FENDL-3 1st Research Co-ordination Meeting, 2-5 December 2008, IAEA, Vienna1 Marilena Avrigeanu Progress on Deuteron-Induced Activation Cross Section Evaluation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Phenomenological systematics of the (d,p) cross sections A.V.Ignatyuk Institute of Physics and Power Engineering, Obninsk, Russia DWBA description of the.
Advertisements

Lorentzian-like models of E1 radiative strength functions V. A. Plujko, O. M. Gorbachenko, E. V. Kulich Taras Shevchenko National Kyiv University, Ukraine.
NUCLEAR REACTION MODELS FOR SYSTEMATIC ANALYSIS OF FAST NEUTRON INDUCED (n,p) REACTION CROSS SECTIONS M.Odsuren, J.Badamsambuu, G.Khuukhenkhuu Nuclear.
NuPAC Physics at the proton and neutron drip lines Theoretical perspectives Angela Bonaccorso.
Single Neutron Stripping Reactions for Structural Study of 23 O Ravinder Kumar Department of Physics Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra Kurukshetra -
Mean field description of the nucleus-nucleus optical potential Institute for Nuclear Science & Technique Vietnam Atomic Energy Commission (VAEC) Dao Tien.
Benchmark test with OKTAVIAN data and Comment on kerma factor Yukinobu Watanabe Department of Advanced Energy Engineering Science, Kyushu University 3nd.
Status of Fusion Nuclear Data Development Mohamed Sawan Tim Bohm U. Wisconsin-Madison Fusion Neutronics Team.
INPUTS : - rock composition: - U/Th contamination: - density: 2.65 g/cm 3 Neutron yield in LSM rock.
1 Maryvonne De JésusIlias/N3/WG5 meeting Neutron studies in Edelweiss “Suite” Valencia (Espana)15/04/2005.
Precise neutron inelastic cross section measurements A.Negret 1 1 “Horia Hulubei” National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Bucharest, ROMANIA.
Nucleon Optical Potential in Brueckner Theory Wasi Haider Department of Physics, AMU, Aligarh, India. E Mail:
The Theory of Partial Fusion A theory of partial fusion is used to calculate the competition between escape (breakup) and absorption (compound-nucleus.
Nuclear Level Densities of Residual Nuclei from evaporation of 64 Cu Moses B. Oginni Ohio University SNP2008 July 9, 2008.
1 CN formation cross section in nucleon induced reactions on 238 U Efrem Soukhovitski, JINER Frank Dietrich, LLNL Harm Wienke, Belgonucleaire Roberto Capote,
Status and needs of activation data for fusion Robin Forrest 1 and Jura Kopecky 2 1 Euratom/UKAEA Fusion Association Culham Science Centre, UK 2 JUKO Research,
Spectroscopic factors and Asymptotic Normalization Coefficients from the Source Term Approach and from (d,p) reactions N.K. Timofeyuk University of Surrey.
Α - capture reactions using the 4π γ-summing technique Α. Lagoyannis Institute of Nuclear Physics, N.C.S.R. “Demokritos”
14th Int. Conf. on Nuclear Reactions Mechanisms, June 15-19, 2015, Varenna, ItalyMarilena Avrigeanu 1 Role of the direct mechanisms in the deuteron-induced.
The Status of Nuclear Data above 20 MeV Masayoshi SUGIMOTO, Tokio FUKAHORI Japan Atomic Energy Agency IAEA’s Technical Meeting on Nuclear Data Libraries.
Nuclear Data Activities at PTB
Neutron transfer reactions at large internuclear distances studied with the PRISMA spectrometer and the AGATA demonstrator.
Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Association FZK-Euratom Status of Neutronics Tools & Data for IFMIF-EVEDA U. Fischer, S. Simakov.
Studies of neutron cross-sections by activation method in Nuclear Physics Institute Řež and in The Svedberg Laboratory Uppsala and experimental determination.
If the Coordinates system is. R r b (impact parameter.
Nuclear Level Density 1.What we know, what we do not know, and what we want to know 2.Experimental techniques to study level densities, what has been done.
V. Avrigeanu - Workshop on Activation Data (EAF-2005), Prague, June 7-9, Progress Report on Theoretical Tools and Calculations of Cross Sections.
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory SciDAC Reaction Theory LLNL-PRES Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P. O. Box 808, Livermore, CA
Extended optical model analyses of elastic scattering and fusion cross sections for 6, 7 Li Pb systems at near-Coulomb-barrier energies by using.
JENDL/HE-2007 & On going Activities for JENDL-4 Japan Atomic Energy Agency S. Kunieda IAEA 1-st RCM of CRP on FENDL-3.0, 2-5 Dec Y. Watanabe Kyushu.
Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe in der Helmholz-Gemeinschaft Karlsruhe Institute of Technology Nuclear Data Library for Advanced Systems – Fusion Devices (FENDL-3)
Potential Approach to Scattering of Exotic Nuclei Goncharov S.A.
1 A microscopic version of CDCC P. Descouvemont Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium In collaboration with M.S. Hussein (USP) E.C. Pinilla (ULB) J. Grineviciute.
Update of uncertainty file in the EAF project J. Kopecky 1 and R.A. Forrest 2 1 JUKO Research, the Netherlands 2 EURATOM/UKAEA Association, Culham, UK.
TENDL for FENDL Arjan Koning NRG Petten, The Netherlands FENDL-3 meeting December 6-9, 2011, IAEA, Vienna.
Cross-sections of Neutron Threshold Reactions Studied by Activation Method Nuclear Physics Institute, Academy of Sciences of Czech Republic Department.
Vlad Avrigeanu / Mihai Mirean_TOF Collaboration Meeting 2006, Paris, 4-5 Dec. 1 Proposal to the n_TOF Collaboration at CERN on IFIN-HH joining Activities.
Filling up FENDL with an all-in-one nuclear data evaluation and validation system around TALYS Arjan Koning NRG Petten, The Netherlands FENDL-3 meeting.
Marilena Avrigeanu28th Int. Workshop. on Nuclear Theory Rila Mountains 2009 α - particle Optical Potential for astrophysical studies M. Avrigeanu and V.
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Effective interactions for reaction calculations Jutta Escher, F.S. Dietrich, D. Gogny, G.P.A. Nobre, I.J. Thompson.
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Württemberg and Large-scale Research Center of the Helmholtz Association Institute for Neutron Physics.
Mesut Karakoç May 31st, 2012 TAMU-Commerce & Akdeniz U. - Turkey Collaborators: Carlos Bertulani (TAMU-Commerce) Adriana Banu (James Madison U.) Livius.
© 2003 By Default! A Free sample background from Slide 1  nuclear structure studies nn uclear structure studies Who am.
Neutrino cross sections in few hundred MeV energy region Jan T. Sobczyk Institute of Theoretical Physics, University of Wrocław (in collaboration with.
Nuclear Data Libraries for Advanced Systems: Fusion Devices FENDL-3 IAEA, Vienna, 2-5 December 2008 A Mengoni IAEA Nuclear Data Section.
The n_TOF neutron flux and resolution function by GEANT4 simulations
Reaction studies with low-energy weakly-bound beams Alessia Di Pietro INFN-Laboratori Nazionali del Sud NN 2015Alessia Di Pietro,INFN-LNS.
Ondřej Svoboda Nuclear Physics Institute, Academy of Sciences of Czech Republic Department of Nuclear Reactors, Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical.
Reaction cross sections of carbon isotopes incident on proton and 12 C International Nuclear Physics Conference, Tokyo, Japan June 3-8, 2007 W. Horiuchi.
Pion-Induced Fission- A Review Zafar Yasin Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences (PIEAS) Islamabad, Pakistan.
Electron Screening in deuterated targets ©Francesco Raiola Raiola Francesco, Fakultät für Physik und Astronomie Ruhr-Universität Bochum, D Bochum,
KIT – The cooperation of Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH and Universität Karlsruhe (TH) Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor Technology Evaluation.
Time dependent GCM+GOA method applied to the fission process ESNT janvier / 316 H. Goutte, J.-F. Berger, D. Gogny CEA/DAM Ile de France.
Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Association FZK-Euratom Review of IEAF-2001 Cross Section Data Libraries for IFMIF Activation.
KIT – The Research University in the Helmholtz Association INSTITUTE for NEUTRON PHYSICS and REACTOR TECHNOLOGY (INR) Nuclear Data for Calculation.
Lecture 4 1.The role of orientation angles of the colliding nuclei relative to the beam energy in fusion-fission and quasifission reactions. 2.The effect.
Improvements of microscopic transport models stimulated by spallation data for incident energies from 113 to MeV Umm Al-Qura University and King.
Three years of cross-section measurements of (n,xn) threshold reactions at TSL Uppsala and NPI Řež O. Svoboda, A. Krása, A. Kugler, M. Majerle, J. Vrzalová,
Two-body force in three-body system: a case of (d,p) reactions
Fusion Neutronics, Nuclear Data, Design & Analyses
Marilena AvrigeanuMarilena Avrigeanu
3. The optical model Prof. Dr. A.J. (Arjan) Koning1,2
Bucharest-Magurele, Romania M. BOROMIZA - Trieste, October, 2017
Vlad Avrigeanu, IFIN-HH ProposalsRO Presentation
Neutron Optical Model Potential &Symmetry Energy
Breakup of weakly bound nuclei and its influence on fusion
Elastic alpha scattering experiments
O. Svoboda, A. Krása, A. Kugler, M. Majerle, J. Vrzalová, V. Wagner
Alpha-particle optical model potentials within
Presentation transcript:

FENDL-3 1st Research Co-ordination Meeting, 2-5 December 2008, IAEA, Vienna1 Marilena Avrigeanu Progress on Deuteron-Induced Activation Cross Section Evaluation Marilena Avrigeanu 1, Wolfram von Oertzen 2, Robin Forrest 3, Aura Obreja 1, Faustin Roman 1, Vlad Avrigeanu 1 (1) EURATOM-MEdC Fusion Association, "Horia Hulubei" National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, P.O. Box MG-6, Bucharest, Romania (2) Freie Universitat Berlin, Fachbereich Physik, Berlin, and Hahn-Meitner-Institut, Berlin, Germany (3) EURATOM-UKAEA Fusion Association, Culham Science Centre, Abingdon OX14 3DB, UK PN2_IDEI_149/2007 [ ] [ ] FENDL-3 1st Research Co-ordination Meeting NDS/IAEA, Vienna, 2-5 December

FENDL-3 1st Research Co-ordination Meeting, 2-5 December 2008, IAEA, Vienna2 Marilena Avrigeanu IFMIF Data Needs [ U. Fischer, ND2007 & "Nuclear Data Libraries for Advanced Systems: Fusion Devices“, TM, Nov 2007, IAEA, Vienna] Activation/transmutation data General purpose neutron data library –Urgent need for qualified IFMIF reference data library – IEAF/EAF (n, p, d), to be further developed, improved and validated –Cross section measurements required for neutrons (E >20 MeV): Cr, Co, V, W, Ta, Pb, Bi, Au, Mn deuterons (E < 40 MeV): Cu, Al, Nb, protons (E < 12 MeV): Cu, Al, Nb, Ta, W, Au, Pb –Validation experiments, to be extended/continued Reliable gas production cross-section data (H, He) Dosimetry data file to be developed for E > 20 MeV (IRDF)

FENDL-3 1st Research Co-ordination Meeting, 2-5 December 2008, IAEA, Vienna3 Marilena Avrigeanu Optical Potential - key ingredient of cross-sections calculations NO GLOBAL OPTICAL POTENTIAL (OP) for d + Nucleus (A<27) (basis of TW5-TTMI-004-D5) COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS of global OMPs for d + 27 Al, 63,65 Cu, 54,56,58 Fe, 93 Nb:  Lohr-Haeberli (1974): A~40-209, E=8-13 MeV  Perey-Perey (1963,1976): A~40-208, E=12-25 MeV  Daehnick et al. (1980): A~27-238, E= MeV  Bojowald et al. (1988): 27 Al, 89 Y, 120 Sn, and 208 Pb at E d =58.7 and 85 MeV None of these global OMP describes data at E<15 MeV Semi-microscopic OMP by using realistic nucleon-nucleon interaction Average of the local OMP parameters for d+ 27 Al, 54,56 Fe, 63,65 Cu, 93 Nb: Phenomenological OMP → cross-sections calculations Analysis of deuteron breakup mechanism: Contribution of breakup to the reaction and activation cross sections Direct Reactions contribution considered through stripping mechanism Activation cross sections calculations for d+ 27 Al interaction INTRODUCTION

FENDL-3 1st Research Co-ordination Meeting, 2-5 December 2008, IAEA, Vienna4 Marilena Avrigeanu 27 Al + d : most recent phenomenological potentials

FENDL-3 1st Research Co-ordination Meeting, 2-5 December 2008, IAEA, Vienna5 Marilena Avrigeanu M. Avrigeanu et al., Phys. Rev. C62 (2000) M. Avrigeanu et al., Nucl. Phys. A693 (2001) 616 M. Avrigeanu et al. Eur. Phys. J. A12 (2001) 399 M. Avrigeanu et al., Int. J. of Mod. Phys. E, 11 (2002) 249 M. Avrigeanu et al., Nucl. Phys. A723 (2003) 104 M. Avrigeanu et al., Nucl. Phys. A 759 (2005) 327 M. Avrigeanu et al, Nucl. Phys. A 764 (2006) 246 M. Avrigeanu et al., Phys. Rev. C62 (2000) M. Avrigeanu et al., Nucl. Phys. A693 (2001) 616 M. Avrigeanu et al. Eur. Phys. J. A12 (2001) 399 M. Avrigeanu et al., Int. J. of Mod. Phys. E, 11 (2002) 249 M. Avrigeanu et al., Nucl. Phys. A723 (2003) 104 M. Avrigeanu et al., Nucl. Phys. A 759 (2005) 327 M. Avrigeanu et al, Nucl. Phys. A 764 (2006) 246 OPTICAL MODEL : prime tool for all cross section calculations Phenomenological OMP global parameter sets: codes default Microscopic OPs: reduced uncertainties  SCAT 2000 [O. Bersillon] - pure elastic scattering OP analysis  DFOLD [M. Avrigeanu] - double folding method (nucleons, d, 4,6,8 He A-target nuclei)  FRESCO [I.J. Thompson] - Coupled Reaction Channel  TALYS [A. Koning, S. Hilaire, M. Duijvestijn] - OMP:ECIS’97; EXCITON; Hauser-Feshbach  STAPRE - H95 (updated) [V.Avrigeanu, M.Avrigeanu] - OMP:SCAT2000; GDH / EXCITON; Hauser-Feshbach Nuclear Model Calculations

FENDL-3 1st Research Co-ordination Meeting, 2-5 December 2008, IAEA, Vienna6 Marilena Avrigeanu Microscopic Real Optical Potential

FENDL-3 1st Research Co-ordination Meeting, 2-5 December 2008, IAEA, Vienna7 Marilena Avrigeanu Approximations

FENDL-3 1st Research Co-ordination Meeting, 2-5 December 2008, IAEA, Vienna8 Marilena Avrigeanu Density distributions & NN-interactions

FENDL-3 1st Research Co-ordination Meeting, 2-5 December 2008, IAEA, Vienna9 Marilena Avrigeanu DF-real & phenomenological imaginary/s.o. potentials Phenomenological OMP

FENDL-3 1st Research Co-ordination Meeting, 2-5 December 2008, IAEA, Vienna10 Marilena Avrigeanu d breakup  1 (a) f pT BU = – Z Z A 1/ A 1/3 E – 2E-6 ZE 2  1 (b) f EL BU = – Z Z A 1/ A 1/3 E – 1E-6 ZE 2 elastic 27 Al + d 27 Al + n+ p inelastic ( 27 Al + n) + p ( 28 Al * ) + p 27 Mg + p + p (2p ch. of 29 Si* ) 24 Na + α + p (pα ch. of 29 Si* ) inelastic ( 27 Al + p) + n ( 28 Si * ) +n 27 Si + n + n (2n ch. of 29 Si* ) Empirical breakup enhancement f BU from (d,p) & (d,n) systematics

FENDL-3 1st Research Co-ordination Meeting, 2-5 December 2008, IAEA, Vienna11 Marilena Avrigeanu Stripping contribution (FRESCO-code; 18 levels of 28 Si)

FENDL-3 1st Research Co-ordination Meeting, 2-5 December 2008, IAEA, Vienna12 Marilena Avrigeanu Stripping contribution (FRESCO-code; 35 levels of 28 Al)

FENDL-3 1st Research Co-ordination Meeting, 2-5 December 2008, IAEA, Vienna13 Marilena Avrigeanu Breakup & DR 27 Al + d ( 27 Al + n) + p (T) (B) ( 27 Al + p) + n peak centroid: E x = A x /A d *(E inc – 1.44Z d Z T /(1.5A T 1/3 + R d ) Z x Z B /(1.5A T 1/3 + R d ) FWHM:  = 0.3 (E inc + 15 MeV ) (1 – A T /1500) [Kalbach, 2007] Breakup energies for n & p

FENDL-3 1st Research Co-ordination Meeting, 2-5 December 2008, IAEA, Vienna14 Marilena Avrigeanu BREAKUP contribution to the SECOND particle emission σ BF (p) vs E d σ BF (p) vs E d σ BF (n) vs E d 27 Al(n,p) 27 Mg vs E n 27 Al(n,α) 24 Na vs E n 27 Al(p,n) 27 Si vs E p 27 Al(n,p) 27 Mg vs E d 27 Al(n,α) 24 Na vs E d 27 Al(p,n) 27 Si vs E d [via BF] [via BF] [via BF]

FENDL-3 1st Research Co-ordination Meeting, 2-5 December 2008, IAEA, Vienna15 Marilena Avrigeanu d + 27 Al: Activation cross-sections

FENDL-3 1st Research Co-ordination Meeting, 2-5 December 2008, IAEA, Vienna16 Marilena Avrigeanu Activation cross sections for d + 63,65 Cu [ former approach ]

FENDL-3 1st Research Co-ordination Meeting, 2-5 December 2008, IAEA, Vienna17 Marilena Avrigeanu CONCLUSIONS  Starting point: available (d,d) and  R data for d+ 27 Al, 54,56,58,nat Fe, 63,65,nat Cu, 93 Nb  poor description by global OMP parameter sets  Semi-microscopic OMP analysis  U DF : ρ d (charge) & ρ Al (charge) & M3Y Paris-NN  W D & V SO phenomenological  improved agreement with data adding the dispersion corrections  Phenomenological OMP analysis for 27 Al  agreement with all available measured data  good description of (d,d) data vs. TALYS default OMPs  improved description of (d,d) data vs. global OMPs  Completion of d+ 27 Al activation cross sections  Deuteron break-up mechanism contribution taken into account  DR mechanism considered trough n & p stripping contributions  Comparison of STAPRE-H / TALYS-1 activation cross sections  NEED to UPDATE the d-activation libraries

FENDL-3 1st Research Co-ordination Meeting, 2-5 December 2008, IAEA, Vienna18 Marilena Avrigeanu Thank you