1 Simulations of fast-ion instability in ILC damping ring 12 April ECLOUD 07 workshop Eun-San Kim (KNU) Kazuhito Ohmi (KEK)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ILC Accelerator School Kyungpook National University
Advertisements

Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider.
1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Electron-cloud instability in the CLIC damping ring for positrons H. Bartosik, G. Iadarola, Y. Papaphilippou, G. Rumolo TWIICE workshop, TWIICE.
Ion instability at SuperKEKB H. Fukuma (KEK) and L. F. Wang (SLAC) ECLOUD07, 12th Apr. 2007, Daegu, Korea 1. Introduction 2. Ion trapping 3. Fast ion instability.
Damping ring K. Ohmi LC Layout Single tunnel Circumference 6.7 km Energy 5 GeV 2 km 35 km.
Recent observations of collective effects at KEKB H. Fukuma, J. W. Flanagan, S. Hiramatsu, T. Ieiri, H. Ikeda, T. Kawamoto, T. Mitsuhashi, M. Tobiyama,
E-Cloud Effects in the Proposed CERN PS2 Synchrotron M. Venturini, M. Furman, and J-L Vay (LBNL) ECLOUD10 Workshshop, Oct Cornell University Work.
SuperB Damping Rings M. Biagini, LNF-INFN P. Raimondi, SLAC/INFN A. Wolski, Cockroft Institute, UK SuperB III Workshop, SLAC, June 2006.
SuperB and the ILC Damping Rings Andy Wolski University of Liverpool/Cockcroft Institute 27 April, 2006.
First approach to the SuperB Rings M. Biagini, LNF-INFN April 26th, 2006 UK SuperB Meeting, Daresbury.
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
Impedance measurements at SLS E. Koukovini-Platia CERN, EPFL TIARA mid-term meeting, Madrid, 13 th June 2012 Many thanks to M. Dehler, N. Milas, A. Streun.
FFAG Concepts and Studies David Neuffer Fermilab.
25-26 June, 2009 CesrTA Workshop CTA09 Electron Cloud Single-Bunch Instability Modeling using CMAD M. Pivi CesrTA CTA09 Workshop June 2009.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
Impedance and Collective Effects in BAPS Na Wang Institute of High Energy Physics USR workshop, Huairou, China, Oct. 30, 2012.
Report on the Damping Ring Meeting at CERN, Nov , 2005 J. Gao IHEP, Beijing, China Nov. 24, 2005, ILC-Asia Meeting.
Fast Ion Instability Studies in ILC Damping Ring Guoxing Xia DESY ILCDR07 meeting, Frascati, Mar. 5~7, 2007.
Comparison between NLC, ILC and CLIC Damping Ring parameters May 8 th, 2007 CLIC Parameter working group Y. Papaphilippou.
Update of 3.2 km ILC DR design (DMC3) Dou Wang, Jie Gao, Gang Xu, Yiwei Wang (IHEP) IWLC2010 Monday 18 October - Friday 22 October 2010 Geneva, Switzerland.
Beam dynamics on damping rings and beam-beam interaction Dec 포항 가속기 연구소 김 은 산.
ILC damping ring options and their critical issues 12th July th ACFA MDI/POL/ACC Pohang Accelerator Lab. Eun-San Kim.
F Project-X Related Issues in Recycler A.Burov, C.Gattuso, V.Lebedev, A.Leveling, A.Valishev, L.Vorobiev Fermilab AAC Review 8/8/2007.
DR 3.2 km Lattice Requirements Webex meeting 10 January 2011.
Preliminary results on simulation of fast-ion instability at 3 km LBNL damping ring 21 April 2005 Pohang Accelerator Laboratory Eun-San Kim.
Multibunch beam stability in damping ring (Proposal of multibunch operation week in October) K. Kubo.
Damping Ring Parameters and Interface to Sources S. Guiducci BTR, LNF 7 July 2011.
E-cloud studies at LNF T. Demma INFN-LNF. Plan of talk Introduction New feedback system to suppress horizontal coupled-bunch instability. Preliminary.
ILC Damping Ring Alternative Lattice Design ( Modified FODO ) ** Yi-Peng Sun *,1,2, Jie Gao 1, Zhi-Yu Guo 2 Wei-Shi Wan 3 1 Institute of High Energy Physics,
Beam stability in damping ring - for stable extracted beam for ATF K. Kubo.
1 Alternative Bunch Compressor 30 th Sep KNU Eun-San Kim.
Cesr-TA Simulations: Overview and Status G. Dugan, Cornell University LCWS-08.
The SPS as a Damping Ring Test Facility for CLIC March 6 th, 2013 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN CLIC Collaboration Working meeting.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Ion effects in low emittance rings Giovanni Rumolo Thanks to R. Nagaoka, A. Oeftiger In CLIC Workshop 3-8 February, 2014, CERN.
Design of a one-stage bunch compressor for ILC PAL June Eun-San Kim.
2 February 8th - 10th, 2016 TWIICE 2 Workshop Instability studies in the CLIC Damping Rings including radiation damping A.Passarelli, H.Bartosik, O.Boine-Fankenheim,
Electron cloud study for ILC damping ring at KEKB and CESR K. Ohmi (KEK) ILC damping ring workshop KEK, Dec , 2007.
1 Update on Ion Studies Guoxing Xia, Eckhard Elsen ILC2007 Workshop, May 30~Jun 2, 2007 DESY, Hamburg.
Global Design Effort ILC Damping Rings: R&D Plan and Organisation in the Technical Design Phase Andy Wolski University of Liverpool and the Cockcroft Institute,
ILC Damping Rings: Configuration Status and R&D Plans Andy Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory January 19, 2006.
3 February 2010 ILC Damping Ring electron cloud WG effort Mauro Pivi SLAC on behalf of ILC DR working group on e- cloud ILC DR Webex Meeting Jan 3, 2010.
Parameter scan for the CLIC damping rings July 23rd, 2008 Y. Papaphilippou Thanks to H. Braun, M. Korostelev and D. Schulte.
Characterization of the Fast Ion Instability at CesrTA David Rubin Cornell University.
Fast Ion Instability Study G. Rumolo and D. Schulte CLIC Workshop 2007, General introduction to the physics of the fast ion instability Fastion.
Coupled bunch Instabilities at ILC Damping Rings L. Wang SLAC ILC Damping Rings R&D Workshop - ILCDR06 September 26-28, 2006 Cornell University Refer to.
Fast Ion Instability Study at DESY
Primary estimation of CEPC beam dilution and beam halo
Status of Fast Ion Instability Studies
CLIC Damping ring beam transfer systems
Cavity-beam interaction and Longitudinal beam dynamics for CEPC DR&APDR 宫殿君
Luminosity Optimization for FCC-ee: recent results
Jeffrey Eldred, Sasha Valishev
Update of Damping Ring parameters
Status of CEPC lattice design
E-cloud instability at CESR TA
Collective effects in CEPC
DA Study for the CEPC Partial Double Ring Scheme
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
Electron Rings Eduard Pozdeyev.
Damping Ring parameters for the new accelerating structure
Overall Considerations, Main Challenges and Goals
Damping Ring parameters for the new accelerating structure
Damping Ring parameters with reduced bunch charge
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
3.2 km FODO lattice for 10 Hz operation (DMC4)
Presentation transcript:

1 Simulations of fast-ion instability in ILC damping ring 12 April ECLOUD 07 workshop Eun-San Kim (KNU) Kazuhito Ohmi (KEK)

2 Introduction  We have performed simulations on the fast-ion beam instabilities in ILC damping ring.  We investigated the effects of various different bunch filling patterns, vacuum pressures and feedback system on the fast-ion instabilities.  Damping ring lattice is included in the simulations.

3 Simulation method (1)  Weak-Strong model - Ions (weak) and beams (strong) are expressed by macroparticles and point charges, respectively. - Barycenter motion in beams is only investigated.  Interactions between a bunch and ions are considered by Bassetti-Erskine formula.  We assume that CO ions exist in the ring and use 1/6 part of the entire ring lattice for the simulations.  Ions are generated at locations that all magnetic components and drift spaces exist. (Ionization in long drift space is examined by every 2 m.)  All electron beams are initially set to zero displacement.

4 Simulation method (2)  New macroparticles are generated at the transverse position (x,x´,y,y´) of beam where ionization occurs.  Incoherent behaviors of ions are obtained by our simulation, but that of the beams, such as emittance growth, can not be computed.  We compute the time evolution of the growth of the dipole amplitude of the beam, where the amplitude is half of the Courant-Snyder invariant J y = (  y y  y y y´ +  y y´ 2 )/2.

5 Simulation method (3) ILC damping ring has a circumference of 6.6 km and trains of 61 to 123, depending on the filling patterns, exist in the ring. One bunch train and 1/6 section of the whole lattice are included for the simulations. for the fast simulations

6 Main parameters of the damping ring Circumference 6.69 km Energy 5 GeV Arc cell type TME Horizontal tune Vertical tune Natural chromaticity -63, -62 Momentum compaction factor 4.2 x Energy loss/turn 8.69 MeV Transverse damping time 25.7 ms Longitudinal damping time 12.9 ms Norm. emittance 5.04  m Natural energy spread 1.28 x RF frequency 650 MHz Synchrotron tune RF acceptance 2.7 %

Filling patterns of the damping ring Case A B C D E Number of train Bunch spacing / bucket Gap between trains / bucket Bunch per train / bucket K b : Time between injection/extraction kicker pulses Bunch per train / bucket Gap between trains / bucket

8 Filling patterns of the damping ring (One example) f 2 bunches in f 2 xn b buckets f 1 bunches in f 1 xn b buckets g 1 buckets g 2 buckets Distance between kicker pulses (pattern of k b buckets repeated p times) 24 buckets n b =2 f 2 =4 f 1 =3 k b =24 g 1 =5g 2 =5 p=1

9 Lattice used in the simulations ~1/6 of the entire ring

10 Vertical amplitudes in different filling patterns Case C shows the fastest exponential growth time nT

11 Vertical amplitudes in different filling patterns 0.23 nT feedback per 50 turns

12 Vertical amplitudes vs. vacuum pressures f 1 bunches in f 1 xn b buckets n b =2 f 1 =49 g 1 =25 ~~

13 Growth times vs. vacuum pressures

Vertical amplitudes vs. feedback number 0.23 nT Case A

15 Vertical amplitudes vs. bunch intensity 0.23 nT

16 Different bunch spacing in a bunch train ~ ~ 0.97x10 10 /bunch25 empty buckets ~ ~ 1.94x10 10 /bunch 25 empty buckets ~ ~ 3.88x10 10 /bunch 25 empty buckets bunch spacing (n b ) =2 bunch spacing (n b ) =4 bunch spacing (n b ) =8 (Same total bunch charge)

Different bunch spacing in a bunch train No feedback in Case A 0.23 nT (Same total bunch charge)

18 ~ 49 bunches in a train 25 empty buckets 25 bunches in a train has electrons of 0.97x10 10 per bunch. 24 bunches in a train 12 empty buckets empty bucket. One and two trains with same number of bunches Case A

19 damping by gap between trains One and two train with same number of bunches 0.23 nT No feedback

20 Summary  We performed weak-strong simulations to show aspects on the bunch filling patterns of the fast-ion instability in the ILCDR.  The simulation results show that bunch by bunch feedback of ~ 50 turns is enough to suppress the fast-ion instability.  We still need more simulation works to understand fully characteristics, in particular of the filling patterns, of the fast-ion instabilities in the ILC DR.