LEADERSHIP FOR ASSESSMENT LITERACY: SHARING LEARNING TARGETS AND THE CRITERIA FOR SUCCESS Principals’ Student Achievement Meeting September 22, 2010 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Know role of and characteristics of effective feedback
Advertisements

District Mathematics Leadership Meeting October 28 th, 2014 Wireless: PSESD Guest Success for Each Child and Eliminate the Opportunity Gap.
Coastal Plains RESA Assessment Literacy: Formative Instructional Practices March 27, April 23, April 30, May 7 Session One: Modules 1 & 2 Session Two:
February 9, 2012 Session 1: Observing Lessons NYSED Principal Evaluation Training Program.
How can we collect relevant evidence of student understanding?
1 Formative Assessment Debbie Owens AMSP University of Kentucky Kathy Strunk AMSP University of Tennessee.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Leadership Terry Holliday, Ph. D., Superintendent.
Welcome to I-CAT Training! Iowa Core Outcome 4 …increase the degree of alignment of each and every student’s enacted curriculum … to the Iowa Core I A.
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
Our Leadership Journey Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckman Connie Laughlin.
Professional Performance Process Principal Level Meetings October 19 & 22, 2009.
Module 3: Unit 1, Session 2 MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 1, Session 2.
Unbridled Learning Next Steps in the Content Leadership Networks.
Section 1 Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Sustaining Change.
Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Supporting Teacher Development Using Danielson’s Framework Goals of our session: Explore core beliefs informing the Citywide Instructional Expectations.
Learning Targets NNMST Science Breakout Session December 8, 2011.
Module 3: Unit 2, Session 3 MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 2, Session 3.
 Participants will teach Mathematics II or are responsible for the delivery of Mathematics II instruction  Participants attended Days 1, 2, and 3 of.
ISLLC Standard #2 Implementation
Full Implementation of the Common Core. Last Meeting Performance Tasks Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Upcoming Accountability Measure Strong teaching.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
The Professional Learning and Evaluation Model. Missouri Essential Principles of Effective Evaluation Measures educator performance against research-based,
The Power of Formative Assessment to Advance Learning.
Module 3: Unit 1, Session 3 MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 1, Session 3.
01.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION 1 16 SEPTEMBER 2015 EMBARKING ON A LEADERSHIP JOURNEY.
Student Growth in the Washington State Teacher Evaluation System Michelle Lewis Puget Sound ESD
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
© TNTP 2014 March Principal Training. / 2 Do Now Reflect on your progress from the last session: How successful were you in supporting a teacher to identify.
Lenoir County Public Schools SIOP Leadership Meeting for Planning, Support, and Implementation February 3, 2011 Rochelle Middle School.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
The Essential Questions PL  How does applying START characteristics from ICC increase student achievement? (Specific To Prairie Crest) 
1 Principals’ Student Achievement Meeting April 15, 2009 Leadership for Assessment Literacy From Paper to Practice.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus.
ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON MIDDLE LEVEL PRINCIPALS FALL MEETING -- OCTOBER 26, 2014 Leveraging the SBAC System to Support Effective Assessment Practices.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
ISLLC Standard #6 Monitoring Education Stakeholders Name Workshop Facilitator.
1 Support Provider Workshop # East Bay BTSA Induction Consortium.
Coastal Plains RESA Assessment Literacy: Leading Formative Instructional Practices January 28 and February 25 Session One: Modules 1, 2, 3 Session Two:
Assessment Formats Charlotte Kotopoulous Regis University EDEL_450 Assessment of Learning.
Module 3: Unit 2, Session 2 MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 2, Session 2.
Session #4 March 2014 preparation policy practice Key Leaders Network.
The Value in Formative Assessment Prepared By: Jen Ramos.
Reading Improvement Plan Introduction History History –Fall of Reading Program Report Staff Development Staff Development Leave No Child.
12.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION MAR 2015 SAMPLING, VARIABILITY, AND PROPORTION (OH MY)
TEACHER EVALUATION IMPLEMENTATION DAY: STUDENT GROWTH AND GOAL SETTING September 25, 2015 Shorewood High School 9/25/15 1.
Sara Hagen August 31,  Summer Institute Observation - August  Interview teachers – September & November  Survey to sample of teachers - December.
Activity 5a Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Deepening Implementation.
Introduction to the Process of Formative Assessment.
Setting the Stage Implementing Math Coaches – Do you have all the right pieces?
ISLLC Standard #6 ISLLC Standard #6 Implementing Educational Policy Name Workshop Facilitator.
Coherent and Effective Professional Development Brooke Ustazewski ADMPS /8/12.
Activity 1 Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Deepening Implementation.
EVAAS for Teachers: Overview and Teacher Reports Every Student READY.
Instructional Leadership: Implementing Conditions for Success.
1 Chapter 2 Grading Design Instruction and Evaluation Systems.
PLCs in Mount Airy City Schools Purpose of PLCs Collaborative meetings of educators in which data-driven decisions are made to improve teacher’s instruction.
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
OVEC/KDE Instructional Support Leadership Network Welcome Your facilitators are: Dr. Molly Sullivan Mr. Buddy Berry Mr. Thom Coffee Mr. Bill Hogan Mr.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
What is Forward? Forward K-5 Instructional System Consultative Services Progress Monitoring Integrated Curriculum and Assessment Professional Development.
ELA Grade 11/12 Cohort Common Core Transition Training SY March 7, 2014 Professional Development Center (PDC) Judy Henderson, Emily Jimenez, Elizabeth.
Standard VI Teachers Contribute to the Academic Success of Students.
12.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION 12 9 MARCH 2016 AREA, PERIMETER... WHAT’S THE DIFFERENCE?
Cycle of Continuous Improvement for
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Our Leadership Journey
Presentation transcript:

LEADERSHIP FOR ASSESSMENT LITERACY: SHARING LEARNING TARGETS AND THE CRITERIA FOR SUCCESS Principals’ Student Achievement Meeting September 22,

2  Will continue with the five-part learning structure: Introduction How’s It Going New Learning (Book Study) Personal Action Planning Review  A place to “work on the work”  Will continue with instructional leadership breakouts – Continue with your green cylinder plans from last year. This can also be your BLT Individual Implementation Plan. Getting Organized: The Structure

3  The district will provide tuition support ($40) for those taking the course for credit; CEUs are at no cost. To maintain eligibility for district tuition support, participants must receive a grade no lower than a “B” in the course.  Course Requirements (to achieve an “A”): Participate in sessions, and complete the required reading/assignments. Develop a plan and implement actions that promote teachers’ growth regarding clear learning targets and the criteria for success. Either facilitate the five-part learning structure, or present an instructional leadership topic for a break out session. Getting Organized: Course Credit

4  This Year: Will focus on Sharing Learning Targets and the Criteria for Success; Will drill down into the Developing People cylinder. Our continued work convinces us that Shared Learning Targets and the Criteria for Success is the hub—the central element of the process. And because of that, we suggest it as the first element to introduce and focus on. The learning target is key. Without a clear understanding of where we are headed, the effects of the other elements decrease. A unified, strategic plan for formative assessment begins with and is sustained by clearly communicated targets and criteria for success. Moss and Brookhart This Year’s Work: Sharing Learning Targets and the Criteria for Success

5 Framing the Work: Dispositions of Instructional Leaders  Dispositions (inclinations) define how we will approach the school improvement work  Dispositions of Instructional Leaders (See handout)  Which dispositions might we be mindful of to support this work?

6 The Learning Assessment Process  Modeling: Reserve 20% of your brain to make connections to the model Both the blue (the teacher) and the green (the learner—you) Write your observations, connections, thinking, learning, etc. on the model

7 Today’s Learning Targets (What you will learn) and Criteria for Success (How you will know you’ve learned it) 1. Understanding of Formative Assessment 2. Motivation Connections 3. Ways to talk to teachers to promote formative assessment growth  What’s your understanding of what you will learn by the end of the session today?

8 Building a Depth of Shared Understanding  Advancing Formative Assessment in Every Classroom: A Guide for Instructional Leaders (Moss & Brookhart, 2009)  Chapter One Summary The Lay of the Land: Essential Elements of the Formative Assessment Process  Learning Organizer

9 Chapter One Learning Targets (What you will learn today) and Tasks  LT #1: Understanding of FA Task: Highlight the phrase/sentence that most deepens your understanding of FA  LT #2: Motivation Connection Task: Complete the Venn Diagram  LT #3: Talking with Teachers to Advance FA Task: Text Rendering – Deconstruct the text, selecting key phrases most important to you.

10 Comparison Against the Criteria  A solo flight  Evaluate your strengths and needs  Feedback - What constitutes quality?  Partner – Give and accept feedback writing your feedback on the sheet

11 Closing the Gap Toward the Learning Targets  How will we close the gap?  Next steps: Regarding clarifying and sharing learning targets and the criteria for success with students: Begin formulating - What’s your learning target for your teachers/learners? (What do you want them to learn?) Nov. 17—Bring artifacts that represent your teachers’ clarifying and sharing learning targets status that includes examples of Individual Implementation Plans. Read pages 5-23 (Ch. 1) & pages (Ch. 2).

12 Summary/Debrief  Today’s Learning  The Learning-Assessment Process Model  Teacher quality exerts greater influence on student achievement than any other factor in education—no other factor even comes close. Formative assessment affects teacher quality because it operates at the core of effective teaching. Moss and Brookhart