Part 1 1. March 20, 2012 Susan Finger & Sue Fitzgerald Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation March 21, 2012 Sue Fitzgerald &

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Institutional Change as a Framework for GE Reform Mary E. Boyce AAC&U General Education and Assessment Conference March 2007.
Advertisements

Confirming Student Learning: Using Assessment Techniques in the Classroom Douglas R. Davenport Dean, College of Arts and Sciences Truman State University.
Modified Wednesday, October 6, 2010 Think-Pair-Share
Session 5 Intellectual Merit and Broader Significance FISH 521.
“What it takes to be great”
Making an Impact: Building Transportable and Sustainable Projects (formerly Dissemination) Webinar 4 of the Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science,
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals: Fellowship Track Washington, DC January 9, 2014.
Whole site approach to improvement Leading the Learning Workshop 3 - for leadership teams in secondary sites Quality, Improvement & Effectiveness Unit.
Russell Pimmel, Roger Seals and Stephanie Beard.  Spring 2010, NSF/DUE Engineering PDs initiate IWBW Series; Spring 2011-CS PDs join  Overall goals.
Bridging the Digital Divide through Supporting the Development of e-Educational Leadership in APEC Countries.
1 CCLI Proposal Writing Strategies Tim Fossum Program Director Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation Vermont.
National Science Foundation: Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (TUES)
Project Evaluation Don Millard John Yu March 27, 2012 Guy-Alain Amoussou Lou Everett
Maths Counts Insights into Lesson Study 1. Sandra Fay, Irene Stone, Sharon Mack First year Junior Cert An Introduction to Patterns 2.
Embedding Inclusion into North Carolina’s Child Care System National Inclusion Institute 2015.
Welcome Welcome to “Getting Results” A National Science Foundation project developed by WGBH with the League for Innovation and 13 community colleges from.
March 20, 2012 Susan Finger & Sue Fitzgerald Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation March 21, 2012 Sue Fitzgerald & Maura Borrego.
Project Evaluation Webinar 3 of the Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Series Scott Grissom & Janis.
Overview of NSF Education R & D Programs with an Emphasis on the TUES Program Louis Everett Susan Finger Sue Fitzgerald.
Funding Opportunities for Chemists at the National Science Foundation Division of Undergraduate Education Pamela Brown, NSF Program Director Division of.
 NSF Merit Review Criteria Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts  Additional Considerations Integration of Research & Education Integrating Diversity into.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals.
Project Evaluation Don Millard John Yu March 27, 2012 Guy-Alain Amoussou Lou Everett
Writing More Effective NSF Proposals Jeanne R. Small Oklahoma City, Oklahoma March 2, 2006 Division of Undergraduate Education (DUE) National Science Foundation.
Proposal Writing Strategies Barb Anderegg and Susan Burkett National Science Foundation Annual ASEE Conference June 18, 2006.
1. Most of the information presented in this workshop represents the presenter’s opinion and not an official NSF position 2.
Dr. Sande Caton. Assessments Why do we assess our students? Individually, write at least three ideas you have about assessments With one or two colleagues.
Writing a More Effective Proposal Susan Burkett and Stephanie Adams February 9, 2006.
Collaborative Conversations Making Connections: Addressing Students’ Misconceptions in Statistics December 6, 2011 Maryann Fitzgerald Beth Shefelker Judy.
1 Welcome and Opening Remarks This project was supported by Grant No DG-BX-K021 awarded by the Bureau of Justice Assistance. The Bureau of Justice.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals.
1 Developing a Competitive Proposal ( An Interactive, Web-Based Workshop) Russell Pimmel Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation.
MakingConnections Assessment.
Sandringham School Computer Science Faculty Year 7 Virtual Tour – Lesson 2.
NSF’s Broader Impacts Criteria Bev Watford, Sue Kemnitzer, Russ Pimmel Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation Session T4B, Thursday.
MakingConnections 5Es. 2 Facilitator/s: Date: 3 Workshop purpose You are here to develop your knowledge and understanding of the PrimaryConnections 5Es.
Workshop for Faculty from Minority Serving Intuitions ---- Overview ---- Russ Pimmel Workshop for Faculty from Minority Serving Intuitions Feb. 8 –10,
Making a “Case” for Problem-Based Learning from Students’ Educational Experiences Dr. Jeanene Reese Mr. Robert Oglesby Dr. Sonny Guild.
National Science Foundation Jan R. Taylor, Ph.D. Director of Research Programs Division of Science and Research WV Higher Education Policy Commission.
This work is supported by a National Science Foundation (NSF) collaboration between the Directorates for Education and Human Resources (EHR) and Geosciences.
1. October 25, 2011 Louis Everett & John Yu Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation October 26, 2011 Don Millard & John Yu Division.
How to Obtain National Science Foundation Fellowships and Awards: The Basics Facilitator: Jeff Ryan Ph.D. A workshop providing information on the process.
ISLLC Standard #6 ISLLC Standard #6 Implementing Educational Policy Name Workshop Facilitator.
OCTOBER 25 TH, 2011 WORKPLACE & APPRENTICESHIP 20.
A very simple way to define and differentiate learning goals and learning objectives! The following set of 5 slides and accompanying questions seems to.
Science Experiences & Outcomes Curriculum for Excellence Support for Trialling.
Instructional Leadership: Monitoring Insights, Patterns, & Trends.
Writing a More Effective Proposal Susan Burkett and Russell Pimmel CASEE Symposium and Annual Meeting October 19, 2005.
13 strategies to use Powerpoint to support active learning in classroom.
Tier 1 Instructional Delivery and Treatment Fidelity Networking Meeting February, 2013 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel.
First Nations and Métis Content, Perspectives, and Ways of Knowing Ministry of Education Curriculum Workshops.
Program Design and Implementation – Problem Solving as a Process for Teaching Mathematics - Exploring relationships between participants’ teaching and.
Cover slide Project, course, team, date. Outline welcome  1 slide introducing the key sections/ information items in this presentation.
TRANSITIONING TO NGSS: FROM CONCLUSION WRITING TO ARGUING FROM EVIDENCE Day 3 Craig Gabler Regional Science Coordinator ESD 113.
Spelling and beyond – Curriculum
THE BSCS 5E INSTRUCTIONAL MODEL: CREATING TEACHABLE MOMENTS
Welcome!! Please sit in teams of 4
CPSC : Collaborative Computing & Personal Informatics
Developing a Competitive Proposal (An Interactive, Web-Based Workshop) Russell Pimmel Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation.
BEYOND STANDARDS. BEYOND STANDARDS Expand knowledge of learning targets; Identify and compare learning targets and standards statements; Engage in.
Session Three – Post Award Management May 25, 2018
Effective Learning Environment Video
Planning Ahead for Your Club
Christa Hooijer – director institute organisation NWO-I
Big Ideas and Problem Solving
K–8 Session 1: Exploring the Critical Areas
How students learn Build on previously learned materials
Introduction to the Question Formulation Technique (QFT) Strengthening Parents’ Skills to Ask the Right Questions.
AVID- Science Notebooks
University of the Incarnate Word
Presentation transcript:

Part 1 1

March 20, 2012 Susan Finger & Sue Fitzgerald Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation March 21, 2012 Sue Fitzgerald & Maura Borrego Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation 2

Most of the information presented in this workshop represents the presenters’ opinions and is not an official NSF position See for official NSF policies 3

GOAL: Enable participants to prepare competitive proposals OUTCOMES: Participants should be able to describe: ◦ Common proposal strengths and weaknesses ◦ Strategies for developing various aspects of the project/proposal 4

 Introduction  Common Strengths and Weaknesses  Developing a Proposal ◦ Goals and Expected Outcomes ◦ Rationale ◦ Project Plans 5

 Effective learning activities ◦ Recall prior knowledge -- actively, explicitly ◦ Connect new concepts to existing ones ◦ Challenge and alter misconceptions ◦ Reflect on new knowledge  Active & collaborative processes ◦ Think individually ◦ Share with partner ◦ Report to local and virtual groups ◦ Learn from program directors’ responses 6

 Group Activity 6 min ◦ Think individually ~2 min ◦ Share with a partner ~2 min ◦ Report in local group ~2 min ◦ Report to virtual group  A few institutions selected  Check Chat Box for your Institution's name  Individual Activity 2 min 7

 Coordinate the local activities  Watch the time ◦ Allow for think, share, and report phases ◦ Reconvene on time -- 1 min warning slide  Ensure the individual think phase is devoted to thinking and not talking  Coordinate the asking of questions by local participants 8

 Write down your three most important pieces of advice to a colleague writing a curriculum development proposal (i. e., a TUES proposal)?  Individual Activity ◦ Allotted time is 2 min ◦ No discussion ◦ Write your ideas --- you will add to this list later 9