1 WASL Mathematics: 2004-2008 Grade 7. 2 WASL Math: Where are we now? Questions to answer: How are we doing? How are we doing? Compared to district &

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Provincial Report Cards Mathematics Grades 1 to 12.
Advertisements

Mathematics Grade Level Considerations for High School.
Level 1 Recall Recall of a fact, information, or procedure. Level 2 Skill/Concept Use information or conceptual knowledge, two or more steps, etc. Level.
WASL Data Only Slides Mathematics, Reading, Writing and Science – Grade 10 Note: These data include all students enrolled in grade 10, even if they took.
Introduction “Singapore math” is the term used to refer to the mathematics curriculum used in Singapore. For over 15 years, Singapore has consistently.
Introduction to Workshop 10 Choosing Learning and Teaching Approaches and Strategies.
1 The New York State Education Department New York State’s Student Reporting and Accountability System.
1 New York State Mathematics Core Curriculum 2005.
ACOS 2010 Standards of Mathematical Practice
Mathematics Grade Level Considerations for Grades 6-8.
Calculators Not! Why Not? Jan Martin Assessment Director, SD DOE SDCTM Feb.8, 2014.
Valentine Elementary School San Marino Unified School District Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Spring 2009 California Standards Test.
MATHEMATICS KLA Years 1 to 10 Understanding the syllabus MATHEMATICS.
{ Mathematics Anna Demarinis.  The student understands and applies the concepts and procedures of mathematics  GLE  Students learn to solve many new.
THE ONTARIO CURRICULUM GRADES 1-8 (read p 1-9 of the mathematics curriculum) FIVE STRANDS:  Number Sense and Numeration  Measurement  Geometry and Spatial.
Connecticut Academic Performance Test Spotlight on Assessment University of Connecticut Neag School of Education March 28, 2008.
Title III Accountability. Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives How well are English Learners achieving academically? How well are English Learners.
Review Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY.
EALR 2: Problem Solving EALR 3: Reasoning EALR 4: Communication EALR 5: Connections Component 5.3: Relate mathematical concepts and procedures to real-world.
Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) and the Connecticut Academic Achievement Test (CAPT) Spring 2011 Presented to the Guilford Board of Education September.
Number Sense Standards Measurement and Geometry Statistics, Data Analysis and Probability CST Math 6 Released Questions Algebra and Functions 0 Questions.
Mathematics Curriculum Roadmap. What Materials Will Be Used to Support Student Learning? Grade 8 Math Resource: EngageNY Supplemental resources are used.
Number, operation and quantitative reasoning 8.1Acompare and order rational numbers in various forms including integers, percents, and positive and negative.
1 WASL Writing Grade 7. 2 WASL Writing: Grade 7.
Common Core Standards Madison City Schools Math Leadership Team.
Language Objective: Students will be able to practice agreeing and disagreeing with partner or small group, interpret and discuss illustrations, identify.
WERA December 2008 Mathematics Assessment Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Mathematics Assessment Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
Spring 2012 Testing Results. GRANT API HISTORY
1 Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) Steve Martin, CMT Program Manager Bureau of Research, Evaluation, and Student Assessment Connecticut State Department.
When presented with a problem, I can make a plan, carry out my plan, and evaluate its success. BEFORE… EXPLAIN the problem to myself. Have I solved a problem.
MATHEMATICAL MODELING AND THE COMMON CORE STANDARDS.
Name Buena Regional Middle School INCLUDE Math Class Year My Electronic Portfolio.
1 WASL Reading: Grade 6. 2 WASL Reading: Where are we now? Questions to answer: How are we doing? How are we doing? Compared to district & state?
1 Student Achievement Data Displays Mathematics, Reading & Writing-Grade 7 Revised: October 30, 2009 Official WASL Results AYP Status District Reading.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Principles and Standards for grades pre-K-2.
Rubber Ball Project By: Kasey Gray. TEKS § Mathematics, Grade 6. (a) Introduction. (1) Within a well-balanced mathematics curriculum, the primary.
CONCEPTUALIZING AND ACTUALIZING THE NEW CURRICULUM Peter Liljedahl.
Alaska Measures of Progress (AMP) Summative Assessment Framework 1.
BC Curriculum Revisions 1968 → what 1976 → what 1984 → what + how 1994 → what + how 2003 → what + how 2008 → what + how 2015 → how + what.
THE NEW CURRICULUM MATHEMATICS 1 Foundations and Pre-Calculus Reasoning and analyzing Inductively and deductively reason and use logic.
ACTion for Mathematics-ASPIRE. Background The math assessment was developed to reflect students’ knowledge and skill accumulation over time; capturing.
Student Achievement Data Displays Mathematics, Reading, Writing and Science – Grade 10 Note: Unless otherwise noted, these data include all students enrolled.
WASL Data Only Slides Mathematics & Reading Grade 6.
MATHEMATICS 1 Foundations and Pre-Calculus Reasoning and analyzing Inductively and deductively reason and use logic to explore, make connections,
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF TEACHERS OF MATHEMATICS (NCTM) Ontario Association of Mathematics Educators (OAME)  The primary professional organization for teacher.
Student Achievement Data Displays Mathematics & Reading Grade 3 Revised: October 30, 2009 Official WASL Results AYP Status.
1 WASL Data Only Slides Mathematics, Reading & Writing Grade 7.
Grade 7 & 8 Mathematics Reporter : Richard M. Oco Ph. D. Ed.Mgt-Student.
Q – start adding questions FGHJFGHJ April 2006 # Correct Answer -
Mathematics Initiative Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Mathematics Initiative Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction CAA Options.
1 WASL Science: Grade 8. 2 WASL Science: Where are we now? Questions to answer: How are we doing?How are we doing? - Properties, Structures,
Process Skill apply mathematics to problems arising in everyday life, society, and the workplace.[K.1A] October 2014Elem Math Kindergarten.
Content AreaGrade Mastery Scaled Score 2009 Mastery Scaled Score 2010 Change +/- Reading/Lang. Arts Math
#1 Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them How would you describe the problem in your own words? How would you describe what you are trying.
Math Course & Placement Information Night Avon Grove Intermediate School May 9, 2016.
ClassScape Benchmark Review Quarter 1. Teacher Resource For Formative Assessments.
What are your thoughts about Diverse Cultural Perspectives; particularly the section on Aboriginal Learners. Do you feel this is a true account of Mi'kmaq-Maliseet.
Granby Public Schools Annual Continuous Progress Review Presented by Diane Dugas Director of Curriculum September CMT Review.
TEERAWIT TINPRAPA M.Ed(mathematics education).  Pre-K-2  Grades 3-5  Grades 6-8  Grades 9-12.
TOPICS GEOMETRY Other Notebooks GAMESStudent Sites K WASL Questions TREASURE MATH CARD GAMES DEFINITIONS GLE Tests EALR’sNCTMOSPITeacher sites.
Student Achievement Data Display Mathematics, Reading & Writing Grade 4 Revised: October 30, 2009 Official WASL Results AYP Status.
1 WASL Writing Grade WASL Writing: Grade 10 Note: These data include all students enrolled in grade 10, even if they took the test as.
WASL Reading: Specific Title Slide for School. Grade 8 7.
WASL Mathematics: Grade 6 Specific Title Slide for School. 7.
WASL Science: Grade 10 Specific Title Slide for School.
Student Achievement Data Displays Mathematics & Reading Grade 3
WASL Data Only Slides Mathematics & Reading Grade 8
8th Grade Mathematics Curriculum
Biker Model Lesson: Discussion
Presentation transcript:

1 WASL Mathematics: Grade 7

2 WASL Math: Where are we now? Questions to answer: How are we doing? How are we doing? Compared to district & state? Compared to district & state? Compared to previous years? Compared to previous years?

3 Levels of Analyzing Our Data Broad findings Specific findings Percent Meeting the Standard Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Performance Levels Strand Scores

4 Grade 7 WASL: Mathematics Performance

5

6 Questions about Our Math Performance What do these comparisons seem to tell us? What do these comparisons seem to tell us? – Celebrations: – Challenges: What do these comparisons not tell us? What do these comparisons not tell us? What else do we need to know? What else do we need to know? Starting in spring 2010, students will be assessed on the new 2008 standards.

7 Levels of Analyzing Our Data Broad findings Specific findings Percent meeting the Standard Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Performance Levels Strand Scores

8 Adequate Yearly Progress: Math Annual Targets for Grades 6, 7 & 8

9 AYP Subgroups In addition to the all continuously enrolled students category, the subgroups include: the five major racial/ethnic groups, special education, English Language Learners, and low income students. In addition to the all continuously enrolled students category, the subgroups include: the five major racial/ethnic groups, special education, English Language Learners, and low income students. The performance of a subgroup is considered if there is a minimum of 30 continuously enrolled students, a change from The performance of a subgroup is considered if there is a minimum of 30 continuously enrolled students, a change from The next slide reflects your AYP status based on continuously enrolled students. The next slide reflects your AYP status based on continuously enrolled students.

10 Grade 7 WASL-Mathematics: Adequate Yearly Progress Goals

11 Questions about Our Adequate Yearly Progress What do these data seem to tell us? What do these data seem to tell us? – Celebrations: – Challenges: What do these data not tell us? What do these data not tell us? What else do we need to know? What else do we need to know?

12 Levels of Analyzing Our Data Broad findings Specific findings Percent Meeting the Standard Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Performance Levels Strand Scores

13 Results by Performance Levels Four Levels in Mathematics “Meets the Standard” 4. Well above the standard 3. Above the standard “Does Not Meet the Standard” 2. Below the standard 1. Well below the standard

14 Picture of Ideal Trends for Levels

15 Grade 7 WASL Mathematics: Performance Levels Trends

16 Levels of Analyzing Our Data Broad findings Specific findings Percent Meeting the Standard Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Performance Levels Strand Scores Starting in spring 2009 grades 3 to 8 students will have shorter math tests, without strand scores. Starting in spring 2009 grades 3 to 8 students will have shorter math tests, without strand scores.

17 7th Grade WASL Mathematics Strands Mathematical Content Mathematical Content – Number Sense – Measurement – Geometric Sense – Probability/Statistics – Algebraic Sense Mathematical Processes Mathematical Processes – Solves Problems and Reasons Logically – Communicates Understanding – Makes Connections Defensible strand score analysis tracks the difference between school and state.

18 Grade 7 WASL: Mathematical Content – Strand #1 Defining what we are measuring Number Sense Number Sense Targets NS01-05 Targets NS01-05 Understand and apply concepts and procedures Understand and apply concepts and procedures from number sense: from number sense: number and numerationnumber and numeration ration and proportionration and proportion conceptual understanding of operationsconceptual understanding of operations computationcomputation estimationestimation

19 Grade 7 Number Sense: Comparison of School to State

20 Grade 7 WASL: Mathematical Content – Strand #2 Defining what we are measuring Measurement Targets ME01-04 Understand and apply concepts and procedures from measurement: attributes and dimensionsattributes and dimensions units and systemsunits and systems proceduresprocedures estimated measurementsestimated measurements

21 Grade 7 Measurement: Comparison of School to State

22 Grade 7 WASL: Mathematical Content – Strand #3 Defining what we are measuring Geometric Sense Targets GS01-02 Understand and apply concepts and procedures from geometric sense: properties and relationshipsproperties and relationships location and transformationslocation and transformations

23 Grade 7 Geometric Sense: Comparison of School to State

24 Grade 7 WASL: Mathematical Content – Strand #4 Defining what we are measuring Probability and Statistics Targets PS01-03 Understand and apply concepts and procedures from probability and statistics: probabilityprobability data collection and central tendenciesdata collection and central tendencies data representation and interpretationdata representation and interpretation

25 Grade 7 Probability & Statistics: Comparison of School to State

26 Grade 7 WASL: Mathematical Content – Strand #5 Defining what we are measuring Algebraic Sense Targets AS01-03 Understand and apply concepts and procedures from algebraic sense: patterns and functionspatterns and functions symbols and notationssymbols and notations evaluating and solvingevaluating and solving

27 Grade 7 Algebraic Sense: Comparison of School to State

28 Grade 7 WASL: Mathematical Process – Strand #6 Defining what we are measuring Solves Problems and Reasons Logically Targets SR01-05 Uses mathematics to define and solve problems and reason logically: define problemsdefine problems construct solutionsconstruct solutions analyze informationanalyze information concludeconclude construct solutions and justifyconstruct solutions and justify

29 Grade 7 Solves Problems/Reasons Logically: Comparison of School to State

30 Grade 7 WASL: Mathematical Process – Strand #7 Defining what we are measuring Communicates Understanding Targets CU01-02 Communicate knowledge and understanding in both everyday and mathematical language: gather informationgather information organize, represent, and share informationorganize, represent, and share information

31 Grade 7 Communicates Understanding: Comparison of School to State

32 Grade 7 WASL: Mathematical Process – Strand #8 Defining what we are measuring Makes Connections Targets MC01 Understand how mathematical ideas connect within mathematics, to other subject areas, and to real-life situations: connect within mathematicsconnect within mathematics

33 Grade 7 Makes Connections: Comparison of School to State

34 Questions about Grade 7 Mathematics Strand Data and Trends What do these strand data seem to tell us? What do these strand data seem to tell us? – Celebrations: – Challenges: What do these trends not tell us? What do these trends not tell us? What else do we need to know? What else do we need to know?

35 Our WASL Mathematics Strengths List areas where students were proficient. List areas where students were proficient. How about the subgroups? How about the subgroups? What did we do to contribute to their successes? What did we do to contribute to their successes? What do we need to continue to do to ensure success with our students in the future? What do we need to continue to do to ensure success with our students in the future? Can we use these strategies to improve areas where our students are not proficient? Can we use these strategies to improve areas where our students are not proficient?

36 Our WASL Mathematics Targets List challenges. List challenges. What do we need to do differently to improve student performance in these areas? What do we need to do differently to improve student performance in these areas? What other data do we need to consider? What other data do we need to consider? What can we learn from our successes? What can we learn from our successes?