Hepatitis-2015 Orlando, USA July

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Recent HCV treatment developments: In pursuit of perfectovir Professor Greg Dore Kirby Institute, UNSW Australia; & St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney.
Advertisements

Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Simeprevir in Genotype 1 (Viral Relapsers) PROMISE Trial Phase 3 Treatment Experienced Forns X, et al. Gastroenterology.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Sofosbuvir in HCV Genotype 2, 3 (PEG not an Option) POSITRON Phase 3 *Note: Published in tandem with FUSION Trial.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Peginterferon alfa-2b + Ribavirin in GT 1-6 (Flat versus Weight-Based Ribavirin Dosing) WINR Study Phase 3 Treatment.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Telaprevir in Treatment Naïve GT-1 ADVANCE (Study 108) Phase 3 Treatment Naïve Jacobson IM, et. al. N Engl J Med.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Sofosbuvir in Genotypes 2 or 3 VALENCE Trial Phase 3 Treatment Naïve and Treatment Experienced Zeuzem S, et al.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Sofosbuvir + Peginterferon + Ribavirin in Genotypes 1,4,5,6 ATOMIC Phase 2 Treatment Naïve Kowdley K, et al. Lancet.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study PEG alfa-2a + RBV versus PEG alfa-2a versus INF + RBV APRICOT STUDY Phase 3 Treatment Naïve, Chronic HCV and HIV.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Sofosbuvir-Ledipasvir +/- Ribavirin in GT-1 LONESTAR Trial Phase 2a Treatment Naïve and Treatment Experienced Source:
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Peginterferon alfa -2a+/- Ribavirin versus Interferon alfa-2b + Ribavirin Phase 3 Treatment Naïve, Chronic HCV.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Sofosbuvir + Ribavirin to Prevent Post-Transplant HCV Recurrence Phase 2 Curry MP, et al. Gastroenterology. 2015;148:100-7.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Sofosbuvir + Ribavirin in HCV Recurrence Following Liver Transplantation Phase 2 Charlton M, et al. Gastroenterology.
Harvoni® ledipasvir/sofosbuvir
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study WINR Study Flat versus Weight-Based Ribavirin Dosing Phase 3 Treatment Naïve, Chronic HCV Jacobson IM, et. al.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Sofosbuvir + Ribavirin in HCV GT 4 Egyptian Ancestry Trial Phase 2 Ruane PJ, et al. J Hepatol. 2015;62:
ALAN FRANCISCUS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, HEPATITIS C SUPPORT PROJECT EDITOR-IN-CHIEF, HCV ADVOCATE WEBSITE JOIN ME ON TWITTER & FACEBOOK – HCVADVOCATE BLOG:
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Interferon alfa-2b +/- Ribavirin for 24 or 48 weeks Phase 3 Treatment Naïve, Chronic HCV McHutchison JG, et al.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Peginterferon alfa-2a +/- Ribavirin for Chronic HCV Phase 3 Treatment Naïve, Chronic HCV Fried MW, et. al. N Engl.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Boceprevir in Treatment Experienced RESPOND-2 Phase 3 Treatment Experienced Bacon BR, et al. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:
ALAN FRANCISCUS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, HEPATITIS C SUPPORT PROJECT EDITOR-IN-CHIEF, HCV ADVOCATE WEBSITE JOIN ME ON TWITTER & FACEBOOK – HCVADVOCATE BLOG:
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Telaprevir BID versus q8 in Treatment Naïve GT-1 OPTIMIZE (Study C211) Phase 3 Treatment Naïve Buti M, et al. Gastroenterology.
How to optimize treatment of G4 patients?. Case: 26 Y male, HCV positive on pre-employment Transfused at age 3 for hemolysis due to G6PD deficiency »ALT.
Hepatitis-2015 Orlando, USA July
Maria Buti Hospital General Universitario Vall Hebron Barcelona-. Spain Relapser or Non Responder? Chronic Hepatitis C.
ION-1  Design LDV/SOF LDV/SOF + RBV Randomisation* 1 : 1 : 1 : 1 Open-label ION-1 Study: LDV/SOF + RBV for genotype 1 W24W12 ≥ 18 years Chronic HCV infection.
SOF/VEL 400/100 mg qd N = 75 W24 SOF/VEL > 18 years Chronic HCV infection Genotype 1 to 6 Naïve or treatment-experienced No prior treatment with NS5A or.
> 18 years Chronic HCV infection Genotype 1 Failure (relapse) to 4, 6 or 8 weeks of GZR/EBR + SOF in C-SWIFT Part A Compensated cirrhosis assessed by liver.
Asselah T. AASLD 2015, Abs OSIRIS  Design SMV + PEG-IFN + RBV Open label Chronic HCV infection Genotype 4 Treatment-naïve Mild to moderate fibrosis.
 Objective –SVR 12 (HCV RNA < 25 IU/ml), with 95% CI, next observation carried backward DCV + SOF + RBV Randomised* 1:1 Open-label ALLY-3+ study: DCV.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Sofosbuvir + Ribavirin to Prevent Post-Transplant HCV Recurrence Phase 2 Curry MP, et al. Gastroenterology. 2014;September.
Hepatitis C: Perspective on Drug Development Issues Debra Birnkrant, M.D. Director, Division of Antiviral Products FDA Antiviral Drugs Advisory Committee.
Hepatitis C Past, present and future Salil Singh Consultant Gastroenterologist, RBH
Hadziyannis SJ et al. EASL Peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD) (PEGASYS ® ) in combination with ribavirin (RBV): efficacy and safety results from a phase.
R2. 임형석 / Pf. 김병호. I NTRODUCTION Chronic hepatitis C infection 130~150 million worldwide 7 genotypes genotype 1 predominates(about 70% in USA): most difficult.
Phase 3 Treatment Experienced
Glecaprevir-Pibrentasvir in GT 1-6 with Renal Disease EXPEDITION-4
Sofosbuvir-Velpatasvir-Voxilaprevir in GT 3 and Cirrhosis POLARIS-3
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Daclatasvir + Sofosbuvir +/- Ribavirin in Genotype 1-3 Trial
Dr. Iram Shad PGT-Medicine MU-1, HFH,RWP
Daclatasvir + Sofosbuvir in Genotype 3 ALLY-3 Study
Design No randomisation Open-label W12 W years HCV genotype 1
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
> 18 years Chronic HCV infection Compensated cirrhosis **
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
No cirrhosis or compensated cirrhosis** No HBV or HIV co-infection
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
ARV-trial.com RUBY-I Study, cohort 2: ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir + dasabuvir + RBV for HCV genotype 1 with renal impairment Design Open label W12.
QUARTZ II-III : OBV/PTV/r + SOF RBV in genotype 2 or 3
BACKGROUND MATERIALS & METHODS RESULTS CONCLUSIONS
Phase 2 Treatment Naïve HIV Coinfection
Which patients with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C can benefit from prolonged treatment with the ‘accordion’ regimen?  Patrick Marcellin, E. Jenny Heathcote,
Elbasvir + Grazoprevir + Ribavirin in PI-experienced HCV GT1 C-SALVAGE
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Boceprevir in Treatment Naive SPRINT-2
Phase 2 Treatment Naïve Elbasvir + Grazoprevir +/- Ribavirin in Treatment-Naïve HCV GT 2, 4, 5, or 6 C-SCAPE Brown A, et al. EASL 2015; Abstract P0771.
Ombitasvir + Paritaprevir + Ritonavir +/- Ribavirin in HCV GT4 PEARL-I
New Hepatitis C Therapies: The Toolbox, Strategies, and Challenges
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Volume 59, Issue 4, Pages (October 2013)
Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir +/- Ribavirin in HCV Genotype 1 ION-2
Phase 2b Treatment Naïve and Treatment Experienced
A Real Life Study on Treatment of Egyptian Patients with HCV Genotype IV with Simeprevir and Sofosbuvir Prof.dr.Abdel fattah hanno Dr. Doaa al wazzan.
Phase 3 Treatment Naïve and Treatment Experienced HIV Coinfection
From non-A, non-B hepatitis to hepatitis C virus cure
Daclatasvir + Asunaprevir in Genotype 1b HALLMARK-DUAL Study
New HCV therapies on the horizon
Phase 2 Treatment Naïve Elbasvir-Grazoprevir + Sofosbuvir in Treatment-Naïve HCV Genotype 1 or 3 C-SWIFT Poordad F, et al. EASL 2015; Abstract O006.
What Does the Future Hold and What Will It Mean for Patients?
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Presentation transcript:

Hepatitis-2015 Orlando, USA July 20 - 22 2015 Hosny Salama

Effect of Sofosbuvir , Brand drug ( Sofaldi ) versus generic ( MPIviropack ) in treating chronic HCV infection in Egypt . Prof. Hosny Salama Cairo University, Egypt.

Chronic HCV infection is high in Egypt with prevalence of 12-14% . More that 85% of HCV is Genotype IV . Response of therapy to SOC therapy was around 50% with a lot of side effects and long duration of therapy

Sofosbuvir is a NS5B polymerase inhibitor . With the introduction of DAAs , a new era of HCV treatment started . Sofosbuvir is a NS5B polymerase inhibitor . It has a pan-genotypic coverage and approved for use in genotype IV AASLD 2014, EASL 2015 . With the availability of both the brand drug ( Sofaldi- Gilead ) and the generic form ( MPI-Viropack- Marcyrl Pharmaceutical Industries ) in the Egypt in 2014- 2015

we conducted this comparative study to evaluate and compare the safety and efficacy of both the Brand and Generic forms.

Patients were divided into three groups ( 35 patients each ) In this study we recruited 105 naïve patients with chronic HCV infection. For all of them the following was done : Liver function tests ( S. bilirubin, ALT, AST . Albumin , PT and PC ), CBS , ECG, fundus examination Abdominal ultrasound, Fibroscan and HCV RNA Quantitative by PCR . Patients were divided into three groups ( 35 patients each )

According to Fibroscan : Group I : F2 ( 23 pts ) , F3 (9 pts) and F4 ( 3 pts ). Group II : F2 ( 22 pts ) , F3 (10 pts ) and F4 ( 3 pts ) Group III : F2 ( 22 pts ), F3 ( 6 pts ) and F4 ( 7 pts ) .

For the first group, triple therapy was used, Peg Interferon ( Peg Intron- MSD according to body weight) , Ribavirin in a weight adjusted dosage and Sofaldi- Gilead 400 mg once daily . For the second group, triple therapy was also used, Peg Interferon and Ribavirin as in group I and MPIviropack 400 mg once daily . For the third group, dual therapy was given using Ribavirin in a weight adjusted dosage and either Sofaldi 400 mg once daily (17 patients ) or MPIviropack once daily ( 18 patients )

Follow – up after one and three months using liver function tests, CBC and HCV RNA by PCR was done .

There was normalization of liver enzymes in 34 ( 97%) patients group I and II, and 35 (100%) patients in the third group. CBC showed mild decrease in HB level in 18 (51%) , 19 (54%), 15 (43%) patients in group I, II , III respectively

HCV RNA was un-detected in 34 (97%) patients in group I , II and III after One and 3 months during therapy .

* Athenia and exhaustion in 23 ( 66%) in all groups The side effects were comparable in group I , II and III : * Nausea and abdominal Pain in 20 (57%) patients in Gr. I versus 21 ( 60%) in Gr. II, III . Diarrhea in 3 (8.5%) patients in Gr. I versus 4 ( 11.4%) patients in Gr. II , III . * Athenia and exhaustion in 23 ( 66%) in all groups * Headache in 4 (11.4%) patients in all groups . However in Group III the side effects were mild including asthenia in 23 (66%) patients and mild gastric upset in 15 (43%) patients .

Follow-up is still going on to assess the SVR 12, 24 after the end of treatment : Treatment for 3 months in Group I, II and 6 months in group III .

Proved to be safe and effective in Egyptian patients From this pilot study, we found that both the brand and the generic forms of Sofosbuvir in combination with Peg/R or with Ribavirin alone : Proved to be safe and effective in Egyptian patients with naïve chronic HCV – genotype 4 infection with comparable safety and efficacy profile . The long term follow-up to assess the SVR in 12, 24 weeks are still going on .

Acknolgement Abdel Rahman Zekri 2, Eman Medhat 1 , Mervat Al Ansary,3 and Sherine A. Alim 1 (Hepatology1 , Clinical Pathology2 and Virology Unit at NCI 3, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt )

THANK YOU

Hepatitis– 2016 Website: hepatitis.omicsgroup.com Meet the eminent gathering once again at Hepatitis-2016 Dubai, UAE October 17 - 19, 2016 Hepatitis– 2016 Website: hepatitis.omicsgroup.com