Ryan Henry Law Offices of Ryan Henry, PLLC. 1380 Pantheon Way, St. 215 City of San Antonio 78232 Phone: 210-257-6357

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CIVIL LIABILITY Instructor: John M. Balloni. Duration: Two Hours Instruction Methods: Lecture, discussion, overheads and video.
Advertisements

Citizens Suits and Environmental Protection in the Philippines Prof. Marvic M.V.F. Leonen A.B. (Econ), J.D., Ll.M. Associate Professor of Law University.
Civil and Criminal Remedies for Constitutional Violations
CONGRESS POWER TO ENFORCE 13 TH, 14 TH & 15 TH AMENDMENTS AND LIMITATION IMPOSED BY THE 11th AMENDMENT Goals: Effect of 11 th A on scope of Congress power.
Remedies Against Govt Defendants – Some Basics 11 th amendment bars suits against the State, unless Lawsuit is against state officer in their official.
Duty of Fair Representation Duty of Fair Representation - MB Labour Relations Act s. 20 Every bargaining agent which is a party to a collective agreement,
Suing the Federal Government Federal Tort Claims Act.
Civil Liability for Chief Judges as Administrators Denise C. Barton, Division Chief Public Employment, Elections & Tort Division.
Intro to Torts Unit 7. Housekeeping Questions? Nuisance.
Avoiding Civil Rights and Employment Practices Claims Division of Risk Management Department of Insurance.
Chapter Two LAW and CRIME
Suing the Federal Government. 2 History Traditional Sovereign Immunity US Constitution "No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence.
Add Munz – FTCA in prisons. Suing the Federal Government FTCA I.
Civil Litigation I Parties & Jurisdiction Not that kind of party!
Law I Chapter 18.
Chapter Sixteen Constitutional and Civil Rights of Victims This multimedia presentation and its contents are protected under copyright law. The following.
A Baker’s Dozen: 13 Issues Regarding the Open Meetings Law 2004 IARC Staff Retreat May 14, 2004 Ames, IA David Vestal General Counsel Iowa State Association.
Judicial Review. Basic Requirements Court must have jurisdiction Plaintiff must state a recognized cause of action and seek a recognized remedy This is.
Judicial Review of Agency Action: Getting into Court Courts review a relatively small percentage of agency decisions Courts set aside an even smaller percentage.
The Judicial Branch. Court Systems & Jurisdictions.
Chapter 13 Administrative Responsibility Torts & Agencies ► What is a Tort? ► Generally, under the concept of “Sovereign Immunity” it is impossible to.
§ 10.1 Judicial Remedies. Basic Requirements Court must have jurisdiction Plaintiff must state a recognized cause of action and seek a recognized remedy.
The Game of Risk Understanding Your Legal Liability as a Trustee NC Association of Community College Trustees April 9, 2015.
Presented by V. Wayne Young, Executive Director and General Counsel Kentucky Association of School Administrators KASA Education Law and Finance Institute.
Legal Aspects for Research Administrators. LEGAL ASPECTS FOR RESEARCH ADMINISTRATORS Mark Bohnhorst Associate General Counsel* * These materials are informational.
Introduction to Administrative Law and Process The Administrative Procedure Act Getting Into Court Standards of Judicial Review.
David Vestal General Counsel ISAC (515) Legal Issues in 911 IENA Spring Conference Des Moines, IA March 30, 2005.
Part I Sources of Corrections Law. Chapter 4 - Going to Court Introduction – Chapter provides information on appearing in court, either as a witness or.
COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND OPPORTUNITIES EXPEDITED CASE PROCESSING PURSUANT TO PUBLIC ACT
Doggie Due Process: The Saga of "Tut-Tut," "Bandit," "Boo Boo," and "Sadie" Altman v. City of High Point, N.C., 330 F.3d 194 (4th Cir.(N.C.) 2003)
Chapter What would likely happen to Anthony if he turns to the courts for help in ending the discrimination? 2. Does Anthony have a duty to anyone,
The History of Law Vocabulary BMA-LEB-2: Compare and contrast the relationship between ethics and the law for a business.
Possible Bases for Liability: Negligence Under State Law Cause of action? Failure to exercise degree of care that reasonable/prudent person would exercise.
Doggie Due Process The Saga of "Tut-Tut," "Bandit," "Boo Boo," and "Sadie"
Legal Issues Legal Issues in Probation and Parole And Community Based Corrections.
Suing the Federal Government FTCA I. History Traditional Sovereign Immunity US Constitution "No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence.
People in a Courtroom. People in a courtroom Criminal Court Judge Jury Defendant Prosecutor Bailiff Defense Attorney Witness Civil Court Judge Defendant.
Mon. Sept. 10. service Rule 55. Default; Default Judgment (a) Entering a Default. When a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought.
Category Day Presentation to the Public Health Service Commissioned Corps June 21, 2012.
The Judicial Branch Unit 5. Court Systems & Jurisdictions.
Brown: Legal Terminology, 5 th ed. © 2008 Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ All Rights Reserved. Legal Terminology Fifth Edition by Gordon.
§ 10.1 Judicial Remedies – 612. Basic Requirements Court must have jurisdiction Plaintiff must state a recognized cause of action and seek a recognized.
Unit 2 Chapter 5 Legal Environments of Business (LEB)
Federal Criminal & Civil Remedies for Unconstitutional Conduct Title 42 USC Section 1982 –Under Color of State Law.
Session 171 Legal Issues in Utilizing Hazard Models and Mapping Hazard Mapping and Modeling.
Kaplan University PA301: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW Unit 9 Seminar: Federal Tort Claims Act.
Lect. 2 1/14/2016. Personal jurisdiction Choice of law Recognition of foreign judgments Constitutional Sub-constitutional.
The Court System Chapter 5. Courts  Trial Courts- two parties Plaintiff- in civil trial is the person bringing the legal action Prosecutor- in criminal.
TORTS: A CIVIL WRONG Chapter 18. TORTS: A CIVIL WRONG Under criminal law, wrongs committed are called crimes. Under civil law, wrongs committed are called.
Criminal Court Proceedings. Investigation Police gather evidence in the crime, in order to get an arrest warrant signed by a judge. Police may arrest.
Article III: The Judicial Branch Chapters: 11,12
GOVERNMENT LAWYER’S REPRESENTATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES Craig E. Leen City Attorney City of Coral Gables *** With special thanks to Yaneris Figueroa,
Troublesome Contract Clauses College of Liberal Arts
Directors & Officers Liability Insurance Review
College of Nursing December 13, 2006 John O. Cates
Suing the Federal Government
Negligence Defenses.
North Carolina Association of Community College Attorneys
UNIVERSITY OF LUSAKA SCHOOL OF LAW ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
Suing the Federal Government
U.S. CONST. amend. XI: The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against.
Chapter 13: Sovereign Immunity and Government Liability
Suing the Federal Government
Function of the International Court of Justice (ICJ):
Mon., Sept. 9.
EEO MODULE 3: DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT PROCESSING
ANNUAL LOCAL GOVERNMENT SEMINARO
Altman v. City of High Point, N.C., 330 F.3d 194 (4th Cir.(N.C.) 2003)
§ 10.1 Judicial Remedies Part I.
Mon., Oct. 28.
Presentation transcript:

Ryan Henry Law Offices of Ryan Henry, PLLC Pantheon Way, St. 215 City of San Antonio Phone:

 Absolute  Judicial  Prosecutor  Legislative  Statutory ???  Qualified Immunity  Official Immunity  Sovereign

Reasons for Immunity Public service plug Protect integrity of governmental systems Protect government’s treasury Protect public servants who are trying to do their job.

Day in the life of Judge Nails

Hard Working Judge

Judicial Immunity A Judge acting in his or her official judicial capacity enjoys absolute immunity from liability for judicial acts performed within the scope of their jurisdiction. Judges enjoy absolute judicial immunity from liability for judicial acts, no matter how erroneous the act or how evil the motive, unless the act is performed in the clear absence of all jurisdiction.

A judge will not be deprived of immunity because the action he took was in error, was done maliciously, or was in excess of his authority; rather, he will be subject to liability only when he has acted in the “clear absence of all jurisdictions.”

In essence, as long as the judge act s 1) within his/her judicial capacity (not administrative capacity and 2) within his jurisdiction, the judge is entitled to absolute judicial immunity.

Meet Dewy Suem

Appears before Judge Nails

  (1) whether the act complained of is one normally performed by a judge,   (2) whether the act occurred in the courtroom or an appropriate adjunct such as the judge's chambers,   (3) whether the controversy centered around a case pending before the judge, and   (4) whether the act arose out of a visit to the judge in his judicial capacity. 1 – Judicial Function

2- Within Judge’s Jurisdiction Focus is not on whether the judge's specific act was proper or improper, but on whether the judge had the jurisdiction necessary to perform an act of that kind in the case.

Is he immune?

Now... Judge Nails is asked to attend a City Council meeting

Car Accident Information to City Council

Official Immunity "Official immunity," "qualified immunity," "quasi-judicial immunity," "discretionary immunity," and "good faith immunity" are all terms used interchangeably to refer to the same defense available to governmental employees sued in their individual capacities.

  1) discretionary duties in   (2) good faith as long as they are   (3) acting within the scope of their authority. Good Faith Immunity

o Absolute immunity = the motives or intent is immaterial. o No matter how evil the motives. o Good Faith immunity turns heavily on motives. o Objective reasonableness test. o Evidence concerning the defendant's subjective intent is simply irrelevant Motive / Intent

An official may be entitled to official immunity if they are performing their official discretionary actions in a way that is objectively reasonable for the official’s particular scope of work

Discretionary Acts Official immunity extends to discretionary actions but not to ministerial ones Official immunity extends to discretionary actions but not to ministerial ones Actions that require personal deliberation, decision, and judgment are discretionary Actions that require personal deliberation, decision, and judgment are discretionary Actions that require obedience to orders or the performance of a duty regarding which the actor has no choice are ministerial. Actions that require obedience to orders or the performance of a duty regarding which the actor has no choice are ministerial.

Statutory Immunity Texas Tort Claims Act – Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code sec

  a) The filing of a suit under this chapter against a governmental unit constitutes an irrevocable election and forever bars any suit against any individual employee…   ….   (e) If a suit is filed under this chapter against both a governmental unit and any of its employees, the employees shall immediately be dismissed on the filing of a motion by the governmental unit.

  (f) If a suit is filed against an employee of a governmental unit based on conduct within the general scope of that employee's employment and if it could have been brought under this chapter against the governmental unit, the suit is considered to be against the employee in the employee's official capacity only. On the employee's motion, the suit against the employee shall be dismissed unless the plaintiff files amended pleadings dismissing the employee and naming the governmental unit as defendant on or before the 30th day after the date the motion is filed. Substitution

Judge Nail’s Immunity 1.Finding of guilt and punishment 2.Information to City Council 3.Car Accident

How to Keep Your Immunity Multi-level Judicial/Administrative Which is it closer to Where does power come from? Public Official Statutory Protections

So what can you be sued for? Harper v. Merckle, 638 F.2d 848 Prospective injunctive relief attorney's fees for obtaining such relief

What Happens Outside Boundaries

QUESTIONS