Reducing Project Duration CHAPTER NINE Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Spring 2008, King Saud University Time-Cost-Trade-off Dr. Khalid Al-Gahtani 1 Reasons to Reduce Project Durations: 1.To realize incentive pay 2.To fit.
Advertisements

Scheduling Resources and Costs CHAPTER EIGHT Student Version Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Project Management 6e..
Project Management for Maximum Effectiveness
CHAPTER 4 MANAGING PROJECT PROCESSES. THE CONCEPT A project is an interrelated set of activities that has a definite starting and ending point and that.
Operations Management
Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 15 Supplement Advanced Methods for Project Scheduling McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Chapter 9: Reducing Project Duration
Reducing Project Duration
9-1 Resource Allocation Some definitions Resource allocation, loading, leveling Expediting and crashing projects Goldratt’s “Critical Chain”
Reducing Project Duration: Project Crashing
Estimating Project Times and Costs
© 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Project Analysis and Evaluation Chapter Eleven.
Reducing Project Duration
■ Project duration can be reduced by assigning more resources to project activities. ■ However, doing this increases project cost. ■ Decision is based.
Time-Cost Trade-Off (Time Reduction = Time Compression = Time Shortening) 4/17/ :55 AM.
Estimating Project Times and Costs CHAPTER FIVE Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
OPER 576 Project Management Reducing Project Duration or Project Crashing Greg Magnan, Ph.D. May 20, 2004.
Quiz#1 Chapter 5: Estimating Project Times and Cost
Stevenson and Ozgur First Edition Introduction to Management Science with Spreadsheets McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Operations Management Contemporary Concepts and Cases Chapter Fourteen Project Planning and Scheduling Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Where We Are Now. Where We Are Now Developing the Project Plan The Project Network A flow chart that graphically depicts the sequence, interdependencies,
THE MANAGERIAL PROCESS Clifford F. Gray Eric W. Larson Scheduling Resources Chapter 8.
7-1 Copyright © 2013 McGraw-Hill Education (Australia) Pty Ltd Pearson, Larson, Gray, Project Management in Practice, 1e CHAPTER 7 Project Time Management.
OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT INTEGRATING MANUFACTURING AND SERVICES FIFTH EDITION Mark M. Davis Janelle Heineke Copyright ©2005, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Analyzing Cost-Time Trade-Offs There are always cost-time trade-offs in project management. – You can completing a project early by hiring more workers.
THE MANAGERIAL PROCESS Clifford F. Gray Eric W. Larson Developing a Project Plan Chapter 6.
Scheduling Resources and Costs CHAPTER EIGHT PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All Rights Reserved.
Time/Cost Trade-off Analysis
Chapter 9: Reducing Project Duration
McGraw-Hill/Irwin© 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved Estimating Project Times and Costs Chapter 5.
Scheduling Resources and Costs CHAPTER EIGHT Student Version Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 17 Project Management.
Time-Cost Trade-Off (Time Reduction = Time Compression) (Time Shortening) Time-Cost Trade-Off (Time Reduction = Time Compression) (Time Shortening)
9-1 Chapter 9 Project Scheduling Chapter 9 Project Scheduling McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Project Management Chapter 8.
Scheduling Resources and Cost
MBMC Thinking Like An Economist. MBMC Copyright c 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 1: Thinking Like an Economist Slide.
Human Resources n How do we compete with everybody else who needs resources? n Where do we find people when we can’t hire new employees? n What does time.
8-1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Project Management Chapter 8.
MEM 612 Project Management Chapter 6 Allocating Resources to the Project.
Reducing Project Duration CHAPTER NINE Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Estimating Project Times and Costs CHAPTER FIVE Student Version Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 10/27/07 SJSU - Bus. 286 David Bentley (Gray & Larson)1 Chapter 5 – Estimating.
1 Finishing Projects Fast James R. Burns Professor of Operations Management and Information Technology Texas Tech University.
3/18/ :47 AM 1 Time-Cost Trade-Off (Time Reduction = Time Compression = Time Shortening)
Develop Schedule is the Process of analyzing activity sequences, durations, resource requirements, and schedule constraints to create the project schedule.
1 Finishing Projects Fast James R. Burns Professor of Operations Management and Information Technology Texas Tech University.
Develop Schedule is the Process of analyzing activity sequences, durations, resource requirements, and schedule constraints to create the project schedule.
University Of Palestine Faculty Of Applied Engineering & Urban Planning Civil Engineering Department PROJECT MANAGEMENT Scheduling Resources and Costs.
Time-Cost Trade-off Models
Project Management 6e..
Reducing Project Duration
CE 366 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS Robert G. Batson, Ph.D., P.E. Professor of Construction Engineering The University of Alabama
Project Planning & Scheduling
Project Management -- Scheduling Resources and Costs
Project Management -- Reducing Project Duration
Reducing Project Duration
Project scheduling Chapter 10 Copyright ©2016 Pearson Education, Inc.
Chapter 8 Scheduling Resources.
Lecture 6: Time-Cost Trade-Offs
Finishing Projects Fast
Manajemen Industri Teknologi informasi
Reducing Project Duration
Where We Are Now. Where We Are Now Rationale for Reducing Project Duration Time Is Money: Cost-Time Tradeoffs Reducing the time of a critical activity.
Where We Are Now. Where We Are Now Rationale for Reducing Project Duration Time Is Money: Cost-Time Tradeoffs Reducing the time of a critical activity.
Where We Are Now. Where We Are Now Rationale for Reducing Project Duration Time Is Money: Cost-Time Tradeoffs Reducing the time of a critical activity.
Presentation transcript:

Reducing Project Duration CHAPTER NINE Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

9–2 Where We Are Now

9–3 Rationale for Reducing Project Duration Time Is Money: Cost-Time Tradeoffs –Reducing the time of a critical activity usually incurs additional direct costs. Cost-time solutions focus on reducing (crashing) activities on the critical path to shorten overall duration of the project. –Reasons for imposed project duration dates: Time-to-market pressures Unforeseen delays Incentive contracts (bonuses for early completion) Imposed deadlines and contract commitments Overhead and public goodwill costs Pressure to move resources to other projects

9–4 Options for Accelerating Project Completion Resources Not Constrained –Adding resources –Outsourcing project work –Scheduling overtime –Establishing a core project team –Do it twice—fast and then correctly Resources Constrained –Fast-tracking –Critical-chain –Reducing project scope –Compromise quality

9–5 Explanation of Project Costs Project Indirect Costs –Are costs that cannot be associated with any particular work package or project activity. Supervision, administration, consultants, and interest –Are costs that vary (increase) with time. Reducing project time directly reduces indirect costs. Project Direct Costs –Are normal costs that can be assigned directly to a specific work package or project activity. Labor, materials, equipment, and subcontractors –Increase with use of crashing activities increases

9–6 Seeking Optimal Project Duration to Minimize Project Cost Compute total costs for each specific duration and evaluate the tradeoff between project cost and duration. Search critical activities of lowest direct-cost increase to shorten project duration. Identifying direct costs to reduce project time Gather information about direct and indirect costs of each specific project duration.

9–7 Project Cost–Duration Graph FIGURE 9.1

9–8 Constructing a Project Cost–Duration Graph Find total direct costs for selected project durations. Find total indirect costs for selected project durations. Sum direct and indirect costs for these selected project durations. Compare additional cost alternatives for benefits.

9–9 Constructing a Project Cost–Duration Graph Determining Activities to Shorten –Shorten the activities with the smallest increase in cost per unit of time. –Assumptions: The cost relationship is linear. Normal time assumes low-cost, efficient methods to complete the activity. Crash time represents a limit—the greatest time reduction possible under realistic conditions. Slope represents a constant cost per unit of time. All accelerations must occur within the normal and crash times.

9–10 Activity Graph FIGURE 9.2

9–11 Cost–Duration Trade-off Example FIGURE 9.3

9–12 Cost–Duration Trade-off Example (cont’d) FIGURE 9.3 (cont’d)

9–13 Cost–Duration Trade-off Example (cont’d) FIGURE 9.4

9–14 Cost–Duration Trade-off Example (cont’d) FIGURE 9.4 (cont’d)

9–15 Summary Costs by Duration FIGURE 9.5

9–16 Project Cost–Duration Graph FIGURE 9.6

9–17 Practical Considerations Using the Project Cost–Duration Graph –For cost-duration tradeoff decision Crash Times –It is more difficult to estimate than normal time and cost Linearity Assumption –However, usually crashing is “all or none.” It is not as practical to do partial crashing of an activity. Choice of Activities to Crash Revisited –In addition to choosing the cheapest crashing method, other factors such as risk and resource availability (at the time of need) should be considered as well. Time Reduction Decisions and Sensitivity –A project is sensitive if it has several critical or near-critical paths. –Compression of projects with several near critical paths reduces scheduling flexibility and increases the risk of delaying the project.

9–18 What if Cost, Not Time Is the Issue? Commonly Used Options for Cutting Costs –Reduce project scope –Have owner take on more responsibility –Outsourcing project activities or even the entire project –Brainstorming cost savings options

9–19 Key Terms Crashing Crash point Crash time Direct costs Fast-tracking Indirect costs Outsourcing Project cost–duration graph