IP BPM Shift Report FONT Meeting: 22 December 2014 Talitha Bromwich.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hardware Integration of the Prototype Wes Grammer NRAO September 24-26, 2012EOVSA Prototype Review1.
Advertisements

ATF2: Status Update Glenn Christian (on behalf of FONT group) 10 th ATF Project Meeting.
N. BlaskovicFONT Meeting1 Preliminary resolution study results N. Blaskovic.
Update of EXT Stripline BPM Electronics with LCLS-style Digital BPM Processors Glen White, with slides by Steve Smith 15 December 2009 ATF2.
PEP II Transverse Feedback System Ron Akre Anatoly Krasnykh Uli Wienands MAC April 15, 2004.
N. BlaskovicFONT Meeting1 November 2013 week 2 FONT shift summary N. Blaskovic.
FONT Meeting1 Calibrations over IP LO power scan N. Blaskovic.
-brief report of October runs and some inputs for the Nov/Dec planning – Nobuhiro Terunuma, KEK, ATF ATF session on LCWS13, Tokyo Univ., Nov. 13, 2013.
Analysis of ATF EXT/FF Orbit Jitter and extrapolation to IP (Data of ) ATF2 Project Meeting K. Kubo.
Progress towards nanometre-level beam stabilisation at ATF2 N. Blaskovic, D. R. Bett, P. N. Burrows, G. B. Christian, C. Perry John Adams Institute, University.
N. BlaskovicFONT Meeting1 ATF February-March 2014 shift plan N. Blaskovic.
1 Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett*, Talitha Bromwich, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Colin Perry.
FONT GROUP MEETING RES VS SAMPLE NO. Talitha Bromwich - Monday, 20 July 2015.
1 FONT Results 2010 Philip Burrows Robert Apsimon, Doug Bett, Glenn Christian Michael Davis, Colin Perry, Javier Resta Lopez John Adams Institute Oxford.
Analogue BPM data analysis Calibration & resolution results.
FJPPL-FKPPL Workshop on ATF21 FONT digitisation studies of IP BPMs D. Bett, N. Blaskovic, P. Burrows, G. Christian, M. Davis, Y. I. Kim, C. Perry John.
NLC Intra-Pulse Fast Feedback Simon Jolly Oxford University NLC Beam Delivery Meeting July 2001.
IP-BPM status Siwon Jang KNU. Contents The electronics repair status –Repair work status –Electronics RF test (by using Oscilloscope) –Electronics shipment.
Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Robert Apsimon, Philip Burrows, Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Davide Gamba,
Magnet Motion Produces Luminosity Loss. NLC Feedback Operation Kicker Gain Bunch Charge Measure deflected bunches with BPM and kick other beam to eliminate.
Development of a Low-latency, High-precision, Intra-train Beam Feedback System Based on Cavity Beam Position Monitors N. Blaskovic Kraljevic, D. R. Bett,
Future FONT BPM Processors C.Perry 25 June Types of Processor Two types of processor: a) present mixer type b) baseband type Both will be made because:
1Ben Constance7 th January 2010 FONT5 December 2009 feedback results During the final shift we ran K1-to-P2 position feedback 151.2ns bunch spacing, quadrupoles.
1 FONT R&D status Philip Burrows Douglas Bett, Neven Blaskovic, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Young Im Kim, Colin Perry John Adams Institute Oxford University.
FONT Hardware Processing electronics and current beam tests Stephen Molloy Queen Mary, University of London.
FONT Meeting1 Charge normalisation and IP LO power scan N. Blaskovic.
Philip Burrows ATF2 project meeting 14/1/111 Plans for ATF2 IP Feedback Philip Burrows, Colin Perry John Adams Institute Oxford University.
Production and Installation Policy of IP-BPM ATF2 Project Meeting, 2006/12/18 Y. Honda, Y. Inoue, T. Hino, T. Nakamura.
N. BlaskovicFONT Meeting1 ATF October 2014 shift plan N. Blaskovic.
1 Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett*, Talitha Bromwich, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Colin Perry.
Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT) Philip Burrows Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett*, Talitha Bromwich, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis**, Colin Perry.
IPBPM issues (Limitation of resolution) Siwon Jang (KNU)
Superfast BPM Processor Scheme and First Results Stephen Molloy, QMUL 2 nd Mini-Workshop for Nano-Project at ATF.
ATF2: Summary of Scheduling Strategy Session Grahame Blair Feedback and Feedforward systems Fast Kicker for ILC bunch train structure Laser-wire Shintake.
1 Fast kicker study Machine Time 2011/10/18~10/29(2 weeks) TB meeting 2011/01/14 T.Naito.
CALIBRATIONS IPBPM FILTER TESTS Siwon Jang Hoyeong Jeong Glenn Christian Talitha Bromwich Friday, 1 May Talitha Bromwich, FONT Group Meeting.
N. BlaskovicFONT Meeting1 ATF November 2013 shift plan N. Blaskovic.
Philip Burrows ATF2 project meeting 1/07/101 Plans for ATF2 IP Feedback Philip Burrows, Colin Perry John Adams Institute Oxford University.
NumberMikey Davis02 November 2012 Roundup of ATF Trip.
Cavity BPM: Multi-bunch analysis N Joshi, S Boogert, A Lyapin, F. Cullinan, et al. Royal Holloway University of London,
FONT GROUP MEETING ATF JUNE SUMMARY Neven & Talitha Talitha Bromwich - Friday, 26 June 2015.
Low-Q IP BPM Y. I. Kim *, A. Heo, E-S. Kim (KNU) S. T. Boogert (JAI) D. M. McCormick, J. May, J. Nelson, T. Smith, G. R. White (SLAC) Y. Honda, N. Terunuma,
1 IP FB tests at ATF2 Philip Burrows Douglas Bett, Neven Blaskovic, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Young Im Kim, Colin Perry John Adams Institute Oxford.
LCLS Digital BPM Processor for ATF2 Extraction Line BPMs Steve Smith 26 August 2009.
ATF Meeting1 IP BPM studies with Honda’s electronics Neven Blaskovic with Wunghoa Park Oscar Blanco Alexis Gamelin N. Blaskovic.
1/33Mikey Davis24 January 2013 Review of 23 rd of January Shift.
1 FONT IP FB Philip Burrows Robert Apsimon, Doug Bett, Neven Blaskovic, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Colin Perry John Adams Institute Oxford University.
FONT Oxford FONT REPORT NOVEMBER Neven Blaskovic Kraljevic and Talitha Bromwich Friday, 27 November
Superfast BPM Processor Scheme Stephen Molloy, QMUL Nano-Project Mini-Workshop at ATF.
D. BettATF Operations Meeting - 15 June IP C. Perry G. Christian Y. Kim D. Bett N. Blaskovic Kraljevic.
N. Blaskovic, T. Bromwich, R. Ramjiawan
Roundup of Week at ATF Mikey Davis 19 April /26.
Siwon Jang Hoyeong Jeong Glenn Christian Talitha Bromwich
Further Tracking Studies and March Trip Plan
Resolution Study T. Bromwich FONT 8 September 2017.
N. Blaskovic, T. Bromwich, P. Burrows, G. Christian, C. Perry, R
ATF cable plan N. Blaskovic N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting.
Firmware Update 29/03/2017 Rebecca Ramjiawan.
Analysis of March ATF Run
N. Blaskovic, T. Bromwich & G. Christian
ATF Shift Plans Rebecca, Talitha 08/09/2017 Friday, 08 September 2017
March Trip Plan Mikey Davis 01 March /7.
Revised ATF Shift Plans
Progress towards nanometre beam stabilisation at ATF2
Progress towards nanometre level beam stabilisation
Phase Feedforward in 2015 & Plans for 2016
NanoBPM Status and Multibunch Mark Slater, Cambridge University
Status of Phase Feedforward Tests
Beam-Based Alignment Results
T2K Run8 MUMON Summary.
Presentation transcript:

IP BPM Shift Report FONT Meeting: 22 December 2014 Talitha Bromwich

18/12 Swing Shift - X-alignment scans - Minimised jitter at IPB(Y) – originally planned to compare with IPC(Y) - AY, EY, Coup2 scans - Calibration v charge on IPB(Y) - Calibration constant and jitter v attenuation on IPB(Y) - Pitch and horizontal motion scans (by Oscar) on IPB(Y) 19/12 Day & Swing Shift - BPFs to remove static signal - Feedback setup & kicker calibrations - Feedback at 10dB and 0dB - Feedback QD0FF waist scan - Static K1 B2 Offset “banana” scan 2 IP BPM Shift Report : Talitha Bromwich

18/12 Swing Shift X-alignment scans (20dB – integrating samples 66 to 72) IPA(X) centered at 3.16 V IPB(X) centered at 2.42 V IPC(X) centered at 6.37 V Minimised jitter at IPB(Y) (to compare with IPC(Y)) 274 nm at 20 dB and 10 dB Little tuning  large beam  large jitter Abandon plans to measure IPC(Y) Some confusion setting the attenuation correctly on ATF interface Scanned AY, EY, Coup2 to reduce jitter to 252 nm Only AY generated any improvement 3 IP BPM Shift Report : Talitha Bromwich

Scans of QD0FF current to reduce jitter – 274 nm minimum 4 IP BPM Shift Report : Talitha Bromwich

Scans of AY, EY, Coup2 to reduce jitter – 252 nm minimum 5 IP BPM Shift Report : Talitha Bromwich

Calibration v charge Calibration constant changed from 0.24 to 0.20 (ADC/ADC)/um across charge range of 0.17 to 0.76 x /pulse. Much less variation than observed in October. Jitter remains within 264 to 294 nm at all calibrations. Calibration constant and jitter v attenuation (charge constant) 0 dB to 50dB, with range and step size scaling with attenuation. 50dB resolution-limited jitter 2.7um. 0dB jitter 267nm. (Data taken with simultaneous modified Python script recording cbpm:xpos and cbpm:ypos) Pitch and horizontal motion scans (by Oscar) on IPB(Y) 6 IP BPM Shift Report : Talitha Bromwich 18/12 Swing Shift

BPFs to remove static signal Tauchi-san suggested adding a 714 +/– 10MHz band pass filter to remove the static signal in the IP BPM signals. Tested with IPB(Y) and successfully removed the high frequency static component  applied BPF to IPA(Y), IPB(Y) and IPC(Y) instead of delay cables. 7 IP BPM Shift Report : Talitha Bromwich 19/12 Day & Swing Shift

BPFs to remove static signal 8 IP BPM Shift Report : Talitha Bromwich Plots by Siwon

Feedback Setup and Kicker Calibrations - Font 5 Board #1 Serial port pin damaged. Solution: Carefully bent it back, plan to replace serial port with spare next time at ATF. Could not bring FONT5 board #1 as it did not pass radiation test. FONT5A board did pass radiation test and brought back. - IPC(Y) 0 degree (I) signal is very messy – two peaks? Solution: None. Did not use IPC for feedback. - Bunch spacing ns, slightly larger than before. Solution: two bunches displays for P1 and P2, not MFB1FF. Longer bunch spacing desirable to meet IP feedback latency requirement. - Intensity monitor signal arrives too soon because it is not processed through the mixer. Solution: Add 5 m delay cable. - Timing problem with 2 bunch mode after beam restart. Solution: Adjusted using Terunuma-san’s specs. 9 IP BPM Shift Report : Talitha Bromwich 19/12 Day & Swing Shift

First Feedback Run at 10dB Gains for I and Q calculated from gradient of kicker calibration and theta from IPB(Y) calibration. Gain I = –529. Gain Q = 327. (1) Feedback Run: Kicker is centering the beam. Jitter feedback off = 190 nm. Jitter feedback on = 220 nm. Therefore, not correcting the jitter. Feedback off bunch-to-bunch position correlation = 43% at IPB. (2) Repeat feedback run, exactly same gains: Jitter feedback off = 190 nm. Jitter feedback on = 210 nm. (3) Two-point latency scan: the following kicker scans gave the same gradient: - using correct bunch strobe settings (77 bucket bunch spacing) - using bunch 1 setting before bunch 1 data Therefore, not latency limited at 77 bucket bunch spacing. 10 IP BPM Shift Report : Talitha Bromwich 19/12 Day & Swing Shift

Second Feedback Run at 0dB Gain I = –175. Gain Q = 81. (1) Feedback Run: Kicker is centering the beam. Jitter feedback off = 190 nm. Jitter feedback on = 150 nm. Feedback off bunch-to-bunch position correlation = 52% at IPB. (2) Repeat run with Q and I minimised using AQF7FF and AQD0FF. Jitter feedback off = 200 nm. Jitter feedback on = 130 nm. Feedback off bunch-to-bunch position correlation = 79% at IPB (3) Feedback over QD0FF waist scan: Jitter feedback 390 to 94 nm at A: best feedback-on jitter. Note that waist is around A. (4) Feedback using ‘banana correction’ Jitter feedback 410 to 67 nm. Note that beam drift not subtracted. 11 IP BPM Shift Report : Talitha Bromwich 19/12 Day & Swing Shift

Second Feedback Run at 0dB (1) 52% correlation 12 IP BPM Shift Report : Talitha Bromwich Plots by Neven

Second Feedback Run at 0dB (2) 79% correlation 13 IP BPM Shift Report : Talitha Bromwich Plots by Neven

Second Feedback Run at 0dB (3) A at QD0FF 14 IP BPM Shift Report : Talitha Bromwich Plots by Neven

Second Feedback Run at 0dB (4) ‘banana’ correction 15 IP BPM Shift Report : Talitha Bromwich Plots by Neven