The use of CAA for formative and summative assessment: student views and outcomes. Sandra Pattinson Animal Production and Science Group Harper Adams University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HND Global Trade and Business Graded Units 1 and 2
Advertisements

Computer Aided Assessment using QuestionMark Perception by Catherine Ogilvie Educational Development Officer.
SIG invited symposium UTILIZING ASSESSMENT INFORMATION FOR (IN)FORMATIVE FEEDBACK.
Integrating Academic Skills Development in a First Semester Chemistry Unit Technology Enhanced Curriculum | Sydney Teaching Colloquium | 2012 ASSOCIATE.
Computer Aided-Assessment: Can it be accepted? Phil Davies School of Computing.
The Effects of Achievement Priming on Expectations and Performance Kathryn Raso Team 14 PSY 321.
‘Enhancing the First Year Experience – A Case Study From Biomedical Sciences’ Paul Hagan Stephen M c Clean University of Ulster.
Experiments with Weblearn Tools in Medical Sciences Helen Christian Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics.
The use of a computerized automated feedback system Trevor Barker Dept. Computer Science.
Item Analysis What makes a question good??? Answer options?
Database Design Concepts Info 1408 Lecture 1 Introduction to the module.
The value of e-assessment in interprofessional education and large student numbers Melissa Owens* John Dermo* Fiona MacVane Phipps * Presenters.
Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development Student assessment: lightening the load while increasing the learning Dr Chris Rust Head, Oxford Centre.
Mark Dixon Page 1 SOFT – Module Introduction.
Analytical methods for Information Systems Professionals Week 13 Lecture 1 CONCLUSION.
Analysis of usage statistics in the Virtual Learning Environment Moodle shows that provision of learning resources significantly improves student grades.
© AJC /18 Extended Matching Sets Questions for Numeracy Assessments: A Case Study Alan J. Cann Department of Microbiology & Immunology University.
Computer-Assisted Assessment (CAA) Bob Rotheram Reader in ALT Office of PVC (ALT)
Miguel Martins, Senior Lecturer – Marketing Department eLearning Celebration 22 July 2007 Improving performance on a Marketing module through the use of.
1 Oxford Brookes University (OBU) – School of Health and Social Care (SHSC) Students Assessment and Feedback Strategies May 2010 Pecs University International.
Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development Student assessment: lightening the load while increasing the learning Dr Chris Rust Head, Oxford Centre.
Edexcel IGCSE Mae Patel, May IGCSE l 25/05/112 Introduction Mae Patel Commissioning Editor at Pearson Education Based in Oxford, UK Responsible.
MASTERS THESIS DEFENSE QBANK A Web-Based Dynamic Problem Authoring Tool BY ANN PAUL ADVISOR: PROFESSOR CLIFF SHAFFER JUNE 2013 Computer Science Department.
Evaluation and analysis of the application of interactive digital resources in a blended-learning methodology for a computer networks subject F.A. Candelas,
Introducing small-group workshops as formative assessment in large first year psychology modules Suzanne Guerin School of Psychology, University College.
SFC Project Re-engineering assessments Weekly multi-choice tests.
Implementing Active Learning Strategies in a Large Class Setting Travis White, Pharm.D., Assistant Professor Kristy Lucas, Pharm.D., Professor Pharmacy.
Challenges in Formative Assessment across ENCAP, HISAR, and CARBS Melanie Bigold, Rob Gossedge, Casper Hoedemaekers, Tracey Loughran, and Maki Umemura.
Planning and Delivery of HND Programmes Janet Strain.
Lessons learnt and changed understanding: Can Machine Dynamics students survive without my lectures? Ian Howard Mechanical Engineering.
The Genetics Concept Assessment: a new concept inventory for genetics Michelle K. Smith, William B. Wood, and Jennifer K. Knight Science Education Initiative.
How to Evaluate Student Papers Fairly and Consistently.
E- ASSESSMENT Why use it.. whatever it is? Phil Davies School of Computing University of Glamorgan.
Techniques to improve test items and instruction
Technology enabled students? Engineering students use of web- based resources Aidan O’ Dwyer, School of Electrical Engineering Systems, Dublin Institute.
Embedding information literacy in an undergraduate Management module: reflecting on students’ performance and attitudes over two academic years Clive Cochrane.
1 The Design of Multimedia Assessment Objects Gavin Sim, Stephanie Strong and Phil Holifield.
Operations Fall 2015 Bruce Duggan Providence University College.
A review of peer assessment tools. The benefits of peer assessment Peer assessment is a powerful teaching technique that provides benefits to learners,
Piloting CAA: All Aboard Gavin Sim & Phil Holifield.
Mark Dixon Page 1 Tech – Module Introduction.
SOLSTICE Conference th & 5 th June 2015 iSpring – Digital Assessment Guides Claire Moscrop & Sue Canning, Edge Hill University.
Strategies for engaging students in computer based assessment – Stage 1, Taking stock Joanne Smailes Northumbria University.
Welcome 3 rd and 4 th year students! Arne Kovac, Director of Undergraduate Studies.
Examination Feedback Maximum Impact, Minimum Cost? Paul L. Latreille Seminar January 24 th 2011.
Heriot Watt University Breakout Session MCQ with Confidence Dr Phil Davies Division of Computing & Mathematical Sciences Department of Computing FAT University.
 What is it?  What is tested?  Who, When and Where?  Why take it?  How to get ready?  Scores? 1.
Semester Pathfinder-Maths-Student Feedback and Evaluation.
“The End Justifies the Means” When and how to use Computerised Assessment to Promote Learning Phil Davies School of Computing.
Nicola Billam, Guinevere Glasfurd-Brown & Martin Sellens CAA Conference 2006 Engaging Students in Formative Assessment: Strategies and Outcomes.
Boris Milašinović Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing University of Zagreb, Croatia.
In-Service Teacher Training Assessment in IGCSE Mathematics 0580/0581 Session 3: Mark schemes, Examiner Reports and other resources.
There are tomes of evidence that team-based learning is highly effective in improving comprehension, critical thinking, and content retention when a course.
Learning Upside Down: Mark Burris Director of Scholarly Technology and Resources (STaR) Using CE6 Assessments and Grading Form Tools.
1 Analysis of Exam Scripts Department of Mathematical Sciences Mechanics 1 Level Department of Mechanical Engineering Engineering Science 1 Level.
CSM06: Information Retrieval Notes about writing coursework reports, revision and examination.
Self-assessing with adaptive exercises Chye-Foong Yong & Colin A Higgins University of Nottingham.
Dan Thompson Oklahoma State University Center for Health Science Evaluating Assessments: Utilizing ExamSoft’s item-analysis to better understand student.
ASSESSMENT TO IMPROVE SELF REGULATED LEARNING 5 th July 2006, 10 th CAA conference, Poppy Pickard Assessment to improve Self Regulated Learning.
© International Baccalaureate Organization 2007 Assessment Model – biology, chemistry and physics SL Paper Syllabus Content % Objective Weighting Time/
E-Assessment: Removing the Boundaries of C.A.A. Phil Davies School of Computing University of Glamorgan South Wales UK.
A MEMBER OF THE RUSSELL GROUP. Denis Duret School of Veterinary Science University of Liverpool Denis.
Cheryl Ng Ling Hui Hee Jee Mei, Ph.D Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
Understanding Standards:
Improving Student Engagement Through Audience Response Systems
Formative assessment to increase student confidence and attainment
Moving Beyond Your Content Area
Multi-faceted Approach to Improve Learning in Pharmacokinetics
Approaches to Learning and Academic Performance in Pharmacology among Second Year Undergraduate Medical Students Ashwin Kamath, Rashmi R Rao, Preethi J.
Multi-faceted Approach to Improve Learning in Pharmacokinetics
Presentation transcript:

The use of CAA for formative and summative assessment: student views and outcomes. Sandra Pattinson Animal Production and Science Group Harper Adams University College Newport Shropshire TF10 8NB.

1.0 Introduction 1.1 Farm Animal Production Compulsory core module (Level 1). Non-agricultural students - high failure rate. E.g. HND Agrifood Marketing and Business Studies + HND Countryside Management. Initial failure rate % %

1.0 Introduction 1.2 Aim of study To examine the effects of the introduction of formative CAA on the results for the module. The module is taught over two semesters and results are presented for the first semester only.

2.0 Methods 26 students on Farm Animal Production module. 2.1 Odd semester: Subjects taught: beef, sheep, poultry. Methods: lectures, tutorials, farm classes. Optional: self-assessment tutorials using QuestionMark Perception.

2.0 Methods 2.2 Self-assessment tests Each test consisted of 10 multiple-choice questions selected at random from database. Size of database Beef production67 questions Sheep production58 questions Feedback provided for each question.

2.0 Methods 2.3 Summative assessment 29 sheep production questions 29 beef production questions 40 poultry production questions 2 general questions Questions not randomly selected. N.B. Negative marking used in tutorials and in summative examination

2.0 Methods 2.4 Questionnaire Presented to students at the start of the subsequent semester (prior to publication of exam marks). Aim - to assess the students’ views on the use of the self-assessment tutorials.

3.0 Results 3.1 Examination results (tutorials available) mean mark41.5 % pass rate 46 % (tutorials not available) mean mark34.8 % pass rate 25 %

3.0 Results 3.1 Examination results Use of tutorialsNumber ofMean studentsmark 0 times 10 (38%) times 9 (35%) times 7 (27%)59.6

3.0 Results 3.1 Examination results Correlations Use of tutorials v. exam mark Sheepr s = 0.59P < 0.01 Beefr s = 0.69P < 0.01 Mark v. poultry mark Beefr = 0.52P < 0.01 Sheepr = 0.36P < 0.1

3.0 Results 3.2 Questionnaire How often did you use the self-assessment tests? Very often, often, occasionally, rarely, never.

3.2.2 As a method of learning I enjoyed the tests

3.2.3 The wording of the questions was unclear

3.2.4 The assessment questions were closely related to the content of the module

3.2.5 I used my lecture notes whilst completing the self-assessment tests

3.2.6 The self-assessment tests helped me to understand the lecture notes

3.2.7 The marks helped me to assess how I was doing on the module

3.2.8 The feedback given if you get the question wrong is useful

3.2.9 Doing the tests made it easier to study for the exams

3.0 Results 3.2 Questionnaire Free response A) Why did you use/not use the self-assessment tests Not usedForgot UsedTo see how much they knew To practice for exams

Free response B) What were the three best things about the self-assessment tests? Easy to use Detailed answers (feedback) Similar format to exam C) Give three suggested improvements. Remove negative marking Remote access Provide the correct answer in the feedback More questions and more feedback

Free response D) Any other comments They were a good way of learning and very useful. It was very helpful. Thank you.

4.0 Conclusions Students who sat optional practice tests had higher marks in subsequent summative tests. This is in agreement with other authors e.g. Sly and Rennie (1999), Charman (1999) Students who scored highest on the beef and sheep sections of the summative assessment also had the highest marks in the poultry section.

4.0 Conclusions Questionnaire responses indicate that for most students the tutorials provided a positive learning experience. Some students requested that the correct answer should be provided if the question was answered incorrectly Deep v. surface approach to learning

5.0 Future direction 5.1 Current semester Pig and dairy production self-assessment tutorials Revision test at start of lecture 5.2 Questionnaire Questions relating to Feedback Test structure

Question: The feedback should state which was the correct answer.

5.0 Future direction 5.3 Question analysis - to identify problem areas of the module or poorly written questions 5.4 Remote access