Intel ® Math William McCallum Institute for Mathematics and Education January 12, 2010 “Education and Innovation will be the currency of the 21 st century.”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LESSON-DESIGN ELEMENTS THAT REFLECT THE COLLEGE-AND CAREER- READY STANDARDS FOR MATHEMATICS AND THE STANDARDS FOR MATHEMATICAL PRACTICE. CCRS IMPLEMENTATION.
Advertisements

North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
Minnesota’s Professional Development Plan to Prepare for the 2014 GED Test Amy Vickers, Minneapolis Adult Education Astrid Liden, Minnesota Department.
Briefing: NYU Education Policy Breakfast on Teacher Quality November 4, 2011 Dennis M. Walcott Chancellor NYC Department of Education.
MYP (Middle Years Programme).  m7oU.
Missouri Elementary Mathematics Leadership Academy Larry Campbell Terry Goodman
Action Research Opportunity Or Research Based Action.
Teacher Librarians. Contact Information Mary Cameron Iowa Department of Education (515)
The Northwest Georgia Science Education Partnership Mathematics and Science Partnership (MSP) Program.
ESTEEMS (ESTablishing Excellence in Education of Mathematics and Science) Project Overview and Evaluation Dr. Deborah H. Cook, Director, NJ SSI MSP Regional.
By Michael Morris Samika Thompson Integrating and Implementing Technology Fall 2009.
Mathematics Curriculum Proposal Transitioning to Iowa Core.
Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant Title IIB Information Session April 10, 2006.
The Impact of Immersion in a Local Research Problem on Technology Skills and Use CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY PREPARING TOMORROW’S TEACHERS TO USE TECHNOLOGY.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
1 Massachusetts Intel ® Mathematics Initiative (MIMI)
USING NEW TECHNOLOGIES IN STUDENT-CENTRED LEARNING STRATEGIES Trif Letiţia¹ Lector doctor, Universitatea 1 Decembrie 1918, Alba – Iulia, România,
Standards for Mathematical Content Critical Areas College and Career Readiness.
Mathematics Bilingual, Immigrant & Rufugee Education Directors Meeting Seattle, Washington.
Copyright © 2004 Stevens Institute of Technology Center for Innovation in Engineering and Science Education 1 Community College Pathways to Improved Teacher.
1 Developing an Evaluation Plan _____________________ The Mathematically- Connected Communities MSP Developed for the February, MSP Conference Dr.
Dates:Tuesdays, Jan 7 – Feb 11
Curriculum Update January What are the big projects? Fall 2013 – Math Common Core Implementation Fall 2014 – English/Language Arts Common Core Implementation.
Developing teachers’ mathematics knowledge for teaching Challenges in the implementation and sustainability of a new MSP Dr. Tara Stevens Department of.
Brooke Bennett. *National Educational Technology Standards and Performance Indicators for Teachers* 1. Facilitate & inspire student learning and creativity.
NCTM Overview The Principles and Standards for Teaching Mathematics.
Mathematics Teacher Leader Session 1: The National Mathematics Strategy & Modelling Exemplary Teaching 1.
Evaluating Outcomes Across the Partnerships Tom Loveless Director, Brown Center on Education Policy The Brookings Institution Saturday,
Illinois MSP Program Goals  To increase the content expertise of mathematics and science teachers; 4 To increase teaching skills through access to the.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Evaluating the Vermont Mathematics Initiative (VMI) in a Value Added Context H. ‘Bud’ Meyers, Ph.D. College of Education and Social Services University.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 Mathematics MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Metropolitan School District of Metropolitan School District of Pike Township Indianapolis, Indiana Pike Township Indianapolis, Indiana A K-12 Coaching.
Establishing a Culture of Mathematics Learning in Urban Schools Syracuse City School District / Syracuse University Partnership Beyond Access to Math Achievement.
THE DRAGON CONNECTION March Who are we?  Jefferson City Schools  Small, rural school district 60 miles north of Atlanta, 18 miles north of the.
Project Director – Dr. Mark Lung Dept of Natural & Environmental Sciences Western State College of Colorado Project Evaluator – Dr. Dave Shannon Educational.
West Virginia University Academic Innovation Next Generation Mathematics Communities of Practice Greg Strimel.
St. Cloud Partnership in Mathematics Grant Presented by: Jona Deavel, Math Coach/7-8 th Grade Math Teacher and Jenny Merriam, Grant Coordinator.
Company LOGO Presenter: Hlengiwe Mfeka – 03 July 2013.
Embracing Math Standards: Our Journey and Beyond 2008.
Implementing the CCSS in Mathematics: Challenges and Strategies CCSSO National Assessment Conference June 2013 Elliott Asp, Ph.D. Assistant Superintendent.
Community Context Series of Community Math Nights Leadership Development for Math Support Team Mathematics Content Courses for K-20 Teachers Ongoing support.
Mid-State Mathematics Partnership Excellence in Teaching and Learning in Middle Schools Dovie Kimmins, Ed.D. E. Ray Phillips, Ph.D. Tennessee Mathematics,
Big6 Overview Big6™ Trainers Program McDowell County Schools.
Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.
Supporting Special Education Teachers: Exploring Alternate Algorithm Strategies to Expand Student Experiences with Mathematics National Council of Supervisors.
K-12 Technology Literacy Curriculum and Assessment.
Online Professional Development: One State’s Algebra 1 Initiative Ernise S. Singleton, PhD Educational Technology Consultant.
Dr. Othman Ali Alghtani Tabuk University, K.S.A.
 Defined STEM and 21 st Century Teaching and Learning David L. Reese, Ed. D.
The Alabama College and Career Ready Standards Unpacking Presented by: Jennifer Dunnagan and Cara Whitehead, NBCT Rainbow Middle School, Rainbow City,
APPR: Ready or Not Joan Townley & Andy Greene October 20 and 21, 2011.
SD Math Partnership Project An Overview Marcia Torgrude and Karen Taylor.
STANDARD 4 & DIVERSITY in the NCATE Standards Boyce C. Williams, NCATE John M. Johnston, University of Memphis Institutional Orientation, Spring 2008.
Tuning Indiana: Education. Originally focused on: Elementary education Math education Special education.
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
Providing a Mathematically Rich Common Core Classroom Please add a sticky dot to represent YOU on the following charts: – On the Road to Implementation.
21 st century Teaching and Learning District Educator Deborah Harris EDU620: Meeting Individual Student Needs With Technology Instructor: Adriane Wheat.
MODULE 3 INTRODUCTION AND MODULE OVERVIEW STANDARDS KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS ASSIGNMENTS.
FSM NSTT Teaching Competency Test Evaluation. The NSTT Teaching Competency differs from the three other NSTT tests. It is accompanied by a Preparation.
What do you think should be the goal of technology in education?
OHIO LEARNING STANDARDS K-12 MATHEMATICS GRADE 3 BY: AMY FURMAN.
1 Embracing Math Standards: Our Journey and Beyond 2008.
Coding Connections at the Interface of Algebra I and Physical World Concepts Improving Teacher Quality Grant Program Summer 2016.
Math for Struggling Learners
MSP SHOWCASE: Intel® Math September 27, 2017
Intel® Math.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Presentation transcript:

Intel ® Math William McCallum Institute for Mathematics and Education January 12, 2010 “Education and Innovation will be the currency of the 21 st century.” -President Obama’s Cairo Speech, June 4, 2009

Disclaimer The instructional practices and assessments discussed or shown in this presentation are not intended as an endorsement by the U.S. Department of Education 2

3 Course Themes Mathematics is problem solving Arithmetic, geometry, and algebra are interconnected There are many ways to solve problems Mathematics is a second language Arithmetic is a manageable set of rules applied to four operations in the context of different number systems

4 Program Tenets Research based and proven Equally respected by math educator and mathematician communities Collaboratively implemented and systems integrated at scale Success hinges upon quality instructors Highly values teacher knowledge and professionalism Safe and rigorous learning environments established Mathematics is not a spectator sport

5 Curriculum Big mathematical ideas that provide the framework for K8 mathematics Procedural fluency and conceptual understanding Multiple supports and differentiated Increasing rigor and cohesion Classroom transfer consistently modeled and explored explicitly in 8 one-hour pedagogy sessions

6 Understanding Mathematics FOILFOIL = first = outside = inside = last (a+b) (c+d)= ac +ad + bc + bd Heuristic mnemonic devices are not a substitute for procedural fluency (a+b) (c+d)

7 a + b c + d b a cd bc ac ad bd area = ac + ad + bc + bd { {

8 Addition and Language 2 sevenths + 3 sevenths = 5 sevenths = = 3 noun = apple adjective = number add adjectives keep nouns the same noun = sevenths adjective = numerator

9 Evaluation Methods Conducted by West Ed –Susan Mundry and Cathy Carroll Second Year (incl: CA, MA and NJ ) Three assessment tools –IM course content survey –Deborah Ball’s nationally-normed LMT survey –Self-report survey Participation rate ~ 85% with n=202

10 Evaluation Results Teachers have an increased ability to solve math problems correctly in all content areas assessed Overall, teachers improved their math content –Computational skills 14% (from 67.5% (pre) to 81% (post)) –Conceptual skills 22% (41% (pre) to 62.5% (post)) All sites showed gains on scaled scores of the LMT survey –Minimal Detectable Effect Size shows a moderate effect (which is considerable for education programs of this type and sample size)

11 Evaluation Results Teachers reported multiple classroom applications and multiple benefits to students Teachers reported the course provided lasting benefits –Mathematical knowledge, strategies, increased confidence, changing their teaching approaches, collaborative learning communities, etc. Course attrition rate was low –15% overall – all classes –3% - disregarding one folded class

12 Content Knowledge Growth Computational improvement = 14% Conceptual improvement = 22%

13 Content Knowledge for Teaching Growth The majority of teachers improved their content knowledge for teaching math

14 Outreach Achieve Evaluation TBD Instructor Recruitment AMS Curriculum Intel and IM&E Instructor Training MAA IM&E Intel Math Scaling Model

15 For more information,