestalozzi Children‘s Foundation emPower 2012 Monitoring & Evaluation Lecturers: Beatrice Schulter.
RCOG International Office Consultancy Skills and Tools Angela Brown, Technical Assistance Manager, RCOG International Office.
Educational Solutions for Workforce Development PILOT WORKSHOP EVALUATION MARY RICHARDSON MER CONSULTING.
How to Develop the Right Research Questions for Program Evaluation
Community Partnership Evaluation for Injury Prevention Susan J. Snelling, PhD Health Promotion Field Support Specialist, Evaluation.
Please read before using this briefing This presentation forms the basis of a workshop for operational managers and other relevant staff to review quality.
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
EVALUATION AND THE RESIDENCY PROGRAM Caroline C. Nielsen, Ph.D.
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
What makes a successful development project? Kristin Olsen IOD PARC
Evelyn Gonzalez Program Evaluation. AR Cancer Coalition Summit XIV March 12, 2013 MAKING A DIFFERENCE Evaluating Programmatic Efforts.
"...the politics accompanying hierarchies hampers the free exchange of knowledge. People are much more open with their peers. They are much more willing.
Regional Seminar 2005 EVALUATING POLICY Are your policies working? How do you know? School Development Planning Initiative.
Indicators for ACSM.
704: Conducting Business in Fiscally Challenging Times: Strategies and Tools to Get There PCYA Leadership Academy Presentation March 28, 2012.
ETP Aims and Goals “My first road safety song reduced road fatalities in children by 14.3% in the first three months.” (Anonymous.
Allison Bridgeman Director of Residence Life Elizabethtown College.
Program Evaluation for Nonprofit Professionals Unit 2: Creating an Evaluation Plan.
Third Sector Evaluation: Challenges and Opportunities Presentation to the Public Legal Education in Canada National Conference on “Making an Impact” 26.
How to Write Grants By: Dom Corcuera. Does this sound familiar?  “I would really like to help you obtain new computers for the science department…but.
Evaluation Workshop Self evaluation – some workable ideas and approaches.
Annual Monitoring & Review THE CRIMEA PILOT Continuous Review for Improvement and the Monitoring of Enhancement Activities Quality Assurance Services.
Copyright  2005 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Australian Human Resources Management by Jeremy Seward and Tim Dein Slides prepared by Michelle.
Developing a Sustainable Procurement Policy and Strategy EAUC – EAF Programme.
Evaluation Revisiting what it is... Who are Stakeholders and why do they matter? Dissemination – when, where and how?
Social Impact – What Works NEFF 7 September 2011 Carol Candler NRF.
Evaluation Matt Shreeve 29 July 2009 Relationship Management Programme Meeting.
Adrienne DiTommaso, MPA, CNCS Office of Research and Evaluation
National Workshop 3 Luwero, Uganda March 2015.
Changing the way the New Zealand Aid Programme monitors and evaluates its Aid Ingrid van Aalst Principal Evaluation Manager Development Strategy & Effectiveness.
1 The project is financed from the European Union funds within the framework of Erasmus+, Key Action 2: Cooperation for innovation and the exchange of.
Developing Monitoring & Evaluation Frameworks: Process or Product? Anne Markiewicz.
Prove Your Point 24 th Feb 2016 Bexhill Museum Emily Leach Kate Pontin.
Developing a Program Logic. What is a Program Logic? A program logic is like a roadmap for a project that sets out how a project will achieve its desired.
Developing a Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) Plan.
IMPLEMENTING LEAPS IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE: TRAINERS’ HANDBOOK Monitoring and Evaluating Results.
Philip Clegg CASE, University of Huddersfield 2015 In partnership with The Social Audit Network.
TYNE AND WEAR FIRE AND RESCUE SERVICE ‘Creating The Safest Community’ Evaluation in the Fire and Rescue Service Vicki Parnaby.
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
WORKSHOP ON PROJECT CYCLE MANAGEMENT (PCM) Bruxelles 22 – 24 May 2013 Workshop supported by TAIEX.
Social Service QI Training Project Hospitality. Overarching Workshop Goals To facilitate learning of new techniques and shifts in thinking about quality.
Guidance for Analyses of Pilot Interventions European Workplace and Alcohol Berlin, 9 November 2012 Jon Dawson.
Evaluating the Quality and Impact of Community Benefit Programs
Monitoring and Evaluation
Evaluation Plan Akm Alamgir, PhD June 30, 2017.
It's not the KPI that drives the business, but the data behind it
Do you want to be involved?
Accounting (Foundation)
Investment Logic Mapping – An Evaluative Tool with Zing
Bid Process.
Grant Champions Workshop Logic Model Development
The GEF Monitoring and Evaluation Policy
Grants Workshop.
The GEF Monitoring and Evaluation Policy
Logic Model Template Inputs Activities Outputs Short-Term Outcomes
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Project Title: (PEARS Action Plan-Step 1)
The GEF Monitoring and Evaluation Policy
OGB Partner Advocacy Workshop 18th & 19th March 2010
Presentation transcript:

Evaluation: what next? Dr Fiona Fylan Director of Brainbox Research & Leader in Psychology, Leeds Metropolitan University Beth Fylan Social Researcher & Director of Brainbox Research

+ Evaluation and beyond Fiona Fylan and Beth Fylan

+ What we’re going to do

+ Evaluation refresher

+ Brainbox queries We need to do an evaluation Our funders want to know what we’ve achieved How can we tell what effect we’re having? My director wants to know whether we’ve made a difference My staff budget is under threat. Help me defend what my team does We have to bid for our budget next year and we need to prove what we do is working How can we do our own evaluation? I need to write a questionnaire

+ Why evaluate? intervention

+ Evaluate to improve

+ Evaluation types

+ Audit / monitoring A form of process evaluation

+ What evaluation questions should you ask?

+ Defining your objectives

+ What are the evaluation research questions?

+ What different designs are there?

+ Evaluation pitfalls  First things first: no clear intervention objectives.  No outcome measures  Process versus outcome – happy sheets  Asking the wrong questions – Did it meet your expectations?  How to interpret the results. Does the drop in perceived skill levels result from increased knowledge of what is required?

+ Your evaluation questions

+ Some in reserve How many people should I include in my evaluation? Who should I include? What questions should I ask? How should I analyse my data? What about E-valu-it?

+ What next? Outputs and stakeholders

+ Report types WrittenPost-fieldwork summaryFull written report SpokenInformal feedback / verbal debrief (qualitative) Full presentation of the research ImmediateConsidered

+ Basic logic models

+ Recommendations

+ Revisit your intervention

+ Create some headlines

+ Mapping and engaging your stakeholders

+ INFORM (low) CONSULT (mid) INVOLVE (mid) PARTNER (high) Joint working group, problem solving team. Seminars, workshops, project meetings. Consultation documents, feedback forms. Presentations, press releases, newsletters, twitter.

Power High LowHigh Interest

StakeholderCategoryWhy are they interested/ What do we want? LevelStatusActions 1. Fleet managers ReferrerAccess to drivers PartnerManage closely Short report and action group

+ Any questions? Any elephants?